PC 86-151i:
r~~a,
{
R~SOLUTION N0. PC86-151
~,A'"•~
A RE,30LUTIUN UF THE ANAH~TM C1'PY PLANNING CUMMISSTUN
THA`P PL'1'[`.l'lUN F'OR CONUI'1'IONAL U5E PLRMIT N0. 'l$06 BE GR?.NTEll
WHGi2EAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive ~ ve..ri£ied
Petition far Condi.tional Use PermiL Proin PROPER'I'IES LIMIT.Ell, 27405 Pue~ta
Rea]., ~30U, t~lission Viejo, Californi.a 92691, owner, and LORAL EN`PERPRISES,
ATTI~: AL,BLK'i' SMtTH, i242 La L,ama Circle, Anaheim, Californi.a 92806, agenr for
certain r~al pra~erty situated in the City of A.naheim, County o£ Orange, State
of Cali.f:ornia, clescribed as:
TH11'I' PORTTON UF ~rr~~ WL5~P. tIALE ~JF LUT 2 IN tiLUCK lA UF 1.'HF~ GULDFN
S`PA'i'L '1'RAC'P, ANll THA`P PORTIUN OP 'PHE; EAST HALF UI ~~JT 1 IN BLOc"K 13
Ol~' THE GUL,ll~N S'PAxE 'rRAC'P, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECOf2DED IN 13C~OK ~,
PA~,;LS 66 AP~D o7 UF MiSCEGLP.NEUUS MAPB, RECORllS OE' ORAI~GG CO(JNTY,
CALIFURNTA, llL~CRIBEll AS rOLLUWS:
PAl:CLL 5 AS SHUWN UN A MAY F'1L•EU :CN fiOUK 124, PAGE 23 UF i'ARCE1:, MAPS
IN THli UFi'I(:E UF 'PHE CvUN'PY RT;COEtllElt UF Ok2ANGR COUNTY CALIE'URNIA.
~n~HER~AS! the Cit~~ Pl.anniny Cc~rnmissiun did hold a public heariny at
the Civic Center in thE. City ot Anaheim on Jui~e 9, 1986, at '1:30 p.m., n~tice
of said public hearing havi.n9 been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with L-he ~rUVisions ot the Anaheim ~~luni.cipal. Code, Chapter 18.03,
to k,;~ar and corisicler evidenre for and agai.naL- s~id proposed conditioiial use
kermit anc~ ko inveatigate and ~naice finda.nys and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHL:lLAS, sa.id Commissi.on, ai-t•er due inspection, investiqation and
study made by itselt and in its behalE, and after due consideration of a.11
evicience and r~E~orl:s off:ered a:. said he~.~riny, docs find arid determin~ the
Fc~lluwina ~ac~s:
1. '1'hat the pro~~os~d use i.s ~rouee!y one Por ~+hich a conditianal use
p~Lmit is author.i2ed b~ ~naheim t~lunxcipal Code Section 18,61.0~0.07U to wit:
to permiL- an automobile repair. Eaci.l~.ty in ~n ~xisting industria~ c;omplex in
th~ ML (Industrial, t,imited) 'Lone witn waiver o~ the following:
S~C~i'TU~IS 1~.U6.0!iU.U2l2 - Mini.mum numUec of parking~:paces.
18.U6.050.0221 (G3 spaces requireci; 58 sp~~:es existing)
~$.06.050.U31
lEi , 06 . UtiO
ANll 1F~.61.U66.050
~,k~
;
I~,^." f
: 1..., r
2. That ti~P requ~sted waiver i.~ herc~:~y grant~d on the ~asis that the
parking waiv r will. not cause an increase in traEfic corigescion ili the
imtnediate vicinity nur adveesely afCecL any adjoinin~~ land us~s anci graz~tin~
c~t the paCkir-g waiver undec the condi.ciors i~aposed, if any, will riot bA
detrimental to the peace~ health, saiety and yener•al ~~elEare of the citi.zen~
of the City of Anaheim,
3. 'rhat the proposed use sha11 be :l.imJ.ted to the ~urrent business
opera~or (Albett ::mith, L,ura1 L'ntcrprises) alid yha11 terminate if and wh~n
said business ~erm:tnat~s.
U834z
PC86-1S1
..,`;y
~~*~
,
4. That. the proposed use wi.l1 not aclversely a£fect the adjoining
~ land uses and the growth aind development oE the area in ~ahi,;h it .is ~~oposed
' to b~ locatede
5. 'I'hat trie size and al~ape of t:ye site propcsed Lor the use is
adeq~:aL-e to a11ow the Pull development of Y.he proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to r_he particular area nor to the peace, heal~h, safety and
general welfare o~ I:he Citizens ^~ i.t~e Cii:y of. Anaheim,
6. That the grantiny of ~he Ccm ditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, i.E any, will ~iok ue de'tr.imental ta the peace, health,
safety and general welfara o~ L-he Citi.zens af the City ok Anaheim.
