PC 86-198:i . . . . ....
, ,..
... .,,..:. ,.~ ... ,
Ti . ~ ,
„~
Rk;SOI,UT.IUN NQ. pC86-•198
A RESQLU`PIUN UF 'rHE ,~1iVAE:EIM CI`rY PI,ANNING COMMISSION
`.'HAT PGTITIUN ~OR CONDI?..IONAL USE PERI9IT N0. 2823 BE DENTEL~
in1HERGAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Pel:iti.on foc Conditi.onal Use Permit From LGO WALUMAN AND ALICE WALDMAN, 813
H~yai Way, I~naheim, California 92.yp5, owners and 'PIM LP:F, 830 North Batavia
Stceet, Or.~nr,e, Californi~ 97.6u~, a~~ent Por certain r.eal ~ronert,y situated .in
the City o~; Anaheim, County o~ Ur.ange, Skate o.f Calitorni.a, describe~ as:
PAF;C~L 1:
LO~: 31 OP TRACT N0. 4U3, AS SH04VN UN A MAP RECOHll~D TN BOQY. lF,~
PA(;G .ll OF MISCLLLANEOUS MAA. S, RECORDS OP OP.A~JGE CUUNTY,
CAi:,I~'ORNIA.
E:C;;EP1'ING THEREF'ROM THE NURT[3 36 k'l;ET THEREOP, AS CONVEYFD TG THE
:;TA'~F. OH CALTFORNIA.
PAI2CEL 2;
LC~`P 32 0~ 'PRAC'r 40.i, AS SHUWN ON A MAP RECORDF.ll IN 13vQK 16~ pp,V~
1' UF t•iISCc;LLA\GQUS MAPS, RECORDS OF qRANGE COUNTY, CALT_FORNtA.
E:.{~gp~r:LNG 7'F1i:F.F'FF;OM THE NOftTtJ 36 r~r•,~ AS CONVEYED `PO THG STATE Gr'
CA~.,I['ORNIA $Y llEF;D RECORDL•'D FEBRUAEZ'1 7~ 1955.
WHEREAS, the Gi.ty Planniny Cominission did hold a public hearina at
the Civic; CenL•er ,i.n L-he Cit,y o£ Anaheim on ,Tuly 21~ 1986 at 1;30 p.m., notice
oF said Fublic hearing h:ieing ~een duly given as required by law and in
accordan~~ with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cpde, Chapter 18.03,
to hear arid consicler evidence Por and against said proposed condil•.ianal usp
pecmit ~~nd Co inv~stigate and mahe finding, and recomrriendations in connection
ther~wit.h; anu
'j WFiEREAS, said Commis5ion, atker due inspection, investiyati.on and
'~ study n:aile by itselF and in its behalf, and af_ter due ~:onsidecation o:C a.Ll
t; evic~ence and r~porL-y of.ferec3 at ~aid t~earing, doe;~ find and detetmine the
;~ follotving facts:
~ l. 'Phat. the propr~:;ed use is propcrly one For which a con~itional
~ use permit is authori.zed by Anaheim M~tnicipal Code Section 1~.~4.050.3UC to
`: w9.L-: Lo pecmiL- an addition to ~n ex:isti.ng restaurant with waivers of:
~
(a) S~CTIONS 1.8.04.045.014 -• Minimum structurai setb«ck.
~ AND 18.44.063 ~ (35 F.eet from Lincoln Avenue required;
! 21 f.eet proposed)
~
; (b) SEC'XI~NS 18.06.050.0233, - Minimum number o.f
^ ~ la.U6.080_ANU ~?arkinn space~.
(?6~arkinc~ spaces requixed Eor a w21k-up
18.44`066.050 i~4staurant; 1--3 parkiry ypaces pr~posed)
0886r
PC86-198
~~ ~
;,~;
,i~.t ~ ~ N«.
Z. That the propoaed use wi11 adversely afEect i:he adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which i~ i.s proposed to be
].ocated.
