PC 88-110~`;i++~,+
R~s LUZZON N0. PC80-llp
`:i
,
' A FtESOLiJ1'ION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COt~dISSIODT
t
~ THAT ~ETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3001 AE GR1~27TED
,
WIi~P.~AS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission di.d receive a veri.fied
;, Petition for Conditional iJse Permit £r~m ROY' 1). TAYLOR, 71I W. Imperial
''' Highway, Brea, CA 92621, owner and RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT GRO'UF, INC., ATTN:
~~;;
` James .7. Nuget, 2855 Hounsevel Terrele, Laguna Beach, CA 92651, agen~ for
,~
certain real property sit:uated in i:ha City of Anaheim, Count~ of Orange, State
of Ca13.fornia, descriLied as:
THE W~ST 124.25 FEE'r' OF THE S0T7T'H 119.6 FEET OF THE
NORTH 481.6 FEF:I.' ~JF LOT 13, MILLS RANCHO, TN THE CITY
OE AN~FTCIM, COUNTY ~F ORANGE, SZ'ATE OF CALIFORNIA,
MEASURED TO TF~E CENT~RS OI' THE STREETS ADJUII~ING AS
SHOYJN ON A MAF RECbRUED IN BOAK ~, PAGE 7 OF
MISCCLLANEOU'S MAFS, RECGRDS OF SAID CdUNTY.
WFiEREAS, tkie CiCy Plan:ling Commission did hold a publxc hear.ing at
tPie Civic Cente.r in the City oE Aiiaheim on April 25~ ].988 a~ 1:30 p.m., x~otice
of said public hearin~ having heen duly gzven as required bp law and in
acaordance witti tY,e provisians of khe Anaheim Municipal Code, Cha~ter 18.03,
to hcar and consider ovidence for and agai.nst said ~roposed conditional use
permit and i:c~ investi~aL-e and make findings and recorunen8ations in connection
therewith; and
WHFREAS, said Commissian, aL•tec due inspection, investigation and
study rnade by i~s~1f and in its kretialE, and aEte•r due consideration oF all
evidenco azid reports afferad at sai.d hearing, does find and determir~e the
following facts:
~-; 1. That the propused use is properly one .Eor which a conditional
i use permit is authorized by Anaheim rtunicipal Cadc Section 18.45.U50.170 to
' wit: retair.~. a 15-bed residential alcoho2 detoxificaL•ion cEnter in an existing
single-fami.7;~ resi~lrnce in the CG "G$nQr11 Cammercial" Zone.
. ~~
''? 2.. That the proposed use .i~ hr•.reby qranted fo~ a period uf three
.>;s (3) years *o expire on April 2~, 1991.
:.,
~~; 3. That the proposed use wil.l not adversaly aEfect the adjoining
land uses an.d the gr~wtl~ ancl developmQnL- at' the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
,:
4. That the sizQ and shape o~ the sitE: pr~posed For tha use is
','-~ adequa~e to allow the fu'll development of the proposed use in a manner not
y' d~trimenta7. ~o th~ parti.cular area nor t•.c~ the peace, hQalth, safety and
garieral wol~are of the Citiz~ns o~ the l':ity of Anaheim.
0270r PCf;R-110
i'
~'
~:u~~;~; ~' i,.+.'•. „
.'.i
:ar
;'`:
' ;i
;''1
~
;<",
f~
';;.
~:;
i;E
.a,.,
;i,,~
; rlt
it
' , f~
... ... I .! ~Y Y/~
~
Y i~~o~~~ M1
, , , .. ! ~~ ~'t'
t
~
. , . . . .. ~ ~'-~~i
5. That the c~r~ntincY ~f the Conditional Use Pe.rmiL• und~r the ;
condit.ions imposed, if any, wa71 not be detrimental ~o the pe~ace, healkh, ''
safety and general welfare ot the Citizons of the City nf Anaheim.
G. T.hat the traff5.c generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden ~:pon th~ streets and highways des.'tgned and impro~~ed to carry
the trafFic in th~ area. ~
~ ~ ='.f
7, That no one indicatecl thezr presenc~ at said pul~l.ic hearing i.n
opposition; and that no cr~rresponclence was r¢c.~i.ved in op~osi.tion to the ';~
subject petition.
