PC 86-44,.w,
Rf:'SULU'1'ION NU. PC8Fi-49
A IZESULUTION GE' `t't1E ANAHL•'IM CITY NLANNING CUMMI;iSION ADUPTTNG
ANU R~:C'(1MPILNDINU 1'U THE c:I`.l`Y CUUNCIL~ UF THG C:I'i'Y OF ANAHEiM ApOP`PI~N Ok~
GI:;NLRAL PI~APJ AML:NDMI,NT NU. 2G8 - I~ANu USE EL~EMEN7`
Wt1ERt;AS, thc Ci.ty ~~ouncil ot' t.he City oF Anaheim d.id udo~t the
Anahei.rn Genecal Plan by RF.:;olution rlo. G9It-649, sl~~owing the gener7l
de::tcript.ion and ~xtent oL po:;sib.le tut.ure c.ievelopmf±nt wiL•hin the City; and
WH~:RLAS, pursuant to a request trom the ~roperty ~wnec f.or, a General
F~lan ~tudy, t:ity stat l preparcci a Gerieral Plan Amendment for <~n a~ea
cansictiny oi a~~proxi.maLely 1.2 acres, havi-~g 10 feee of, frontage at the
?asterly k~r~r,inus oz cypress St~~eet~ anc~ b~ing locaLed approxi.mately 215 feet
east uf the centerlin~ of CoLYman Slteet; and
WIIEkt:AS, the Planning Depai~roent ~]eFmed it ~ipprr~prial•e pursuant to
tne p_avi~ions of k~~e C~liLor.ni.a F~nvironmental (~ualiLy Act, thal: L•here are no
signif.icant environrnent.al imp%:ccs ~ind r~:commr.nded that a Negative Declar.atior.
be approve ; ~.~nU
Y:fI~REAS, thc Anaheim City Planning Colimission did hold a public
hearitig al the Ariaheim Civic Center, Council ChamL~c, ZUU SouZh Anaheim
fjuu].evGrc.~, on r'~Uruary :~, 19t36, at 1:3U p.m., noti.ce r;i r,aid puk~lic h~ari.ng
having bc:en duly given as ~eciuir~d by law and in ~ccor.danr.e with the
provisions o1 lhe Aiiaheim [~uni~,:xpal Code, to tiear and c~nsid~r evidence for
~u~d cigai.nst saici Atnendment ro thc~ Anaheim, Gcneral ~lan and to investigate and
~nake L'inctin~a:~ and recc~irmendations in connection therewith; and
WtiE}?F.'AS, ~aid C:ommission, aftee due consi.deration ot aJ.l evide~ce and
re.NortB Ott~?LCd at s~ii~J hearing, Dt~LS E[EItLLY EINU:
1. That sutfxcient evidence was pr~~a~nted wrir,h sub~tantiatcs the
ne~~u Lor an .~mendment ~u tht~ Ana:~eim Geneca.l Plan, a.nd it i~
deemed appropri~7te that "L•'xt~ibit E3" be adopted, designatir.g the
~nCire ~area for low•-m~dium densit,y residential land uscs, with
the der.sitl not to exceed 15 uni~s ro the acre, similar to
G~:n~cal Plan Amenument No. 16U approveci by the City Counefl ori
Novembec 12, 1580, un ff~ apprn~~tre 6.5 acres locate~y
immediat«~ly we:~L• vf uubjc;ct property.
