PC 87-258~
t ~tw~:«`~
~`~
F:E50LUTION NO.. PC87-25$
A RESCILUTION OF THE ANAHEItZ CTTX FLANNING COMMTSSION
THAT PETY7'ION FO12 RECLA;~SIFICATIOI~ N0. 87-88-28 B~ GRANTEA
WHEREAS, ttie Anaheim City Planning Commiwsion did f~eceave a
verifa.td petition for. Reclassiiication from BHIRHUHI~AI U. YA'TEL', ET. AL, 4
Harrisl~urg, Irvine, CA 92720, owner, and t~YUR PAT~I.,, 4~a.rrisburg, Irvine,
CA 92720, agenC, of cer~ain re21 nropert~~ situated in the City of Anaheim,
Cour~ty of Oranye, Stai:e of California, descrik+ed as follows:
THF NORTHrRL'Y 1GOe0Q FE~T OF' T~iE SOUTHERLY 200.Q0
FEET 0~' THE NORTHEAS~ QLTARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
Q(JAR7ER OF THE SOUTFIWEST QUARTER Or SECTION 27, Y11
TOWNSFiIP 4 5'?UT?~I, RANGE 10 WEST, PAR'PLY IN THE RI~ICHO
SAN JUAN GAJON D~ SAN7~ ANA AND PARTLY IN THE RANCHO
LAS IIOT~SAS, IN THE I:ITY OF ANAHEIM, AS SHOWN Oti A MAP
'PHERFOF RFCORDED IN B(30K 51 PAG~ 1:).• IrfISCELLANEtlUS
MAPS, RECUnDS UF SAID ORANGE CQUNTY.
, ~
~r~ai~; ,
'~~; . . , -. -
WHEREAS, the Citv °lar ,i.ng Commissinr. clid huld a publ.ic hearing
at the Civic Cen~er in the C~t,y of Anaheim on DecQmber 7, 1987 at 1:3A p.m.,
notice of sai.d public he~rang having been duly given as required hy law and in
accurdance wzth the provisions of the AnaY~eim Muriicipal Codp. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and c~nri.d~s~.• ovidence for and against ~aid orc~posed rEClass~~Yeation
and to investigate and -nake findings atid recommendatioris in cen,ne~ti~n
tlierewi.th; and
I~iHEREAS, said Cummissi.on, aft'e.r due inspect~ion, investigation
~nd study made by itself anci in its behalf, arid ~fter ilue co.nsideration of. a.ll
cvidonee a:~c~ repor+:s offered at sai~ hearing, does firid and c~etnrmine the
fol].cw.ing f~cts:
1. Tf~~az the petitianpr pro~oses reclassificnt.ion of sabject
~roperty £rom tla~ CG (Corrunercial, G~rxei~al) to the CL (Corc~nercial, Lirnited) or
a 3.ess xn~ense zone zone.
2. That L•l:e Anaheim General Flan designat~s subjec~. prcperty
for General Con'~merci al lan~ uses.
3. That the propo~ed raclassific~.tion of subject ~roperty 5.s
*i~cr~ss~rx nnd/or desirab].e for the orderly and proper developrnent oE the
c ~mm•an i ty .
%~. ~'hat the pr~Fo~~ed reclassification of subject property does
,proper~y rc:late t~ the zones and kheir permii:tied uses 1oc~lly estahl.ished .in
closa uraxi.mi.ty to subject property and ta ~he zones and their permi~~ed. ~ase~
genera3ly established ~hroughout the community.
5. That no one ix~dicated their presence at said publ:c hpnring
in ~pposition; and that no corrPspondence w~~s received in opposition to
subjeat petition.
0145r PC87-?,58r
s
,:f
<: ;,
~ K]1
`~ . ~ `'~ ~1.
4 i a.1 . '., 1
' ~<~~ ,;
; ~.
CALIFOI2NIA ENVIRONtdENTAL QiIALITY ACT FTNDI~: ThaL the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has re~vi.ewed the proposal to construct a 79-roam,
4-story motel in the CL (Commercial, Limited) zone with waiver of minimwn
structural setb~ck on a rectangularly-shapF~d parcel of land consi.sting of
zpproximar_ely 0.68 acre, having a frontage of approximately lOQ feet on tho
west side of Ha:Y,or Boulevard, havi.ng a maximum depth oF approximatel.y 300
Eeet and beiny locat.ed ap~,roximai:elx 460 feet sauth of the cen~erlino of
Orangewood Avenue, and further descri.bed as 214Z South Harbor F3~ulevard; and
does hereby approve the rTegative Declarai:ion upor, finding that• it has
considered the Negative Declaration to~ether with anl comments received
during ~he public review procoss and further Einding orx the basis oP the
a.nitial s~udy and any comments recc~ivod that there is no substar_tial evidence
, that the Project will have a signi.ficant ef•fect on khe enviroiunent.
