PC 88-100~
~
~
~.,;.
~, ~
C
RESp~I N N .,_PC88-100
~
~.. ~ ~ , rr~;+.r, .r : ,'~t..i.FvaYVk~anuv~aC~L
hY ~ri~
,~~
~ 1; c
~a yy.
~.,..,
. . ~ . . .,"~'G'
~~1,
A RESOLUTIQti OF THE ,ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI~TG COMMISSION r~
THAT PETIT.TON FOR COT7DITIOtiAI, USE PERMIT Np. 2997 SE GRANTED ~'~~
'~J
If~
WHEREAS, thQ Ana2~eim City Pl~nning Commission did receivrs a ~eriEied '~
Yetition for Conditional t7se Permz~ Erom PLAXA INVES'rMEN7,'S, 314 S. Brookhurst, `~
Suite 20C, Anaheim, CA 92E10~, owne: and DHIREN SNAH, 13144 Carmel Street, ~`?~
Cerritas, CA 907A1, agent for cer~ain real property situated in the Cz~y ot ':~;~
.Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: '`:~~I
THE NORTHERLY 97,25 I'EET, ME~:SURED ALONG THE WESTERLY "
fiC
AND EASTERLY LINES, OF TI3E WES~ HALF CF THE WEST HALF r;:
OF THE SOUT:iWESx QUARTER OF THE SOUTFIW~ST QUARTER OF `'`~
SEC'PION 12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE `'~~
RANCHO LOS COYQTES, AS PEit MAP RECORDED IN BOQK 51,
PAGE ].1 OF MISCELLANEOUS MF~PS, IId THE ~F~ ICE OF THE '"'~/'
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ~
~rr,
,~
r;
WHEP.LAS, the Ci~ty Planning Commissiur. did hold a publzc hearing ,~ •,,4'
the Civic Center in ~he City of Anaheirn on April 11, 1988 at 1:30 I,
p.m., notice ~~
af said public hearing haviny boen duly given as requ:red by law and in ~;
accordance with the provisions of tY~e Anuheim Municipa]. Code, Chapter 18.03, .r~
to hear and Gonsic3.gr evidence for and against said proposad conditional use !,~f
permit and ~o inve~~igate ~nd make findings and recommertdatians in connectian ~''~•
t:herewith; and ..
WIi~~2EAS, said Cammission, aftPr due insp2ction, investigation and
skudy mado by itsQlf and in its beha'lf, axid after due consideration oF ~11
evidence and repor.ts affered at said hea.riz~g, does find and determine ~he
following facts:
1. Thati the pruposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authnrized by Ariaheim Mur.iicipal Cofle Section 18.44.Q50.16~ to
wit: to construck a 3-story, 55-unit motel.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the gxowt!~ and developm~nt of the are~- .in which it is proposed
to bo located.
3. Tnat the size and shape o~ Che site propnsed for the use is ~~~
`V. adequate tp al.low the full devel~pmQnt of thQ proposed use in a manner, nAt -'~'i
4' aQtrimontal to the particular. area nor to tha peac:~, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Rnaheim.
,,
; 4. That the granting of the Conditional TJse Permit under the
; conctxtions imposed, if an
,•~ y, tvill not be de~rimen~al to tPia peace, healt.h,
;;
~sc~fety anc3 general welfare rf t;he Citizons af the City of Anaheim.
; ,~
~; 5. That the trafiic generated b~ the pruposed use will nnt impose
?~ an undus burden upon the streets and highways d~signed and improvec~ to cmrrp
y the tra£fic in ths ar~a. ~""
~
.~
0268r
f't`," '
;7, ,.~,;
y~~~r~r ~y r
~~iy. d' f i ~:'i'.h l . .
m
PCEB-100
;;}
.. . . . , .. ..... ., i~~'I.'{f~J
+ ,jr .~r Y~{r'S~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ''' r ;,~ '~ ,k~<~~~ r, ~,
~ ; ~ r '~~ ~~
~ rr:'
, ~ s
.,tj.
~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~''.~~~.
~ l';
6. That. no one i.ndicatec] their presence at said public hearing in t;
opposition; and tha~. no correspondence was recea.ved in opposiCion to the
; subject petition. '
`;
~j That t'he Anaheim
~A„LIFORNI ENVTRONMFNTAL QUALTTY ACT ~TN'DIN,~:
City Planning Commission has reviQwec~ t~he proposal to construct a 3-story,
,c,~_unxr motel on an irregularly-shaped parcel r x3mate 1 97nfeet1 an the
;~~ appror.a.maL•ely 0.67 acre, having a frontago uf ~~p oximatel y 1~40 foet north
;~; eas~ side o£ Stanton Avenue, and beii~c* ].ocated app Y
oP the centerline uf Lincolii Avenue and f.urther described as 328 North
Stanton Avenue; and does heroby r~pprove the Negative Declaration upon fin~ing
that i* has consi.dered the I~egative Der.laration together wi~h any comments
received during the gublic review proaess and further fincling on the basis of
' the initial study and any comments received L•hat there is no substantial
'h
'+~ evidence that the projecY. will have a signiPicant efiect on tha environment.
n
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pl~nning
„~ Comn-ission does h9reby granC subjact Petition for Condita.onal Use Pormit,
`I~ upon the following conditians which are h~reby £ound to be a x~ecessary
prereguisite to the ~roposed use of ths subject property in ori~er to preserve
the sa£ety and general welEare oE the Citiaens oE tha Cxty of A,riaheim:
~1) That prior to issuance of a bua.lding permit, the appropriate
, traffic signa7. assessment fee shall be ~ai~ to thQ City of
Anaheim in an amounh as determ:~ned by ~he City Conncil.
