PC 86-304,
~~
R~;SULUTI011 N0. PC86--304
~.h~~i
I,.
: ~ .'.:.~:.~J
`; I
~, tit
A R.ESOL' UTION OF TH~ ANA1~E; ~M CITY E~LANNING CO6IMISSION
'PHAT PETITION FQR VARIANCF N0. 3023 BE GP.AN'rED
WHER~AS, the Anaheim City Planninq Comrt~ission did recei.ve a verified
Petition for Variance from ROBk;RT T. BRAVO, FREEMAN W. OF~EHS ANU pNNIE C.
~WGNS, 2451 4v'est Mall Avenuer Anaheim, Calzf-ornia 9?.8Q9, ownets nf certain
real pr.operty situated ia the City oE Anaheim, Caunty o£ Orange, State of
California descr.ibed as:
LUT 96 OI' TRACT 19A0, AS PER h~AP RTCORll~ll IN SUOK 82 PAGES 8, 9
ACID ~0 OF MISCELLANFOUS MAPS, IN THE UFFICE UF THE COUNTY
RF~QI2DLR OI' SAID COUNT.Y o
WHEkEAS, ti:e City r.~anriing Commissinn did hold a public hearir~g ~t the
Civic Center in Lhe City of A~aheim on December 8, 1986, ai: 1:30 a.m., notice
of said pub" :c r,eai _:ig having beer~ clul,y given as rec;~lirecl by law and in
accordance with the ~,rovi.sions dP the Anaheim Muniripal Code, Chapter 18.03, tc.~
hear and consider evidence ~ and againsL- sai.d proposed variance and to
investigat~ and make findings ~ r.eco~rmendations in c~nnec~'on thecewith; and
WH~;REAS, s~id Commission, aft, r due inspection, inve~tigal-iun an~' ~1:~:~y
made by itselr and in its bcralf, and afker due c~nsi.c~erakion of all evide:~ce
aitd reports offe~ed at said hearing, does f:ind an~ ~3etermine the foll.owing
F_acts;
1. That the peti.tioner pro~oscs waiver of the following to retain ar-
addition to a single-~amily resic~ence:
SECTIUe7 18.?.G.063.030 - Minimum rear yard setback._ '`~~~
- .~a
(10 feet reqsired; 6 E~et e~tisting) ;';~
2. Thal the above-mentzoned waivsr i., hereby gcanted on the basis that~ .;~f
therc ar.e specia.l circumstanc~s applicable to the property such as s.ize, shape, i'S
,;,:
topography, local:ion and surroundings w}~:icti do not apply ~o othez identically
zonPd property in the same vicinity; and that strict appli.~ation of the Zoning
C~de deprives L-h~~ property c~f ~+rivileyes enjoyed by otner prdperties in L•he
identical. zone and classiEicati~n in ~ne vicinity. "~
3. That tt7,~ CE'CSIl~StFd vari ance is hereby granted subjecF to
petit±oner's sti.pul~.tion at the public hearir~g to either paint or cemcv~ the
itnsiyhtly shec~ curzently lo~ated two Eeet .~r.om the r-~rth property line; and
further to r~move a11 unsi~Y~t.ly building materi.als currently stoced on the roof
o~' the shed.
A. 'Phat thFre arP excepkiana.l or exkraordinary circumstances or
cond.it.ions applicable to the property involveci or to the intended use of the
pr~~erty that do not ~pply generally to tP:e property or class of use in the
same vicini.ty and zone.
5. '"ha~ the requested vacia~ce i.s necP3sary for the ~r~servati~n and `'~
enjoyment of a gubs~antial property cight possessed by other property in the
same vicinity and zane, and denied to ~h~ proper.l:y in questi~r~.
1001r
PC86-~304
~ ~,
',%
;;'."
'v;
,~
,
t ~,
, , ,. . _ , . . . . _ .. , ._ .;_,...u~acrs
,.~-~.
G. 7.'hat l-.he requesr.ed variance will nc~h. bc ma~er.i,al.ly detrimental to
~he pLbJ.ic wel£are or iniurio~as t~ the praperLy or lm~r~vements in ~uch
virinity and zonE~ ln wh~.ch tYie p[operty i.y lor,at:ed.