PtOW, THER^cFORE, HE IT R~SO~VED that ~tas Anaheim City ~'lanning
Co:nmission does hereby g~anh subject Petition for Reclassification ar.d, by ,o
doing, that TitZe 18-'l.oning of the Anaheim Municipal Cocle bi~ amended to
excluds the above-described property From the CC (Commerc.ial, General) zc,ne
and to incorporate said desr.ribed prcperty inta the CT. (Cammercial, 'Limited)
or a less inL•ense zone upon the foll.owinq conditi~ns which are hereby iound
to bo a nc~cessary prerequisite t~ the propo•~ed use of subject prope:ty ia~
order to oreserve the safety and general welfar•e of the Citizens of the City
of Anaheim:
l. That the owner of subject pr.op~rty shall pay to Y.ho Cit,y or
Anaheim a fee for tree pla~~i,ng purposes along Harbor Boulevard
in an amoun.t as determined bl the City Cauncil.
2• ~fl~t the owner of subject pr~~ertp shall su}~mit a le'tt~r
reque~ting termiiaation o£ Vaz•iancc~ Na, ti56 to the Zoning
nivision.
3. Tht~~ prior to the i.ntroduction of an ordi.nanc~: rezcning subject
property, Gonditian Nas. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisi~ns or rights granted by thi~ r.esoiuCinn
shal:l bec~m~ null and void by actioti oE the Planning Cornmiasion
' unless saxd ccnd.it.ions aro nomplied wi~h tvithin one year ~rom
t the da~e of this re,olution, nr such f'ur~r,er timt ~s ~n~
Planning Commission may grant.
i
4. Th~t approval of this application constitutes approval of L-he
pror.~osed xoqaest o~y to t'tie extent that it complies with the
Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code ar~d any ather ap,plicar,lca GS.ty
regula~zons. Approval doas not inclu.cle any action or f•indings
as ~o campliance or approval of the request rPgarding any otliQr
applicable ordinance~ regulation or requiroment.
i
0145r _z_
PC87-2S8
,~il i-;:~ I~^Ms1 ' ~ . . ~v~N)ti."•S:S`.~~
,~ ~~ . ~ . . 5~'2
~;~ .. ~ . . ~`4
~E IT FURTHER RESQLV~D
does hereb ~~at the AnaY,eim Cit
y find and detErminE that ado tion og ~' P~annin
PradicaLed upon applicant'~ cam li.arcce ~i~h g ~ommission ;
hereinabove aQt torth. this Resolution is
p e~ch and a11 e3tPress:ly ~'
declared invalid or Should any such conditions of the conditioas ~
cJmpelent u unen t' o r cea b le •~'r ~ n Y P3r t thereof, b~ °~;~,
j risdictio,n, then bY the final judgment of 3ri `,
; contaxned, ~hall ;oe deemed nit11 andsvoxdsolution, au~ Y court ~f 'a
~~,,, anY approvals h~r,ein `>`'~
„~7 :.;:;T
THE FOREGQING RF30LUTI0~ iy Sig~~d and 3 ''~~
of December. 1987. PProved b me ~
j;~ i Y t.zis 7th ~la~, :::ii
~~-f.~,,.-~- ~G (~I,~
'~~`---.~_ ~~" ~C'-~.. '.'f~'~
CHATRMAN. AN EIM CITY PLAN_ G CO gMM IIu pN
'~ ATTEST; ,'
,;
~
~: ~
f:
~ SEC!^ K AI2Y. AN~~ ~1"~''t,,~
T •^----• .: ~'i7
j AHEIM CTaY 2I,.r~NINC COMMISSICN
STATE OF CALIFORIv~IA )
COiJNTY pF pg~~E ) ss.
CTTY OF AW]~T~~IM ~
I• ~dith L, Harris
Commi~tsian, do hereb~ • Secretarp of. the Anaheim
adopted at a mee~~.rg afcthelE~ that rr_e foregoin City P1~nnin~
7. 19g7 Axzeheirr Ciky Ylar~nin g resolution was passed and
. by th~ toZ~~,W jy~y vote nf the mernbers thexzO~ mxssion held on D~Gem~~r
AYES; COMMTSSIUNERS:
NOES : BOUAS, BOYDSTLTN E~ EI.DHAUS, HERBST, MC BURNEY
CQMMISSIUN~RS: NONF ~
ABSFNT: COMMJ.SST.ONERS: • ~SSE
CARCJS ILLO
TN WSTNESS WHER~pg~ t havs hereun~o Set m
December, 19g7,
y han3 thi.s 7th day of
________ ~~:_____ ~'G ~
~Ff:RETARY, 7~~~jl,q CITlt' p~~«,
LANISING CObi-~fISSION
0145r
_9_ ;' '
~.~;_.
PC87-2~8
'~i f
Jr ~ .
~i~~; ~~.: . ~
~i~7`r'~t t'.
~ !t~ {' ~ ~~
~q ,f w ~f '~ .. . . .. _ . .. _ .
.2r.e`.. r~•n>'..' . ..:, . _.. ., . ~ ~~
r ~
/' "f
~.., ~~