PC 86-271,.
RESOI,'.1'CION N0. 1~C86-?.71
~ A R~SOLU2'IOLJ Ol' TFIG AP]AHEIM CITY PI~AN~IING COMMTSSIOIV
THAT 1'GT.TTION FOR VAHYANCE N0. 3613 BE GRAN'PEll
WH~RL•;AS,
Petitian Eor Vari
' Stre~~t, Auaheim,
Pari:ridge Street,
sikua~ed in the
described as:
the Anaheirn CiL•y Planning Cammission did receive a veriEied
ance F rom TUM EiAGV'.iHORNL AND CONNIG HAWTH~RNE, 17 %~ Par tr idge
Calif.or.nia 9280G, owners, and T,OUT~B BALLENTINE, 1775
Anaheim, California 92a06, ayenti for. cer~ain real property
City of Anaheim, Count~,~ oP Orange, State of C~liEornia
LOT 22 7.'F2ACT NQ. 9149, AS PER fdAP RECORD~D IN FiUOK 38U, PAGE 1 T~ 4
INCLiJSIVE, MTSCELL~;NE:OUS MAPS, !N THE OFFICC OF I'HG COUN2'Y NECQRDER
OF SAIll COUN'rY.
WNEREAS, ~he City P'lanning Commission did hold a public hear.ing at
t;~e Civic C~ntcr in the Ci~y of Anaheim oi2 ~ctober 27, 1986, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of :;aid ~u~lic heariny- h~v~.ng been duly given as requirEd by law an~l in
accord~ir~ce with the ucovisions of r,ize nnaheim Muni.cipal Cade, Cha~t:ex 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence £or and against said aroposed variance and to
invas~iga~e and -na.ke [indings and recomlaendations in conn~ckion tharewi.~th; and
WEIEREAS, s~aicl Commission, aEter duc: inspection, in~estigation and
study mad~ by it.selF and in its behalF, and a[ter. due consideration oF all
evidence and repcrts ofLe,red ar :;aid hearing, d<~es find aricl determine t:he
Eollowing Eacts:
1. `Ptiat the petif:.inner prv~oses Wc~7.J~rS o£ the follnwing to retain
an exi~t:ing patio cover in th~ RS-50U0 Zone:
SI~CTTON .t£3.~7.063.03q - Minimum rear yarcl se~back.
+ (Mi.nimum J.Q-Eoot set:back required; 5-foo~~
sethack existing)
2. That tf~e a~ovc;-mentior~ed weiiver i~ here~y granted on the basis
that, thezc ar.n special circumstances applic~3blc to the property such a~ size,
:~ha~e, ~opography, ].ocal•.ian and surrounding~ whicli do not apply tu otner
idenl-ical'l~ roned property iri the same vici.nity; ancl that strict ap~licatian
of the Zcniny ~:ode deE~rive~ the property of. pri~~ileges cnjoyed by other
properties in the ident.ica.l znnc and classif.i.cation in tlie vicinity.
3. That khere are excE~ptiorial or extraoriiinary circum~:ances c,r
condition~ ~p~licable t~~ ~.he properky invc~'lved or to the inzended use Qf the
property that do not 3~P1y generally to the pro~erty os class of use in thc
:;am~ vicinity anc~ zone.
~. lhat thF~ ce~.~ue:~ted v~~riance .is necessary f~r lhe preservatior~ and
enjoyment oE a substantial prnperty righ~ possesse;] by other pr~;~erty in the
same vicinity and zone, and denied to L-he property in question.
5. 'Pl~at the requested variance will nat be mater.i.ally dPtr~imrntal to
kh~ public welEare or injuri~us to the prup~rty or improvements in s~!ch
vicinity ~nd zone in which the pr.operty i.s iocated.
09G3r PCBf-271
.. ., .. . . ,:;
r , . . _.
~'Xr•
,,
..M~.,,
~
'-.;C
6. `~hat no one indicated theic presence ak sai.cl public heari.ng in
opposition; and that no corcespondence wa.s received in appositiori to subjec:t
petitior..
ENVIK~NMENTAL IPIPRC'P F.l'NDING: The Planniny Director or his
authori.zed represenr_~r.ive has det~rmined that ti~e proposed pro;ect Eails
within the definition ~f Categorica~ Exemptions, C1ass 3, as deLined in the
SraNP c~IR Guide~.ina~ and is, L•L~eref.ore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to pcepa~e ~~n ~7R.
NUW, ~H)3RFFORE, BB IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P.lai~nir.y
Commissiori does herehy grant subjerr. Petit:~on fur Variance, upon the fo.llowing
condit~ions which are hereby found to l~e a nr~cessary prerequisit~e t~ the
proposed use of. t_he subject pro~erty in or~er to preserve tt~e safeky and
general welfare of th~ Citizens oF rhe City of Ar.aheim:
1. That subject properr,y shall be develuped subsrantial.lx in accordance
with plans and specificar_ions on file with the City o~ Anahei~n marked
Exhibil: Nos. 1 attd 2.
BL IT PURTH~R RESOLVGU khat: the AnahE.im Cit.y Planning Camm:ission does
hereby £ind and determine ttiat <~dopkion of t-.k~is ltesolur.ion iw expressly
predicated ~.~pon applicant's compliance with each and all af the conditions
hereinaUove set Forth. Should ~ny such condition, ur a~~~~ part ehereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgrnent oE any court of
conpetent jurisdi.ction, ~.hen this Resolu'•.i~n, and any approvals hPr:=tn
cont:a.Lned, sh4i11 be deemed null and void.
'PHE FOI2GGOING RGSOLU'I'ION is signed and ~pNeaved by me this 27th day
o~' OctobEr, 1986.
c.C ') .~'>/ i.: ..
. ~.~..ir.Gl~.~ ~,, L~,~~ ~," ;-^'';'"~' /:,
CHAIRMAN, ANAH~IM CI'PYT i~LAj~1tJING COM.MTSSIO[J
ATTEST:
!~ -~-J •
~ ~_
SECR~TAR'l, NAHEIhI ~ITY I?LA IdTNG COMM2SSIUN
S'l~iATE OF C~~LI['ORNIA )
COU[~'PY OF ORANGE ) ss ~
(:ITY Ob' ANAHL•'IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, 5ecr~~hary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, c7~~ hereby cerr.ify tha-: t.he Poregoing r?soluti~n wa~ passed and
adopted at a meerinq oL the Anahei.m ~it~~ P]anni.ny Commi~sion held on October
2'l, 198fi, by the E~i:. -~-~i ny vor.e oE the membcrs rhereof :
AYES: CqMMiSSI0t7ERS: BU~:.. C12Y, HER35'P, LA CLATRE, LAWTCK.I,
h1C BURt~_~.'!, MESSG
NOE~: CUf4MISSIUNGRS: NONE
ABSENT: COh1MISSIONERS: NUtdE
IN WITNESS WHERL~F, I ha~~_ hereuntu set my tiand this 27i:h day of
Octc,ber, 1986.
, ~Ll r-_ ,~_,_,_,~~~~w' , „ , ~~
~;ECl~F'PARY, ANAHEIM CITY L~LADININ(i COMMZSSION
-2- PC36-271.
~
;~.
''i
~G