PC 86-240If . '~
,~a
: ~~J
~~`(!
~t'
~~ ~~a
;S.
RESOLIJTION N0. PC86-240 '`~'
A RESOL,U~r~or~ UF THE ANAHEIM CI`PY PLA~iNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CUI~DITIONAL USE PERMI'P ?d0. :?842 BE: C.RAN7'GD, I[~ PART
WHEREIIS, the Anaheim Ci.ty Planning Comm.is~i.an d~u recei.` a veriEied °'
Petit:i.on for Cor~d:it.i.onal Us~ Y~~rm.i.t from ORANuE'PHORPE PF20AlENADi' P. 0
Box 1(~,
,
'.~ 15005, Santa Ana, Californza 9'l'I05, owner and INDUSTRIAL PROPEi;i•Y .
NWNAGEMENT, '~.,
c:; 1495 East Warner Avenue, Sar~ta Ana, Cali.fornia 92714, agont Fqr certain r~al '`'?~'
~~~ properl•.y situated :in the Ci.ty of Anaheim, County
of Orange,
State of 7:,,
~~~
Calif.orni.a, descri.bed as: !{~'~~
THAT i~ORTION Or 'PFIC FRACTIONAL NOR'~HWEST ~IUARTER OF SECTION 1, '°`
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANC[i0 SAN JUAN CAJON BE
SANTA ANH, AS SHGFIN ON A MAP TH~;R~OF RECORBED IN BC10K 51~ FAGE
10 OF' MISCELLANrOUS MAI~S, Rk;CORD~ 0~ SAID ORANGE COUNTY, SIiO;dN
AS 1?ARCEL 3 ON A I~AP REc,CRDED IN BOOK S7, PAGE 2~ OE PARCEL ;~'
[~1APS, RECORDS OF SAID QRANGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS; l-.he C.it.y Pla~lni.ng Cummi.s~:i.on d:id holr' a public hearing at
the Civic Cent~r in the C.:.~y of Anaheim on S~pternber 15, 29a6, at 1:30 p.m.,
noti;.e of sai.d publi.c hearing havi.ng b~an du.ly gi.ven as required Uy law and in
accordai~ce with Li~a prcroisi.on~ of tn~ Anaheim Munici.pal Code~ Chapter 1$.03,
to hear ancl cons.i.der. ~~vzden~e Eor and aqainst. said proposed conditiona:l use
permit and i_p investigat~e an~ mak~ findi.ngs ~nd recommendations in c~nnecti.on
therewith; -r.~d
WEiERGAS, said romm~~.ssion, at~er due i.nspect.i.on, 9.nves*igation and
stuciy madp by a.t;~elf and tn iks betial.f, an 9 aEt~r due consideration of all
evidence ar~d ~.•epor!:s ofEered ~?r sa.i.d he~ri.ng, does f:ind and deta~rmi.ne L•he
followiny facts:
1. That the ~~roposed use ia prop~rly on~~ Eor whi.ch a rondition~l use
Nermit iy author.iz~~cl by Anaheim Mun:icipal Code Sertion 18.GZ.050.390 ~o wit;
to permi.t a sanc;wich shop, deny.i.ng of-E-sa.le Ueer and wi.n~.
2. 'Phat the propu:;ed o£f-saie beer and wine use zs den.ied on the
bas.is that the subjecr. ~roper.t.y i.s located i.n an industrial area where
y'.:
conveni~nt avai.labiliLy oF otf-sal.e beer ~nd wine and po~stble consumpti.on is
;~; not an appropri.ate usQ; that ~;ai.c use could r.reate a clanger to i.ndustrial
-`:
~h.:,
'~ employees operatiny h~avy equi~ment oc machinery; and further that subject
~ property is in th~ same vici.n.i.ty as an e~;isting r.ecreat_,:i.onal. cznter where
~ teenagers anc~ ,young peopl.~ r.urrenh.l.y con-aregate on w~ekends creatin,g traffic
4-
~r an~i tra:~h problems and ~i~at subjec" ~~~e r,ould c~nr.r.ibute to th~se ~roblerns.
