PC 87-230~
~
~~
,,,, ~
R~50LUTION N0. P_._ Ck37-23¢
A RESULUTION OI TIi~ ANAHEIM CITY P~,ANNING COMMZSSION
THAT PET.ITI~JN E'pR VARIANC~ N0. 3720 BE GR~NT~D
yJFiBREAS, th.e Az~aheim City Planninq Commissian did receivQ a
verifie3 Pei.ition for Variance from LINCOLN PROPERTY L~D., 19742 MaGArthur
Blvd., t~240, irvine, CA 92715. owrer, of•. certain r.eal property situated in
the City of Anah$im, County ~f Orang~s, State af California deacribed as:
CpMMENCING AT A POIP7T ON THE WEST LINE OF THE
NOF.THEAST QiJAFTER OF THE NOR:CHEA~T QUA~2~'ER OF SEGT.ION
17, TOWNSFIIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 W~ST, ID1 TFI~ RANCFiO
SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANT.A AIIA, IN THE CITY OF ANA.HET.M,
C~OUNTX OF ORANG~, STAT~ OF CALTk'ORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
DQAP ItECORDED IN Ii~OK 51, PAGE 10, M1SC'ELLANEOUS MAPS,
OF SAID ORANCE CAUNTY, 425 FEET SOUTFi OF TIiE
NQRrHWEST CORNER OF .TD NORiHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER RUNNLNG THENCE SOUTH UN SAID W~ST
LI.NE 268 F~~T; THrNCE EAST PARA.LLEL WITFI THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID NCRTHEA5T ~UARTER OF THE NORTHE;AST
QLTARTER 315 I'EET; THENCE T30RTH PARALLEL WITH THE WE~T.
LII3E C)F SAID NQRTHEAS'P QUARTER Or THE NORrHEAST
~UARTER 693 FEET; `?'HENC~ WES~.' CN TH~ N~HENCC ~~SUUTIi
ai~,zp NORTHEA^aT QiJARTER 212.50 ~EFT;
PARr~.L~'LEL WITH TIi~ WEST LXNE t)F THE NCIRTHEAST QUARTEP.
pF TF(G NbRTHEAST QUAl2TE12 425 FEFT; THENCE W'r".ST 102.50
FP~BT TO THE POINT OF REGINtTING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM TIiL NORTH 66 FEET THEREDF~
WHEREA5, the Ci~y' Planning Commis:sion did hold a public hearing
1987. ~t 1:30 p.m.,
at the Civic Center in tho City of Anahexm on N~1~en~as9re uired by law a:n~ in
noL-ice oP said public h.~arixiq having been duly g~ q
, accordance vrith L-hQ provisions af. the An~heim Municipal Cod~, Chapter '11~.03,
to hear and coizsider evidence for and ac~ainst said pr.~posed variancs ar.td t~
ir~v~s~igate ana make fin3ing~ and recommendatic~ns in connection th~rewith; and
r WHERFAS, said Commission, af*er due inspectian, investigat:on
and stuciy made by itsel£ and in its be2-~alf, and aftsr due cons.ideration of. a17.
evid~nce and re~~rts of~erec~ a~ said heaiing, does ~ind and determine the
follnwing facts:
l. That the pet`.t;ioner propases waivers of tYie following to
cc~nstruct a free~tat~ding sign:
tA) ~.~TI~~I$.,Q5...y4~~ ~~22
IaND '1$.44.Q57
(B) ~E.~TYQr(S 18 0~.4~~SLz.~.
AN~: 44_Q~
M~ximum ar.~.'a U•f ireestandina sic~n.
( q ~a, uarg fee~ permitted; l~~t,., saua~S~
feet proposed).
Pexr~f e ?o.~atiQn~~ £. r.~~.~tan~l'~.na sig~
(~fget frg~n nropertx?~ng reguired; ~.
i•eet proposed).
~ ' PC87-230
~ 0112r
~'~':,: i
:~'. ., :.7 a i,;o w n .. ,
J~.~~r;~~y
!~w°'7
Iry
~
~
. . , ' ~ . s "' '
A~
--1ii
c:: ~
~:
'Ir~
2. That the above-men~ioned wai~ers are hereby grantecl on the basis
tliat ther~: are special circumstances applicablo to the pruperty such as size,
shape, topogxaphy, location or surroundinc~s, which do not apply to other
icientically zoned properties in the vicinity; anci that strict appliaation of the
Zoning Code deprives th~ property of privilegas enjoyed by other properties in
identical zoning classificatior. in the ~~icinity.
3. Tl-iat therc are excoz,tional or extraordinary circumstances or '
conditi~ns =.pplicable t:o i.-ia property i,nvolved or to the intended u~e of the
property t do n~t ap~ly generally to the prnperty or class of use in the 5ame ~'
Si
~ ~~icinity a~, . zo~e. ~;
i:;
~•~ 4. That the requested variance is neces~ary for the preservation and '``
',; enjoyment ot' a substantial property right possosaed by other proper.ty in the same `f
? vicinity and zone, and denied to khe propErtv in question. '"
5. That the requester_l variance will not be materially detrinankal to
Yhe public welfare or injurious L-a the ~roperty or zmprovements in such vicinity
aild zone in which the property is locatFd.
6. That one person indicated his pres~nce at said pubtic hearing in
r~p~asition; and that no correspondcnce w:~s rec.eived in opposition to subject
petition.
