PC 87-231~
RESOLUTION N~PC87-231
A RFSOLUTTON 03P THE ANAHSIM CT_TX PLANNTNG CObIIy1ISSI0N
THAT PETI1'ION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NQ. 87-$8-29 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, th~ Anaheim City Planning Camrnissi~n clid receive a
verifiecl petitiun tor Reclassi~ication from BARBAR.A J. POLENTZ, 1537 ~.
Chapman, Orange, CA 92666, owner., of certaixi real property situat~d in the
'st City of Anaheim, County oi Orange, State of' Cali.fornia, described as follovrs:
THE SOUTH 267.OU F~ET (MFASURED FROM THF NORTH LINE
OF TH~ UNNAMED STREET, NOW KNOWN A~ LA PAI~M~. AVENUE, )
OF THAT PQRTIUrI OF LQT 10 Q~ THE MILES RANCHO, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP 12ECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 7,
MZSCELLANEOU'S MAPS, ftECQRnS OF ORANGE COUNTY~
!~! CALTFORNI~, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
nEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE PIORTH LINE OF LOT 9 OF
MILES RANCFiO Y7HICH FOR THE PIJRPQSF QF TIiE FOLLOWING
MEASUREMEAI'15 IS CONSTRUED TO BE THE CENTERL'iNE OF
ROMNEYh, llRIV~, ADJUINING SAID L07'S ON TH~ N~RTH,
~VESTERLY 328.98 FEET FROM TuE NORTHEAST CORNER OE'
S:AID I,OT; TFiENCE SOLiTFtERLX 1, 319 . 20 FEET IN A DIF~CT
LING TO A PO.iNT ~N THE SOUTH LIhE OF SAID LOT 10
WHICH FOR THE PURP0~3E~ OF THTS MEASUREMFNT IS
C~`NSTRUED TO BF 'THF CEriTERLTNE OF L' A PALMA AVENUE,
I~D,TOTNING SAIA LOT ON TH~ SnL'TH, WES'.CERLX 156. ~2 FEET
FR~M TH~ SOUTHRAST CORNLT2 UF SAII~ 'LUT 10; TIiEtTCE
WESTERLY 174.66 FEFT AI,ONG SAID SOUTIi LTNE; 'PHENC~
NORTFIERLY 1,319.30 FEET IN A UIRECT LINE TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
GXCEPTING THFREFROM TFiE EAS~ %O.QO FF.E~'.
WFiEREAS, Y.he City Planning Chmmission did hald a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Novamber 9, 198i at 1:3U p.m.,
rictice oE said public hearing having heen duly given as requiretl by 1aw and in
accordance witY~ the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cocle. Chapter 18.03~
L-o hear and cansider evidence for and a~aii~st said propose3 rPClassifxca~ion
and t~ investigate and make fin~linqs and recommendatians in coi7nection
Cherewith; and
F1fiEREAS, said Commission, after due insgection, investigation
and study made by itself ~nd in its behalf, anc. aFter due corisideration o£ all
evidence and rPport~ offered at said hesring, does Pind and dotermine the
following facts:
~~.~~'2.'.M'i.,ltl
S I{
1. Th~t the petiL•ioner proPoses rec.lassifica~~ion of subjec~
property £rom tho RS-A-43,000 (Residential, I~gricultural) znne to the CI,
(CommQrcial, Limited) zonQ.
2. That the Aziaheim General Plan designates subject property
far Gener.a:l Commercial ].and uses.
~ ~:::,: U17.9:r
~,
~
t'i;4 ,_~ '~.: - .
iY j;F
tWj~~~.(~ 1 f~~
~~.%~, ~ } , 7~"r~c i ., .. .
,'. , 'j
PC87-•231 ~:,~`
p:
~ " . . i '~ ~ ~f
~ ~ r .`; s~''t~
. ~.~
~
+~.
neces,~ary ar.d/or d sirable fo r~thP o derly f and~.D oper de elo ra ~rt is
p ~' Y
communi~y, Ament o£ the
4. That the proposed reclassiEication of subject property does
properly relate to the zones ~nd their. permitted uses locally e~tablisYied in
- cluse proximity to subj~~,;+; property and to tlae zunes and the,ir permitted ~ises
~~, generally esfiablished th:~u~~,out the community.
