PC 86-299~' i
RCSOLUTIUN NQ. PC$6-299
^'1.
A RESOLU'i'ION OC '~HE ANAHEI:I CITY PLAIaNING COf~IMISSIQN
THAT P~'TI`PION FqR VA,,TAN(~E N0. 3611 BE CRANTED
WHEFtE;AS, the Anaheim City Plannirig Commission did receive u verified
,I: Petitior. F.or Variance from ilUGO A. VAZ~USZ, ET AL., 2240 West Lincoln Avenue,
V~~...
:~ Anahei.m, Calif•ornia 92Q01, owners of certain real proper~y sitiua~ed in the
;,
City of Anahcim, County of Orange~ State of Califo.rnia d~scribed as:
DEGINNING A'P ~HG [~G CORNCR OF Tf1E W 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4
OE' TH~ NE 1/4 OF SCC~l'ION lII TOWNSIiIP ~S R10W JN 'PHE RANCHq LOu
COYO'PPS IN THG C.ITY OF ANAHE [M, CdUNTY OF ORAtiGE ~ STA'PE OF
CALIEORNIA, pER M.Ap IN HOUK 51 PAGL 10 UF M.M. THENC~ S 0° 07' 36"
E 66.01 HEET; 7'HENCE S Sa° 58' QO" W 164.00 FEGTp TIiENCE S 0° 07'
30" E 85.OU fEE'P TO THE TRUL•', POINT OF HLGINNING; THENCE S 0° 07' 36"
E 193.04 FrET; THEhCE S 88° 58' 00° W 176.U(i EFET; '~'i-1ENC.E N 0° 07y
36" 6J 190.00 PEET; 'Z'Ei~NCE N$8° 58' 00" E 40.OG FErT; THFNrE [V po
07` 36" W 5.Oa ~EET; '.CHENCE N f3$° 5$~ C'p" G 136~00 FEET TU THE ~r~tuL
POZNT OF' BEGINN:[NG, SAID PARCGL CONTAIN.,iVG 34,Oa0 SQUARE FEET OF
U.7ki ACRES.
. . : ~~....,, F I
WIiEREAS, the City Planning Commissi.on did hold a pub].ic hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 'l7, 1986, at 1:30 p.tn.,
notice of said public hearinc~ having been duiy given as required by .1aw and in
~~cordance with the provisi.o~is of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said prop~~se~~ variance and to
investigate and make firidinys ,~nd re~ommen~ations in conne~tion t:herewith;
said public heari.ng having been cont.inucd to the Planning C~mmission meetin,g
of. Decem~er 8, ].9g6; and
'~ WHE.RF~S, sai.d Commission, after due inspec!:ion, investigation and
~ study made by it~elf arid in its beh~lf, and after du~ considerat::ic~n of all
" evi.dence and reports off.ered at said hearing, does Pind and determine the
;~ followiny facts:
1. That the ~etit-ioner proposes waiver of the foll.otainq to
co~struct a 3-s'tory, 34-uniL• "~L•fordable" apartment cnmplex:
~~,
:~
,.~.
(a) SE~TTON 1$.01.130 - Re uired lut frontaye. ~`.
,`:;:
(fron~age on dedicated street or a.llev ~',,;!
required; no street ar alley fronta~e proposed) ~"
._ ,a
(b) SECTION .1g.34.061.010 - Minimu_ m~ site area ~Er dwelling unxt. ~~
(].7.00 ~quare feet per dwe].ling unit required; ~
94U square fee~ pez dwelZinq unit proposed) ~,
(c) SE;~:'rror~s 18.3h.p62.0i1 - Maximum buil~ing hei~hc,
(2 st`ories at 3lt feet hi.gh permitted;
3 sCOries at 35 f:eet prop~sed)
(d} ~ECTTUN 18.34.OG2.02U - Maximum site r_overac~.
~ (558 permitted; 77~ proposed)
099 '-
PC86-•299
= ~~t~~~~~
;t?
, ~'~ir~,~~'?~I
~i~;
'~
i ~?
