Loading...
PC 85-29RESUI:UTION NO. PC85-29 A RESOLUTION OP TIiE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COD1h1IS5ION THAT P6TTTI~t+ FOR CONUITIONAL US£ PERMIT N0. 2655 BE GRlNTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannir,g Commission did receive a~~crified Petition for ~ondir_ion<~l J^,e Permit from JOS~PH P. GLEASOPI, 1655 West Rroadway, Anaheim, Culifornia 92802, owner, and W. SOMBRS, 7342 Orangethorpe Avenua, 6uena Pack, Cali.for~ia 90G21, agent for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of. California, described as: LOT 17 OF TRACT N0. 2177 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIP„ COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CAIIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 59~ PAGES 36 AND 37~ t9ISCELLANE00S MAPS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CUUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the Ci~y of Anaheim on January 21, 1485, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance .rit}: the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate ano make findings and recomuiendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, ~aid Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation and study made ~y itself and in its bel:alf., and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offeced at said hearing, does find and determine the following Eacts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit i~ authorized 5y Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.41.050.130 to wi:: to permit an oEfi~e use in a residential structure. 2. That the proposed une will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth ar.d development oE the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. That the size and shape of the site propused for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to ttie particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens oE the City of Anaheim. 4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit unGer the c .itions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, t~ealth, safety and general welfare of the Citi~ens of the City of ~naheim. 5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon tF.e streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. :: =a ~ , . ~0426r t~ PC85-29 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FIt7DING: :hat the Ann':eim City Planning Commission has ceviewed the propcsal to reclassify subject property from the x5-7200 (kesidential, Sinyle-Family) Zone to the CO (COmmercial, Office and Pcofessional) Zone to permit an office use in a residential structure on a rectanyularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 7,080 square feet located at the northeast cornee of Sumac Lane and Euclid Street and f~rther describQd as 1695 "rlest Sumac Lane; and does hereby approve the Negati~~e Declaration upon finding that il has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received durir.g the public teview process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that thece is no substantia]. evidence that the project will have a significant eEEect on the environment. NOW, TtiEREFORE, BE IT RESO;.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for. Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerec•uisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City cf Anaheim: 1. That due to the change in use and/or occupancy of tne building, plans shall be submitted to the Bui;ding Division showir.g co~pliance with the minimum standards of Lhe City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbiny, E1ECtrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. The appropriate permits shall be obtained Eor any necessary work. 2. That no medical and/or denta] of.fice uses shall be permitted o~~ subject Frop~rty in connection with this conditiunal use permit; and that yrior to commencement of the activity herein approved, issuance of a building permit, or within ninety (90) day.s fro~ the date herein, whichevec occurs first, a covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney's pffice shall be recorded. Proof of recordation shall then be submitted to the ~ity. 3. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the adoption of the zoning ordinance in connection with Reclassification No. 84-85-2'L, now pendinn. 4. That alI driveways shall be redesigned to accommodat:e ter. (10) foot radius curb returns as cequired by the City Traffic Engineer. 5. That trash storage areaa shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with the Street ~taintenance and Sanitation Division, the location of which shall be determined by the City Tcat-fic Engineer and the Stieet Maintenance and Sanitation Division. 6. That prior to final street inspections, 'NO parking for street sweeping' signs shall be installed as required by the Straet Maintenance a~d Sanitation Division and in accordance with specifications on file ~ith said division. 7. That all air condition~ng facilities sha15 be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffe[ed fcom adjac~nt properties. -2- PC85-29 ': ~ 8. That the on-site land;caping and irrigation system shall be renovated and maintained in accordanc~ with City Standards. 9. That the parking area shall be striped to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. 10. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the CO Zone including the removal of the existing free-standing sign, unless a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council. 11. That a six (6) foot high masonry block wall shall be maintained along the north and east property lines. 12. That the existing six (6) foot high concrete block wall adjacent to Sumac Lane shall be ceduced to a height of 36 inches in order to provide for improved visibility for vehicles entering and exiting subject property from Sumac Lane. 13. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked EKhibit No~. 1 and 2. 1:. ThaL- prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied wiL•h. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of th~ pnaheim I4unicipal Code. 15, That prior ko the commencement of the ~ictivity authorized under this resolution, or final buildiny and roning inspections whichever occurs first, Con~ition Plos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13, above-mentioned, shall be complied with., BE IT FURTHER RESGLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoptic~n of this Resoiution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with eacli and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereoE, be deciared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nu11 and void. THE FOREGOTNG RESOLUTION is signed and appro ed _by me this 21st day of January, 1985. ., ~ ~ --- ~..~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~//,C./i~ SC=;iI/~ ~l~ip/~. __.- CHAIRMAN, ANAF~EIM~iCITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ ~~oL - SECRETARY~ ANAHEZPI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC85-29 ' ^ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OP ORANGE ) Sg, CZTY OF ANAHEIM ) ir Edith L. Harris, Secretary oE the Anaheim City Planning Com^~ssion, do h~arebx certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Ci.ty planning Commission held on January 21, 1985, by the f:ollowing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMIS5IUNERS: BOUAS, BUSHORF,, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE NOES: COMMISSIOtdERS: NONgURNEY ABSENT: COi4MISSIC•NERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOr, i have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of January, 1985. C~ ' ~ SECRETARY, ANAHETM CITY P ANNZNG COMMISSION -4- PC85-29 ~r . . . ;. ..