PC 87-251:~. _,. . ;: . , . -_. -
~i, ~ •.,i , ~ y
~1: ~ r ~~ ~I~fL~~
., ~',i~,
. ~°?~ ~~~~ ', ~ ~
RE 'ULUTION hp_~ p~~_~
A Rr,SOLUTION UF THE ANAI~IEI?•i CITY PLANNING CONRdISSTON
ALOPTING ANb RECOMMENDTNG 'tq 1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHE u~
IM
Ai)OPTiON OF GENFRAL PLAPI AMENDM~NT N~. 232 - LAND USE ELFtrfENT 1`.'
WI~IEREAS, the Anaheim Ci~y (;ouucil of L-he Czty oF Anaheim did
adopt the Anah~im Genoral P1an by Resolut3,on N~.
description and ex~enf: of possible ~uture d~velopment w~hinSthe1C~tthQ g~neral
Y, and
WHER~A~, pursuant to a.raquest trom rhe property oaners L•or a
General Plaz~ I~rnenc7meut for a study area consistin
l~cated on the east side of FairmonL- Boulevard, a af apnxox.imately 3.0 acres,
°~ the centerline of Santa Ana ('anyon Road and Furthprd~~ly 1080 feet south
South Fairmonh Epulevard; and described as 220-226
' WHEREAS, tkie Planning Department deemed
i pursuant to the provisions cf the California Environmenta.:. 1~ apPropriare~
'•` Negative DeclaraCion be prepared; an~ Qualiky Act th7t a
;
~;
WHEREAS, the Ana.ieim City Plannin
heaxing at the Anaheim Civic Center Council ~h~~ye~~on~ood Q°1a a~ublic
Boulevard, on D~C~mber 7, 19a7, at 1:30 p,m „ notice pf th Anaheim
~ b~en ~uly givett as requ3.red by law and in acaordance wpthlth~hero~x~, haviny
the Anaheim Municipal Cac1e, to 2,Q1r and consider eviRence for ~nd~ StQ~'S of
General :~lan P.mendmerir and against said
recommen3ations in connecL•ion tlierew.irh1nand~lg~t~ and make findings and
WFIEREAS, said Commission, 3F~er due cons.ideration, in~pec~ion,
investig~Lion and study made by i.tself and after .
evidence and reports ~£Eered ~~t said hearin du~' ~onsa.deration of a11
g,. Does Hereby find:
~• Tha~ evidence prQSen~e3 substantiaGes tl~e need for an amendment ro
tho Anaheim General P1an at this time.
z• That Exhibit D rc~de~igna~i.ng the property for ~Tillside Low-Densit~~
Residential shauld be adopted.
3• That 1U pex•sons indicated their preserace ak said public hoaring an~
tra~ no correspondence was rece.ived in oppo~itian ~o subject
pe Citiqn.
NO'rJ, TFiSREFORE, B~: IT RESOLVED
Commission has reviewecl the proposal to c,:tisic~er ih ~m~ a ent to lthe Landntrse
~lernent ot the Generzl Plan redesiqnatin
desigx~at•;nr of Hillside Estate llensiC• ~. ~ subject property from the current
an irre ularl P L 1 o HillsidQ Low-Density Residential ~n
4 y-sha ed n~rc~l of land consist;ing of apploximately 3.0 acres,
].o~~red on the sast side of L'airmont Bou'levard, having a maximum depth of
appr.oximately 210 feet and beinc~ loczted a M
centerline of San~a An~ PPxoxima..ely 1,080 foet south of the
Fairmon~ Boulevard; and doe~a e~ eby ~recommendg~thee C ty eCounci12~~2~~ S~uth
~eCla~i~e Declaration upon finding t;hat it has pPrO~e the
Declararion ~ogeLher wi~h any comments rQCeived durin c~nsider.ed th~ Negative
g the public
0138r
' pC87-25~
f:- .
~,.
~ , «~t~
^!
~,, ~
-'•..
/~'~-ln.~` ~~=C----
CHAIRbSAP7, ANAFiEIM ITY PLA?dNING COMMT5SION
A....
~
.•.~ ,f~~{z~
R{
~'~'.'~ ~i
. :,.r,
~ ~ ':~~a:
'ir
~~t
~ . . .~ ~ ;'r~::
~,+
. ~~:.~~~'.Y
review process and furtYier f.indirlg on ihe ba.sis o:E the initial stucly and an~ ',;
comments received that thero is no substantial evadence that the project wi11
have a s5.gnificant effect on t:he environment.
BB IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to ~he foregoing findings, the
Anaheim Cit~ Planning C~mmission does hereby recommond to the City Council of
tha City ~f Anal~eim adoption of General Plan Amendmsnt No. 232, Land Use
Element, ~xhibit B.
;;
iHE FOREGOI~IG RESOL[ITTON is signed and 3pproved by me this 7th day of
Deeember, 1987.
