PC 88-118:E~iT~~;'Y~'... .
RES_ OL~T=Ot~ N0. PC8R-118
PARC~L A;
';; THOSE PQRTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN BLOCK 23 QF THE GOLDEN
~?: STATE TRACT, AS PER MAP RECQRnED TN BOOK 4, ~'AGES 66 AND
67 OF MISCELLANBOUS NjApS IN THE OF.ICE OF TH~ COUNTY
RECORDER 0~ SAID COUNTY', DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
~a
-• EN-FE~TG CHEN, 804 ~, Buchanan Court,
Brea, CA 92621, agent, ~f certain real property situated 9.n the City of
AnahEim, County of Orange, Si:ai:e of Calif~rr_ia, descr.ibed as follows:
' ,,?)ti
A RESOLUTION OF xHE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION '
THAT PETITION FOR RECLA5SIFICATION N0. 87-88~47 $~ GRANTED `"~•'
A.
t^]HEREAS, the I~nahQim Ci~y Planning Comms:,sion did receivQ a S~
verified petition for Reclassification fram MI~,RGOT M. DUKLETH, 80~ E. Suchanan ~`.;';~'~'
Court, Iirea, CA 92621, ownPr and CHI
U279r
COMMEI~CIPtiG AT THE EASTERLX' TERMIDNS OF TIiE NpRTHERLY LTNE
OF THE LAND CONVEYED TU TFi~ STATE OF CAI~IFORtdIA BY DEED
(STATE PAi:CEL ('l13) RE(;ORD~D JANLTARY 13, 1967 TN BUOK
Fi152, PAC;E 1, OFFICIAL' RECORDS QF SAID COI7NTY, SATD
NORTHERLY LINE BEiNG A C UfiVE, CUNCAVE NORT.HERLY, AND
FiAVTNG A RADIUS OF 467g, 00 FEET; THENCG ALOIIG THE EASTERLY
CANTTNUIaTION OF SAID CURVE FROM A TANGENT WHTCH F?EARS
SOU'TH 83 DEG. 06' 01" EA;ST, THROJGH AN ANGLE QF 1J D.EGo
3~' 53", AN ARC D`f.STA2vCE OF 864.11 FEET TQ THE
TNTE~RuECT20N OF A LIN~ PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT WESTERLY,
~17.5Q FEET, iKEASUi2FD AT .RIGFIT 712iGLES, rROM THE E~STERLX
L~TNE OF SAID L~OT 3, WITH ~'HG NOEtTHERLY ~,:iNE OF TFIF PARCc;L
OF LA•rID COr1VEY'ED TO SAID STAT.E BX AEI;D fgTp~~ pARCE~, (7~I)
R1iCORDED JANU~~l2Y ~1, 1967 .iN IiQOK 8165, PAGE 766 OF
UFP'IC:[AL RECORDS IN ;~AI~ O1'I'ICE, SAIB INTERSECTION BEZNG
TH;? TIlUE I~OINT qi' B~C'IT7NTNG; TT~ENCI~ ALONG SAIb PARALLEI,
LTi~'E, .NORZH 7 DE'G. 19' 35" 41LCZ'. 98.1i4 F~ET TO THE
NO.F.THE1tLY LING O.F SAIT.~ BLOCIt 23; TiiENCE ALONG SAID T,AE1~
MEN7':LONED NOT~THEFtLX LI.HE, SC~UTH 3^ DEG. 40' 27" WEST,
702.63 FEET. TO THE CUR~'E HERBINABOVE DESCRIF3ED AFi HAVING A
L~Nr,;~CH OF 864.11 1?~ET; TIiENCI; EASTERLY ALQNG SAID LAS~
MENTIONF'D CURV~, THROU~11 AN p,~v'GLE OF 8 DEG, 41' 4g~~, ~
AR(: 1)I ST.ANCE OF 71~~ . 20 r EET TO SATD TRU~, POINT UI'
BEGINtTTNG.
