PC 86-194~
~Y
'i
' RESULUTION N0. PC$6-.194
A RESOGU'.CiON OP THE A~lAHEIM CI'!'Y PLANN2NG COMMTSSION
THAT PE'.PI'PION kOR VARIANC~; IJO. 35a2 13E GRANTFD
WHERhAS, the Anak,Pim City Planniilg Commisrion dic~ receive a variE.ied
Petiti.on fur Variance fcom 1VAN Ni. ~~UR1~TN ANll DARGENE K. TUkPrN AS TRUSTEE9 Or'
THE TURPIN TRU,~T, 5330 Sunr.rest Roacl, Ar.ahFim, Ca:~if~rnia 92807, owners af
c.~,, certain real pro~erty situated in ttie City ut Anaheim, Countl oE Orange, State
„ oL Cal.if~rnia d~scri.bed as:
L~OT 10 UP TRACT 10998, AS SFiUWN ON A MAP R~CURDEll TN BOOK 532~ PAGES 20
TO 25 INCLUSIVC OF MISCGLLi1NE0US MAPS, RE:;O.RUS Oc^ 012ANGL COUNiY~
CALXFURNIA.
Wt~LREAS, the City Planning Commis~ion dy.d ho.ld a public t~eacing at
the Civic C~nter in the City of Anaheim on July 21, .1986, ~~t 1~30 p.m., not:ice
; cF said puU1i~ i~earing having been duly yiven a;: r~:yuired .by law and in
accordance witn the provisions ~f the Anaheim Miinicipal Code, Cflapter 15.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and a~ain~l. yaid proposed variance and to
inve:shiyate and make findings and cecommer:Ba~ions in con~~-ection therewiGh; anc~
,..
W1iExEAS, said ;'oit;mission, aEter due inspection, znvestigation and
stttdy made by itse.lf an~.: in its behalf, antl af-ter due consideratio~i of all
evic~ence and r.eports otfere.~ at said hearing, does find and derermine the
tollowing facts:
,•:,:
l. Tha~ the petitioner proposes waivet of the Golluwi~g to construct a
two-st•ory~ aingle-t~mily residence:
SEC"PION 18.84.09'L.G11 - Maximum sl-ruclur4]. heiqht.
~ ~ (25 Eeet in,Scenic Corr~dor permittnd;
35.5 t~et pro~~osed)
2. 'I't;a~. tha ab~~ve-men~ ioned waiver iFS hereb.y yranted on the basis that
there are apecia? circumstarices appl?.cable t~ tl~e prop~rty such as ~ize, sl~ape,
topography, 1~cat.ion and surroundings which do no: a~~ly ~:o other i.dentically
zoned properk.y in the saine vicin.ity; and L'nat strict app.lication of the Zorsing
Code deprives the proper.ty of privileges c:njuyecl t~y other prop~rties in the
id~ntical zone and c.l.a~r~ification in the vicinity.
3. ~hat tt~~r.e ~re excepti.nna.l or ext taordiriary circumstar.ces or
conditions a~pAiuabie to the pro~erL-y involved or L-o Lha intended use aF the
property that dc not a~~ply yen~ra'lly L-o CI1P. Ur~perty or class o~ use in ~hc 3ame
vicinity and zone.
4. That the reques~ed vacianc? is necessar.y for thc pre;servation and
enjUyment ~f a~uk~stantia.l pLOper.ty right pogse~sed by other property in the same
vLcinity and zone, and denied to the p::o~arty ir questi~n.
5. That tht requested variance wi11 not be ma~erially detrlmental to the
p~~blic weltare or iajurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and
zone in which r.he FropErty is located.
6. That no one .indic~ted ~heir presence at said publlc tiearing in
opposition; and that no corre~pundee~c~~ was reeeived in ooposition to suk~ject
petition.
