PC 87-43
F"'ti.
i
RESQLUTION N0. PC~7-43
A RESOLU'rION OE' TEIE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TI3AT PE`PITION F'nR VARTANCE NG. 3636 IiE uh;NIED
WHE;RGAS, tr,e An~heim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petikion for Varia.nce from HARTMAN CORPORATIpN, 536 West Lincoln Avenue,
Anaheim, Ca.lifornia 92a05, owner and k3ENC0 DEVEL~FMENT GROUP, 420'1 Long Beach
Boulevard, Sui.te 4Q3, Long Beach, California 90807, agent for certain real
properry yituated in the Ci.ty of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
CaliPornia, described as follo~~s:
PAFCELS A~ B, AS SHOWN UN A MAP F~T,ED IN BOOK 22, PAGE 32 OF
PARCET, MAPS, Ih THE OE'EXCE 01' THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGF
~OUNTY, CALIF'ORNI.A.
PAT~CI:L 2
RN EASEMrNT $.34 c^~ET IN ~r1IDT~T P'OR INGRESS AND EGRr;,u OVER THAT
PORTJOiV OE f.,OT 5 OF 7.'RACTS ti0. 71, AS SI30WN ON A MAP RECURDED Tr?
BOOK 1Q, PAGG ?.2 OP' MISCEL' LANF.OUS NAPS, IN THL' OF'FICC OF~ THE
COUNTY RECORDEI2 OF SAID COUNTY, TEIC SOUTH L:CNE OF SATD EASEMEN7'
DLING DESCRIBED Aa COLLUWS;
BEGTNI~ING AT A PCIi~`~ UN THE CGNTCRLTNE Or THE 60 E'00'i' ROAD AS
SHOW"~ ON T;iE MAP GF TRAC'P N0. 71 (SAIU 120AD BEJNG NU;4 KNOWN AS
STA~l'.. COLLEGL ~LVD. ) SAID POIN'.C DEING 280.34 FEF.'P SOUTH,
(MEASURED aLQNG SAID CCNTERL7NE) Pl20M THE NORTIiWES'.C CURNER OF
S~CTION 2S, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTEI, ~ANGE l0 W~ST, SAN IIEKNARDINO BASE
Al~n MGRID.CAN, 'i'HENC~ T'AST, PARALLEL WITii THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
LI~T 5, 250 FEGT.
F.XCEPTING THGRCFROPI T[iAT PORTION INCLQD~ll WITIiIN SAID 60 F00'r
RO~D AS SEIOWt~ C~N THL MAP OF SAIll TRAC'P N0. 71.
;~:.. _
WHGREAS, the City Plann:ing Commissi~n did 1~old a publi.c l:earing at
ttie Civic Centcr in the City of Anaheim ui~ February 2, 1987 al ~:30 p.m.,
notice of said publi.c hearirig having b~en duly given ~s required by .la~, ~nd in
accurdance with the provisions of the Anaheim tdunicina:l Code, ChapCer 1b.03,
ro h~ar: and cons ider evidene~ for artc-l ayainst ~air] proposed catianc:P and t~
investigatA and make Fi~idings and recoii~m~~nda~ions in connection therewith;
said public he~ring having beeri conl:inued Lo the Planning Commission meptiny
of k'ebruar,y J.B, 19E17; and
WIiRREAS, said Comm~.ssion, after due inspection, investiqa~ion and ~i`
study made by its~lf and ir~ its behalf, and af~er ~ae consiGeration of all ;;,:.
~vide~7ce :and reports oErcred at said hf~aring, does fir~d and determine thp 'i
E~l~owing facts: ~~
j,
1. That the peti.tioncr proposes waivprs of the iollow;.ng to
constcuct a commercial ceriter:
(a) SECTIOI3S 18.06.Q50.022, -• Minimum ~~umber of parkin s aces. '`
18.06.OSO.fl233, (264 required; ].55 propospd) ~~
7.~.06.000 AND ! ~~
19.44.066.050 ;;,
1054 r PC87-43 ~~;~.
~'°°a
sigtl permitted with less
(b) SECTIONS 14.05.~~~~067 (~ne freestandir~g£ Lreestanclinq~ S•
AND 18
than 600 ~eet of street Erontage;
two proposed)
~ si ns
(c) SEC'PTONS 18.n5•~9.3'`67 ~~freestandingcsign•,not permittedlwhen ~•
~ AND ~.a.4
loc~ted closer tnan 40$ of lo~ width to
adjacent proPerty line; 10$ proposed)
~ le .