PC88•-118
.e~~~~
~: ;,;; , ~ , r•'t i
, ~*~"
~ ' . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . .. ,~:y~~ 1 ~!i~;~`i
` , ~ ~ ~ .. . ?f
~ WHEREAS, rhe City Planning Commiss3on c7xd holc9 a public hoaring
at th~ Civic Conter in tho Cit:y of An~heim on May 9, 1988 at 1:30 p.rn., notico
of sr~id pub7ic hearinq h~ving been duly given ~s reqiiirecl by law and in
accordanco wf*_h tho provisions ~f th~ anaheim Muni.cipal Cade. Chapter 1t3.03,
ho noar ancl cons.ide: ovideiice for ~nd against saicl proposod xQClass3fiaati~n
and to invs:~tigate flnd make findings s~nd rQCOmroQndations in connection
ttiorewith; nnd
W~i~REAS, said Commission, after. 3ue in,pectS.on, invesrigation
an% stuc~y made by itsclf Pnd in its belialt, ancl aftEr duo consideration oE ali
evidencc: and regarts offereA ar. s~f.d hearing, does find and determine tlze
followinc~ facts:
1.. That tho Qetitionc~r proposQS reclassiEication of subject
praperty from thE RS-A-43,000 (i2~sident~al/Agricultural) Zotte to the ML
(Inclustrial, Limi.ted) ~one.
2. Tha~ th~ Anaheim Genera] Plan designatr~s subject proFnrty
,,
for General Industri~l land u:,es.
3. That thr: propo~ari roclaa~ification of subjoct ~rororty is
ai~Cesyary 3nd/or dQSit•able Lor the orclerly aud proper cievelopment af hhe
,_' - commun i ty .
4. ThaL• the pro~osed reclassificaCion of s~ibject properY.y does
~roper.ly relate to the zon~s and thetr permitted usQS locally established in
clos~ pcoxi.mity to subject property and to tho zones anci ttieir permitted usQs
genorally established thr~ughout tho conunun.ity.
. 5. Ttiat the proposed re~classification of subject property
requires the dadiaakion of n~arby streets .in accordauce wit?~ the Cii-cu2ation
F.lemeut of the Ge:ieral Plan, duo to Lt~Q au~iciputod increase in traffic which
~~ill be 7enerat~d by Lho intcnai£ication af land uso.
6. That two (2) p~ople indicated their Z~resanca At said public
hoaring in apposir.ion; and thar. no currespandsnce was r.eceived in oppoaition
to subjacr petition.
CALIFQRtiIA_Et1VIRQt?MEN1~I.~QI~I~LITY 1~~T_,.NItID7t1~: That the Anahe.im
City Planning Commission has re~~ie,~ed Lhe proposal to r~clnssity s~~bject
property from the RS-A-•43,OOn (Itesiden~i~~l, Agriculturnl) Zone to the ML
(Inciusl-rial., Limited) Zone and t~ c:onstruct a 3-story ~~fl-Eook t~igh) 66-unit
motel with waiver of maximum structural heiglzt oti an irr~gu2arly-shapK~
parcol of land cur.aistinq of epproximalely 0.9 acre locatc:d on th3 north 3ic3e
oC ~:h~ RivQr3ide (Houte 91) Preeway an8 beiriy lor~ted west oF Cho centQr.line
of the southern torminus oE w"hite 5tar Avenue; arid does hereby arprove the
tregative De~claration upon [ind.inq that it has considore~ th~ Neyative
Deciaration together wiCh any cornmenes receav~d dur.ing the public review
process an~ furthor fincl.ing on the bas.ia oE thc inil:ial atudy nnc! any
canunents received thak thQrQ is no Rubstantial avidonca th:~t the pro~oct af13.
ht~ve a r~iqni~icant c•ffert an rhe ~nvironmont.
