PC 86-35RESOLU'; ION N0. P:.'86-J5
A RLSOLU`PION OE 'PHB ANAHEI[9 CTTY PLANNING CONIMISSlON ADOPTING
AND REC:UMNII;NDT~G TO 'PHL CI`PY CUUNCII, OL' TIiE CITY UF ANAEIEIM
ADOP'PIOid Oh ~ENERAL PLAN Ah1L•'NllMLN7' NO. 20 %- RTUING AND HZKII~G TRF+ILS
pOR`iiUN OE' '1HE; I:hVIRONMf;NTAL RGSOUI2CF AND NA[dAGE:6IFNT ELEMEy'.C
~r~HEREAS, the C:i'r.}~ c:ouneil ot t'r~e City oL Anatiei.m did aclap~ the
AnaY~eim General P:lan k~y ResoJ.ution No. 69R-644, showing ~he generzl
clescri~tion and ex~ent of possible future clevelopment withi.n the Cit,y; and
iJkiL•'NL•'l1S, on Ju1y 3, 19E3~, the City Council approved an update and
cor~solid~tion of_ aIl elements oi t~he General P.lan; ~nJ the Riding and Hi.lcing
Trai'ls ~~ler~enl- was CUIIt}~zrr W1th th~ Consa: ~ation, Open Space and Recr~atiun
hl~ments to fU[tr~ tne Lnvi~ ental ResUUrCe and Planagemer~c B].ement; and
WHI;RE;AS, the Equest~ian aiid Flikiny lrails Portion ot the
Environmental R~source and tf~anagemenl; Element was pr.~pared to guid~ the
d~~v~lopnient ot an interconnect~d sysLem c~t equestcian and hiking trails; and
WHEREAS, pursuant t-o a requ~st ~com the proNerty owner foc a ren~ra.l
Plar, Amendinent SLudy, City staf~ ~~rr:U~red ~~ G~~neral Plan Amen~im~.nt for
deletion of the Nohl kanr.h `i'rail, e~t:ending fC~~IlI Santa Ana Canyori Raact belween
Peralta E:i 11~ U~ive and Nohl Can,yun Itoad La the L~alceview Tr~ai.l; the por~ion of
t;h~ Four c:orners Tr~il pxtendi.ng fram the Lakeview TraiJ. to Royal Oak Ruad
between Honeywo~d I~ane anci tJohl. kanch Itoaci; anci Lh~ porCion oP the Lafceview
~Prai.l exL-endinq ~rom Peralla El.ill~ Drive to Nohl R~~nch Road where it
inLersects with t•ie; '~> Avenue; ~ria
WHLRI~AS, thc I~lann.iny liepa~L-ment dec:med it a~proprir~L~~, ~ursuant to
t,ie ~~rovisions of tl~e: C:alitornxa Environrnenta.l Qua1.iL•y Act, t:hat che project
will have Il0 ~i.ynil.i.cank et.~ect: on the envirunment .ancl therefore a Negativ~
Ue~:.la[~ti4n should be ~i~proveci; and
WNL•'RLAS, the Anaheirn C~ ty l~lanni.ng Comm.ission dad hold a public
hearing at L•he Anaheiin Ci.vic Center, Councii Chaml~er., ?.00 South Anaheim
I3oulevard, o:i January 2U, 1986, at .l::;U N.m., notice of sai~~ ~ublic hearir.q
hav.ing been dul.y qiv~~n as~ req~i~recJ by law and in accordance with the
~:,covisions ok the Anaheim l•lunicipal ~ode, to h~~ar and c~nsidec evidence for
and against . aid AtT~endment to the Anaheitn Ger~eral Flan and Lo investigate znc]
make f:indings and rECG!11P1E(llldrl~JllS in connecti.or~ ttierewith; and snid pub.lic
heacing ::~ving been c~nt.inued tc~ lhe Pl~nning Cominission neeting at February
3, 1y86: and
l^lFIL•'ftEA5, ~ai.d Com~aission, aftcr clue con:~ideration, Lnspection,
invest:gat.ion and sl-ady made by iL-se.it, anc3 after due consi~;3~_•ration of all
evidence and repc~rt:s cffe,.ed at .%~id he.ari.ng, DOES HL•'kEBY I~Itd~:
1. 'Ptial :>iii[icient evic.9ence was pces~n*_ed whi.ch substantiate~r~ the
ne~d ivr. ar~ amendmtnt ~o the Anaheiin Genera.l P.lan, anc3 it ia dPemed
' appcopriate L•hat "Exhibit e" k~e adopte~3, deleting ~.he entire Noh7. Ranch Tcail,
" and potl.ionr oE the Laket~icw ancl F'our CoCners Trai.l:s.