~I~IFl~R1~AZA EDiV'IRONt~iEI~TAL UU.ALTTY _AST FTNDIN~: The Planaiir~g
Director or liis authorized representative ha~ determined that the prqposed
project ialls wit.hin th~e defin_tion of Catec~orical Exen~ption~, Class 11, as
defined i,~x the State E:IR Guidelines and is, therefore, ca~egux•icalZy ~x~ampt
from the reguirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RESOI:,VED that ti2xe Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereb}~ grant subject Patition far Variarice, upon the
Eollowin~~ condiL-ioris which are herQby found to be a necessary prerequ3.;;ite to
the propased usQ of the subjeet propert~ in orcler ta presarve t.he sa~el:y :~ncl
general welfare of the Citi.zens uf the City of Anahai;n;
l. Thttt this Vara.anca is granted subject to the adoption of the Zaning
Ordinance in connection witli Reclassif.ication No. 57-88-22 and the
parcel map pc~rmitted by Variance No. 3721, now pending.
2. That the new c~nsi:ruction authorized ay this resolution shall be
sexv~d by unclerground utilities.
3. That subje~t properk.y s:~all be developod substantially in accordance
with plans and ;pecificat3.ons on file with the City pf Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 3. and 2.
~:; 4. 'Ihat prior to the commencement o.E the activity authorzzed by this
`'~ resolution, or within ~ p~riod of ane year from the date of this
resolution, ~,rhichever occurs first, Condit;on No. 1,
~;i a~ove-men~ioned, shal.l be complied wit;h. Extensions ior further
~'` t5.me to complete said conditions may be granted in accordanca with
~ Section 18.03.090 of tho Anaheim Munici~~a1 Cade.
~;
~( ~
~ i~r~' ~ ~
~~~;.~, ~ ,~: , ~
~ ~
~~1:cF~~lJa9~i1:.+~ .,J~.d„ t. ~r.ri r :.>...-, ..~ ;,.:.
-2-
PC87-230
,'~
'j
t
1~
„. . ~ !, ~afS}~)
~~
.,.'•~
A!~
. . .
'1~ 5~
irl
. t
;
il
~~~1
_ ).~
~ <:~c
;~a
5. That prior to final building azid zoning inspections, Condition ~Tos.
2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be compJ.ie~ with.
6. That approval of ~his appl.ication cori;tit+~tes approval ~t the
proposed request only t~ the extent tihat it complies with the
Anaheim Munic.ipal Zoning Cude and any other a~plicable C.ity
regulation~. Appxoval does not include any actir,n or findings as to
compliance or approval af the rea~t.~~t regardin~~ any other applicable
or.di.nance, req~~lation or requirement.
~ ,
B~ IT FURTIiER RESOLVED that the Ana~eim City Planning Commi~~sion
a.oe5 hereby tind and determzne that adoptian o~~ this R~solution is eMpressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conclitions
her.einahove set torth. Should any such conditions, or any part Chereof, be
declar~d invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
compei:ent jurisdict:ian, then cha.s Resolution, and any approvals herein
coni:ainzd, shall be deF;med •rilxll and vuid.
THE E'OR~GOZNG FEy~QLUTION i.s signed and approved by rne this 9th day
oF NovembQr, 1957. /~ ~
~n, / //° ~~/~
~~J ~i...,FJI,f _ .(;~ ' ,t° -'~'--~--• _
..HAIRMAN, ANA~iEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTFST: `r~, `
-- / .~i'-~'' ~ r~~~1.~t,l~yi
SECRET '~ANAHEIhf CITY PI,AIJIrING COMMISaION
STATE UF CALIFORNSA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith T~. Harris, Secretary of. the Anaheim Cit~~ Planning Commissian, c1o
hereb;~ certii=y th~t t.t.Q foregoing resolGtaon was passed and adopte~ at a
meetinc of the Anaheim CiL•y Plaiizting C~mmissioil held oxi November 9, 1987~ by
the following vote of th~ members thereof:
aYES: ~OMMISSIpNERS: BO'UAS, BOk`DSTUN, CARUSIL~I~C, rELAHAUS, HERBST,
MC ~URNEY, t4ESSE
rIOES: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE
ARSENT.: COMMI55IONERS: NONE
TN WITPiES5 WHEREC~F, I ha~•e hereunto set my hand this 9th day of
Novembnc•, 1987.
~~~ ~
___-~_~~c..e.~G ~' "~
~ / "" , -~~„C, _
SECRETARY, ANAfiEIM CITY PG.~NNINC~ COMMISSION
:~; ~
~ : -•3-
~y .
g~;1~~~~ { ~ ,
i ~ ~nAMl~~~f ~
r ~~~~a~rh4~J~~ /~ i4v ~i~~ i 4~ ,, ~, , . ..
?l n !~ ~, j, ~y , ~ .
~l 9a,/~ ~` ,Sr'. '
~"' b ~.,~,fi~ ~ f~y+ ,
~f~r,~,~~,~~ ~ ,
()~ ,
~/'~if C;Y r F ~ .
~ i 4~,^ yr iIt ;~ ~' ..
R{..7' ~+~h ~~,~ rj : .. .
y N ~ ~ ~ <
a , ,,7 iF y,~., ~~,; . .
..:' L'M~~t. ~ `Y I /, ,.~.:,..... ..~.,....._,... . . . _,...-.: ~ . . . . . .
;:%~
;i
,,.+,7
~1';
~ ;:~
°;~
~ ~~.';;
>~,
:,:.;
-.~
PC87--230 . 'I~
1
SU
rF~
, .eid