.,
5• That the proposed reclassification of subjec+~ ro ~rC
requires the improvement of ~bu~ting s*reets in p~' y
Circixlatiion Element o£ the Gexier.al P.lan, <<CCOrdance with the
traffic which will be generated by the inteix~s ficatio.n fl land usea increasa in
~' ~ F• Thal no orie indica~ed their preserice at s~i,1
, hearing in appos~tion; and th~.t no correspond~nce was Leceived zn opposition
~,,,~ to subject petitiori~
~ALIFORNIA ~1~V:[RONMENTAL OUAL7TY n,Cr p~xpiDYN' •
Ci~Y Planning Commission has reviewed the ro.~~ -~~ That the Anaheim
property from I:he RS-A-43,000 p F~~al t~ reclas~ify subjec~
(Commerczal, Limited) zone Co (construcY..ala s nglelsto y' 4QU0-squareh~foot
medical otfice building oIl a rectangularly.-shaped parcel of land coi:sisting
of approximately 0.3 acr~ locat.sd at the northeas~ corner cF.'La ~alma Avenue
and L~isure Court, liaving apnrox3.mate frontages oF 7p teet on the north sic~e
of La PaJma Avenue and 187 feei: on the east side of L~isur.e rour.t~ arid daes
hereby a~prove t:he I3egative Declaration upon fin~in
the Negative D4:clarakion ~ g tn~-~ it has considered
ogethc~r wirh any comments received durinq thP
public r~:vieor process and further finding ou t,he basis o€ ~he a~~itial study
and any comments receivod that: there is no subs~antial evid~•nae
proje;,t wi11 have a significant effe~ct on the environmen~, ~h~~ the
~~~^1. THGREI'~RE, Br IT RESOLVED th~~i: the AnahQim City Planning
Commission does here~y granr subject Pet:ition f~r ReclassificaLion and, by so
~~'•~g. ~haC Tit1e 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Mv.r,icipal Cocle be amendecl to
exclucle the abuve-describ~d proper~y from the RS-A-43,~00
Agricultural) zone and to incrrp~rato said described property `into ~ tk~e aCL
(C~mmer, cial, Limited) Zone upon the fclJ.owing con~.i :;.prls which are herebp
found to be a nece~sary prerequisiL•e to Lhe p.raposed use of subjecL- pro ert
in order to pr~+serve the sa:Eety an3 general welfarp o~ the Citizens of the
City of Anaheim;
1~ That the owner of subje~t pr~perty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee for street lighting a).oiig Leisure Court i,n an amount as
determined by the City Council.
Z• That curbs and g~~~tars shall be repaired along La Palma Avenue and
Leisur.e Court as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
with standard plans and specifi^ations on file in the Office of ths
City Engineer.
_2..
- ' PC87-231
~4~:~~. . ' ..
i
tr~
; ~~',
jr'r
.~~~ ~~ ~s r r~ t
i.~• ~i'~i~lr ' . ,; ~ .
~k~~l ~~ibvYO,'~ :P~.:_l,~i . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~r
s,;
;.
`i
.. ~ . .'., i: ~~:il
~-r:~ _ ~0. ,~~~
~'~ .i
3. 1~hat t~treet 13ghCir~y £acilities ~lonq La Palma Ave~-ua sha]1 k~c~
insr_allad as requirc~d k~y the UC.iliCies General ManagQr iii accordance
wiCh spoci~icati~ilz on file in ~ho OfL•.icR of UtiliCies Ganexal
ManayQr, ;~nd tt-at sec~~rity in tha form ~f a bond, certi.Eicata of
deposi.t, 1~t1:Qr of credit., or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactozy to tho City ~f Anahc~im, shall be po~ted with Cho Cil•y
to g aart~nt~io ttie satisfactorx cnmpletion of ~he above-mentioned
imprcvemc~nts. Said sectirity ghall be postad k~~h the City of
nnali~:.im Y~rior to tho in~roduc~:ion of an ordinancQ rezoning subject
prapert}~. ihe abo~~g-requared improvoment~ ~sh~ll ~e installed priar
t~ occup~ncl,
4. Th~t prior to adoption of the ord~nance rezoniny suk,ject prnperty
;,, the appropriate E~,es due for prim~ry, secondary and fire protect~on
, shall be p~id to the Wat~r Utility uivision by the owner/developor
in accordt-nce wi~h Rulc, 15A and 20 of tho Water UtI13t,y R8h33~
Ftules and Regu'la~ions.