~ .
y~.
.r' ,
,:, .
PC86-3~
070)r
. r,
'~", ;
- ~ s
~~
_.,.
~~~~. . , ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~}ti,p~E~~~~
,~, ;,;;!ti
!"i ~!L.
•,~
"+
N~W, THEREI'O~E, HG I'P RESOLVGI'i, khat the hnaheim CiLy Planning
Commissiun has reviewed L-he pruposal l•.o amend t:he Riding and Hiking Trails
portion oL the ~m~ironmental Resource an~.f Manayemenk L1er~ent of the General
Plan aelet.ir~g l-t~e entire NohJ. Ra7r_t~ Trai.l, exkending trom 5ar~ta Ana Canyon
Ruad between Pera:lta I-!i11s Drivc and Nohl. Can~yon ttoad to Che Lakeview Tra.il;
the port.ion of the k'our Corners 'i'rail extending ~rom the Lakeview Trail to
` Royal Uak Ftoad betwecn Eioneywood Lane anc] Nohl Ranch R~ad; and thL~ portion of
~ the Lal:eview TLail extencling krom Peralta Efi11s Drit+e ta Nuhl Ranch R~ad where
it intersects witt~ ,Ieats Aven.ue; and does hereL~y apt~r~~~E the Negative
Declaration upor~ Yindir.g tr~ar_ ;,t }~as consiclered the Negative Declaration
t~gether witt~ any comment5 recei.ved ~luring the public r.eview process and
Lurther finding OIl che basis of the iiiitia.l stucly and ,any comment~ recei~ed
that r_~~~r~ is no suk~stanl•ia.l evidence ~hat tl~e F>roject will have a significant
effect on the envirunmc~nL.
Il1; I'i' F'UR"1'tiLk Rk~SULV'r;U t;ha~ pu:suant to the Eureyoir.g findings, the
Anaheim Cit~~ Plannin~ C~mmi.ssiun ~~rs hereby arlopt and recommend to the City
c:o~mcil ok tt~~ c:ity r~~ Anaheim adoption o1 General Plan Amendment No. 2Q7 -
F.:~hibit fi.
'1'Hi: FURLGUINC RE;SU~U'~IUtv i.s signed and appraved by me khis 3rd day of
r'~_~I~ruary 3, .1984.
J `, ~ ,? ..
L~l~~.-r%.~_, , % ,~~ ,
L'EiATRWUMAN, ANAH.GIPt 'I'PY P r~NNING CUb1FiTSSTON
A:i'TL•'u'i`: )
_ ~ J.~~x~.r.~efb.~~l. ') ,~_~~~ _,
5L•'CF,tL•"1'ARY, AN:`.F?E1M CI'PY ~'LAD~NINu CGt1DtTSSIC?[v
S',CATL UI' CALIE'URNIA )
CUU[Jl'Y 01' CEtANCL•' ) ss.
Ci`PY OG' ~NAfiL•'IPt )
G t, E:r]ith I.. Harr~s , Sccr.atacy ot ~h~. 1~narieim City Planninq
c;ommissi c~ri, ,l0 1lereby ~~^rr.if! thzit lhe £ocer,oing resa.tul-ic,n was p~ssec7 and
~ aUoF~Ced at a mF~etiny o~. l•he An ai~eim C~ir_y planni.ng c;or~miss±on held o~ reLruary
4 3, 19FsE~, t~y L'ne tollowing vote ~t Lhe m~~bers thereof :
~
4 AYE;S: c:~t9MiSS?UML•'RS: f3iiU1!u, MkY, HI•;It[i5`i~, Ln CLn7.RC, LAWtCKI, !4C AURNGY
; NULS: COMMISSIQNE;I25: NO~IF:
; A~iSF.N'i': CUMh1ISr.;.TUNERS: MGSSL
Iiv t^~I'1'P~k;S:; wH~;REUF, I ~~ave hecc:unto :;ce my har~d t~~is 3xd raay of
I'~bruary, 19FS~. y~
:
~
5r'C:ttr~`i'ARY, At3AHEJM CITY c1,A NING COMMIiSZO"7
_ '~