PC 86-256:; ;
,-. •`
ltl;SOLUTI~N N0. PC86-256
~~
,~,,
~ i - 3~ ~~,~
,~~F~,
i,~~
~ t';r
~~
'; ~r,
A RESOLUTION 0~ THF~ ANAHLIM CI'!~Y PLANN7Nt3 r,UMMISSiON
'PHAT L'ETITION FQR VARIAtdCC N0. 3598 BE GRANTFD
4VEIG~tEAS, Lhc rlnaheim City Planning Commi~sion di~~ receive a vezitied
Petit.ion f.or ~lariance Prum BRYANT FINANCIAL C0121?OHATION, 3960 East ~I.'housand
Oaks Boulevar~, Thousand Oaks, CaliFornia 913G2, owner, and F3~ULEVARD
D5'V~LOPN,~;N't, 777 South t~(ain Street, S~iit;e 106, Orange, California 9266~ and
WILLDAPJ ASSOCJATES, 'l90 S~uth Anah~im Roulevard, Suite 100, Anaheim,
California 92805, agents for certain real properl-y situaked in the City of
Anaheim, Cou~~ty oF O.r~nge, SL-ate af'. Ca1:Eornia dESCribed as:
PARCELS 1 AND 2, TN THC CITY OF tiNAHF:[M, CUUN`.PY OE' ORANGN~~ STATE UF
CALIFOF2NIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FIT~ED IN DOOK 155~ PAGES 29 TO 31,
1NCLU5IVG UF 3?ARCEL MAPS, kFCC)1~DS OF URANGE COUNTY~ CALTFORNIA.
WE:EFLAS~ the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
~ L-he Civic Center in the City o1 Anaheim on September 29, a.yaF, at 1.:30 p.m.,
notic:e oF said public hear.ing having been duly glven as required ay ].aw and in
; acco-~dance with ~he pruvisions oti the A~ahei~n Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear. and c~nsider. evidence Lor and againsl- said propose~ variance and to
inv~stigate and make findings and rerommendations in c~nnection therE~with; and
WHL'REAS, said Commission, df:l:er due inspection, investigatiun anc7
study made by itselt and i~ its behalE, and after uue con,ideration of a11
evi.dence and r.eports oCfer.ed at ~aid hear.ing, does fi«d znd detnrmine the
Fol.lcwina facts:
1.. ThaL• tl~e ?etition~r oroposes waivers of. the following to
construct two, 62-lot resic~enl;ial condominiuiri sub~-3ivisions:
(a) SEC'1'TONS 18.2%.C63.012 - Minimum gara~e setback.
~ ~ 18.'1i.063.0121 (Setbacks f~r Lront-on garagas
ANL 18.27.OG3.0124 shall nct be betw~en :10 and 25 zeet
~rom f.r~nt ~~ruperty 1in4; aetbacks
between 10 and 25 feet propo5ed)
(b) SE;CTt01~S 18.31..063.020 - Minimum distances between buiid.ngs.
~ ANU 18.31.063.022 (y-foot sctback a~jacent L-o
~ interior lot lines and 18-toot setback
back between buildings requirec; 5 fNet
and 10 to 12 Pcet resQectively peoposed)
- 2, T4~aY, the above-mentiuned waiver:~ are hereby gr.ari~ed on th~ basi~
lhat t.here are Sp~CI%il circumstanc~s a~plicable t~ th~~ pro~ert,y such as size,
shape, topography, locatiun ar~d surro~anc3inys which do not aPply to other
, t~enti.cally zoned pruperty in the same vicinity; and that strict application
o~ i:he Zoning Co~~e d~prives the prc,perty of privilege~ enjoyed by other
praper.ties in the iden~ical z~~ne «nd clas~it:ication in ~~e vi.cinity,
~`,~; 0995r PC86-256
>. y.: ~ ,.. . , .
\'4\
t1ti~
t'. ~1
!~
'
~
3. Ti~at there are axceptional az extrac~rr3inary circu~nstances or
conditions apptic~ble to tt~e property involved or l-o the intended use oE the
rr~pecty that do not app.ly genera.lly ro l•he property ur C.li15s of use i.n the
same vicinit,~ ?nd zone.
4. That the requested variance is ner,essary for the preservati~~n and
enjoyment oF a substantial property right possessed by oL•her property in the
+~.
` same vi:.ini.4y and zone, and der.ied to the pr.~iperty in quesrion.
~
,:~
~:w
;
5. Th~r the reyue~ted variance will not be
materially der.rimental
to
,
the ~ublic weliare or irijur.ious to the property
or improvements it~ such
vicinity and zonz in which ~he property is 1~caL-ed.
6. That no one :ir~dicated their presence a t said public hearing in
o~position; and that no corresponclence was received in opposition to subject
~;; petition.
