PC 88-103,~~
.
' ~~1 '~,!
RE,$,Q~,~iTION NQ~ ~88-10~
s
t\ k~ESQL~UTION OF THE ANA.FiEII~f CTTY PLANNING COMMTSSION
TH.AT PETITiON FOR VARIANCE N0. 3771 f3E DENIED
WHERFAS, the Anahea.m City Planning Cummission did receive a v~rifzed
Fetitzon for Vari.ance from T~STA ALMA EMMA BOSWELL, c/o Thamas P.~nald Baswell,
2033 Pa.rk Ridge, Norao, CA 91760 and MARY PLICET, ].9t111 Bur].eigh, Yorba
Lznda, CA 92686, ownsrs and MAGDX HANtvA, 4000 MacAr~hur Boulevard, Suite G80,
NewporY. Beach, CA 92fi60, ayent Por cer~ain real property situated in the CiCy
of Anaheim, County of Oraz,ge, State of California described as: ,
B~G:iNNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE W~ST HALF 1~F
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTk~R Ok' THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OI' SAID
SECTION 17; ~hENCE WESTERI,Y ALONG THE SOUTIiERLX LINE OF
~AID SECTION 17, A AISTANCF OF ].05.00 FRET TO TTiE
SOUTHW~ST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIHED IN DEED TO btARY
CLARK, RECORDEV AUGUST 4, 1955, IN ~OOK 31G1, pAGE 522
UI' OFE'ICIAL RECOSDu; THENCE ALONG THE W~STERLY LINE 0~
~'HE LAND bESCRIBED I1Q uAIn DEED, NORTH 0 AEGREES
25' 14" FAST 210.00 F~~T 'r0 THF NORTI~'r~FBT CORNEft
xHEREOF; THF.NCF SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57' ~8" EP.ST 105.Q0
FE~.T TO TAE EASTEF.LY LIZIE OF 5AID W~ST FIALF; THENC~
SOLiTHE12LY ALANG SAID EASTE:tLY LING 210.00 FEET TU TFi~
POINT OF HEGINNING.
PARCEL 2: B~,GINNING AT A QOINT II7 THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE SOtJTFIWEST QUARTER OF SI~.ID SECTION 17, SAID POINT
BEING 100 FE~:'S 4iEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER 0~ THE WEST
HA~F OF TFiE SOCJTH~AST QUART~R OF THE SOUTHWEST QU'ARTGR
OF S~r_~YON 17; THENCE WEST ALONG THR SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SOUTHY3EST (~UAR'.PER 117 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 25'
~.~" EAST 210 FERT; TIiENCE SOUTH 89 I3rGREES 5? " A9" EA~T
]17 F~E~; THENCE SOUTH Q DE;GREES 25' 14" WEST 210 FEET
TO THE POINT OF HEGINN7[I3G.
~XCEPTING THEP.EI'RQM TFIAT POR•rrorr INCLUAED WITH PARCEL 1.
~~ WHEREAS, L•he City Planz~ing Commission diI hold a public hoarfng at
,~ l:he Civic Conter in ~he City of Anaheim or~ March 26, 198F3, at 1:30 p.m.,
x+ netir.e of said publi.c hoaring having been du3y giwen as required by ].aw and in
accordancg with tho prov3sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, f;hap~er 18.03,
to hQar and consider evidenco for and again3t said proposed vaxiance and to
~: investigate an~ mak~ findings and recommend~tior,s in connection tiierowith; and
subjer.t petition was cor_~inued ~to tha~ meeti:~g of April 11, 1988; 3nd,
;;, WHFREAB, said Commiasion, aftor due inspection, ineestigation and
';:' study made hy itself, and in it~ behalf, and after dus considerat~on of all
:~' evidence ~nd reports offered at said hoari.ng, does find and cZetermine ttie
~'-` following facts:
~
0262r PC88-7.03
~~':
`< .
,~
~L. ;'~~, . . ~ , , .~ ,..};.+~~~7Y
~
;~
,;
~, ,;,.
~ ~
7.. That t2ia petitioner proposes waivexs of the fallowing to
construct a 3-story, 30 unit "affordable" apar~ment r_omplex under authority of
Cali:Eornia Government Code Section 65915:
(A) ~ECTIAN 18 ~a_ n~i _ nlp _ t~inimurn }3 i in~Sita Area
pgr Dwelli,n ni~.
(B) ~C~IONS 18.34 Q 2 O11 - d xi ~m &tru~iral Heiaht,
and 1 34~.2 OZ2 (1 storv within 150 feet oP a
single ~amily~ zane .and 2, Storio,~
otherwise permit~ed; ? ~
Stor.i~s proposQd)
~~~ ' ~ ~I-~-18-~h ~n~~?Q - Maximum Site CovQracxa.
(~~ permitted; y~ propased)
" 2. That the requested variance is hereby denied on t;he basis ~ha't
~~ it was wittzdrawn by the petitioner subsec~uexit ~o advertising and further on
'' the basis that Reclassification No. 87-8~-44 submit~od in cnnjunction with
'=: sa:i.d Variance was denied by the Planning Commission on April 11, 1988, thereby
~' prohibiting said variance.
3. That there are no e~~ceptional or extraor3inary circumstances or
condition~ applicable to the groporty~ involved ar to ~the intexid~d use of the
~ property triat do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
, same viciniry and zone.
4. That tkie requ~:sted varianc~ is noL necess~ry for the
preservation and onjoyment ~f a subsrantial prop~r~y ri~7ht possegsed by ~ther
propertx in the same vicinit~r anci zone, and denied ta thc~ property in question.
5. T,hat the requssted varianc~a wili ba materially detrimental to
the public wplfare or injurious to th~ proper'ty ~~r impro~~emebts in ~uch
vicinity and zoua in which the property is ..loc~ted.
