PC 86-294~{~+4~
RESOLUTZON N0. PC86-294
A RG60LUTION OF TEIE ANAHETM CTTY PLANNTNG COMMXSSION
DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USG ELF:MGNT OF TEIE ~
GENERAL PLAN - DESIGNATEP AS GENE.RAL PL'AN AMENDMENT ivu. 221
WHER~AS, ~he City Council oE ~he City oE Anaheim did adopt t.he
Anah~im General. Plan by Re~o.lutian C~o. b~R-644, showiny the c~Qneral
desr.ription and ext:ent of possi~le Euture developmEn~ within the Cit~~, and
WHERCAS, the city s~aif ~:repa red a General Plan Amendment for an
area car~~is~iny of approxim~;t-.ely 6.3 acres located on th~ east side of
Fairmo-~~ Bouievard , approximately 1,000 feet. sout.h of Santa Ari a Canyon Road;
and
~~1
. •:l;~~~
;~~Y
WEiERFAB~, the Planning Departmenr dee~ed it appr•opriatE, pursuant to j~
the provisions of tne CaliL"ornia F.nvirur~mental Qu~liGy Act, after review of `~
r_he prooosal ~nd
~ ; Tnitial St~ady and f~nding na significant environmental
-;;
;.
~ impact, thak a Neg ativca Dcclar.ation be appr.oved; and .
~,.
ti' 4JHLREAS, t•hp An~xtaeim Cit.y Planning Cornmission did ho1~3 a publi~
~ hearit~g at the Anaheim Ci~~ic Cent-er, C aincil Chamber, 200 South Anaheim
Rouleoard, an tvovember 24, 198G, at 6;30 p.m., notice o.f said public; hearing `'~1
. havir?g been duly given as required by Iaw ancl in accordanee ~aitb the
~ proviaion~ oL t-he A~iah~im Municipal Code, r..o hear and consider evidence for ~~;
and agaxnst a~id Amerdment to the Anahei~ Genera]. Plan and tc~ investigat~ and .
~.
;~;
make Eind.i.ng~ and recommendations in cann~~tion t~.h~rewitn; and ,
,,,
WHEREAS~ ~~id Commission, aEter due consa.der.ation, insgec~ion,
investigation and stud,y macie by i~.self, and aE~er due consideration o£ a11
evidence and reporls oI'rered ah. said heazing~ DOES H~KFHY FlNU:
1. 'Phat- sufP.icient evidence was not-. presenhEd to substantiate the
nc•ed for an amNndment tc, the Anaheim General P1an at this kime.
2 ~'PF~ah. an amendment. t.o rhe Ar~aheim Genersl Plan d~;signating the
prc~perty for Hillside Mcdium Density Residential would set an
undesirabl.e prececlent ah. ~his time since lhe[e arE serious
rraffic qi~estions which l~ave nok been adequately a~dressedo
3. Thar. tYie propos~d HiZlside t7?diuir Uensity ltesidential d~siynation
is incom~atible with the sue~:ounding Eiillside Eshate Den~it,y
Resid~ntial la~ld usas. Thc reLorp, no change adopr_ed for ti~~:
suUjeck ~tudy area.
4, 'thar 2~. persor,s indicated tneir presence ah khe 5eptembec 29, ~~~'~
.,;";Y
1986 meetin~ and 38 peop].e ir~r?ica"ed their presencF at said ".'
public heari.nc~ in oppositionJ and ~~7ak petit~inns containir.g ;i~,~
approxi.mately 91 signat.ures an~ aporo. iiudtely 20 lehtPrs were ~''
;
'; received in np~oyirion r.o subject petit.i~n. ;,;~,
i;,
'.';
,: ~~
~ $0991r
~
.~;, ~ ,.~'
'~i
•s ?
,.?~:~v„~.. : ~ , _ ,,, _ , , . . . __ .. .. .. . '~~~.
~
) y }4`
~ , . . r.1i_~I
, . ~ . ~.,~~ ~ ..r,p~4 Y~i',
; ""~ 3,'Y
. ~ ~,.~.~.~
. . ~,::~,'.i
L•' iMGNTAL, IN;k~ACT FINDING: Tha~ ~he Anaheim City Planning
~'ommission ~ r~viewed the prop~sal to amend htie Anaheim General Plan
desi.gnatior r.~m Hillside E~~a~e Density Re~idential designation tu Hillside
Medium De~• ty Residential on ari irregularl,y-sha~ed E~arcel of la.nd consi~ting
of apprr ~~a~.ely 6.3 acres lacated on the east sie f Fairmorii: Bc~ulevard,
approxirr ely 1,000 feet south ~f Sai~ta Ana Canyon P.oad; and does hezaby
approve r.he Ne~atiVP Declarat:ion upon findiny that it has considered the
Negative Decl.aration togeth~r caith any cominents recei.ved during r.he public
re~~iew process and further. Eindiny on the hasis of the rnitial Study and any
comments received that there is no substaritia.l evidence that the project will
have a signif.icant eFfect oi~ rhe environment.
NOh', THERE~O~2E, BE IT RESOLVF~D, that pur.suant to ~.he Foregoi.ng
findings, the Anahsim Cit~ Planniny Commission does hereby deny Genera.l Plan
Amendmenl• No. 221.
THB EOREGOING RESOLU'!'ION is s
oE Novernber , 198G ~
->
~`='
~-:~.
,~.:- " r -
CHAIRMAN~
igned ,snc7 a~proved by me hh~s 24th day
r- ,~~:,... -_~.,.
~ ~ ~~~' _~
ANAHCI CI'PY P.LANNiU~ CO6IMISSION
/
ATTES'P: ~
~j ~ b!
/ ~ ti~
SECRET RY~ ANAHE:[ht CITY PLANNING COMMISS:~ON
STATE OF CALIEORNI.A )
Cc7UN'PY OE ORANGr ) ss.
CT'~'Y U1 ANAHEIM )
I, Edihh L. Elarris, Secretary of hhe Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do here~y certify +~.na~ th,~ i'orEgoing re:olution was passed and
atlopted at a meer.iny of- t.he Anah~im City Planning ~ommis~ion hPld on November
2~, 1986, by the fo.llowing vote o[ th~: member~s therea£:
AYES: COMMISSlONERS: BOUAS, F.[2Y, HGRBST, GA CLAI,RE, L~.WICKI, MC BURNEY,
MLSSE
NUES: CUNIMI6SIQNf:R~: NONE
AbSENT: COMldISSIO[J~,NS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHE.t2E0F, I have hereunto set my haric3 this 24r,~ d~~• of
tdovember, 191i6.
.
d~-~( ..~~~ ~~
~~ _,L~~c~t~.:,
SECR[;2'ARY, ANAHL•'IM CITY PLANNING CUi~1MISSION
-2-
~