C~LIFORNIA~_ ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT EIr1DIN•: That the Anaheim ;
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposax to retain a 15-bed `~
residential alcohol detoxification center in an exist3.ng single-family
residence on a re~tangul~rly-sh;~ped parcel t~f l~ind consisting of ''t
a~proximately 0.3~ acre having a fron~age of approximat~~ly 119 feet ~n the -
nort.h side of VICLOY Avenue, and being l~cated approximate).y 250 feet wesic of
the cent~rline oE Harbor Boule;vard arid further described as 523 West Victor '~
Avenue; ai~d does hereby appruve: the Negative Declaration upon fiiiding that it
has considored the Negative Declaration together with any comrnents rec~ived
during the public review process ax~d Eu•rther ~inding on the }iasis o~F the
initial stndy and anlr cnmments receivad that thsre is no subutanti.al evidence
that the project will have a signi~'icank effecC on the environment.
NOVI, THLkEFORE, BE IT RESULVRD that t'.:~ Anaheim City Planning
Commissiot~ doQS hereby grant subject. Petition for ~onditional Use Permit, '''~
upon tt~e fol2owing conditions which are hereby found to be a ne~cessary _
prerequisite ~o tre proposefl use of the subject property in order to pre~erve -
tihe safety an~ general welfare of the Citizens of the C.ity of AnaY.teim: :v~
1. That damaqed an8/or ha~ardous sidewalks ~h~ll be removad and/or '
recanstructed alflzig Vict~r Street as requ.ir~d by the Ci~.y '`
~ngineer and in accorc?ance wi.th standard plan~ and
specifications on Eil~e iii the Office af tha City Engineer.
2. 'i'hat subject £acility sha11 be licensed by tho Sta'ta of
Califarnia. ~,l„`
3. :Phat trasY: sto:age areas shall be provide~ anl maintained in
accordance vrith approved plans on file with the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Divi~ion.
4. That- yates shall not ~ie insLall~d across the drivewap in a
rnanner which. may auverse'ly aifect -•ehicu'lar ~raffiC in the
adj~cerit public streets. Installation Af any g~tes shall
conform ko Engi.neering Standarcl Plan No. 402 and shall re
subj~ck to tne rQView and approval of• L•he City Traffic Engineer.
Y
_2_ PCt38-110
,
~~'i
~Ycy,',•f,4v~,~j~ ,I
~7f.i1`ilRi.ir(rt4~A/~,.n,e. . ,~~i.~~ u . . . . . .. ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ . . '. ~ , .~ ,.J,.t~C
4Lf 1'fydM'~~yl~Vr-~~~"~ ~ Y1r}~ ~ ` 11 4y=~ I! +..~ ~ ~~^ - ~ ~~~Cn ~c" 1 . tI ! ~ ~~C ~' ~. ~
`,~• '.. _j ,~ ~~'q~f7 ~r:~ ~ i~:. ~:•i t ~r r°~ M l~J~Y
T~G~~:v.~ . ~1~ . . . . ,f'~ t . ~~ {~ ~~t ~r{
i~.
v-~~ni ` . . . . . . . . .. ~ .. . . , .. ~.
;~,,~ ~ ~ ., .
I 4 ~~ ~~~~
'~ .
5. T.hat all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground
mounted equipme~,t shall be nroperly shielded £rom view, ancl the
sourd buffered from adjacent residential pruperties.
6. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of
;.~ ~he CG ZOI1P.~ unless a variance allowing s~.gn, waivers is
~;>:;~ approved by Y.he City Council, Planninq Commissien or Zoning
~~`°• Admzn? strator.
7. Tha~ a six (6)-foot high masonry block wall shall be maintainad
along ~he west property ].ines exceptirig the £ront setback where
th~ wa11 heigYat sti~7.1 nut exceed three ( 3) feet.
8. Tha~ the on-site J.andscap5.ng shall be m~in,tained in compliance
wiLh city standarc~s,
9. That subject p~•operty shall be ~-~evelt~ped ~urstzntially ir.
accordance wit.h p7.~.~• and specificat:ions on Ei].e with tih~ Ci,tp
of Anaheim marked Ex ~5,t Nos. ? through 3,
10. That CondiCion Nos. ]l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 3,
abovE-mentioned, shall be cnmpletec~ within a pe:riod of sixty
(60} days from the date o£ this resolutiori.