FNVI:UNMENTAL IMFACT F7NDING: That khe Anaheim City Planning
Comm.i.s~ion has reviewed the proposal to c~nstxuct twu, 6'l-l0~. attached
caridorain~um ~ubdivisions with waivers uf a) minimum garage setback and b)
minimum distarice between builda.n~s on an irrr:g~ilarly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 40 acres located un the easc side of Stage C~ach
Road and Camino Grand~, and on b~th siclzs of Flackamore LanE, southwest oE tY~e
inteYsertion aE Nohl Ranch Road ~Znd Serrano Avenue; an~ does her.eby ap~cove
th~e Negative Declaration upcn finding ~hat it has considered Lhe C]egativ~
Declarat•ion together w:ith any comments received during the public review
~rocess and further !`inding on the basis ot the initial sY.udy and any comments
received that thece is no substantial evidence that L-he Project wi11 havp a
sianificant ~f.fect on the envicon:»ent.
N04~1, 'PF1E~.EHORE, 3E T'I' RESOLVED that the Ananeim City Planning
C~mmiss~ion cioes hereby gtant subjecL Pet;ition ~or Variance, upor, ths following
conclitions which are her~by L-ouncl t.o be a neceasary prerequiaite to the
~YOpGSCd use oE the sub~ect ~r.operl-y in orcler ~o preserve the saEehy and
gen~ra.l welfare ~.E the Citizens o~ th~~ CiL-y of. Anaheim:
1. That prior to final tcact map approval, special facilities L-e~s shall
be paid to the Wa~er Ul-.ility Division by the developer in a~cordance
with Rule 15E3 ot th~ Water UL•i.lity Rates, Rules and itegulations.
2. That: suUject proper.ty sha11 be developpd substaritially in accordance
with p.lans and sper,iEications on ~ile with the Ci.Cy oF Anaheim matked
Exhibil No. 1.
3. 'Phat priar to L•ina:l building and ron;.ng ins~ections, Candit~~an Na. 2,
above--men~ioned, sllall be compliecl with.
B~3 i9~ r~3t2TH~R RE~OT~VED that L-he Anaheim City Planning Commission d~es
tiereby Eind and deter.mine thai: adnption uf this Resolution 15 expressly
predi.r.ated upon appli.cant'~ compliance wit" each and a11 of che conditiions
hereinabove uer. Forth. Should any such c~niii~ion, or any part ther.eoE, be
declared i~lvalid or un~r.forceable by ~he finGl judgmeni; af any court oE
campetent j~~cisr~?c~ion, then this Resolu:ion, and any approvala herein
cantained, shall be c~~emed null a-id void.
-2- PCBli-256
EN~~ r i.. .i::,: , , _~
~~, ,~ ,,....._:' ~ ; . . ~ ,: . . , ; ~ ,, _, r .~4;'i ~''~v'~r`~
;a ,.,,~,., ... :., , ,.. ~ i:(r ~. ` r
E~r~ . ... . , . Y, ',''~- ~1 t `t'
~~
"~i ~
~.,,~ .
~.,
THL FOREGOING RE:SOLU~.~ION is signed and approved by me this 29th day
5ept;ember, 1986.
.._'C~~. ~~'~"~..~';., ~ ~ ' ~,
.- `/
CHA.LRMAN, AN~~M CITY PGAN NG COMMISSIUN
AT7`~;ST:
e
~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~
~ . ` n ,r~. ~
SGCRETAR~', ANAHFIM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STkT~ Or CALTFOFtNTA )
CUUNTY OP QF2ANGE ) ss ~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Z, ~dikh L. Harris, Sacr.ntary oF tt~e Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereb~• certily thaL Che 1'~:~r.rgoi~~g re:olution was passed and
adopted at a meeting oE the Anaheim City .Flur~ning Commissian held on Se~tember
29, 1986, by the tol.lvwzng vnte oP the members t:r~~~reof•
AYES: CON1[dISSTONERS; BO[1AS, FRY, EfERBST, LAWTCK.T., MC }~URNFX, MESSE
NQEfi; CUMMTSSION~P.S: NphL
ABSENT: CUMMISSIC)NEi?S: LA CLAIRP
iN W7TNESS WNEREOE', I have hereunto ~et ~tiy hand this 2Qtli day of
SepL•Gmber, 19$6.
~ C~,L..L,`.~~,. ,~ ~ ,
SECkF.TARY~ ANAH^LM CI'i'Y PLANNIN CCMP1ISSI:Ofd
~Yrii:
n~
~` '
~~"I r
~~ i% `tl
RJ~: v~tiS t r
v:'k
~~r~,~ ~~
3 ,
~~ ~
~~rr,,
~
'~~_~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
; ~`"" ~~~ ~i''ii
, ~ ~
-~+`rr,.:y * ~
~+" r~:
~ 1
J:
p~sr..~, q 4:
, . ~~ ~~
F
'` ~;~, ,;r:,
,~ ,w,
~3-
_ ~~
~~r
E'C86-25G