PC 87-112~!
~, i
~ ~ '
/'~ ,
~FSOLUTION N0. PC 87-11'l
`'~ A RrSOLUTION QF THE ANAHF.YM CITY }'LANNING CUMMTSSION
CLARIEYING LAN^ USE F.EGCILATIOtdS - RESOLUTIQN OF UI3CERTAIN`PIES
IPi CUNNECTION ;,'ITH PGRMITTBD USES IN THE Mi, ( INDUS~RTAL ) ZONE
t'~f
~'~~
^
~ WHEFtEAS, Secta.on 1a.02.041 oE th~ Anahei-r~ Muriicipal Code specif•ie,~
th
,
~ at it an ambiguiry ar.ises conceriZing the appropri.ate cJ.assification f~r a
particu.lar use wlthin the mean~ng and intent of the Zoning ~ode
it ~hall be
,
the duty of the Planning Commission to ascertain all pertinent facts ancl set
Eorth its findings and Lhe reasons thereforr and such findings shall be
~:
~ refF~red to ti~~e City Counc?1 ancl, if apFr~~~~~ ~y C~uncil, theceaf~er such
interpretations shall govern; an~9
~,,:;
~.
~'~~ WHERCAS, on March 31, 1987, tt~e C.ity Council considered a r.eques~ed
C
d
' o
e Ameizdment thak the in:;tallation re air anc! s
~ P ales of mobile te.tephones be
;
;:,~,
Y
a.].lowed as a permi~ted use in ch~ MI, "Industrial, Limitec~" Zone, originall
re
+o
d
d
c
mmen
e
for denial by the P.l~nr.inr, Commi~sion, and reFerred the item back
to th~ Planning Cammission tor further consideratioh; and
§ WHE:tEAS, th~ petitioner and ):~is atL-orney made E resentations at ~he
Marct~ lb, 1987, and Apr.il 13, 1987, Planning Commis~ian meetings and a letter.
;;; dated Apri.l 8, 1987, was uubmitted f~.-om ~ar.lene B. Fischer of Hill, Farrer and
;; Durrill, a}r.orn~ys re~resentir~g .7ames Shab, Global Telecommunic~tions
;`~ Coroora"r.ion, recommendir.g and Px~J ~inzng that the "assembly" which takes piace
~~:
' iii c;onne~tion with the installation, repair and sales af mobile telephones
y~. should qualify as "products pro~uc~d r~n th~ premises" as descr.ibed i.n SQc~~on
;; 18 .61,030 ,060 and for the pur~ose o£ permitting r~tai'1 s~~].es as ar, accessor~r
~: use to a E:>rimary permi.tt.ed ML use; ~nd
;,;
ti'
C~: WHERr~AS, subsection 18.61.03U.()60 ,atat~s re~ail distrik~ution of
~~ r~duuts
~'. P produced on tiie ~,remises, where not the primary retail uutlet Eor
` said products, is a permitl-ed acc?sSOry us~~; and
J
`;,
si
;: wHERE1~S, L-h~ Rnahe.im City PJ.anning Commission d:td consicier ~ubject
r. request at tr~e.ir reguiar meeti~g o~ A~ra.l 13, 1987, and aftEr due
investi.ga~ion and study made by i.t~e1F and in its beha:~f, and after due
~ cons?der.ation af all evidence and r~porrs o*'fered, ~ioes hereby find and
~ det~:rmine the fol'1.nwinq i:acl•s:
1. That t!:~ Plann:ing Commission cnntir~ues ~o ieel th~ "installation,
repair a~id sales of rnobi.le te.lephones" a.s not an appropriate
"persiitted ur acce:>sor use~~ "
Y i.n MC, Zors~, but is an apProprLate
"conditional usP".
2. That the speciEic use, as described, i.s "instal].ati~n", not
"assembly". The equinment {c~r telephones) is ~roduced/ assemnled
at another 'location ~nd is "install~d", not "assembled", in the
customer'~ car.
3. That ttie retail ~~roduct ~car tele~hon~s) is 3n7.d and installed at
thzs busines~ pr.emi4e, nc~t at otner ret~,il outlet prernises.
lY
~ ~~~~.::•M
2329p
PC87-112
, ~ ~,-
t ~'
' . . . ~ - ', ~~)'r,'
~i~l
Y
~ ~'
4. That it ~~~s baen an on•-going practice for uses such as the
installation/remov~.l af. muEflers, car radios, etc. or o~her
activi.ties invo.iving uustomer's cars to re consi.derPd as condi~.ion~l
uses i.n ~he ML ? ~ne. ~',
5. That the peEiL•ioner had indicate~l at the March 16, 1.987, meeti.ng
that. he woulci be will.ing to insl•.all sameon~ else's caL• phone, if
requested.
NOLJ, THCREFORE, B~ IT RE;SOLVED, that the AnahEim City P].anning
Commission does hereby maice ~he deter.mination thah the "assembly" that takes
place ~n co~nection wit.h the installation, repair anr3 sa'les of mor.ile
tele~hones daes not quality as "produccs pr~duced on the premises" and shnuld
not be ~ermitted as an accessory use to a prirnary induskrial use in the ML
"Indus~.:riai, Limited" Zone.
THL FOREGOIP~G RFSOLUTI~N i.s signed and appCO~: ed by me this llth day
of May, .19~7.
~ l~ °~~c> ~,>,~/- ~ ~
CHAIRMAN, ANAH M CITY PLAN NG CO[~IMTSSTON
RT1'~,'ST: ~
~~~. ~' -
~
SECKL'TAKY, ANAHEIhI CTTY ?LANNING COMM7SSION
;i`.L'ATE OF CALI~'0l2NIA )
COl'JNT'1 OF OR~IP~GE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHL'IM )
-;; I, Edith L, Fiacris, SF:cretar.y of L-he Anaheim City Planning CcrR,miysion,
';; do h2reby c~rtify khat tne foregoing resolution was passed and adop~ed <zt a
I rneeting oL thc Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion held on hlay 11, 19d7, by the
F.ollowing vote of th~ members ther~of:
~
A^ AY.ES: COMMTSSIONF.RS: BOUAS, FRX HERFiST, LANITCKI, MC9URNE;Y, MLSSE
` NOLa: COMMISSIONERS: D10t3~
~ AEiSL'NT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRL•'
IN WITN~SS P1HEF?EOF, T~~ave hereunto ~et niy hand this llth day of. May,
1~87.
~ ~~~v j~ ~ .
~t..t.~'.
S.CRE'PARY, ANAHGIM CITY PT~At1NING COMNIISSION
,~
...: ~
-2- PC87-112 ;~