11• That approval of this applicat.ion constitutes approval of the
proposed request only tn the extent that i.t crymplxes with thQ
Anah~:im Municipa.l Zoning Code and any other appl.ica.ble City
regulations. ApprQVal dues not include any actinn or findings
as to compliance or appr.oval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinarice, regulati~n or requirement,~
~ B~ IT FUR'PfIER RGSOI',VEll that tho AnahQim City Ylanriing Cnmmission
~~ does hereby f.ind and deter~ine that adoption of this Resolutzon xs exnressly
y predi~ate8 upon applicant's compliance with each and a11 ot the conditions
,;A
hereinabove s~C forth. Should ~ny such conditions, or 3ny part thereof, b~
,, declared invalicl or unerifoxceable by th~ final juclgment of anv court of
;4 competent jurisdiction, tren rhzs Resolution, ar.c1 any approvRls herain
~ contained, shall be deomed null ancl void.
~';
?; TIiF. FOREG4ING RESOLUTION is : ign~~d ~na ~p~roved by me this 25th day
;; oF April. 1988.
~
41
~~ ~~ ~ .
~.~"!,~-c'~'~ " - ~ !y~~S2~---
CHAIRMAN, ~ Z2"1 PLA?1NTNG CODfMIuSION
~; ATTEST: _
~
~
°~; ~~-•- ~ ~
~'
~
;? SECRETA Y, ANATiEIM
3 CITy pLJ~NING COMM
',
TS ION
~
J
N ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ .
f
i::..__:~.. _
__~~
~~
4h
tA 1 i ~.. , .
11 ~ h .
. ~ ~,
'.~.II
I
EL
~~
Fi
~
~ r
~
,
. i
.
.
1"y~1
, .~:
~
r~
~*~r ~3
i ~ -:
~
"~,
x
'
~j .
PC88-1X0
y
~~
}fi5'Y.,+t~~!`+J~ 1 ~. 1 . . .
_
{ `
!
r
' "
~I
1
~~r.~ +J .
.
~ ~ ~~ E
x~c
'
ti
~..
t
_,.~
;
~'t~~rs3;~~~.'''~~+
~~~ ~~ ,
~ '
~ ~
~~
.
.,., ~
,
_. ~ . . . . ~ _ . . ~ . . ~ . . _ ~. . ~ .., ~ ~i ~:f!'l~t~S~.Y.~
`~~l
STATE OF r_p,L?FORi'rTA ) `,i;,
CDUNTY 0~' OFANGE ) ss. '''
CITY OF ATTAHElM ) ~.`,;
I, ~dith L. Harris, Secretary of trie AnahQim City Planning `,.~;~
Commission, do hexeby cer.tify that tihe foregr~ing rosolution was passe~ and `~
adopted at a meeting of the AnaYzeirn City Planning Commiss_on held on
1~
bpril 25, 1988, by the following vate of the cnembers ~h~rea£:
• ; c:
AYES: COt~AiIS~IONGFS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CAEtUSILGQ, F~LDHAUS~ HLc~BST,
MC SUR't3LY, MES5E
NOES: COMt+1ISSI0NFR~: NONE
ABSENT: ~OMMTSSTONERS: NONE `-~%-
',,.,t
IN WTTNESS WHER~OF, I have hereu;~to set my hantl this 25th day of
April, 1y88.
~~
_~ ! , J^ ~ __ ~~ i
SECRE ARY, ATlA.FiE2M CITX PLANNING COMhfISSTQN '~~~
~ . . . :.`~r'r
1
~ I
7i .
J
~1'
~
~"
,`
S
~~
tri ~
a~ ~ ;,
~'~~~~ ~,~, ; .
,~ ,; >':
~ ~' ~=q"4 i~~~;
~y~~ ru ~ ~ S ..
i~ ~~ M ` ' !x.{ ~
'~~jt~t"'%v ~4r ~rJ ~; ~•.
. . ~.~`~.EdAr?4i~ tt~ ~'~.r,..~~
I
I~
, ~ l~~'_•~.
i~
~~
. . . .. . . . ..~.~
f5%
Y`~
i~
-A- PCaB-110 -~;2~