PC 86-156~s
,
~
_ _ , . _
, , _.
I's tu.
,~~}~ :~, r_! , ..~t 3 •~'~`w;y1i,^.`'~l
~
~~f ~ ~
'V .~
C ~lMY, I:
~
" , 1
~l.
(
~
Rr,SOI~UTIUN N0. PC86-155
A RESULUTION UF 'rH~ ANAH~TM CI'1'Y PLAN~;ING CUMMISSIUN
THAT PL''TI'i'ION 1'(7i2 VARIANCE NU, 3570 BE GZANT~U
, WHL;RFAS, ~he Anaheim City P.lanning Commiss.ion rii,., ~~ceive a
Pekition Eor Variance tro
D
~ verified ~
'
1~' m
LBRF, FcO~ E
~^
~lUN.sER, 121^
Upal Avenue,
Calif.u;ni.a 928U5, owner,• and AL•AN J Anaheim, ,`:'f
n
.
GU5SIP1, 1ti41 ll White Star,
Calitornia 9).F30G, agent Por c~ri:ain
~ Anaheim,
,
r.r
a,l property situated in the
Anahei.;n, County of Urange, State of ~alifornia described C.ity of ~
as:
LU`!' 3 UE' 'PKACT N0. 236F3, AS PER MAP THEhEOF 12E~ORULD IN BOUK
PAGE 39 Uk' MISCELLANEi?JS 65, ~'
~I
MAPS, IN THE 0!I'TC~' ~~
UF SAIU CUIJN'1'Y. UF. 1HE COUNTX RECpRDER
~;
: I~ti~;R~AS, the City Planning Commission did hald a publi~ hearing at
the C:ivic C;enL-~r zn the Cil-
f
~
' y o
AnaoFim on J~tne 9 1986 at 1;~0
of said publ.ic hearing having been du1 ~~ ' p•m•~ notice
ivcn
Y
•
r y
as r
equi.red by law and in
accordance with the ,
pro~ isio~,s oi' the Anah~im Munic~
al C
t
d
h
p
a
o
e, Chapter 18.03,
zar and consider evidence for and ayains~ said
,, pr.oposed variance an~l tp
invcstic~ai:e and make L-indinca:; and recoinmendations i
'
4', n connecl•ion therewitn; and
`~~ WkiLkh;AS, said Comnission, after du~ insp~ction, investigation and
St~~~Y made by i~seli a
d i
- n
r~ its beha.lf and a
~viciGnce and ra ~ Eter d~e conside.ration of all
ports o.tf.arr~d at said hearin
7
g, c
oes t;,r~d anc~ ~etermine the
~ollowing Facts:
,~~~ i. That the petit.ion~r ~
construct a familyroom udditi
the foilowit~g to
v
~'r on Lo a sin le fa~rily
zPsidence
` SLCTIUN5 18,q4~04"1.07.D - Re uir~ ~
~ -~ ~ ~ r~aX yard setback
'
~: .
AI~C 18•26.U63.030
( lU-Ec,ot setback reyuired; 6~-£eet: ta 21 £eet
~
' proposed)
'
i. Thut the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis
ttia~ there are speci~l c,;,rcum~tanc~s applica~le ko the pr.operty such as size,
shape, topogr.aphy, loc:~ti~n and surruund:ings whieh do no~ appl~{ to ott~er
identically zoned property i-~ t:h~ same vicinity; and that stricL application
of the Zoniny Cade deprives thc p~t~perty oC• pr.iv.i.legt~s enjoyed by other
pro~erties in the identical zpqe and classification in the vicinity.
' :~. ~l'hat L•her:e are exce~~~i.onal or extraordinary circu~nstances or
~ conditic;zs ap~licable to ti~e ,~rope~L-y .invclved or to tne intended use of the
~ pr.oper~y that do not ap~ly generally lo tr„~ property or class of use ira the
sarne vicinity and zone.
i
; ~!. Th,~t tl~e reque,^,ted variance is necessar for tl-e
~ en~u~~~~~,.=nt o~ a suhstantiGzl y PresPrvation and
i pro~erty ri.yhh p~ssessecl by other proper.ty in the
; same vicinity and zone, and d~n.Led to the prupcrty in c~uestion.
