PC 87-125-~w
RESULUTIOII N0, &C37-125
A RE~OL[ITLUN OF THE ANe~HEIM CITY PLANNIP~G CQMMISSJOid
y~unm U~TT'i'ION FOR CONllI7.'IONAL U.`'iE PERMIT NU. 2910 IIE D~NIEL
~~~~~
<,
x
WHE1tEAS~ th~ Anaheim City P?anning Commission did receive a
verified Yei:irion ior Conditional Use Permit from ASMAIL RAS`PG GARI. ET AL,
1108 N. Acacia Street, Anaheim, CA 928C15, owner at certa~n real properl:y
situ~ted in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State .F California,
desceibed us:
THAT POR.TION OF `LO'1 2'l OE 2'HE GOLllr:n'• ~'~ATE TRACT N0.
2, I1~ `t'HL CITY OF ANAEIL.iM, AS P1;R MAl' Rr;CORDED IN BOOK
4, PAGE; 68 U1 MISC'r',LLANLOUS MAPS, IN THL•' OI'FTCE Or 'PH~,
COUh'P~ kECOi?UER Or SATD CUUN~'Y~ I~IORE PAF'.['ZCULARLY
PfsSCRIEIED AS Et~LLU~J5:
SEGINN:iI~3G AT A POTNT IN 'I'HE WGST LTNE Of SAID LOT 22 ~
SAID L'_r:E 6EING CON~IDGRr.D AS AT~()NG THE C ~N~'ER L' TNF OL•'
ACACI.A S7!REET AND T~OCATGD 5'16.21 FEE`1' SGUTH OF THE
NOR'P~3WEST CORPIER OF SAID I~O~' 22, SAID POINT E3EING THE
SOUTHr~IES`r CORNER OF THE VOR'i'H 8 ACRES OE SALll I~OT 22;
RUN[~ING f RUM SAID POIN'.P OF BEGII~NING EAST 2~31.85 FGET
ALONG A LING PARALI.EL 'PO THE~ NORTH LINE OF S.~TU LOT
22; THENCE SOU`l'H b2.64 E'E~T ALONG A LINE PARALL~L TO
THE SAIA WEST LINE OF GOT 22; TEfENCE WES'~ 287..84 1?EET
P13RALLEL `i'0 SAID NORTH LINE TO A POINT IN THE SAID
WEST LlNE; THENCE NOR~i'H 62.64 ['EET TO TiiE PO:I~12' OF
BEGINNIIVG .
WH~I~EAS, the Ciky Planning Commission did hold a public l~earing at
the Ci.vic CPnter in the Ciky uf Anuheim on May ll, 1.987 at 1:3U p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly givet~ as required by 1a~,a and in
accordance with l•ne provisions of the Anahei;n Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear ancl co~isider evidenc:e for anc9 againsl: said propos•ad eonditi.or~al use
permit and to investigaL•e and makE Ein~ings actd recammendations in connection
tberewitki; said public hcaring having been c~n~inued to the Plannin~
C~mmis:~ion meeti.nys of Juna 8 and June 22, 1987; and
WEiERLX~S~ said Commission, a2`ter due inspection, investigation and
study made by i.tself ar~d in :its behalL•, and ~f.ter due consid~ration o.~ all
evidence and r.eports af1'ered at said he~rir-g, does find and determin~ the
f ollowing facts :
1. That the prop~sed use is pr.operl.y ane tor which a conditianal
use permit is authoriz~d by Anahsim MunicipaJ. Code wection 1~.34.05u.03i~ ro
witr to permit a child day-care facility for a maximum of '24 c!:il.dren.
2. That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that• the
i.ncreased traffics genera~ed bY an increased number ~f parents dropping oFf and
picking u~ ch~.ldxen would creat.e a hazardous conditi.on on r~cacia Street.
1143r
!'; ''::
r• ~, ;
L~C87-125
'.
,
~~ .
'w
~
~
51
~
~
!
1.i
',;~
.';'s
•~ .
r,
~ . . . . . , . . . . ~ . . . . ,. . . ~. . ~. . . ~ ~ , . 1 ~ ' ~ ~1 ~ ~
~es an~i ~.
t:he ~rnat t.he propoaed use will
growth ~nd devel adveryely afEect th~ adjoining land
JC~1tCU . optrient oE the area in which i ~ is propo:;ed t~ be
inr:luding 4.