:~ ~~ ',i
y ~
ATTEST:
~~~~~C~~ ~~' ^ .~~_
S~CRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLA23IdING COMMiSSIpN
ST.A~E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN1'Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY QF ANAHEIM )
I, Edi.~h L. Har:-is, S~cretary o~ the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do he:oby cartiEy that the foregoing r~solutinn was passe~ci aild
adopt~d at a mPetin.7 of' the Anaheim City Planning Comrni,;sion Y~eld ~~n December
7, 19$%, by the f.ollo~~ing ~•ote of the members thereof :
AYES: COMMrSSTONERS: BOUhS, BOYDSTUN, FELllHAUS, HERBST, MESS'E, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMI~SIONERS: NQ2JE
ABSENT: COMMI5SION'ERS: CARUSILLO
I21 WITNESS WH~RLOF, t havo hereunto set my hand tnis 7th day of
Aecember, 1987.
.~
-~-,.'~~~._. ! ~_ %~Y~'L'Z~~ ~.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITX PLI~NNIDTG COMMI5S: ~~i7
s~
~,~
0137r
..2_
~`C87-25'1
;:`;~
~~
, ~.
~~~
~
~;a~~
!~,
r
CALIFORNT.A ENVTRdNMENTA.L QUALTTY ACT FINDING; That the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has rev~iewed the proposuJ, to establish a 12~unit
(previously 17 unit) RS-500U(SC) si.ngle-family residentzal subdivision wit:h
waivers of requzred 1ot• frontage, minimum building pad ar.ea, maxim~un numher
o•F. bedroams, minimum gaxaga setback and minimum rear yard ~etback on an
. irregularly-shaped parcel of lancl consisting oL• approximatEly 2.97 acres,
,~ having a frontage of approximately 8~3 fpet on thE northeast side of I'aa.rmozit
: IIoulevard, having a maximum deptri~ uf approximately 210 feet and being located
approx.imately 1080 feet south af i:he centerlirie of Santa Ana Canyon Road and
farther described as 220-•226 South Fairmont Bc,ulevard; and does hQreby
appro~e the Negative Declarata.on upon finding that it has considered the
Negative Declaration together with an.y commen~s received during the public
rev.i.ew process and further findinq on thP basis of the initial stuc~y ~nd any
comments received that ttiere is no substantial evidence t}iat the project will
have a significar.r effect on the environment.
2vUW, THEREFqRE, AE IT RESQ'LVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Comrr~issiorx docs hereby gran*_ Petition for i2eclassification and, by so doing,
that Titla I8-Zoning of tlie hriatieim Municzpa'1 Code be amend~d t~ exclude the
• at~ove-described property from th~ HS-HS-22,OOA(SC) zone and to incorporate
sai~ described propert,y i:~~o the RS•-HS•-10, 000 ( S~) or a less intense zone upon
the following conditions whzch are hereby iound to be ~ necessary
prer.equisite to ~1~e proposed use of ~ubj~ct property in order to pr,eserve the
safety and genQra.l wel:are of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That thQ owner of subjecL- property sha11 pay to thP Ci~y o~ Anaheim
a fee xor t.ree planting purposes alung I'airmont Boulevard in an
amouYit as dekermined by the C.itiy Council.
2. That the vehicular access rights ~o Fairmunt lioulevard except at the
private street opening, shall be dedicatecl to ~he Ci~y of Ariaheim.
3. Th~t a11 engineering requirem~r.ts of the Cxty of Anaheim along
E'airmox~t Boulevard, including preparaL•.ion of improvement plans dnd
installarion of a11 i.mprovement~ such as curbs and gutters,
sidewall:s, water far,ilitzes, street grading and Aavement, sewor and
drainage facxlities, or other appurtenant work ~hall be comnlied
with as requirod by the CiCy Engineer and in accordance with
specitications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and that
security in ~he for.m of a Lond, cerlificate of depasit, letter of
credit, ~r. cash, in an amount and forrti s~S:isf:ac~ory to thQ Cfty ot
Anaheim, shaZ1 be posted wi~h Lhe City to gua.rantee L•he satisfactory
compl~tion oL• said improvements. Said security shall ba posteii with
thQ City prior to int-rnduct:ion of an orclinance rezoning subject
property, to gtiaraYitee the installatian nf the above-reqaixed
im~rovements prior to nccupancy.
4. TYAat strQet lighting facililies along Fairmox~t IIoulevard shall be
5.nstalled ~s requar~ed by the iitilities Genera~l Man.ager in accordance
with spc:cifications un file in the Office of Uti].ities Genexal
~ Manager, and tki~t secuxity in the form of a bond, certificate of
~~ c~sposit, lottez o.f credik, or caah, in an amoun~ and ~arm
sa~isfactory to L•he City of Anaheim, sh311 be ~osted with the City
0139r -2- PC87-252 `,~
;.~
'1
' ~ 1~1
~4'
~'S't 1^~)~~~~
__"__.._ .__.__ . . , . ,. ~`I•,•.~i~