PC 85-73RESOLUTION NU. PC85-73
A RESULUTIOPI OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAtJNING COMDIISSION
THAT PETITIOtJ FOfi CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 26G7 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commi:>sion did [eceive a verified
Petition for Conditiunal Use Permit fcom KF.'NNSTH W. NOLT AND HELEN L. HOLT,
1557 West Mable St[eet, Anaheim, California 92802, owner, and DAVID JACKSON,
1557 West Plable Stceet, Anaheim, California 92802, agent for certain real
property situated in the Ciryo uf Anaheim, County of Ocange, State of
Calif.ornia, descri.bed as:
PARCEL 1:
Tk1AT PORTIUt7 OF LOTS 6, 7 AND 8 OF BURKLE'S SUBDIVISIOt7 OF A
PU:tTION OF VINEYARD LOT 'E 7' IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ AS PER
F1AP THCREOF RECOF,DE~ IN BOOK 1, PACE 36 OF MISCELLANF.OUS MAPS~
RECORDS OF SAZD ORANGE COUNTY DESCRIDED AS FOLLOWS:
EiEGINNi~G AT A PUINT IN THE EI~S'PERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6~ 183
FEET SOUTHERLY FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CGP.N£R OF LOT 1 OF SAID
BURKLE'S SUE3UIVISION, THENCE SOUTNEP.L't ALONG SAID EASTERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 6, 180 FEET TO THE MUST SOUTHF.ASTERLY CORNER
GF SAID i0T 6, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHF.RLY LIPIES OF
S~ID LOTS 6, 7 AND 8, 160 ~EET TO A POlNT WHICH IS 187.50 FEET
F;AS'i'F.RI.Y FP.OPf THE SOUT:iWE:STEP.LY CURNER OF LOT A WEST BROADWAY
:RACT AS PER MAP THc:REUY RECORDED IN BOOK 4r PAGE 88 OF
MISCELLAtJE0U5 MAPS, kECORDS OE' SAID ORAt7GE COUNTY, T}fENCE
NOR'PHERLY PARALLEL 'PO TN~ WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF WEST
BROADWAY TRACT ANU ITS NORTHERI.Y EXTENSION 180 FEET, THENCE
EASTERI,Y 160 FEET °ARALLEL TO THE IJORTtiF.RLY LINE OF SAiD LOT 1
AND ITS WESTERLY EkTPNSION TU 'LF36 POINT OF' BtGSNNING.
WHF.'REAS, the City Planniny Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Centec in the City oE Anaheim on March 18, 1985, at 1:30 p.m.,
nc,tice of said aublic heaciny having been duly given as required by law and ia
accocdance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Ftunicipal Code, Chaptet 18.U3,
to hear and corisider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
~,ermit and to investigate and make findings and recon,'nendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its hehalf, and afte[ due consideration of all
evidence and repotts offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followin9 facts:
1. That tt,e proposed use is properly one for which a conditionul
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Manicipal Code Section 18.81.050.060 to
wit: to expand an existing privatc school to a maximum of 225 students.
2. That the proposed use is he[eby g~anted subject to the
petitione:'s stipulatior. at the public hearing that. bus loading and unloading
will take place on Chestnut Street not Citcon St:eet.
~ ;0473L PCBS-73
~~:s:;.:; -. .-
-~..
3. That the pcoposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adr3uate to allow the full development cf che proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general w?lfare of the Citizens of the c.ity of. P.naheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
con~itions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahaim.
6. Thar_ the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to cacry
the tcaffic in the aree.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corres~ondence was received in opposition tn khe
subject petition.
ENVIROtdMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the AnahEim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the Pr~posal to expand an existing private school to a
maximum of 225 stuoents un a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 0.66 acce located at the nocthwest corner of Chestnut Street and
Citron Street, and further described as 121 South Citron Street (Fai.rmont
School); and does hereby approve the tiegative Declaration upon finding that it
has consideced the Negative beclaration together with ar.y commeats received
durina the punlic review process and further finding on the .basis of the
i:~iti.al sL•udy and any comments received that there is ne~ substantial evidence
that the project will have a signif.icant effect on the environment.
NOW, TEIERSFUHE, BE IT RES~LVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject uroperty in ordEC to preserve the safety
and general welfare of t~,e Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
i. Ti~al rrioc Cu iSS4aR~'e ot u Luildiny pec;;~it, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as ~etermined by the City Council Eor new commercial
buildi.ngs.
2. That the total enrollment of the school shall not exceed 225
students.
3. That the existing trash storage areas shall be repair.ed and :,~~~
maincained in accordance with apprcved olans on file with the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Division.
:''t 4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. Tl~at fire sprinklers shall be znstalled as cequired by the City Fire
E(: j
3~, Marshall.
p; ~.i
`
`"%~ -2- PCOS-73
~.r~ _
;a~
Rsovwus.,~s,~.~-^^•- - _ _ _ _ _ .
.. : '
~:ak:yliw<,..h....r~'- .ta•• - . ~ ~ .. .
s
.~
6• cound
That all aic conditionin, facilities and other coof an 9
ro erly shielded from view, and the
mounted equipment shali be ~' p ~o erties.
sound buffe[ed f~om adjacent residential p P
~, That subject property sFall be developed substantially in accordance
witn plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nus. 1~nd 2.
g, That ptior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prio~ to issuance of a buildinq permit, or within a
period of one year ftom the date of this resolution, whichever
above-mentioned, shall be complied
occurs ficst~ Condition N~. 1,
with. Extensions for fucther time to com~lete said conditions may
be qranted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
hlunicipal Code.
y, That pcioe to thc commencemer.t oF the activicy authorized unde: this
resolution, oc final building and zoning inspections whicheve[
, 4~ g~ 6;,nd 7, above-mentioned,
occurs fi[st, Condition Nos. ~,
shall be complied with.
gr IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expcessly
licant's compliance with each and all ° arththeceof,lobe
ptedicated upon aPp Should any such conditions, or any P coutt of
heteinabove set forth. the final judgment. of any
declared invalid oc unenforceable bY
then th:.s kesolution, and any approvals hecein
competent jurisdiction,
contained, shall be deemed null a:::7 void. raved by me this 18th day
THE FOREGOING ~ESOLUTION is- signed an %~PP j
of Match, 1985. , . . ~_ ~- _y-! .'~
`\~ ~. . / i L -'
CHA 12MA~~ ADIAH~It~~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~d~--~ ~ ~C~w f..,
TnN
SECRETAR]r ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~~i~
r STAT.E OF CALIE'UHN:LN J
k` ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
" CIT_ OF ANAHEIM ~
}; ., Ylanning
~ i Editt, L. Harcis, Secretary of the Anaheim City as::ed and
Commission,~ do heteby certify that the focegoing cesolution was p
of the Anaheim City Plan~ing Commission held on March 18,
adopted at a meeting
1985, by the followin9 vote of the members thexeof:
COMMISSIONSRS• B~UAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY 'r1ERBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~
AYES: ~ p1C BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COF1M'tSSIONERS: NONE hand this 18th day of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
. March, 1985. • ~ ~ / ,
/F1(
:• j
v~;,:. :,,;
~w i : ~ .
~.r ~ ~iyc . ,,..,,._. .,......., . _ .
. F4'S'~h ~.
,~, '/ ,~.~~~ '~
G~'----=
i.v ~ecrrij~
SECRETARYr ANAHEIM CITY PLANN r+ P~85_~3
-3-