ins T: it r_he :~iz~~ and :;hapc~ of
ufLtcicnt: on-sit th~ ,:ite propnsed tor ~ha use
~, traFf.ic,
and
e dr.op-oEE anci ~i~.k._uF spaCN
is, thecefore
not ad ,
Eoc khe inereaseci
~• proposed
u;;e ,
~quate
i.n a manncr not detrimen~~1 co allow r_he ful:l
- dev~lopment of the
peace, he
a.irh
~ ~~z~ety a;~d yenera
l w~lt<ir~ L
o thc~ particular acea nor to tha
An~heim, . ;,~ rf~~ ~iLizen9 of the City oE
5. That the gr~nting .~f t11~, CORCj.lC10Rd.i Use Permil unr3er the
con~3iti.o;,s im~osed, iE ~~n~+, wi1.1 bH c3etri.ment~~1 h.o the ~eace, healkh, safety
and genr_~~•~1 wE•lf.ar.e of tti~ Citizer.s or the City GE Anaheim.
6. That the tc~.ffic y~nerated 'ay th~ pxoPo,~~ usE wil.l impo:~e an
andue burden u~cn the strenr_;; ,3~~ hiqhwa,ys d~signed and improved to carry the
L•r.afEic in the area. '
7. That cme i.nterestF~d person .i~tdicated his ~resence at the May ll.,
~yd7, publsr. heacing, and no one ~
lyb~ ~~dical.ed their pres~nce at the June 2?.,
, public hear.i;~~~ in opposition; ancj that no correspond~nce was received in
op~osition to the su:~j~~t ~Pticion.
LNVIRUNMFN'.PAL IhIPAC`i' FINDI[3G: 7~hat the Anat~eim City Plannir-g
C~mmission has revierred khe proposal to permit a r_rild daj~_c.are facility Eor a
maximum af 24 children on a reckangularly-shaped parcel Qf .land conyt~tin ~F
appcoxi~nat~ly O.Z1 ar.r.e, locat~d a `~ `~ 9
cer.tPrlir~e of kemneya Dr.ive, and L~r~.rhXrm~ea~ri~~~ ase].lU8LNo1rth At~aci.a
Street; and does hereby approv~ the Neg~rive Declaration up,~n Einding t!~~~r it
has cr~n::id~~r~d ttif~ Neg:,~r.~.~~ ueclar.ar_ion to ethr~
~3uriny the public review proceas anci furkher findinahr~nnCh~~}~asfssofetheV~d
Enir:al study and ~ny commer~~s received thar tl~ere is no s
r.hat the pr~jF~~t will. have a siqniEicant eEEe- ~~Sr~ntial evic]er~ce
~t nn th~ enviro7ment.
NOW, THF.'RLEORF, gF IT RESOLVED ~:hat the Anihei:n City Pla7ning
Conmiss?on doc,s hereby d~~~y subjE~r Petit:ion toe Conditi~nal Use Pecmit, on
the basis or the aforemen~ioned findings.
TNE E'OREGOI~JG RESOt~UTIUt•1 i~ 3igned and approved by me ~h.is 22nd day
aL June, 198'1.
/~ / .
--~+/' ' r~'•-•'// .1rkLc. ~'~~1 _
Cf~~1.iRISAt1, AN .~~;~`~: NfJ~NG ~UMMISSI4~J
_ „~~g~~t':
' ~ .
S~CRF.`PAEtY, ANAHE[N, CI'i'Y pLANNiNG COAfMISSION
.z_
1'C87-1Z5
r-
~"\
~~:
STATL OC CALIL~ORNIA )
CUUNTY' OI' URAN~E ) s~+.
CITY Ul? A~AHFiM )
I, ~:ilith L. Harris, Secretary u~ t:he Anaheim c;ity Planning
Commission, do hereby certiEy that the foreyoing resolution was na3sed and
ad~pte~1 ac a meeting ~a£ the Anaheim Ci.r.y Planning rommission held on June 22,
1987, by ~he Enllowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMlSSION~:RS: BOUAS~ FRX, tiEi2E3S1', I~AWICKI, MC HURNEY
NOBS: COMMISSIONEKS: MGSSE
AF3SENT: COMMIS~IONERS: NONE
V~CANT: COMMI;SI~Nk:RS: ONE
IN WI'rNFSS ~rEt~:t?EOr, L hav~ t~ere~mtc, seC my h~nd this 22nd day oF
June, 1987.
,
~ ~'~° .
SCCRE'.CARY, ANAHETM (.1rY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~
F.
~~
r; ~
-3-
.~. .v ~~ a1P~~~. _. ,i . , . .. .~ . . . .. . .. . , . , , . .. ~ . . . . . .., ..,.. .. .
~f~'I
~r
~
P~87 -125 ; `~~~
~,;,}~i
._. ., . .~>~'.~t~
, . ~~i:,i+~'Y{~~in'~
,~ai,~
~r`~
;~
,
.~