PC 87-101.
,
. ... .. . . . . . . ~~ r ~ t ~ ~> ;~?~~!s~~
RESOLU'~IUN NU. AC87-101
A RI3SOLUT?ON U~ TI•iE ANAHEIP1 CITY PLANNING COMMiSSI~N
THA.T PFTITIQN [~OR RECLASSTFICATION NO. 86-87-32 AF' GRANTF,D
WHGR~AS, the Anaheim City Plarining Commission dic~ zeceive a verified
petif:ion f~r Reclassification From WARRF.[~ S. L.IU, ET AL, 2736--2740 West
Lincnln AVe11ue~ Anaheim, California 92QO.1, owner and MAGUY HANNA, 4000
MacAr~hur Boulevar~, }~680, Newpo~~ peact~, C~lifornia 92660~ agent For cartain
real prc~perty s.ituated in ~h~ CiFy af Anaheim, Cour~ty o.E Orange, State of
Califor.nia, d~scribed as iollows:
THE E~ST 190 . 00 I'1?E7' OT THE WES`P 315 , 00 r EET OF THE NGh?'HEAST
QUAI2TGR OF `i'H~ NORTHWI;ST QUAR'~'sR Qf THF tJORTEIEAST c,~JARTGR 0~'
uECTIUN .13, TOWNSHIP 4 SOU'PH, RA[4GE 11 W~ST. IN THE RANCHO LOS
CO'iOTES, CUUNTY OF OftANGE, S'PATE OF CAf.,IFORNIA, AS PER Mp,p
F2GCORDCD TN DUUK 51, PAGE 1~ OF MISCELf.~ANGOUS MAPS, TN THG
UFk'ICIs OF TJiE C~UN`PY RECORDER OF SAID CJUNTY.
WH~REAS, tha City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Ci.vic Center in the City of ianahesm on April 27, 1987 at 1:3Q p,m., notice
oi` said nublic hear.ing having beer- duly gzven as r~quired by law and in
accordance with the ~rovisinns of the Anaheirn Municipal Cn~e. Cha~ter 18.03,
to ;~ear and conszder evidence for and against said ~roposed reclassification
and Co investigate and rnak~ [indings and recommendaL•iotis in conriection
ther~witn; and
WHERGAS, said Commis,ion, aFt?r due inspection, investi~aL-ion and
s~udy madc~ by itsr.~lf and i.n its behalf, anu aEter due consicleration af all
evidence and reports of[ered a;: ~aid hcaring, cloes find and determi.ne ttie
following far.ts:
1. Tliar_ tt~e pel•i~ioner proposes r.~~classi~lcation r~~ subject property
Fr~r~~ CL (Commercial, Limil:ed) ro I~M-1200 (Re;identialr tqul~ip].e-Family) zorie.
2. 9'hat the Anaheirn General Plan desiynates subject praperty for
Genera]. Commercial .lr~nd uses, G?neraa nlan Amendment No. 22$ was recamm~nded
For approval by t:he Planning Commission in conjunctiion with this request to
rer3~signate subject propecty Genera'1 Cornm~.rcial and/or Medium Densi.tY
Residentia.l land uses.
3, That the pro~~osed recl.assiFtcation of. sub~ect pruper.ty is
necessary and/or desirable For ~he orcierly .~nd pcoper devel.o~ment of the
com;~unity,
4. Th~k r.hc ~ronasF~d reclassiEicati~n oE subjFCl property does
~roE~erly relake L•o thry zones and their ~ecmitL-ed uses locally estabiished in
cl.ose pr~ximitl t•o sub ject prop~rty r~nd la the zoney and their permi~ted uses
gener.ally ~stabli~hed Chrouyh~~it the community,
1110r PC87-].O1
~
~;
;~.
,. ~...._ ..._. ..... . . _~..._,.... .. ~. ... . , ~ . . ~. .... ., ... ~ _ _„ .. ~ ... ~ .~,_~~~ ~ ~q '~~~~.~'t
. . . . . . ~ ~ . . . ,~ t
5. That two (2) ~~rsons indicated their pr~sence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that one letter and a petition, r.~n~aining
approximately 61 signatures werF r«~calved ~.n oppps.ltion ta subjoct petition.