7. `1'hal the t.eafPic ;yQner~Led by the proposed use will not impose an
undue burden upon the streets and hiyhways desiyned and improved to aarry the
trai'.fic in the area.
8. Tha~ no one indicated their pres~nce a~. said public hearing in
opposition; and thai: no correspondence was received in oppasitian to the
subject petition.
~NVTktUIVMN.NTHt, TMPAC'1' EINllING; That the Ana~;eim City Planni.ng
CJ711I11).SS],OI1 has reviewc~d rn~ propusal k:o permit an automobile rep~ir facility
i_n a~i existi.ny industrial com~lex in the ML (Tn~9uctrial, Li-nited) 2one wiL-h
waiver of rniniinum number. oi 1~ar.king spac~~s an an irregularly-shaped n~ircel af
lanc~ consistiny of: appruximately 1.44 acres, Piaving a frontagP of
ap~:roxirnately 385 feet on ~Il~'_ so~.ith szde oF La L~ma Circle, and £utther
describe~i ay 1'l4'L La Loma i:ircle; and c~ue:~ hPreby ap~rove the Negative
Declaration upon fir.diny ~,~c-st it has considered the NEg~lrive Declarat:.on
toyathar with any cominents received during the public review process an~
further Lind~.ty on the basis oE the i.nitial study and any commen~s received
that l;her~ is no substanti.al evi.dence L-hat the project wi1.L have a.igni.ficant
etiect on i:he environmei~t.
NUW, '1'li~;REi ~~t2L, k313 I'1' RESOLVED Lhak th~ Anaheiru City Planning
Coiomission d~es hereby gtant subject i~etition for Cnnditional Use Pat:mi~, upon
h.he iollowiny conditicns wtiich are t~ereby fou~id to bP a necessary ~rerequisite
to the proposed use o~ the subject pr~~trty zn order L-o ~aceserve the safety
and gener.al welkare oF t.he Citizens o£ the City o~ Anaheim:
1. 'i'hat subj~:ct pr.operL,y sha11 be developed substantially in accorclance
with ~la~xs aiid speciEications on ~i1e with l:he City ot Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
"l. Tt~a} this usc~ permit shal.l b~: iimited to L-he aurrent ausir,ecs operatox
(Albert Smith, Loral L•'nterpri~es) and sha.ll tPrminate if and when said
business L-erminates.
HE i:' FUR`.CHLlt RSaOJ~V~u L•hat l:he Ar,aheim City Plannzng C~mmis~ion dpes
hereby Eind and c,ietecmine that adoption of this Rrso.lutien ia expressly
predicated apon applicanL-'~ cornpli~ince with ear.~h and all oE the conditi.on~
tiereinabove set forLh. ~huuld an~ such cnnciiCions, or any parL- thereof, be
declare~.i invalid or unenEurcew~].e by the ~ina.l judgmant oE any couri: o~
cam~eL-en~ jur.isdic*inn, then this xesolution, and any approvals herein
conta.ined, shall bN deeined null a~c~ voi~.
'l' PC86-151 !~
. ".Yf:'! ~.~ . ~ .. . .. ~ . - .. ,. ~. .
^
,~
adopted at a meeting eL- the Anaheim Cit.y I~lanning Cammisszon held on June 9,
1986, by the Pollowing vote of the membei:s thereof:
AXE~: CUMI~IISSIONEIl:;: 80UaS, FttY, Eix~RBST, 'LA CL,AIRF, LAWICY.I, MC BURNEY,
DiL'55L,
NO'L'S: CC~~IMTS:.,IUNI;RS: [~ONE
AtiSENT: CuMMISSIUN~R:,: NOlJ~3
iN WI`PN~SS WF{E1tS~)[ , I havr hereunto set my hand i:Y-is 9th day aF June,
198ti. ~ 1~/ t'.
~,F1~.
S~CI2~'T.ARY, A~IAIiEIid CTTY PLANNING COMMI55IUN
THE F'OREGUING RESOLUTIUN is signed and approvec~ by me this 9th ciay of
June, 1986. ,;
./' ~'~ '-' . - ^~
,s~?~~ .r , % ~.~ _, ~~_~.~.. ~'. ~~,, f ~ `~ /~ ~ ~ •~ •,= ~....~:..., ~
CHATRItiOMAN, AhAH~It~I CIT.Y PLANNING COtdMISSION
ATTLST:
• ~ .~ r
_sLy~~(~ __.~e~~
SECRETAR , APJaHGIM CITY PLANNINC~; COMMISSION
~'rA'.['E OF CP.LIFOt2t~'IA )
CUU~TY OF Utt~NGh ) ss.
c:I`PY OE' ANaHETM ) `,
I~ Ldith :~, liaxris, 5ecr.~etary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do herct~y ce-~rtify tnat the Furegoi-ig resoYutioil was passed and
-~-
PC85-151