PC 86-116,~
~~~~*~
'i'i,;'.
re
KGs~r.u~r:oN No. PCH6-.116
A.Ft!•.SOLU'P10N ON 'PFI~ ANAfiF:IM CI'PY PLANNING COMi~1ISST_UN
'1':I~'i' PE'CITION F'OR CUNllT`PIONAL USE P~RM:[T N0. 2793 F~G GI:AN'PF'U
WHE1:T:'AS, th~ l,n~~heim City Plannin,y Comrni::sio~l did receiv~ a verifi~ed
Petit.ion f.or Condi;:~.~na.l Usc•: Peemi.t from PATTtTC[( .I. SHEi,TON A~in SUSAN F..
SHE,LTON, 2:['l North State College Boulevard, An~~heim, Ga.liforn~a 92AU6, owners
af cectain rc~a.l pro~erty si.Luated in thc City of' Anaheim, Count,y of Orange,
StaL•~ uf CaliEo.•nia, c3~}scribed as:
LU'1' 6 UG T12AC~r .t635, AS PER MAP ;~t~'CORDEll IN DOOK 49, PAGEE 1 ANb ?.,
FtTCORDS 0[' SAID COUNTY.
WHGRGAS, the C.ity Plannino Commission did ii~la ~~ pubtic hearing at
the Civic renter in Lhe CiL•y oL- Anaheim on April 28, 1986, at 1:.30 p.m.,
notice of saic: publ.ic li~aiing havi;~~7 k~een du.ly yiv~n as c~equired i~y law and in
accardance with the pruvisiona oF the Anahr:.im Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to heac and con,ider evidencE~ for and ayainst said proposed condlt.ional use
L e~~mit and to ir.vestie~a~e and make Lindings ai~d r.ecurrmAndations in conn~ct.ion
lherewitt~; ~~n~i
WHEREAS, ~aid Ccrranission, after dury inspection, inves~igatio~t Znd
study made by .iL-selF and in its behalt, :ind afi:e~ c~u~ consideration of alJ.
evid~~n~N and re~~orts oEEered at said hcaring, do~~s f.ind an~l ~i?t~rminc~ the
E~llowing facts:
1, Ti~at thN ~roposed use is r~roperll one for which a condit;ion~1 use
pernit is authorized by Anahe:~r~ t4unicipal Cod~ Se~:tion 18.44.Oh0.1~l; Y.o wit:
4•o expan~j ~n exi,L-ing docl-or.':c ot'fice in a convert~d re:~iden~ial structure
wi r.h waivet oF:
:.L' '.~^::C .G."vo.~~v.ulil, - Mi~imum number oE -~~;rkttilg y~iaces
~
18.06.Ob0 (iU seice:~? reyuired; 6 spaces existi~tg)
Af~ll .1~.44.UGG.USO
2. 'Phar, the C@c]U!?; ced ~oaiver i:: hereby yranred on t.he ba5ic ~hat ~he
park.ing waiver will nc~l can^e a~i increase in tr.aiE.ic congesti.~n i.n the
immediate vicinity nor adv^c~:~~ly ~~f[ect any adjoininy lan~1 uses and granting
ot rhF~ t~arkiny waiver undec the eonc;ition3 im~osed, if any, will not be
~'eL•rimentaJ. to th<~ ~r:~ce, health, safer.y and general welf.a r~ oE thn cir,i~~.nn
of th~ CiCy of Anahcim.
3. .'hat tti~ proposerl use will not adversely afEeck the adjofning
land uces and ~he ~rowth ar,cl d~vc~lo~ment of. the are~ in which it io ~CO~OS~?CI
t0 11i: 1~~Ci1tF~d.
~. Tha!_ r.he si:.~: ~nci shah~ nf the ~ite propuse~3 for the u~e is
adequa~e lr~ a11ow the Eul.l deccic~pmcr,t n[ t~~~ pro~osed use in a mann~r not
detrimental to the par-:icul~r are;.t nor Co the ~~e:ace, health, safety and
gPnecal ~~eifarF; of thN Ci~il~il:i o~ the CiL•1 of: Anahe.irr~.