3. That the size and shape oE che site proposed for the use is not
adequate +.o allow the full deve].oprnent ot the prop~sed use in a manner not
detr.i.m~ntal to th~ par.ticular area nor co the peace, h~ealth, safety and
,;. ~eneral welFare o.E the Citizens oE the Czty of Anahei~r,.
r'~ ~, That the qranting oP the Cor2rlitional Use Per.mit under thQ
conditions i.mposed, if. any, wi.ll l~e detrimental ~o the peace, hea lth, y,~[ety
and general welFare oP the Citizens of the ~ity of Anaheim.
5. Tt~at the traCFzc generated by tt~e ~eoposed use wi].1 imp~se an
~:ndue burden upon the streets and highways ciesigned and improved to caccy the
tT8tf1C in the ~, ,
6. That no ~ne indicated theic presence at said public heari.ng in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in appositi.on to the
subject petitioi~..
ENVIRONy~NTAL IbIPACT EINJING: ThaL. the Anaheim City Planning
Comrnission has reviewed the pcoposa.l r.o ~Etmit an addition ~o an existing
wal.k-up restaurant with waivers oF mini~~um structural setbac:k and mir~imum
nurnber of par.ki.ng spaces on an irreguZ3cly-shaped parcel of land consi~riny of
appzoximately U.1G acre lo4ate;i at khE nurth2asL• cozner of Lincoln Avenue and
T~~anya prive, and further descr.ib~d as 313$ West Lincoln Avenue; ancl does
hereb,y approve l•tie Neyative D~claratian upon Pincliny thak it ha:, considered
thc Neyative Uec].aratinn together with any cornments received cluzing the publ~c
review proc' ~ss and fucther findiny on the i~asis of the initial stur,~y ancl any
comments re:eived khat khere is no subUtantial. evidence that the prajsct wili
have a sigr-ificant ePfect on the environmen~.
NUW, THEREFURB, DG T'P ktES~)LVGD thaL- Ghe Anaheim Cit~y Planniny
:.'ommission doe~ her.eby deny subject Petition for Conditioria'1 Use Permit, on
the basi.s oE the aforementioned findingse
`PH~ FORFGUING RESOLU'TIUtd is siynea anri approved by me this 21th day of
~7u1y, J.9p6.
> ~1 >
~ _~ ,,/f~~~/ ~) /`1/ ~ I C ~/ //1 ~/ ~l
~: _L~ fi"~~L_'_ __ l. •/!i/ ~ f ~ !,/ _.!_/
CHAIHMAN, ANAEi~Ttd CJTY P7~,~JNING COMMISSION
A`.ITEST:
.,~--~V ~, , ~.,•
S~CRLTA. Y, ANAHLIM G:L'P~ P'LAI3NING COMMISSION
-2-
, . . ';'~.~,~..~
,~,1
1:
P~86-198
; `;
~
;
,
,.
,
. r
.
~~ ~. . _. .. .
,.... . . . . ...., ,. . ~ ., _.
""?
• , ,.k,,
STATE CF CALIFORNIA )
COUN'PY OF ORANGE j s5.
CITY OF ANAHETM )
I, Edikh L. Harris, Secr~tary of th~ Anahei:n City P.lanning
Commis~ion, do hereby aertify that the foregaing r.esolu~ion was passed and
ado~ted at a meetang oF the Anaheim City Planning Comma.ssion hel.d on Ju7.y 21,
1986r by the =ollowing vote of the members thereo~:
AYES: CUMNIIf`,SIONERS: BOUAS, ERX, HERBS'P, LA CLAIRE, MC fiURNFX, MESSE~
NC~ES; CC)MMISSIONERS: L,AFIICKI
ABSENT: CI]MMISSZONPRS: L30NE
IN WI'~NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sc~t m,y hand th?s 21th day of
July, 1986. n - ~ f
<<~',~ '~'~'~ -
SBCRF RY, AN.AHEIM CITY PLANN:CNG COMM~SSION
„;~
-3-
:r;
PCti6-198 '':'i
;~,
>r;~
, ;i
- - -- ~ 'J_ a 't ;~'~~