I.~
3. That ~.he ~roposed use, a~ gr.anted, wiJ,l not adver ~ely afPect the
~~~~ i~,in:i.ny land uses anra the growth and developmenL of th~~ area i.n which it is
, proposed ta be located.
4. Thak t.he si.ze and shape oP the si.te pro~osed f.or the u~e
as '~"
granted, i.s ade~iuate to a1:l.ow the £ull development ,
oE the ~ropo ~er~ usE in a
m~nner not d e',:rimen'~a). to the parti.cular ar,ea nor to khe peace, h~~altk~, s~fety ~
and g~nezal we~tare of the Czt:izens o£ the City Gf An aheim. '.;~
` .
' 0931r
z~
'!
_; PC86-24U
?
~~,
,
g(,!:~.' ~
I .
~i
~
f
~
'M
:
.
r
174
/~
1y
~~
t~~ J ~ ~45~ r: /~~ J ,.
.
~
~: ~
~, . ~ ~'
t
~ `l~ h~ ~! f l
~ ~.
~
~ ~
%
~
' . , ~LN
~y}
YY, ' .
~
~ r~ p,
' i
i.ii.nwe.r~,oe•~.,~. .- ..,._,.~ ..
...........~,.......... ~~.
...... ..,_.,_ .._...,..... . .
,
.. . . ~ . ,,7
... -.~.:1
.~.. _.,.u .
w,.,
; . ~...
4. That the gxanting of the Condi.t.ional Use Permit under the
condi.t-.i.ons i.mposed, if any, will not ~e detri.mPnhal to ~t~e peace, health,
saEety and g~~neral welfare o:E the Ca.ti.zen~ of the City o~ Anaheim.
5. That the traf.f i.c generaied by the proposed use wi.ll not i.mpose an
undue burden upon +~he ctr~e~s and hzghways designed and improved to c~;;rry the
traffi.c i.n +-he area.
6. That no one indi cat:ed thei.r presence at ~a.i.p pub].ic heari.n7 .in
opposition; and that no corr~spocic]ence was rece9.ved in opposita.on t~ the
sub ject peti.ti.on.
ENVTRONMENT~IL IMPACT FINbING: ThaN the Anahe.im City Plar.ni.ng
Comm.ission has~ reviewed t:~e ~roposal ~o permit a sandwi.ch shop on an
a.rregul~~rly-shap~~c! parce.l of land cansi.sting of approximately 9.1 acLas
locai:ed at the southwest corner oE O.rangethurpe Avense and L~lacentia Avenue,
and =urther aescri.bed as 237a East Orangethorpe Avenue; and does h~reby
approve tt-,~ Negat.a.ve Declaration upon Finding that it has consiuered thP
[~egative Declarah.i.~n together wi.th any comments received during the p~lblic
~eview process arid f~rther finding on the basi.s of the initial study and any
comment.s rece.ived that. tr~ere is nc substan+:ial evi.dence t.hat the project wi.11
have a szgni.ficant efPect ~n the er,vironment.
NOW, THF;REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED +~hat the ~nahetm Ci.ty planni.ng
Commiss~.on does he~eby g~-ant subject Petiti~n Lor. Conditi.onal Use Permit, upon
the followi.ng conditi.ons ahich are hereby found to h~ a necessary prerequisite
l•,o the proposed us~ of. the sub,ject propect.y a.n orcier E~~ preserve the safety
and gener.al welEace oL- the C•it.i.zens of ttie Ci.ty of Anahei.m:
1. That a traffic signal as~ass~ncnt f.ee equali~:~~ the diffecence between
the indus*_ri.a.l and commercial asseUsraen~ fees sha11 be paid to the
Ca.i~y o~ Anat-eim i.n ar~ ~~mount as determined by c>>e Ci~y ~~unci'l.