5. ~1'hat Chr~ gran~ in~ nf ~}1~: CUCIC~IC7,Ulidi rise PtCUiiL i~~~r~er the
conditioiis inp~sea, it aily, .+il.l. not be detrimenkal to th2 E,ea~~, health,
sai-~ty an~! ~31?n~ra.i. wrl£et'c aE Cf1C ~.itiz~n:~ of th~~ City o£ T,natz~im.
p799r
PC86-I16
~~ r "Ji~YT,
i
i ` `;'i
"
i
,
6. That
the
tr.~~[fic generatcd b1~
tl~ie pcoposed use wi11 nok impose an
undue burd~.n upun rhe streets anc3 t~.ighw~ays de~igned and im~roved to caery Lhe
trat:fic in the area.
'i. 'Pt~ar, no one indicated their p~:es~'nce at said pub.lic !~earing in
oppouil•ion; ancl tha~ no corrr-.sponc~ence was r~c~eived in u~position to khe
subject pet.it,ion.
I:NVIRONt~EN`.C1~F~ TMPAC`: .I'INDING: ~hat t:he An~~heim Cit~l Plann~.ng
Cammisrion ha::i evi~:wed ti~n Etir~iposal L-~ ex~anii an existing d:~c~or.'s oftice in
~ ~;on~crk~r) ~sidentiaJ. stru:ture with waiver of m.inimum number of pack~ng
Spi.1CeS an a re~=tangularly•-sf~a~ca c~ar~el of. land consistinc~ of approxxmatel.y oY
EeeL- on ~he ea~t side oF St~te Colle~e Ruulevard, and Eurther described as 212
N~~rth State Collf~ge 3nuleva~~c9 (Patrick ~Ie Shelt.on, D. P. ~i., Inc.); and does
hec~by a~~~rove thf~ Negative Declaration upon £indina t`:Zt it has ~~onsi8ered
t,he Negative lleclarati~n toyether wiCh ~~ny conimen~s received during the public
review pracess and fuc~ther Einding on t.t~e basis of the initial study and any
coir~ments received that khere is no suUstuntial zvid~nc~ that the project will
have a significant eELect an tFie cnvironment.
hiGW, 'i~iEREF~RE, El~ IT C2G50LVr,~) t~hat the Anah~im ~ity Planning
c:ominissior. doe:= her.e~y grar~~ subje.ct Petit.i.on fo~ CnndiY.?anal. Use Nermit, upon
the following condit;ions which are herPby found to be a necessary prerequisite
~o L-uc ~~:oposed tase ot the ;~ubject ~~ro(~~~~'L-y i.n ~rdFr ku pre.~erve the 3afety
and c~eneral we~~are c~t Lht_ Cititens uE ~he Ci.ty uf Anahei.m:
.l. That r~ricr to i:,suanc~ ~L• a building permit, L•hc: ~~ppropri.ate ~raff.ic
siyi~~.l assessment [ee sh~all bu ~aid ta the Cit•y oP Anaheim ir an
ar~~unt as der_crmi n~~d by Lhe c:i ty Co~~nci.l £or r~~w conmec•cial builciings.
Z. T}~ai, the owner. ot sub jact proper .y shall pay to ~h~ City of Anatieim a
:p~ for street liyhr.ing alcng State Colleye IIoulevard in ~•n amount .as
r~eterm.~.u~:~.~ by the City t:ouncil.
3, ~T,,.~C r_h~~ okner c,t subjecC ,~r~~pt~rfy sha.1.L pay tu t:he Ciky o: Anaheim a
Lee for tcee planting purposes alnny SL•aL-e rol~eg~~ Boulevard in an
amount as determin«~d i.>.}• the City Council.