ENVIRONMh.NTAL IMPACT FTt3DTIdG: Thd~ the An7he
Commission has reviewed the~ ~. im City ~lanning
propo~als tu consider a1L-ernate proposal oF
ultimate land use~s including, bu~ not limit:ed to General Commercial and/or
Medium Densily Resid~ntia.l deszgnations ~n the Gener.al Plan anr~ t~ reclassify
subject pro~erty tro-n the CL (Co;nmercial, Limited) Z~ne to the RM-1200
(Re~.;idential, Multi~l~-•Fami.ly) 'Lone Lo conytruct a 3 story, 111-unit,
"affordaUle" apartment complex unde: autherity ~f Sta'.e Government Code
secri.on G5915 wi~h waiver.s of permitted encr.aachment into required yard
(deleted), minimurn building site area per dwel].i.ng unil•, maximurn structural
height, maxirniam site coverage anc] minimum distance between buildings (deleted)
on a r~cEang~la~ly-shaped parcel of land consistin oP a
acres, having a~rantage o~ a ~ PProxi.mately 2.62
pproximate].y 190 feet un the south si.de o£
Lincoln Avenue, being locate~.] approxinia~e.ly ~00 f~~
Dale Avenue and fiirther deac.ribEd as 2736_~ ~,~ e~~~ of: the centerline of
hereb a 740 We~t Lincoln Avenue; and does
Y ppru~~~ the Negakiv~ D~~clarat9.on upon Pinding thac it has cansidered
th~~ Ptegative Decl.araciop together wiL-h any comments recpived durin t!e
re~~iew process and further findir.g on the basis of thn iniLial s udy~ andbany
r_omments rectived thak i.here is nu suhstantial evid~nce that t he pr.oject cuill
have a::igriificant ef1'ect on the E~nvironmenL-. ,
NOw, TH~;RErORF, BE IT RESOLVED tFat L-he Anaheim City P2aizning
Cc~mmiss.io;~ doe~ hereby ~r~nt subj~~ct Petition for Recl.assiffcatiort and, k~y so
doing, that Title lfl-•7.oning of the Anaheim YuniciPal Cod~ be ~mended to
exclude the above- descci.bed propercy Erom th~ CL (Cam;nerci.a.l, Limited) and to
incorporate said de;crz~,~~d pro~erty into ~he RM-1~00
4lultiple-Family) Zone u~:on the Fo1].owiny or~ndi~ions wh? ch ~~~ ,, ~Resid~ntial,
be a necessary prerequisite to the rn ,~,n~ ~s,, hereby found to
to ~reserve ttie saLety and general~ welfar~ °~ subject property in order
Anaheim: oE the Citizens of L-he C:ty of
•1. ~'hat khe owner of subjecl- property shall .^,ubmit a leCker. reguesting
termina~ion of Var
iar
,;
1
.
,ce No. E7.7 anr~ CondiL•ional Use Permit Nos. 172p
and '1543 to the ~
lannin
ne
t
.
g
~ar
rnent,
z. That ~rinr to the intruduction of an ordinance
z~7oning subject
property
r
~nditi
_
,
on No. 1 abov~-
- mentioned, shall be completed. i'he
provisi~ns or riahts
ra
t '
g
n
~d k;y this cesclution shall beconc~ null and
void by actiun of tt~e PJ
annin
C
i ~'
~l~
.
g
ormn
ssion un? ess said conditions are
cemp.lied with witnin one year from the dat ~
e of this re;;olution, or
such fuxther t.ime ,~s thc: Planninq Cnmmitisio '
~..
~
n may grant. I '
~
8L ~`r FURTHCR RESpLVED thaL- the Anaheim CiEy P1ar.n?.ng Commission does
herPLv find an~i derermi I;,
'r,;.
t
ne thar adoptzon of this Resol~iL-ion is zxpre3sly
prer]icated upon appl.icant's compliar~ce with 1,~'
e:ach and a.11 of the conditions
her~inabove set Eorth, Should any suc:h condikion '~
, or any parL- thereoE, be
6pclarec inval.i.d or un~nforceZble by the finai `
;.~
compe .nt jurisdiction, t.han this Resu.luti~n
nd g
~U
i
,
any appro als
here
n
r.ontr inecl, sha.ll be cieem~d nu.ll and ~•oid. `
i~~
-z- i'~
~~~
PC8?-101 "
! r;
+ '.
.~;,,r
~"=' -- --- -- . '~
~
THB F~1tEG0ING R~:SOLU'PION is ~igned and approved by me this 2'7rh day
af April, 1987.
/ ,~~''~ ~ li ~
- l~ L-, ~ ..l.~
CHATRMAN, A:~AH. M CTTX PLANN' G CCIMMISSTON
AT`.CEST:
. ~• -
SF•CRETA , ANAIiEIM CI ' PL NP~ING COMMISSION
3TATE UF CALTF~RNI~I )
COUNTY OI' ORAI~GE ) ss.
CI'.CY OF AHAHEIM )
:[, Edii:!~ L. Eiarris, Secretary of l'ne Anaheim Ci.ty Planning
Commission, do her~by certify that th~ forego~ng cesolution was passe~3 and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City P1annI.ng Commission hel~ on April 27,
1987, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYE~: COMMISSIONEKS: BOUAS, rRX, HERBST, LnWICHI, MC F3URNEY, MI~SS~
NOES: COMMISa.TONERS: NONE
AB~ENT; COMt4ISSI0NFRS: LA CLAIRE
zN W£TNE~S WH~REOF, T have hcr.eunto set my hand this 27th day of
Anri.l, 1987.
"~ ~~~ /aL.~~/l/t~~
lV
SGCRETARY, ANAHGTM CITY PGANNTNG COMMTSSION
~
' ~''~~
_ ~~:,.
,~,~
,~
~ ~ ~ ,~~i;
; ~,
;~~
~s,
;;~
~-3~
PC~7-•101
,,;y
; ,.~
,-;;~'
' ;~:~