~~
~.,, ~
2. Thr.t the abov~-rn~nl•ionec3 waiver:; (a)- (~) and (d) are hereby
gr.anted on the basis that ther.e are special c.irc:umstar~ces ap~licable ~o the
properry su~h a5 size, shape, topography, locatiur~ and surr~undinys which do
not apply to oL1~er identically zoned pro~er.ty ~n hhp same vicinity; and that
strict apFlicati.on of the Zoning Code deprives the propertY ~~ privileges
enjoyed by o~her nroperties in the idPntical zone ~nd classi.fication in the
vicxni~y.
3. T}~at the above-menl-ioned waiver (b) is hexeby gr~nt~:d under
author.ity of Califurn~~~ Government Code Section No. G5915,
4. That thare are ~xceptianal or exl•raordinary ci:cumstances or
conditiuns ~pplicable i~o th~ pro~erty .involved or ~c, the intended use o~ the
proper~y that do n~l: apply generally to l•he property or r.l~ss oE use in the
same vicinit:y and zone.
5~ ~i'hat the requ~stec3 variance is nectsaaey
anr3 enjoyment of a subst-ancial propert,y cight possessed
the same viciniky and zone, and denied Co the praperly in
~• That L-he requested variance will not be n
l-o the public welFnre or injurious to trie property or
vi~~inii:y and zona in which the property is located.
for thE preserva~i~r.
bY o~her proper.L•y in
question.
~aterially cie~ri~nental
improvements in such
7. ~hat one pers~n indieatt~d his ;~resence ac said public l~earing in
Qpposikion; and that no curresponclence was receivF~d in opposition to subjec~.
pekitior~.
EN~IIRONMENTAL TMPACT ~YNllIr'G; That the Anuheim City Planning
C~mmission has reviewed the proposal Lo reclassiiy L-he reorther.ly 178 feet of
SubjecL- property Frum th~ CL (C~mmercial, Limi~ed) zone to the RM,-12U0
(Resrdential, Mu].Li~le-E'amily) Zone arid to construct a 3-story, 34--unit
"affordable" apartment complex undPr authorit~l oE Cal.ifornia Governmer-t Code
Section No. 55915 with waivers ot required lot frontage, ii~inimum site area per
dwelling unit, maxirnurn builcling height anr] mar.imum Site coverage on a
cectangularlk-shaped parce:l o~ land con~isting of appro~imat;ely 0.76 acres on
l•he south side o£ Linc~ln Avenac, and turther de~cribed a~ 2240 West Linco.ln
Avenue; and doQs hereby appr~ve the Clegative Declaration upon f.inding that it
has con~idered Ehe Plegative Leclaration together with any contmetlL•s received
d~lzing th~ public revie~v ptocess and furth~r firid.ing on the basis cF the
initial study arid any ~omm:~n`s receivecl that tnere is no ~ubstantial evidence
~h~t fihe project wi11 have a signi.ficant raffect on ttie environment.
NOW, THERhFORE, BE IT RESOLVEU L-t7at the Anaheim City Planning
Commis~;ion does 17ereby yrant subject Petition for ~/ariance, upon the fallowing
condi.tions which are l7ereby fouac7 to be a;-tcessar.~+ prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject pr~perty in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare oE the Ci.tizens uf ;:he City ~£ Anah~im:
1. That prior tc~ issuance
recreation in-lieu fees
amount as determined by
of. a building permit~
~hal.l be pai~9 to th~
the CiL•y Council.
-2-
apprapriate gark and
City of P.naheim in an
PC86-299
,; .
~:
,,,
' :.
i
i
'
~ -i
"; ~
1
~
:~:i
a.
That pri~r to issuance of a building permit, the appropciate trafPic
signal assess~nent Eee sha11 b~ paid to the City ~f Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council.
3. That gates shall nat be insLalled across any drxveway or private
street in a manner which may adverselu aff_ect vehicular traffic in
tne a~jacecit ~ublic stteet{s). Installation of any gates s~~all
r.onfor-n to ~ngineering Stand~rd ~.lan No. 402 and sub~ect to the
review and approval of the ~ity Traf-f.i~ Etigineer.
~, That all dciveways sha11 be constructed ar reconstructed t~
accommodatE ten (lU) foat radius ~urb returns as required 5y the City
TzaPfi~ Engineer.
