PC 87-2064~
` .~,r~~ rp~~.~ {.,ri?.1~r ~,;~!tvr,t i.r;~,., , . .
.~ - . . ~ .. . . . ~ , , . .,,.. . .. , 'M1' 'i . . f ,~ ..t; ) r ~ ~r ~} N ja~ ~5~} .
r
, ~ s,- wt: a ~h
~
~~~
~
, ,
, ,
,.
•
t
~ti•~•. , .
~., ~
;~
'~
,
~
RE50LUTION NO__P g~_2p~ _~.
~:
r
A R~~U'LUTTON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CGMMTSSION q
F,
~
ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDING TO THF CITY COUNCIL OI' 'iHE CTT`~' OI' ANAHETt~i ~;
AUOI'TION 0£ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMETIT N0. 231 - LAN.D USE ELEMENx ~~
~~
WFiEREAS, the Anaheim Citx Council of. the City ot Anaheim dicl ~`I
-~+
,
adopt the Anaheim Gener~l Plan by I2es~lution No. 69R-644, showin th~
~
1
~er !-
,
.
,
description and exter.t of possible Luture de~~elopment witliin ~he rgtl•~ ~nd ,
`,
WHER~AS, pursuant to a request from a number of pronerty owners
for a General P1an Amer
clment f i1`,
,
or a study area c~nsist.ing of: spproxir~atel~ 3.9
acres (21 lots) located on th j,
e nortli si;ie oi Pear1 Street b~twee» West SY.reet
and 170 feet east of bwyer P]
~cE
d '
`
.
, an
on the south sic'.e of Pear7 s*_reet
l~etwe~n Carleton Avenue and '170 fee~ east of Dwyer Place; and ~
~
, ~
WH~REAS, the P'lanning Department deemed it appr.opriate :
'e~r
,
puxsuant to the provis.i.ons of the Calif~rnia Envir.or.mental puality Act
a ~'
,
Negative Declaration k~~ prepared; and ~~
WHEREAS, Lhe Ar.aheim City Planning Commission did ~iold a public
hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center (;oun~il Chambcr, 200 South Anaheim
Boulevarcl, on September 28, 1987, aL 1:30 p.m „ noi;ice of public hearing
having been du).y give.n as required by law and in accordance with the
provis.ions o:E the Aiiah~im Munici~al Cade, lo l:ear ana c.nnsider eviden: e tor
~nd ~qainst said General Plan Amendmen~ and to investigate ~nd make finding;~
znd rECOmmendatioris iri connectiori therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a:Eter due consideraY_ion, inspection,
invesl•igatiori and study rnade by itself and aF~er due consideraL-ion a£ ~11
evicience and reports oifered at saici ~1Qc1r1riCJ, Does :iereby Find:
1. Thal: evidenc~ presen~ecl substa.ntiates the need 1~r an ~mendmen~ t~
the Anahein~ Gtneral Plan at thi.s L•ime.
2. ThaL• tY~e current Medium DF~I:Slty residential designaLion typically
taY.es thc: torrn o£ ~p~rtment complexes and theoretically would permit
z maximum oL• 140 ciwe].ling units par acre and nould be implerr.ent;ed by
the RM-1200 'I,one.
3. Th~t the Low-Medi.um density residenti~l desigiiation also permits
apartmFnr complexes at lesser densities t~an the Medium Density
Resicienti~l designaY.ion. as well as duplexes and tripl~xes, and
permits z Cheoretical rnaximum ct 70 dwelling units ~~x acre.
4. ThaL- all ~roperties within subject area are zoxied RM-2400 whir.h is a
typical implemen~ation z~ne ~or the Low-Medium densit~y reszdential
desic~r,at~ion.
