PC 85-70RESOLUTION C70. ~C85-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 3461 BE DENIED
wHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition foc Variance Erom kOBERT ALLAN 1ND CATHEP,I~E GREIG DENHOLM, 6710 East
Johnstown Circle, Anaheim, California 92807, owners for certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, Count.y of Orange, State of Califcrnia
desczibed c~s:
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWi: O[r A 14AP FSLED IN $OOK 67 PAGE 9 OP PARCEL MAPS~
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIll COUNTY,
WHEREAS, the City planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 4, 1985, at 1:30 p.m., notice of
said public 1~earing having been duly given as cequired by law ~nd in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Cha?ter 18.03,
tn hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance ar~d to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Conmission, after due inspection, invectigation and
study made by itself and in it~ bAF~lf, and afCer due consideration of all
evidence and reports ofEere~ at said hearing, doee find and determine the
following facts:
establishla twoh(Z)-loc s ngle lfam J~~D ubd vision l~ers of the folloaing to
SECTION 18.26.061.010 - Minimum lot area (7200 sauare feet tequired;
6331 square feet proposed for Parcel I~),
SECTION 18.26.061_020 - Minimum lor y.i.~~ti ~r~ Lrcn~a e(7~p =_~et
cequired; 55 feet oroposed for Parcel A).
Z. That the ahove-mentioned caaivera are hereby denied on the basis
that on the basis that there are no special circumstances applicable to the
property sach as size, shaFe, topography, location and surcoundings which do
not appl~+ to other identically zoned property in the ~ame vicinity; and that
strict application of the Zoning Code 9oes not deprive the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the identical zone and
classification in the vicinity and further on the questionable stability ap
the slopes,
3• That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply genecally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zon~.
4• That the requested variance is not necescary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by ol•her property in r
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the propc•rty in quection. !
, t0465r ~
PCBS-70
5. That the requested variance will be materially detrimcntal to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or impcovements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located.
6. That three perso~s indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
E~VIRONt4ENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to establish a two (2)-lot RS-7200 (SC)
single-family subdivis;.on with waivers of minimum loE area and minimum lot
width and frontage or, an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 0.37 acre having a frontage of approximately 114 feet on the
south side of Johnstown Circle, and further described as 6710 East Johnstown
Circle; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon the finding that
it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received
during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the
ini.tial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will h~~e a significant effect on the enviroament.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day of
Macch, 1985.
~ 7 ~ /•,:i r. .i
CHAIRWOMAN, PRO TEMP RE
ANAHEIM CZTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/c (~~ ! i'~".~ /~ • /~T~l ,r ~.,
SECRETARY~ ANAHEZM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAH~IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on March 4,
1985, hy the following vote of the members thsreof:
AXES: COMMISu20NERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY, iCiNG, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN WI'CNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of
March, 1985.
~
~... n / y'
~ 0.-~ -~ N ~. • ~..r . _
SECRETARY~ ANAHEZM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~' ,'4 -2-
PC85-70
~r ,;~
~ti;'
~~
.n-,ra .~;rcr,.,.. ..,..~,:,:„>..,._.,:. . .. ._..