5. That the proposed parking sL•r~zcture design sha11 contorm to
~ngineerin~ Sta~dard Plan N~. ~~02-A pectaininy to standard details
~or paricing structures.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a m~nner
satisE~ctory L-o the City Engineer.
7. That si.ibject property sha1..1 be setvec by underground utilities.
8. That prior to commencement of structural frami~;g, fire hy,9rants shall
be instailed and ch~rged as required anc3 determi.ned ~o I:>e necessary
by the ChieF of- ttie Fire llepartment.
9. Tr~at trash storaye ar. eas st~a11 be providec3 and maintained i~i
accordance wi.t:h approved p.lans on Eile r:il•h the 5treer Main~enance
an~ Sani.t.ation Uivision.
10. That L-l~iis Variance is granted subjec~ to the aclopti.on af l:he Zoaing
Oidinance ii~ connection with Recl~ssifiration No. 86-87-~.4, now
pending.
11.. That fi re .,}~rinklers st~a11 be ~.nsL•~l:l.ed as required by the City Fire
Matshall.
12. That prior to issulnce of building ~ermi.ts, tha applicant sha11
present evider~ce sa~i.sfactory l•o the ChieF Building inspector that
the ~roposed ~~ro7ect is in conformance ~aith Counc~tl Policy Number 542
'Saund P.ttenuation in Residenti.a.l ~r~j~cty" and wil:h Noise Scisulation
Standards spe<:iL-.ied in l•.he California Administrative Cocie, Tztle ?.5.
13. Thati prior to is~uaiice oF a bui.ldxng permit, r.evised p.lans sha11 be
subrni.tted showing the relocation anr~ alignmer-t of al.l driveways,
dimensioning af a.ll ~:ypical par.king spaces, and showir~y all gr.ades
for. underground parking ,tructure l•o be satisfact~ey to the City
Traffic Engineer.
14. That Uubject property shall be deveio~ed substantia.l.ly in accordance
with plans and spPCific.~tions on file with the City of Anaheim mar~ked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
15. Th~: prior to Linal buildin,y and zuning inspecti.ons, C~nditinn Nos.
3, ~, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 14, above-m~ntioned, shall be comp].ied wzth.
-3- PC85-299
':;;f
`r
,. ~ ~.
',;y
~~
;;
• ~;:
_ ;:<;;
,t
,,
;.~,•;n
:; •~:ti
~~
a~ IT E'URiHGR RESOf,VED that the Anahelm City Plunninq Commission does
hereby fir;d and deter.mine th~~ adoption of this R~solu~ion is expressly
predicated upon applicant°s compliance wi~h each and all o~ the conditions
hereinabove set f~rtn. Shaulc9 any such condition, or any part there~F, be
declared invalid or une~iforceable by the Einal judgment of any courc of
competent jurisclic.tion, then tt~is Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shal.l be deemed null and void.
TEiE ~ORLGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 8tn aay of
December~ 1986.
..~' ~ ~ . ,~,-~,., d ~
r - . ~ ~rr~`
--- ~f-~- r~:..:~:~~
CIiAIRMAN, ANA ~ IM . Y PI~1~Id :INN u COMMJ:SSION
A'rTEST :
~ " ~ I .
/
SFCRETARX, ANAHEIM CITY PLAN[~ING COMNiIS~ION ,
STA'PE OE CF~LIFORI~IA }
COIINTY OF ORRNGE ) s~.
CITY GF ANAHETM )
T, Edith L. Harris, Sectetary oE the Anaheim City Planning
Commissioiz, do hereby certify that thP fure;oinq resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting ~f ~he Anaheim City Planning Cc~mmi.ssion held on December
8, 1986, by the fol.lowing voL•e of th~ members the~eof:
AYES; (:ON,MISSIOP?ERS: BUUA.S, FRXp HERBS'P, LA CLAIRE, LAWICKI, MC DURN~'Y
~fESSE
NUES: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMTSSTONERS: NONF.
IN WITI~ESS WHEP.EOF, I nave k~ereunto set my hacid khis 8tti day of
December, 1y~6.
,
-, c~.c-.,,.G~~ ~ / _
SLCRETAP.Y, ANAH~IM CI`.I'Y PLANNING COMMtSS~QN
"4' PC86-299