5• That, altt~ouqh the Medium Density dQSic,~nation, 11ong ~~il:h associated
height res~rirtions for multi-family zoried d.e/elopments within 150
feet oP si.ngle-f.~mily zone properties and, recentlX, wiLhin 150 feet
of existing sirigle-family ho~nes, provides a significant amounL- of
protection frorn multiplc~ farriily encroachment, thP Low-Medium density
0079r
i'~ ' PC87-206
<.:
t '
-~~~ _ _ , ,, ~,~:;°l . ,,;;:
"r~ ^I
y , .~ . a e e
between Carleton AvenuF ;an3 i.70 zeet east of D~~yer P1ace; and does hereby
rECOmmend Y.he City Coizncil approve the Neg~tive Declaratian upori finding that
it has considered i:lie Negai:ivs ileclaratiori together witYi any comments received
durinq the public review process and iurther Linding on i:he basis of t'he
initial stu<3y and any comments received that L-here is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a s.;nificant eff.ect on the environment.
i,'. o ~c.n.iw ~m
~ S~
. . . ... '. ~i,
'}~~~
,~;;,j
~, Y ti
resicler-tial designation provicies a sigizificant transitional area,
and a subsl-.ancial buffer between higYior density multiple family uses
on the south and szngle-family uses on the north.
P]OW, TFIEREFORE, BE TT ItESOLVEU that the Anaheim City P~aniiing
Commission has rev3.ewed the proposal ta consader an am~ndment to the Land Use .
E~lement oi tl~e GenE-~ral Plan from t.he current Medium Densii~y Residantial to the
Low-Medium Density Resident:ial land use on an ar~a consisting of approximately
3.9 acres (2t lots) located on tne north side of Pearl ~treer b~tween West !:~~
Street and 170 fPet eas`- AF Dw er Place and on the •-ovth side oP Pe rZ Str t ~
IIE TT FURTHER Ri.SOLVED that pu.suant to tnF for~goin~ findings: the
~naYieim City Planning Ccmmission, does Yiereby, aclopt and recomm~nd to t~ie City
Couricil. of the City o£ Anahe~m adoption uf General Pl~n l~nendment i?o. 231,
Es:hi.bit A- Land Use Element.
THE I'UFtEGOING RGS~~LU'~:LON is si.gned an ar~prov~ by me t111S 28th day of
September, 1957.
Qh..~ ,~'~.e„~.~~?
CFiAIRN1AN, ANAHETM C'ITX PT ANNING CONSMISSYOId
ATxEST: :7 ~
~~ ~4~ ~ ~~
- -.~--. --- -
SECRE'PARY~ ANAHEIM CITY ~LANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFOk2NIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 5s.
CITX OT' ANAE~Ik;IM )
'',~ T, Edith L. Harris, 5ecretary of the Ariaheim Ci.ty Planning Commission, do
'•' hereby certxf~• that tl~e foregoing resoYution was pass~d and :adopked ~a~ a
" meet.izig of. i:he Anaheim C.i.ry Ylarininq Comanission held on Seprember 28, 1987, by
~~' th~ following vote of Lhe members ther~of:
; t~
AYES: COMMISSION~RS: I3qUA5, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILL~O, HEBBST, MiSSE
NOES: COMMSSSIONERS: N'ONE
ABS~NT: COP~fISSIONERS: FELDHAUS, MC f3UFP~L•'Y
~r~.`'~ September,
~~ ;~~,
l~',~ ~
ti
i~:n r - ... _ .. .
PnkjiJ`~ x r ,-~J1
f irtt Oi ~'(1 Y~ 1: . ~. .
~ 'i ir
' ~ ~~~~~~~ ~,
~~ ~xsy~~~X r 4 .
~~{frl i
~~'~~' ~
J'~y 'i .
r ~~r ~;
..r`,,,,, '
.,,;~~,,~ , ;
~+ir°`~~~rv~
F ,( i.~Y t , i. ~
Y
IN 41ITNESS WH~I?:~~CF, I have her~uzito set my han l this ?.8Lh day of
1987.
~ ~ ~/ l ~~' .~..A ^`
~~_~~~ A -v ~ ~~Y=~~_~
SEC.RETAP,Y, ANZ~HEIM CITX PI~ANNING COMMTSSION
-2- PC8']-206
';;;
;,«
;,:
~ `~
. . ..... . .~}!
. , .. (~~i~~~