Z. T.nat subject. pro~erty sh~ll be develop~d substan"i ally in accarcia~ ~~
with plans ana specificat.ions on Ei1e with the c'i.ty oF ~:na~~eim mark~~d
Fxhibi.t Nos. 1 ar.d 2.
3. That pr~ior to commencement ~f +:hc: activi.ty herei.n approvec?, cendi.tion
3,; Nos. 1 and 2, above-ment.ioned, shall be c;om,plied with.
~~;,
: F3E IT FURTHER ~iLSOLVED t:hat the Anar:eim Ci.ty Placining Commission dues
;:~ hexeby find and deter.m:i.ne that adopt.ion oF. this Resoluti~n is express~.y
gredtcated upon appJ.icant°s compl.i.a:~ce with each and all aE the conditi.ons
;~~ heretnabcve set :~'orth. Should any such conditions, ~r any pa~-t thereof ~ be
~ declarec7 i.nva:ii.d nr unenrorceable by the Einal j~.idgment o£ an1 court of
'`~1 c:ompetent jurisdi,chi~n, ttien r,his Rt?SU1~1t:i,Gn~ anci any a~provals her.ei.n
;'.~ contained, sha1J be deemed null and void.
t. --2_
~~~~ ,~
, , r:; .~
~ ,,
~ }!~'`~s`~`~~ya,~lt~ ~ "~ ~ ~
.ks~t~~s. v ;~~~ :!- ~
~~~~,: „
`.,~~
~.;.~~
~r~
;s;r
;s;
,;>~y
'i:
;r,
;,~.:
,~~
~:
~';~
PC85-2~0 ,
^`"`,
t J
- - .~ ~
~j~
~~
~'^~i y3~J~
~n i
L
~ .~f1.J
:i;~`1
~jf4
THE FOR~GOZtu; RES~LU~P10N is signed and approveG by me this 15th day a°
of September, 1986. ~ ;-0~
.< i
~, .
J'~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~'~
., , i .• ;~h;
" "~,c~ ,:';~~'~~
CHAIkMAN, A AHEIh1 CT7.'Y L'l,'VNING COMMiSSI0t3 ;' ,;,,:;'~
:~~;~
A'.C'1' E S'P :
J~ /
~~- ~' -z~~`'~~~ ..~~ .l,.~r~.~
SE RETARY PRO TEMPO°L'
ANAHEIM CI`.CY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
STATE UP CALIFQRNIA }
COUN'rY' QF ORANGC ) SS.
CI`i'Y OF ANAHEIM )
',~~
,A,,
;~~~
,4
,:;~:
,~~
~~, :~
~~:i
,;`1
<.:~ F
~ ,~~
';~,
T, Pamc~a Fi. Sh.arnes, Secre~ary oE t.he Anaheim City i~lanr,ing '-'ri
Commissiori, do hereby certiPy t~hat the £or~~gaing resolution was pas:,ed and ~~
,~~.:
adopted at a meeti.ng of the Anahe.im City Planni.ng Commi.ssion held on Sep~ember r~
15, 19~6, by khe fal.lowing vota uE the members thern~f: "~'=
:;,;~
~',
AYES: COMMTSSIONERS: BdUAS, FRY, HER1357.', LA CLAIRE, LAWICKZ, MC BURN~:Y~
MESSC ;;`
:~~
NOES: COMMISSIUNLRS: NUNF
ABSENT: COMMISSIOC]ERS: NQNE ,`i;,~
ai
~r,
IN t9I'!'NESS WH~RFOF, I have heteunto set my hand this i5th day of. "
September, 198G. ,~~?
.~;
~.'~~.lQ'.2..~'-f'/f/i~l~~ .' ,-~~,1 %~ ~ '~
,~:
CRGTARY P~70 TEMPORE '°~
ANAKEIM CITY YLANNING COMMTSSIUN 'F
~~;
~ `: 3
r;±~
;ryi
~.Y