S 1~$ •
(d) SEC7'TC)N 18.05.U93.0231 ~ (3001ftm permittedl;~a~d-ent~~~rOp°sed)
'.t'hatJ the above-mentioned waiver (a) is herEby denied on the
2.
basis th~t the p~tking variance is substantial and ~rill adversel~laLfe.ckingn
~ricinity, thereby
sa~ety or
traffic cungestion in tl~e immedia.e
ad)'oining land uses; and ~~17ens ofathe1c:ity~oftAn<~rie,i.meace, health,
qeneral we1L-are oE the citi and (d) are nereby
3. That t•he abov?-mentioned wai~~ers (b~+ ~O~ uulic hearing to
cleni.ed ~n the basis chat che petitiun~r stipulate~~ at t. e P
ontormance with Coc3e, if the proposed l~nd use is approved.
pravide signs in c
~, That ther.e ar~ no excepti~nal or extcaordinary circumstances ~r
licable to th~ property involved or ~o ro~~ ~n~ssdcf use in ~hE
c~nditions aC~p
pro•perty that do not apply genera11y t:o the praper y
same vicinit,y and zone. ~or the
y. Tl~~at ~Y~~'~ reofea~suLstantial~property rr ght possessed by other
anc~ ~cnn, and c~enied ho the property in
ncescr~aL•ion ari~l enjoy~~~~nt
prc~pecty in the same vicinit~'
questicn.
6. That the requ?sted vaciances will be materially detrimental to
tQ Lrie propertY oc irnprovements in such
the E~ubl.'~c weltare or injur.ious
vicinity a~d zone in ~~rhich the pr.op~:Kty is lorated.
6, That ore person ~ndic~L•~ri his presence at said public hear.ing in
~ppo~ition; and tbal: no co,~resoonder~ce was eeceived in o~po~ition to subject
~aetition.
IMPAC`C FItdDING: That thc Anaheim City Planning
GtdVI, RJ~~`~A~~ _.. from the
Commission has teviewed~djhe`pneP~'~ol ~h~ r`L1~~Commercia.lct Limi.~ted) Znne to
~i, (zndustrial~ Li.mi
const:rur.t a commer.ctal cenfer wi+~h waivers oP miriimum number. of par n9
freestanc3ing sig-is, peemitted 7.ocat3.on of
spaces, maximum number > sigri~ on an
freesL•andin9 signs and rninimuin Qistance be*we of fap~rox m tely 2.86 acres
irreqularly~•shape~] parcel oE land consisting
locatec3 soutt~ and east of.. the southeast rove cthe f Ney~tive Declaration ~upon
College Tioulevard; and CI6ea l~erebY aPP
finding that it has consider Ublic~ce iew Processlandt furt'~egEfindi ~ on the
comments recei~~ec] due ing ~h - ~
basis of the initia.l stud~~ and any commants received that there is no
subscantial uvidence that the praject ~rixl have a si.qni~icant effecL• on L-he
envir.onment.
PC87-43
-2-
'.~
1
~ ',;'~
~':~;
~
r,~~ . . . . .. . . .. .... . .... .. ... .... .......... , ......... ....~..,...~,.-,..~... ,. ....,.., .i.. ..... ~,. , ., . ..~.. , .~. . . ~ .,.. ._ .~.. , . .r:t"- , .. ~li":
1! ~ ~\
1
~,1
l, f
~
~ NOW, `~HEREFORE, ~F. IT RFSOLVED that the AnaP~e?.m r.ity Planrii.ng
'' Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis oE the
af~rementianed findi.~gs.
THG I'OREGt~ING RESOLUTION is sic~ned and approv2d by rne rt~is 18th day
of rebruary, 1987.
~, ,~;: ,
//- ~~r
ic:~' 1 ' ~
CHAIRMAN, A AHEfM CITY P ANNTNG CUbIMIS~TON
ATTEST: ~
. ~'' ~` ~a4~~='.et~~
SECRETARX, ANAHEIri CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
STATE OE' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CT`rY OF ANAHFIM )
~; I, Edith L. Harris, Spcrei:ary of the P.naheim City Planning
~' Commission, do h2r.eby certify that the foregc+ing re:;olution w~s passed and
; adopL•ed at a mAet.ing o[ thP Ar~a hei~~~ City Planni.ng Commission h~ld on T'ebr~acy
.18, 1987, by t!~~e fol'i~wing vot~ of th~ members i:hereof:
;
'
AYFS: COMMISSIONERS:
BOUAS,
E'R'.f, Hf'!2E3ST, LA CLATRE, LAW.ICKI, MC BUHNEY,
MLSSL
_:
~r~ NOES: COMMISSIpN~RS: NONE
•<, AASEN'1': COMMISSICINI:RS: NONE
IN WTTNESS WHE~;CO1~ , T have hEreunto set my hand this l~tti day of
G'ebruary, 1987.
~~~- `~ .Q~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHGIM CITY PLANNTNG C_ v OMMISSIQN
r~- PC$7-43
,'i
., ,
,
,~,,`;
~.~:~;
~, ,