~
5~ That the requested variar.ce will not be materially detrimental to
che public weltare or injurious to the ~~
ropecty or zmprc~ements in su~ali
vicinity and rone in which the pr.op~rty is located. .
6. That na on~: indi~~-:ed their presence at said public heari.ny in
oppqs.itior~; and that na cor.rea•~ondenc:~ was received iri ~~position to subject
petikion.
U839r
PC86-156
;.
;..w.•..~ ..:................_._ _ .. ... _ . ,
~;
_ . ~ ~:~ ~;~.~;;~.
r'~` .
~~:
~"~°^,,
~
~NVJRUNMENTAL IAIPACT FINL~ING: TP~~ ~.lanning DirectoC or l~is
au~horized re~resentative iias deL-ermined that the proposed project Palls
within the definition of Categori.cal Gxemptions, Cl;as:; 5, as deEined in t-,~
S~ate EIR Guidelines and is, thereFore, categorica~ly exempt From the
rec~uirement to prcPare an EZR.
[Ji1W, THERLE012B, tiE IT RESOLYED that ~he Anaheim Cicy Plannin~
Com-nission does hereby granl: subjECt Petiti~n For Variance, tlpon ~he fo,llc.~wing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessaiy prerequisite t~ ttte
proposed use oE the ~u!.>ject property in order to preserve tye sa~ety and
general welfare of tk~e Ci.t.izens ot the City of Anaheim:
1. Thai: subject property shall be developed substankially in a~:cordance
with plan: and Sp~Cif.iC~~tion~ on Li~.~~ with the Cit.y of Anaheir; =!arked
E~hibit No. 1.
BE IT 1UR`PHER 12E~()LVE~D that the Anah~in~ Cit.y P~anning Commission daes
rierebv find and detErmine that adoption of this Resolution is expr~ssly
predicated upon applicant's coinpliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forL-h. Shouici any such condition, or an;~ part thereof, b~
d~clared invalid r~r unenforceable by tt,e L-inal judgment of any court af
aompet~~nL jurisdiction, then this ~tesolution, a~d any appro~~als herein
contained, sha11 be cleemed nu~l and voida
'1'HE FC~R~;GOING ~tRSOLUTTC?N is signed and apptaved by rre tY:is 9th day of
Ju~ie, 198G.
~` ~a~'!. r. ~.,•. ,,., _ .~,' <~'r..~~ L~i Gl.~.r• .y~i
rNAIRWUMAN, ANAHL•'IM CI'PY PI,ANNrNU COMMTSSIUN
A`t"I'EST: ~ .
) ~ d~L.~,Lz/
SECf2F.;TA Y, ANAEIH;IM r~TY ~LANNING COMMISSIUN
5`i'ATE UP CALIPOTINIA )
COUN`PY OF UKANGF; ) ss.
CI`i'Y OI' ANAH~;IM )
` I, Ldith L. :iarcis, Secretary r~f the An~~heim City Planning
~`: Gommission, do hrreby certify that the Eorec~oing resolu~ion was passed and
~},`;i adopted at a meeting of the Anakieim Ci.ty Planniny Commi.ssian held on J~.~ne 9,
,~;;; 1986, by ~he ~ollawing vote ot r_he rnembees ~hereof.:
AYL;a: CUMMISSIONEKS: fiOUAS~ FltY~ EiEREiST~ LA CLAIi2k~~ LAVdICKl~ MC BUI2NFY~
M~;SSk;
NOES: CUMP]ISSIONE1t5: NONE
AI3~iEN'i': CUP1N'iISSIUNu12S; N~JNL''
IIJ WI`PN~SS WH~KEUF, 2 have he[euntu set my hand this 9th clay of June,
1.9~G.
~ ~'~ 1~~ ~"~ .
SL(;nETA Y, Al~l{~.E~ M CI'1'Y ~~LANNING CUMMISSION
-3- PC86-156
~
~ ~~
r~M:
;t`
.;~„
'_;
{
~ ~ :~~