PC 87-89RESOLUTION N0. PC8'7-89
A RESOLUTION OC TI~E; ANANF.I14 CITX PLANNTNG ~phiMISSION
'1'HAT PE'SITION FUF2 V1U2I~NCE N0. 3651 BE GRANTEQ
WIi~FtEAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commicsion did receive a verified
Yet.ition for Var.iance trom KWOK BELT. LLE AND SIUMAY LEE, 201 Sauth Hampton
Street, Anaheim, Californi.a 92Q04, owners oP c~rtain real property situated in
khe C.ity of Attat~eim, Coui~ty of Oran~e, State of California described ~s:
LO'C 69 OP TRAGT NU. 6691 AS L~E;R MAP RECORDED IN BO~K 250 PAGES 20
AND 21 OF MISCELI~ANRVUS ~4AP5, IN THE OFEICE UF iHE COUNTY R~CORnER
OF SAID CUUtv:Y.
WHEREAS, the ~ity Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 13, ).987, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of sai~.3 public hearing haviny been duly given as rer{uired by law and i.n
accutdance wfth the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 16.03,
to hear and consider ~V.id~tlrg for and again:~t ~aid proj osed va[iance and ta
investigata anc9 :nake f indings and recominendations in connectiot~ therewith; and
WHEREAS, :~aid Commi~sion, after. due in~per.tion, investination an~l
study made by itsPlf and in it~ beha.lf, and aiter due con~ider.ation of a].1
evidence an~3 ceports offered at said hearing, does fxnd and dekecmin~ the
followir~g facts:
1. That the petiti:~ner proposes waiver of tt~e following to construct
a family-coom adr3ition to a ~i.ngle-family resideiS;:e:
S£CTIO~ 18.27.062.020 - Maximum lok covera~e•
~ ~ (35~ permittedl 509; proposed)
2. That the above-1TIP_RtlOf13~ waiver is hereby qrUnted c,n the basis
that th~re ate apecial ~ir~umstances applicable to the propecty such as size,
xhape, topography, location and surroundinys which do n~t apply to h~heC
identi.cally zoned property in the same vicinihy; and that e:rict ~a~.,plicati.on
of the Zoning Co~e deprives the ~roperty af ~civilege3 enjoyed by other
nr~perties in the identical zone and classifi.cation i~~ the vicini*_y.
3. 'fhat thece are exceptional o: extcaordinary ci[~umatances~ or
conditions applicable to the property invvlved or to the intenaea use ot ene
pcoperty that do not apply yenetal~y to the proper~,y or class of use in t•:~e
s~me vicinity and 2one.
4. Thit the reque~ted variance iu ne~easary for the presecvAtion and
rn joyment oE a s~bstantir~l property right ~osses~aed by other propecty in ctie
same vicfnity and zone, ar.d denied ro the prop~rty in queation.
5. That ihe requested varionce will nUl be matarially d~trimental. to
thP public wr;lfare ~r in~uri~us to the prop~rty or improv~ments in suct~
viCiniCy and zone in which the property is 2ocated.
1102t YC8')-$9
,. ,
.: ~',:~
.~
~;,~~~
;+; , ~ _ ..,. ~,,.
T;';,j,
15. ~ . . , F.11
~', ,II..'
.
.. Ns~ ~'~~ ~~i,
.. ;';1.~
6.
oppasition; That no
and that ona indicated t:;~P~,r
no corresPondence
r
e o d
~t
public heariag in "'~
`1
petition. w<~s cer.eived
in
Pposition to ~ubject
~NVIRUNMENTAL iM~AGT FINDING;
auth~r;.zer) representAtive
m
~he Planning
Directnr or his ''
~"
, within the
~
St
~ de£inition of Ca ego ri al
~he ~'L°Po
Exem ti~n sed
PCO~e~t f~lls r;
,c
;
::
ate EIR
''
~ Guidelines and is, therefor s
~'
i ~
t
o aP defined in the ~~
"
requixement
r, to
P[epare e,
an EIR. ~
~a
~g
r
Y xempt fcom the
:r.
~'
NQW~ THERE;FORE, H~ IT RESOLVED that the Anaheiin C.
Commis~ion does hereby grant subject Petiti.an for Variance, upon the following
condition~ which are hereby found to be a necessar
,, proposed use of the subject prn t~t Y prerequisite ro the
~r
general welfare of the Cztizens ofptheYC ty o~dAnahc~im pKe4erve thP safety and
~
, 1• That fiub;jr.ct prooerty shall be dev~
. with plan~ and ;;nzcxficat:ons on fileuwithsthetCity~o.fyAnaheccordance
E;thibit No. 1. ir~ mar.kRd
~- gE T'I' FURTH~R RESOLV~U that the Anaheim City planning Cammissi~n does
~ hereby find and d~te:mine tnat ac'~ption of this R~solutiun is ~xpreRSly
predicated upon aP1~Iicant's compliance with each and aIl of the cond.itions
hereinabove set focth. Should any
. `~"'`~?=~u ~~~vaiia or uneni'orceablP buch eondirinn; nr ar;, ,,:~_•t the:~~~f be
co!rpetent Y the final judgment of any co~~xt pf
contafned, sha11 abe tdeAmed tnull and vQ aeSO~~'tion, anci any approvals hc~rein
?'t~E POkEGOING R~SOLU~~ION is sign~~d and apprcved by me this l;ith c~ay
of Aptil, .1987.
,i='
~ ~. , / .
/l /L~'~l /q~ /' .
~L.~.- •~7s...1 r ' % " ~ I,-l
CNI,IRMAN, AN ~EIM CITY ANPJING COMMSSSIJPi
ATTEST: ~ . ~
-,
SECRF.TA Y ~
, AN,,HEIM CITY P:.ANhING l,UMt~1ISS:ON
-2-
..
`~'~
PC87-89
ar. 1', ,: r e ;.<.~- , . . _ . . . .
5~~i'IYd'M4+111'~~'•i"4-~. . r.:r x.._. ..,. . ..,.,.. ', , ~ ~
~_ _, . .. .. .. ~r^ ~ ,~ -~ ..ti. 3 ~ ~ 11~:.~~,,~7p~S~'rvds,~)'~~'~"1;~~"a~a~J~~~;~ii~
'~ t.
r+~
4 . ~R *'
:'.
STA2'~: OF C_'ALiFOHNIA )
COUNTX UF ORANG~ ) s~~
CITY Ok` At~r~HEIM )
I, Edith I~. Ha;ris, SecceCary pf the Anaheim Ciky Planning
Commi.ssion, dn hereby cer.tify that th~ Foregoi.ng resalu~ion was ,passed and
'' adopted At a meeting of the Anaheim c:ity Planning Commi.~sion h~ld on April 13,
~ 1997, by the following vote oE the me:nbers thereof:
~
AYES: COMMTSSTONERS: BOUAS~ FkX~ HERBST~ LA CLr\IRE~ LAWICKI~ MC 6URNEY:
M~.riSG
hOES: COly;d1SSIQNERa: NONE
ABS~N7.': CUMMISSION~RS: NONE
i;
IN WZTNL•'SS WHER~UE', I have hereunto set my ha~d this 13th day of
; A.pril, 1987.
i
~ ~ .
'i ~.,
SECRET. Y~ ANANEtM CITY'Pi,ANNING COMMISBIUN
-3 PCA'/-89
'~~l
~~i I
.,~