5. That tkie owner
a foe ~o of siibjoct propsrty ahall pay to the City of Anaheim
r ~;Ae
L'ourt
i p;,antiny purposes along I,A Pa1ma Avenuo and Leisure
.
n an amo unt as determined by thQ City Cour.cil.
6. T}iat in rh~ even~: a parcc~l map is not recorcl
ex.i~ting lo'
;s
th e~i combining ~he two (2)
,
,
Division with a ~ property ownar/dev~lc+per shall Purnish the Zoning
approvod by the copy of a rec~rdsd cove~iant
Ci~y Atturne
a
i and agree,nent, in a form
ona p~,rc~l, y,
gree
~ig to ho]d subject property as
7. ThF,t prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ;:ncf 6, ahove-mentionod,
shall be comp].Qted. Tho pr.ovisions ~r rights gr~nted by this
ros~lution shall be~o.ne nu11 and void Ly a~~tion o~' the ~lanning
Commis~ion unless sai~l cc.nditions are romplied with within one year
Erom t_hc~ date of Cliis resolution, or such further tf;ne as the
Planning Cormission may gran~..
~3. That approv~~l o~ this appl.ic~rion consti.~ut~s npproval of the
propo3ed requ~st only to tho ~xteat tliat: i,t complies Nith the
Anaheim Nunicipal Zonfng ~od~ ai~d any othsr applicable City
c'eaulations. Approval does not include any 3ction or ~3.ndinqss as to
compli~nce or approval oE the request regar~9ing any ot:ier upplicablr~
ordinanr_e, requlation or requirement.
'r= . . ~
J..Y.~ .
!':•
~ ~A ~.. . .. .
9 J
6P- ~';
( ~ j / ~,~_ ~ ~
43 r~~
~r 1ti: t:(tC~ .. - .
f f~:f .
~'hS~~~..y~.t~F~~ J, -..~..~
Ir •r.,.,:..,,
~
r3~ PC87-231
{
';
/
.a'a1
__ - . ~ ' ' . . . I~~;~~i577r:k:~,
~ ~~I
^~~~ r
~~
~ ir ~~
. , -,~;~,~~~
r~
BE I'.C FURTHER RESdLVED thai: the Anahelm C.ity Plannfng Commissior-
' does 2zeruby £ind 7nd tZetr~xmAne that aiiopta.on of Ghis Etesolutinn is exgx•essly
' pr~dicatQd upon ap},licant's complia.ncP witYi Qack~ anc~ all of. the cc+ncli~inns ~;
hereir~above sst forth. Should any suali conditians, or any part therc~of, bo
doclared inva].id c~r unenforceab:le ry the final judgmont ot anv court of ti
~ aompetant jurisaictinn, ~hen thls Rc~so2utian, ancl any appravt~ls herein
, conlainud, shalY be deemod null and ~~oid.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is siyr.ed and approved by me th:is 9th day
of Novomber, 1987. %'?
4~ ~~~. ~~ ;~~--E'------__.
-.z-_~_. , ~.
CFIAI~tdAN, .~NAFiF.JM (;IT` PLANNING COMMISSION
;
,;
~ ATTGST: ~,
~
_ _ ~..d~~~~ ~st.! __._
SECRETRR , ANAH~7M rITY ANNING COA4S2SSION
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGR ) ss,
CITY OF ANl-HEIM )
1;
I, Ec9ith L. Harri.s, Secretacy ot• the Anaheim City Nlanning Commission, do
hereb,y certify th~L- the f•oregoing resolution was pas~ed ancl adoptecl at a
mesting of the Anahezm City Ylanning Commi~sion held on November 9, 1987, by
tho L•olluwing vote of thc members thereuf:
AYES: CO:~izSSIONERS: IIOU'AS, EOYDSTUN, CARLISILLO, F'E;LDHAUS, HEk2B5'P,
MC FiURNEY, MESSE
NOE;S: C4MMISSIOi~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: ~OMMISSIOt7ERS: NGNE
IN WITN~SS WFiERF.OF, I have hereunto se~ my haixcl this 9th day of
Novomber, 1987.
L~' ~ ~ - .
--.~.~ _~~~____
SECRGTARY, ANAHEIM CTTY PLl-NNINC COA4rlISSION
-~-
PC07-i31
'' ~
;,F
,; ~