(2) That the oraner of subject pro~arty sha11 irrevocably offer to
dedicate ta the City of Anahein a strip of land ~~1 feet in
widtYa from thc centerline of the street along StTn~on A~renue
for stre~t wideniz~g pur.poses.
(3) That the owner/deve].oper nF subjeet praperCy sha11 post a
taithful performance bond in an amount approvc~d by the City
Enc~ineer witk~ the City of Anat~oim priar to issuance of a
building pormit to guarantee t~he removal of existxnr, stre,et
improvements along Stant~n Avenue and thn reconstruci:ion/con-
3trur~ion of full street improvements at the ultimate locaCion
when requirod by the City Enqir~eer.
(4) That the axiveway shall be constructed with ten (10) faot
racliu3 rurb ratur.ns as required by thc~ City EngineQr.
Exi.sting brokan or cracked driveways shall be removed anc~ re-
placed as required by the City Engineer.
(5) ~hat prior to commenc~ement of stxuctural Framiag, on-site ~ire ;•~~~i
hy3rants shall b~ installQC1 ~nd chargecl as rec~ui,rea and ;~
deterrnined ~n be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. ~i'
; ~:
~ `, ,
~
(6) That subject property shall be served by ux~darground utilities.
,
E' ` ~
r.,;; _.
l. f
)ti~;,;,~, ;'+ '~ e
. ;x
- ;..,`,
-2 ~C88-1Q0 ,~;
,~r;
~ rrr:;4
, J~~pil~t
------ . .. . .. .. ~ .. . .. ~t~~d~?1.e2~~} Zi.J~~l.'?~.~~~1~~.75~e4f~~~~
~.-e~r.~~a~RCS~I~ ~
~
(7) Tha~ trash sto~eage areas shall be
aacardance with agproved plans on
ten~ance and SanitaLiati Diviszon.
enclosure ind:~cated or Exhibit No.
accc~ssi.hie loaation to the sa~ti~f~
tor„ance and Sanita~ion Divisicn.
- C ~:~ Il~~~ 11~ Fau;~
~' d};..'~4 i ~~~•.~w~~
F~~ ,
~ . ~ ~ . . .~ ~ ~ ~. t .~i f r~~.
~'.~~ 1i~ ,;
~ ~ ~ df.
provided and ma.intained in
~a.le with the Street bfain-
In addi.tion, tha ~rash
1 shall be reloca~ed' ta an
~cti.on of the Stxeet Ma~n~
(8) Thr~t th~ owner of subject gropert~ shall extend an existing
E-incl~ water line on Beach Baulevard to subject pxoperty a.nd
sh,al7. abt~ndon the existing 2-~.nch wate~~ line currently serving
subject property Erom Beach Boulevard.
(9) That the drivewap shall be 25 feet ia width and shall, bF
;; ].ocated a.: closs ho tha north property line as pn~sible~, to
t
~,1 t:he satisfaction o!E tre C9.ty Trr~~£ic Engineer.
~i (10) Thal• drainaqe o~ subjact property shall be dispus~sd ef in a
~i
i mdnner sati.stactory to the CitX Engi.neer.
,y
i~
(~.lj
That a11 air cr~ndit9.oning facilitie~ and other roof and ground
~~ mou.nted sqnipment shall be properly shial~led from viRw and the
"`'+ sound buFfered from adjacent residentia7. propert.ies.
~
~~~ (J.2) That tho praposal shall comply ~:ith al1 signing re~uirecnents
oL• the CL Zone, unlQSS a vari.ance allaw~ing sig~n waivers is
, avpro~ved by ~he City Counr_zi~ Planning Commissian or Zuning
Adminis~ratr~~c.
' (13 ) '.Chat a six ( 6)-foo't hi~~h m~sonry bloc:c ~vall shal~ be r.an-
~
, structed and maintainec? alony the eas~. property l~ne.
`~ ~ 14 ) That any propossd parl~ing area l~.ghtinc3 fixturzs adj acent to
any r~sidential properi:y shall b3 dOWri-11Cj1]~P;i witlz r~ maximum
heighti of 12 fe~t. Said lighting fix~:urr~s sha~.l be d3rected
away From adjacent residential prop~:rty lines to pratect the
residential integzzty o£ th~ 3rea.