6. '.fhat 10 ~eoplo indacated their presenae aL said public hearing
in opposition and r.Qferred to a previ.nu:;ly submitted n~tition con.kaining
approximatel~ 200 signatures in opposition in. conn~ction with VariancQ No.
37~k5 on L-he samo property.
,, .
Ij!.
~
~~y ,~ ,;
t;ALI RI1I ,~IRONM~NTAL 1AUI ~~T p~~; That i:he Anaheim
Ci~y Planning Commi3sxon has reviewed the pr~pasa~. to construct a 2 and
3-story (prnviously 3-story), 28-unit (previously 30-uriit) "a£fordable"
apartment c~rnplex on a rectangularly-shapad parcel of 2and consisting of
approximately 0.70 acrQ, havinq a fronL•age pf. approximately 217 feet on the
norrh side oF Ball Roaa, and be3nq located ~.ppraximately '00 feet weat of thQ
cer~ter2ine ~f Nutwood Stree~ and. Further described as 2011 and 20:L7 West Ball
Road; and does haroby appr.o~je the Negative Declara~ipn upon £inding thaC it
has consi.dered the Negat3.ve llecla.r~tion together with any comments zeceived
during tho public review process an~ ~urther finding on the basis ~f the
initial study and Pny comments re~Ql~~ed that there is no subs~antia7, evider~ce
that the projert will liave a significant effect on the onv:tronmenti.
-2-
Pt;a8-103
; ~:
';t1
' ~~,k:
t. ,.
„ :#:
y~
J
. J ~~ 7 ~r.~j'.
~ ?r '''~~
. i. 1I {VL~I~~
A' ,
~4 _.. •~( 1 r,•r 1 5,1~ ~ ~'~ x ,~Y f/ s ,t' V
. . ~ , . .
~ t~.. if !)t 1 .T ) 1 ~{ fr},Jna~s`'~~{r~"/}"~ .
,. . ~ ~.
r ~ ~
`~ • ,
.
• .
. . . . ~ J i
., ; Y1 '( .
r
1
~.
~
~, ~ ' . .
~ ~'
~ ' ~
r +„F
K1
. . , .
.
. . - . . , ~.~KI
t
(~~ ~ ~ ' ~
_ 11~Z)~~
11:- 5 . ,
. ~ ~ - U~t
~
:~ ~
y:;
NOW, THEREI'ORE, BE IT RESOT~VED that tha Anaheim City Pl~nning ~
~,~#
"`~ Commission does hereby deny subaec~ Fetition for Variance on the basis of th3 " :'ti;
aforementioned findings. .';,j'
' 't
TFIE FOR~GOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this llth of ;~~
,
April, 1988.
iL4'"'P._._._-.
~ 2 :;,~,
c
' .
. .
CHaTRMAN, ANAHEIM CIT! P ANNING CCT+4dISS:CON ;
~.~::
~~~
~~' 1 '~
ki ; ATT~ST:
~ '=g
;;
, ~ ~ll
_
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSTON
;~I
~ ' ~;:~,
~•`;;' STATE OF C.~LIFORNIA ) ;
'
~ ~OUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. "
y ,;
•'
*,., CITY OF A2TAHEIA4 ) >,?~~
~
~,~ I, Edith I~. Ha~:ri~, Secretary of the Anahei.m City Plannii.~ ~~~
~' :+ Canunission, do hersby certi.~y tk~at the foregoing rasolutcion was passed and • "`:
;' ~ ado;ptod at a meeting of thE+ Anaha:tm City F~lanning Commission he],d on '~.'~
~'; Apri1 11, 198~1, by the followi.ng vute of the members thereof: ~'~
~,<<;;
'? AYES: COMMIiiSZONERSt IIOYDSTUN• CAZ2iJSIGLOr ~~~BST~ MESSE~ MC E3IIRNr^.Y '~~y
NOES: COMMZSSIONERS: BOUAS, FELDFJAUS '~~~
ABS~NT: CnMMYS.iI~NER5: NON~ ~: ir,.
~t~
IN WiT:dFS5 WHERFOF, I havQ her.euntio set my hanci L-his l~th a~y of 5,~
~'~
i ~ /
April, t988. `
r ~~
,};~
Yi ~
V ~i/
~
_ ---~ .d~Ji~~~`!~~ ~ ~~ ~/ ` - ,
~ i]ry
~
S~{:RETJ~RX, I~.NAHEIM PLAN27TNG COMMISSION .
~;;1
~, ~ ~~r`J
, ~~.
,,j
,~
, :~
!,
~ .;,~
F}',, . -`~~~
I ~~,
~ . :1 I ~G~
z'i
r +
~,t
~
~ ` 1
.
yy
+1' i :!~1
v{~
~ r
i .
i ~
C
i'~ ~~
~
a~
Y~ ~j U
~
. ..~~5i!
•~'.
,
„;
~ti
'
~
.
'
ii
y ;
i
~
~{
(*" 1. ~,~~' 1
.
r
~ :~
~~~:
I1 ,. E tt
~ Y
~
(.. i i1
ily
~
y
r{ ,
w . . . .
^•
. . . ~
,.. ..... ~ .tij
~
~~ ~~
~
Y
.
r R ' '
~
j~
" A I.
~
~
1 ~ ~~•I
~ Sn.
1~
fi
•-3- PC88-103
` `
j
T~
iYt ~ 4
ri
a
~
,~^ ~
~;
4
~~.7Wr:w~r.........- .~ ~ ......~~.. ~,...:.._ ........ .......... ~......,....,._ ..... .. ... ,.. ... . . ...._.,. .... .... ................ ..... ...,.. ... ........_ .._.. ... . ~. ~ ~ . ...... 5.~.~