7. 'PhaL no one i.c~dicutec~ L•h~ir pre~ience at said ~ublic r~earing in
op~osi.t.ion; and ~:hat one .ier.tr~r wa3 rcceived i.n npposition to subjecC petition.
L•'NVikONMF:N'rAf. ~MPAC~P E It~DTNG: The Planning Uirer.Lor or hi~
auth~~cized repcF.~entativF has iletermined that Y,he px~posed project Ea.l1s
within Che definition oE Cat~gori.cal ~xemptionn, Cl.a~s 5, as deEi.neu in rhe
St.~te F.'ift Guic~elir.e3 and is, cherefore, ca~eguric4.lly exempt Lrom the
reguire~nent tc prepare ar. [:tR.
NOW, THERF;FORG, Ei~: 't'P RESO[,V~u tha~ the Anaheim City Planning
Commi:~sion does hereby grauc subject, t~etition for Vaziance, upon the Eol.lowing
condiLion~ wtiich are heceby founc3 to be a ner.essacy ~cc.re~uisite Lo thta
pr~_~osed u~e of the subject pc~pec~y in ord~r to preserve tt-e saEety and
yener.al welfare of th~~ Citf.zens of the CiL•y of Anaheim:
1. Ttiat subjecL property shall be developcd substantially in accordance
ti~i~h p.lans an~: s~eciticati.ons on file with the City of An~heim marke~]
Exhibit No. 1.
2. Tnat tEie unsight.ly sl~«~d currently ~o:ate~i Ewo (2) ieet from the nori:h
property line shal.l be cir.her painted or renwved.
1. Th~t the uns~ghtly huildi7g matectal~ c:ucrE~ntly storer:i on the rooE oE
thr•. b.tildi.ng :;hall ae removed.
E3B Z'[' NURTHGR RF,SOLVf:J thar_ tne Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find a7c: determine Lhat adoption o[ thi3 Re~olution is expressl~+
pceciicated upon ap~1:.~:~Ilt's co;n~ifanc~~ with each and all oi th~ conditions
here±nahove set ~ortt,. Should an:~ such cor,dition, or any part t•~~eteof, be
declared invalid or ~.m enEorceeble by the Eina1 judymanr. of any court of
compecent jurisd.tcti~~n, th~~n tt~is R~301Ut1Uf1~ and any app[~vals herein
cc~nt.aine~, shall be deemed n~l.l and void.
i
:~ ~ ~~~~~.~
SF.CHETAZ_, I,NAHc:IM ':iTY PLANNLNG ~~MMLSS.Ot3
....-~ , '
i ~v~ /" ; ., ~l J
l:ilA~~ JA nh '~' I`P~ LANNI/ 'COMNSISgION
A'P't' e, ST ; '
'~f{E EURE~~OIN~~ 1:L•'SOLUTLUN i.: ~i~3nec] and approved by me this ~th da,y ~f.
necer~b~r, 1986.
~~ .
~ ~ _~_ pC66-soa
'', ,r..,
s~a,xr•, or cnt,2FORNiA ?
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Gy,
CIY'Y OE' ANAz1EIM )
I, Edith 1_~. Hai~ris, Secretary of the An~h~im City Plannir~g
Commiasion, do hereby cectify that the Fotegoing reso.lution w~~ passed and
adopte~3 at : mN~ting o~ the Anaii~im City Planning Commissi.on held on December
8, 198G, by t~e fallowing votc of.' the mernbers thc~r~of:
~x~S: COMMtSSION~RS: BQUAS~ F'RY, HERpST, LA CLAIR~, LAWTCKI~ MC 9URNF.Y
NOF.S: COMMYSSIONE;RS: NONE
A^SEN'P: COMMISSIONGRS; ML•'SSE
IN WTTNESg WF1GR~:OF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3th day o~E
December, 1986.
-_.~ _ .~' ,, ~
SErRE"'ARY~ At;A~ ITY F'LAN__~"'~~~._.._
CUMI~II SSI ON
-3-
PC86~3b4