0882r PC~6-194
;.W-,
~~
. ~;,v:
{
ENVTRJNMEN~I~AL tMPAC'"i' k'INDTNC: The P1ar.ni.ng Direckor or hi~ authori~ed
representative has d~tecrnined thaL• the proposed praject ~alls wikhin the
d~:finitiQn of Cateyorical Exemptians, Class 3r as defined in the State ~T22
Cuidel,tnea and is~ therefoce, categorica).ly exempt ~'rom tne cc~quiren~ent +:o prepate
an E:iR.
NUW, THERb,i'GR~, BG I~l~ RESOLVED thaL the Anaheim City Plannzng Commis~ion
cioes hereby yrant subject~ Petitiotl C~r Vari~lnc~, upon the Eoll~wing cancliti~ns
~:, wnich are h~reby founcl to b~ a necessary pcerequisi~e to i:he propo~ed us2 af the
y;; ~uhiect proper.ty ~.n ord~r to ptese:ve th~ safet~y and general trel~are af the
Cii.i~ens of th2 Ci'ty of Ana heim:
1. 'Chat subject ptor~erty shall be cleveloped substaritially in accordancE with
p~ans and Gpeci~icahions on f.ile with che City oE Anaheim marked Exhibit
;i Nos, 1 l:hr.ou~7Y: 5.
RE I'1' I'URTtiER 12ESOLVEll that the Anaheim City Planniny C~mmission does
'` hernby fi-id an.d dQterrnine thaL• acla~tian of i:hi.s Re~o.lution is expres~ly pcedi.cated
upor- applicant'U compliance with each ancl all ~f the conditiun: hereinaUove set
`:; furth. Should any such condition, or any ~art thereof:, be dec.lared invalid or
unenforceabl~ bp L•he final judgmen~ aE any courk ot competen:. juc°.~diction, then
`~~ this Resolul:ion, and any anpLOVals herein contai.ned, shall be deerned nu11 and void.
THG FORFGO:LNG R~SQLUTIOfJ is s~.gned ~.nd ap~roved by me this 21L-h day of
~Tu].,y, 19FiF,.
,.~-`'-~'
/ .
Y~.,; -L~•~I , c,~%b ~ ~` /
,v a .~ . ~
HAII2MAN, ANAc L':[M, CI'1'X PT,, NNTl~1G COMMISSION
a~r~.c t: s~r : '
~~.
~._,(1"~ -~ ~S~ %, . .~
SECRET~':RY, ANAHLIM CI'~Y P ANNING COMMISSIUN
STRT~ OF CAt,IE0R~IIA )
CUUN'PY qG' ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
,' I, Ecii.th L. Ei~rris, Secr~7l-.ary of the Anahc~im Ci.ty Plunnin~ Commission, do
' :~e~r.eby c4rtify that L•ne foregoiiin resoluti~n ~~aas ~assed ar_d ;~dopted at c m~etinc~
~"• ~f the; Anaheim Cii:y Planning Commis~ion he.lcl an ,IUly 21, ]9t3G, by the Eoll.owing
~; vote of the membcrs there~t:
Y;;
:f ;
AYES: CUt4MI5SI0~VERS: L30UAS, E'RX~ H::RfiST~ GA CGI~TRF., i,AWT~'KCr MC t~URNEY,
~1 LSSF
NOES: C:OMMISSi0NER5: NON1;
;i,
t5~i AH5ENT: CUMMISSIONERS: NGNr
19 E16 .
}?jti ~ ;;'...
t~~~-,
~~~+,4tifty
,. ;,r;.
~y I
~~i~ ~-
~ y+t~ G~p' .
t '~!,/1~,,;«t~~~rJ,, .
~'S
5
N ~r ,
~~~~~
~ ~,
ar~ ~~~ ~~ ~~
~~ , ~ ~,;~,~ ~,
~ ~.~u '~,
~~ ~
{r~ f:3~Z ~ r -'
, L~_~<-,~. .
IN ~~7TTNGSS WHERLOE, I r~~zve heceun-~o set my hand ~his ~lth day qs July,
`:~ .,~--` ,O ~' '
!~ ,4 . .,/ . ..c'. -
SECRE'~ARY, ANAHG_T'9 CI`.CY PLANNING COMMTSSInN
~~-
I~CBG-I94
,,s