Loading...
PC 86-106-.r RESULiI'.PION N0. PC86-].06 A 12GSOLUTION UL~ TH13 ANAHLIM CITY PLANNING CnMMISSIOU DENYING RTQU~ST TO h1~llT~Y CONDITION OI' APPFtOVAt, UP' RECL,ASSIC'ICATT_UR~ NU. $`~-86-17 WH~;RFAS, on January 20, 1986, tha Anaheim City Pl~nnin, Commiswion granted RtclassiL'ica~io~; No. 85-86-.17 by Itesolution No. PCa6-30 to reciassify subject property from RS-A-43,OOU(SC) iResi.dential, Agricult~aral-5r.enic Corridor Uver.lay) to +:L(SC) (Cummerci.al, Limited-Scenic Corridor Over.lay) on properL•y coi;si.sting ~i uppr.oximate.ly 2.91 acr.~s at the souti~ea~t c~rner oE the i.ntexch~nge at l:he Riverside E'reeway anc ImperiaJ. Highway and lor,ated approximaEely G75 f~et north of th~ center.lin~~ c.f Santa Ana Canyo~~ Ro«ci; and WH~REAS, in granting said r.erl.as~i[i.cation, ~he Flanning Commis5ion ;.,~ irnposed certain conditions, i~~cluding Condition No. 4, which re~ids as fo1).ows: "4. That pC10C to the introcjuc~ion of an ordir~ance rezoning subje~t pro~~erty, Cor~di.ticn Nos. ~, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, sha.ll be com~~let:~d. The ~rovisi.ons or r.ights gran~ed by triis tesolution shall become riul.l at:d void ksy eicL•icn of the Plnr.ning Commissinn unless said conditions are compl.ied w.ith within or.e yE~ar from the dal-e of' L-his resolution, or such ~urther time as L•he Plana:ing C'ommiss ior, ma.~ gcant. " WfiEKFAS, thc:~ petitioner has requ~sted a revision of Concii.tion No. 4, L-o r_c~ad as follows: ''4. 'I~h~,_ ,;c icc t:o Lh~:~ intr~dur,tion o£ an or.dinance r~zoni~,g subject ~roperty, Cor.di.C:ion No. 3, above-~r~cnt•ioned, shall be completed and l•hat X>riar ko the Linalizatir~n ot zoning on subject ~ro~,erty, C~ndil.ion No:;. .l and 2, above-mentioned, shall be cnmpl~l-ed. Ti~e ~r~~visians or rigl~ts grantecl by l•niy r~solulioii shall become null and void by ac~~~on of t_he Plannirig ~ommi.~sion unless said conditicns are corr~~~.lied wi.L-h within ~ine ycar Pram l•he date of L-his resoluti.on, or sucti Eurther timE as the ~lanning Commission Tay gz~nt." Wti~I?E1,5, the City Planning Com;nissi.on did hold a public hearing at the Civic Cent~r xn the City pf Anahei.m on ~pri' 'l0, 1986, al• 1:30 p.~n., notice ~f said ,~ublic. h~ar~ng having be«~n duly g.iven C-~ti requ:red by law and :Ln accor.dance wi_t.h tne pro~~isions oE thie Ar~dh~itn Municipal Code~ Chapter .18.03, to hFar and can;:•ider. evidence for and agai~st sa:id propos~rl modiEication ro ~onditions ot approval ~E sai.cl recla.~si.fication ~nd to investiya~p and make findings and recomntendat.ions in conn~~tion therewith; ~:nd WHEItEA5, said Plann.i-:g Comrni.ssion, afker due inspectian, investigation and sturJy r~~ade by itself anr'a i.n iL•s behali, and after due consideration oE all evid~~nce and reports oEferc~~ at. sai.d heariny, DOF,S H~RrIiY FINU: 1. That certa.in imE~rovements ar.e necessary, ~articularly becau~c ~t~is petition .involves r.er.oning and suF~divi.sion of Zand, a~~d t~t~e requirement Eor c:er~ain :~treet im~rovem~nt~ is to m:itigate ~mE~acts caused by the intensi.fication o~ land u;~es an~ ti:e requirement fo ae s~~tisfie~3 pr.ior to the introductiori of an ordi.nance rezoniny pr~perty are the Cit,y's best yuarantee that th~ improvements ~.~i11 occur. 0799r PC86-lOfi , ;: c ;:~: 4~ NOW, THEREFOR~;, ~~E IT RisSULVFLI that l:he Ari~iheim Ci.ty Planni.ng CommiSSion does hereLiy deny the requesf. to modify Conditicn No. 4 of. Resolution No. PC86-30 in connection with R~c:cassification Noe 85-fi6-17, on thc basis of the for.eg~~ing findinys. THE FORFCOING 12ESOLUTT~[~ i.s signed and aF~roved by me thiU 2~th c~ay o~ ApCil, 198G. .. ~7~C ~~.z,~-i ~, l J l~~.c _r\) CHeIIHWOh1AN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ;' ~' `______~~~~/y~ ~ ~1.~ -~ _ _ SFCRETA Y, ANAHF'I[d CITY PI~ NNING CUMMiSSTGN STATL OF CALIEORNTA ) COU~ITY OG' URANGE ~ ss. CITY OF A[JAHEIM ) i, Edit•h L. Hacris, Se^_retary of th~ Anaheim ~iry Planning Comu;i:;sion, do hereby certify thr,t the Foregoi:~g resolution was passed at~d ad~pte~9 at ~3 meeting of the Anaheim City Planr.ing Commissian held on April 28, 1986, by the following vet~ of the membcrs thereof: AYE~: COM~IISSIUNERS: BOUAS, FkY, H~'RBS'P, LA ~L'AIRG, LAWICKI, t4C EURNEY, M~SS1; NOES: COMMISSIC)NERS: NUN~; ABSEN`1': COMMISSIUNrRS: NONG IN WITNFSS wEiFRF:Ur•, l. have heteun~o set my hand this 28th day of Apr:i.1, :L9~s6. ~ ~i Y ~~ ~~--'~ ~_ ~~.Q.._M~_~-~.~ SF.CR~TARY; ANAHE:I:M CI'PY PLANNING COMMISSTON ' -Z- PC$6-10 ~ `{ ;;;~ ~~.w..~~ ~ ,~ ._ , . . , ~. .~ :, ~ .z: ~. ~e r~ o ~; ~ ~ ~. ~''~~~ .ry . , ~ ~~