4. 'i'h~+t subj~~c;t pro~erty sha:ll be developec sub~tan~a.aily in accordance
wit.h plans and :spF~cifiratior~s on file wi.th r_hc~ City of nnat±eim rar.ked
F:'xl~inir_ Nos. 1, '1. ~.~nd 3.
5. Tnat prio: to iss~iance uE a buildiny per.mit , oc wit:~.in a period of
on~ year Eron~ the dac:~~ oE this resol.,~tion, whichc~ver occurs firsC,
C~ncl.ition Nos. 1, 2 and .3, abc~ve-ment:ioned, shall ae complied witF,.
Extc~nsion:; tor. f:urthc;r t i rn~~ to c~mE~let~a sai.~ condi~ionr may be
granted i.n acc:o:clanr.e wit:h Sec^tion 1d.03.09L' of the 1lnaheim Municipal
Code.
6. ~t~ha.t ~~cior. Lo ti:,al hui.ldir,y anra •>.,oning inspections, Cand.ition No. 4,
cZbUV~? ;;,tnti~~n~~(~~ $Il~'ill ~!? CUlll~~.lt?~ W~tit.
rr
_2_ PCBG-116
~ .. ;,-,
~ f;~
,
~;•
,
~,.. , ~,
r,'~,~, 4~
. ~. . ~.., ^ ~
~ ' ' ~,~
BE TT 1'URTHC,R RF.SOLVF.D that. th~ Anahezm City Planning Commission does .`
hereby Lind and determinc; that adoption u£ this Re~olutian is er.pressly
predir„ated upon apPlicant's c~mpl.tance wi~h each ~and ali oP the co-ic~itions
hereinab~ve set Lorth. Sh~uld any su~:h conditions, or any part khereof, be
cleclared invalid ~r. unenf.orceable by the £irial judgm~n~ of any court o£
campetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, ar~-7 any approval~ hecein
containep, shall be deemed nu11 and void.
'I'HU E012EGOtNG RFSOLU'I`ION is signed and ~ap~,raved by me th.is 28th day
of Apr.il, 1.yg6,
. !' f ~
f ,~ . ,~
C.~/l < ~-~.~~ _ ~'1 ~`~=~'- _ ~- ~ c.~-C,{_{i ,i
CHAiktWUMAtJ, AA~AEIEIh1 CITY PLANIdING COMMISSION
~TT`r;ST:
~
~ ~ Q~~ ~~ ~~
~~~,_.._.,L~.,~l~`il~t..~.e~.. i
S';CRL•'TA Y, ~~NelfiEIM C1'1'Y (~LANNIfdG CUD1M~ ISS;[pN
S'.'ATE OC ~;ALTE'~~~tNIA )
COUN'!'1' OI~` (?RANGF j :-;, ,
C' ,' : C GF Afdt,llE? ^; )
t, Edith i,. H~rri.:;, Secretar.y oL- the Anaheim Cit~: Plannang
romm.iss.io.n, do herzby certi.fy th~t the foregoiny re oluti~n w~-~s passed and
adopted at a meeting oP Ch~ Anaheim City Planning Commission helc cn April 2a,
1936, by th~a f~~llowi-tg vote oL thH me:nbecs theceoL:
11YESs COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, FRY, L'A l°I~AIRE, 1,AWICK.C, MC BUR~IEY, MESSF
NOES: COh:.4£SSIONERS: NONE
ABSEId'i': COMMI.SSTUiJERS: NOP1E
A9STAZN: CUMMIS:TONERS: iiERf3S'P
rN WIi'NESS 47FfF.ltEUE', I i~~v~ FI~LEl171hG ~et my han~3 this 'l8th day ot
April, 1986.
~.~ .
/; ~ .
~ .~s.--~~r . ~ .~_...~,,. ,. - .
SFCI2E'.CARY, ANAHGIM CI`PY PLANNING ~'OMMISSrON
~3~ PCSG-.116
„~:.,,.._... _
~ .. . , . ..... .,.~ ... .._.
_ _ ~ „~.,,,.;~:r„