Nc)w THf:ftG•'FOkE, BE; ?~i~ CiGSULVF:U, tha~ ~he Anah~im Ci t~ P1annLng
l:cmrnission has r.evi.erred the E~rop~:aal ta amend the General Plsn clcsianation of
thE~ Lan~ U~e L~ement troni General Cummercial and Low DensiLy RESidential to
Meui~anc Uen:;i.ty ai Law-~deaiu~a [~en:;ity and. to r.er.la~sify ~ub jecr praperty from
khn Ra-A-93,Oq0 (Itesidential, ~1yri~ultur.a.1) Zorie ta the RM-1200 fResidential,
Mu1L•ipleAk~'amily) Zone to cons~ruc~ a~.~--unit apartment complex with waivec of
rnaximurti strucr,ur~l heighl on a rectnnyular.Iy-shaped p.-~zce.l ai iand consisting
ot appra;cirnately 1,7. c7rC~S locat~~d ar. the :~our,h~_~tscerl.y terminus ot C~•pre~s
Stc~et, ana Eurthcr ~1E~SCl'Zbc3d as 1918-193? E:aat Cy~resc Str.eet; and doea
hereby a~~pruve th~: Negative pc~•1cir.t~t.i~~n upc~n tiinding that it ha3 con3icler~d
t!-~c Neya~ive Aeclaration t~gether with any cor~~m~~nts recc:iv~.d durin~; the publl.c
review pr.~~c;e:.a and Lurnc~~.~ ;'xndin~ on the basi:s of Lhe inikial sCuc]y and any
comments rc~ceived khat th~rc~ i.:; rio sut~~tar-tiGl eviden4~ that the pro ject wil~
have a slynifir,an~ ekfert on Lh~r ~I1V1~OI1ffU311C.
071dc PC$6-44
{ .....""'"'_.....,. ~.
; S ,. . . ~. . .. .. . . ; . .. ~..:., - . . ~ . ~ .
~; ~ i ,,. .~,. , .. '..... . .,. . . - . . .
f . . ._ .. .. .. _
.rl ~' .. .. ... .., . _ .~. ... .~`~... ., . .. r~ ,.i:.,~. ,W~+;,~;Cia~ ',r.
•: ~
n1; I'r t~Ult'1'HGk R~;SOLVt;ll thuk pursuant ~o t:he foregoing findings, the
Anaheim City Plai~niny Commission doc~s hereby adopt ~nd recornmend to the C~.ty
Counci.l of the City c~f AnahFim adaption of Ceneral Plar~ Amendment Plo. 20g _
Land Use E.lemen~, Exhibit "f~".
THE. ['UkEGOtNC; RESULU7'lUN i;; s;.yned and approved b,y me this 3r.d ~lay of
I'ebruary, 198b.
. ~
fJ /' r"
. ~•'l ~ ~~ - /~, ~ i 4'~ I
CHAIRH'UMAN ANAHI:IM C.I'PX PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: '
,r ~ ` .> . _-..~~..yL~9kw"~~+Yr
SECRh 1~" i~, ANAfiE;Zt~f CI'1'Y ~~LANtJING C'UMMT3SIpN
'•' S2ATL UF CALZE'URNIA )
COUNTY UI' URANGL ) ~;; .
CI`l'Y UL•' ANAlti;? ~' )
Y I, EdiLk~ L. tiarri.s, Secr~tary o.t the Anaheim City ~lanning
commissian, c1o herel~y ceztify that the foregoi.ng reso.lution was pas~ed anc]
aduP~~.u at a rnceting ~~t the Anaheim City i~lanning Cummission held on 'r'ebruary
3, 1y86, by r_he f~llowing vote of ti~n me~mbers thereof:
AYF~S: ~:UFIMISSIONF;R;;; k3U~AS, E•'12Y, ftE}2DSi'~ LA CLAIRE, LAWZCK.I, MESSP~
NUGS, (;UMM.:SSIONERS; NON~
AlSS~N'i': CUh1M.IS:iIOPJ};1'tS: MC ciUI2NL•'1'
I[~ WITNI'SS WHLRLU!', i Have heceunto se~ my hand this 3rc~ c~ay ~f
February, 1y86.
~
..~ - .
~ , -yl..
:~I:~RE:7'AR , A?JAEIE'ih; r_xZ'y p ANNING COriMISS2~N
...2 -
FC86•-44
~~
:~Y
~, ~
r.