~;
`~ (15) That th~ owri~r et subject pxopgrty shall suY,m.it a letter
ra~uostin~ ter-nination of Conditional Usa Permit Nos. '1080 and
~' . 1119 to *_he Zoniny Division.
~'
' (16j T.b.at subject property sha11 be d~~velaped substantially in
'"
'' accordanae with plans and s~ecificatians on. file with khe City
;: i Af AnaY~eim rnarked ~xhibit Nos. 1 thx~ough 5.
r; ~
ti~
i^; _
(1%) That priar to issuaace of a bv.i~ding per.mit, or witt33n a
period of on$ ;raar fr.am tha aate af this resolution, Candition
Nos. "l, 2, 3 and ].5, ~bove-mentionpcl, shall be complie~ with.
Exten~,ions for further timo to c~mplp~o said conQitiazzs may be
grantod in accorclance with Secti.on 18.03.090 of ~he Anaheim
Municipal Cod~~.
-3
i~C88-100
,, . ,
. . .. .. . .. . ~' . . ,~ , < _.;i~ f~ .,., .,;+1, .~ ~.~s,,',. ~
~
A , : ~
~ ,•~ ,~ ~ ~~,'"~ ~.~q ~
y~ y~}
~
'
~
'~
~
~1+~ .
'~;~
. . • . -
~
~ ~ ~
.,. i t
i
ci't?'s
' °+~~T
;,
, ;`
~
, ~ ;7~:
~ ~~ ~ ~~~~s~ifi
. . . . . . . - '~' ~,.
r~
(18) Tk~at prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition 5
~~~
Nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 16, a}~ove-mentianed, ;~a
shall be comp~isd with. -
„
~
~
~
;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission ~t
~~
; does hereby £ind and determine that adoptior~ uE this Rc+solution 3s expressly `~~
F
~ predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all oE the condit
ions ~'
,
~
~ ~
hereinabove set £orth. Srould any such condic:zons, or any par~ thereof
be '~~
.
.
~;, ,
declared invalic~ or unenforceable by the Einal judgment of anx court of .i~
,~ compet~nt jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and auy appro•~als herein r~
~
~1 con~~ined, shall be cieemed null and void. ~~~'
,;
TH~ FOkEGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 11Lh day S
. . . ~.~ii~l
.~~
,:i.
d j of ,Apri1, 198R.
~
~ ;,
,
''~
F,. ~
~
~
-'2 a
~
.,
~ t
~-!
+~~~ .~-
_
-
i
CHAIRMAPi, ANAHEY CITX PLANNING COMMISSION ,'v
J~.
-
~;.
' ,
,;~
`
`
I ATTEST: _. • r:~~f
`
~~.
.
ii~
~
SECRETAR , ANAEi~IM CITY. PLANNING COMMISSTON rs,~~y
y,f
~~
,r~p
, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 1'
COUNTX OF URANGE ) ss~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~f~,~
'.l C:CTY QF ANAHEIM ) ;:;;`
.
~;
~
:
I, EdiCh T,. Harris, Sec;rQtary of the An~heim Czty Planning
Commissxon, do hereb
~ertif Fs,
~~
~~ y
y tha~ Lho foregozng resnlution was passed and
adopt•ed aY. a mee~tiny of th
A
h 'j
e
na
eirn City Pl~nning Commission held on
Apri1 11, 1988, by t2xQ following vote of the momb
h ~~
~~ ers t
ereof:
. . . ^~;T~Y
'~ AYES: COMMISSIOI~ERS: BOUAS, BOXDSTU~T, CARUSILLO, H~RBST, {?
'~ MC BLJRNEY, MF.SSE :;:::~t~;'
;
~ NO}~S: COMMISSTONEitS: ~IONE `,;:':':{t;
i~? ABSENT: COMMYSSIONERS: NONE '"~~,
r`3 ABSTAIN: CONfMISSIONERS: k'ELDHAUu `~~
~.1
~,~
TN WITNESS W.EIEREOF, I have hereunto se~ my hanci this llth day oF
A
il
1 ''f.
,
~
;:ti; pr
,
988. ,
;
,;; <t:
:'f;
~;
, ' _ ~
~.
,
~
~ SECR~TARX, ANAHEiM ~ITY Px,ANNING COMMISuION ~;~
S'
~~
~
iM
I~•~
; ~{ ~
~
'; A
,' ~ 1.;~~
r: ;~r
i.;
C~ :;~
~ ~
. ?
: ;%c
~
;
~1 . ~
i +•t
i
.
~
. . ~ ~ '~ C
~~it
~
.,
~ i
%
~5
s ` "4- k~C88-100 ~ ~ ~~
~
,7
~
~
q~
~~ ~
t~'
~' ,
, 1
f
' ,
~
~
~ ~
~
, ~ ~ . . .
. , ~ . . . . _
~ .1}~{
~'
~.t+ ~
~
2+1 ~'N,S) Y~%iU~~~ .
_-. _-_ .._._.__ . . . ~ ~ .... ~ . . .,.. . .. ~~
t f ~i
5~ /
. ...V~~).~~