PC 85-05RESOLUTION N0. PC85-OS
A RESOLUTIUN OF THF. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN3 COMMIS:iION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSTFICATICN N~, 84-85-18 BE GRANTEn
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did teceive a verified
petition for Reclassification from AR':HU, STAHOVICH dND MARJORIE STAHOVICH,
805 Ramblewood Drive, Anaheim 92804, owners of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, cescribad as
follows:
LOT 23 UF TftACT N0, 743~ BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Or^ SECTION FIFTEEN (15), TOWNSHIP FOUR
~4) SOUTH, RANC'E ELEVEN (11) WEST~ S.R.B, S M., ORANGE
COONTY~ CALIFGRNIA, RECORDED IN BOOK 22~ PAGE 10~ OFFICIAL
MAPS OF ORANGE COUNTy, CALIFORN.IA.
WHEREAS, the City Planninq Commissi~n did hold a public hearing at
t}~e Civic Center in the City of Anaheim en JanuaLy 7, 1985 at 1:30 p,m,,
notice of sa?d p~~~?ic hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter Z8.03,
to hear and consider evi~ence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investiaate and make findings and recommendations in connection
there+~ith; anci
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and aEter due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
Lellowiny facts;
1• 7f~at the petitionec proposes reclassificatinn of subject
property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricult~~ral) Zone to the RM-2400
(Residential, Plu.ltiple-Family) Zone.
"t. That the Anaheim General Flan 3esignates subject property for
low-medium density residential land ises.
3• 'lhat the proposed reclassification of sub~ect property is
necessary e,n~ior desirab~e for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
4• That the ptooosed reclassification of subject pr~perty does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close pro:cimity to subject property ~nd to the zones and their permitted use~
generally established throughout the community.
5• That the proposed reclassiEical•ion of subject property requires
the dedicstion of abutting streets in accorr~ance witii the Circulation Element
of the Ge.zeral Plan, duc: to the anticipated increase in c:affic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6• Tnat no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
#0402r
PC85-OS
ENVIRONMENTl.G It4PACT FZNDING: That the Anaheii.q City Pianniny
Commis~ion has r2~~ewed the proposal to r?classify subject pcoperty from the
kS-A-43,U00 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) oc a less i.ntense zune to r_onstruct an 8-unit apartment
complex wit:~ waiver c~f maximum structural height on an ircegularly-s~iaped
parcel of land consisting of app_oximately 0.47 acre having a frontage of
approximately 130 fee:t on tt~e north side of Savanna Street, and further
described as 3639 West Savanna Street; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration upon £im9ing that it has considered the Negative Declaration
togetiier with any c~:~mments received during the pub.lic review process and
further finai_ng on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no sut-tantial evidence that the project tiill have a significant
eEfect on thE environment.
NOW, THERSFORE, BE IT RESO;VED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does he•reby grant subject Petition for Reclassificakion and, by so
doing, thal Titie 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Ptunicipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential,
Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said described property ir.to the RM-2400
(P,esidential, Multiple-Fami.lyt Zone upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary pLErequisite to the proposed ~ise of subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim:
That the owner of ~ubject property shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the City of Aaaheim a sr_rip oE land 32 feet in width
from the centerline o~ the street along Savanna Street for street
widening purposes.
2. That prior to the introduction of an ordinanr.e rezoning subject
pcoperty, Condition tac. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The
provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null
and void by action of the Planning Commis^ion ~~nless said conditions
are complied with within one year from t2.: ~ate of this resolution,
or such further time as the Planning Com~aission m3y grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thA Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each an~ all of, the conditions
hereinabove set f~rth. Should any such condition, or anv part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable tv the final judgemnt of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLOTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day
of Januais; 1985. -
_~ ~ ~ ~
~~, ~~~' '/y' ' ~ ~~t. ~ ~
CHAIRIdAN~ ANAHE b1 ITY PLANNING COMI4ISSlON
ATTEST:
Ci~' L~ ~C J;C- L c.-c. .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIPI CITY YLANNING COI7MISSION
-Z PC85-OS
~~' - -. :
1 _._ .. .
~
1
i
i
STATE O.• CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es.
, CZTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plann.ing +
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anahei.m City Planning Commission held on January
7, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COI9b1ISSIpNERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE; FRY~ HERBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~
MC .9URNEY
NOES: COMMSSSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMN.LSSIONERS: NONG
IN WIThESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7tt; day of
January, 1985.
~~G~ ~ %~w
SECRETARY, ANAHEZM CITY PTANDIING COMMISSIUN
-3- PC85-OS M:I
'= ,~ i
~~'?~~I