-?. - P..9R-•11~
; _~
~,~J~
4~1~ .~.1"l.~'
y,+ `., ~,.~ , ' . . • • . . . ~~ - - ~- ~ , ar ~ f
7ufy,~,N~'Y f ~ f (: ~' .. .~ . ~ ~ ~ ."'4F :va~fL~'.i~~~
~~
~i f' r~'F
NUW, THEREE'QI2E, FiE Ia RESOLVED that the Anaheim C3ty Plann~ng
Commi.ssaon docs her~by grant s~ibj~3ct Peti~ion tor Roclassification and, by so
cloing, tr~at Tit1Q 18-Zuninq of ~he Anaheim Municipa2 C~do be amanded to
~xclttdQ t.he abovQ-described praperty from th~ RS-A-43,C00
(Residenti~-1/Agricultural) Zon~ and ~~~ incorpnr~r,e said closcribad prop;~r.ty
into thn MI, (lndustrial, Limit~~d1 Zon~ upon the Eollowing condt~ions whi.ch
ara Y~eraby fuund to be a nocQSSary preroquisite to tlin proposed uso of
subjact property in order to presorv~ LTlf~ safety and genoral welfare of the
Citixens oE thQ CiL-y of Analicsim:
1, That ~he nwner of subject proporty shall irrovc.ahly offer ~o dedica~e
to thQ City o~ Anahoim tha west~srly 15f~ teer, ~f the ~v.bj~ct proporry for
public street purposes.
2, That a perpetuaJ. oASeinert agreement witY, h_he ~w~ner of tho property tu
the aast, prc,viclinq for circul.ation ot trash trucks from one parcel ta
L-ho othor, shr~11 be subm.itted to the Ciry AY.torney's OEfi~P tor review
ancl appro~~al. The appr~vc~d agreempnt shall then be filed aiid recorded
in the Office oE the Orange County RecordQr. Proof of said rec.~rdation
shall then bc~ submihL•ed to Che Zoning Division.
3. That prior to the introQuckion of an ordiuance rer.uiiing subject
proporty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-metitioned, shall be cdmpleted.
The provisions or ri5hts qr3nted by this resolution shall b4co,ne null
and v~id by action of t}ie P2anning Commission unlesn said conditions are
complied with within ~ne yc~ar from the daCe oE this ro~olution, or such
furth3r t.ime as tl~e Planning Commission may grant.
4. That appruval of this npplication constitutes approva.l rf khe proposed
request only to the extent L•hat it complieQ w;th the Ar.aheim Municipal
Zoning Co~le anif any other app~icable City regulations. Approval doee
n~t include nny act.i~n or find.ings a.s t~ compliance or approval of the
r.equest rogardfng any othe.r applicabl~ ordinance, regulation or
requirt~rnent.
BE Ix FURTHF.R RESOLVE~ r.har. the Anaheim C.ity Planning Commi.ssi~n
does h~reby find and derermir,e thah adoptian of this Reso'lutfon is expsossly
pre3icated up~n ~pplicanC's complianco w.ith f!nCTI and all of the r,ondlh,ions
hereinabove :set forth. 5hnuld 3ny suc2~ cor:ditior-s, or any part thuteof, be
declarecl invali.d or unenforceable by the final judgment o~ any cour~ of
compet~nt juriodictlon, then this ResUluCion, atiti any «pprovals herein
~ontainad, shall be d~emod null and void.
-3- PC80-118
~ ~ ~ ~'~::a
:;
_ ~:;~
~ .
_~.".,,
7 !
~ ' . :~-l 1 ty,; riIS~
' . ~ g'~~l~t~?ti~ .
cY
, ~ , ' ~ .~'-+ ..~i .
'~`~l
. . . .~,~~~i
~r,I.
'A
T~iE EAREGOING RESOLi~TTO~T, is signed ancl apprn~~ed by me this 9th daZ- "~
of May. 1988. ;:g
• ~ i
i ` .,~' ~ ~ ) , i>,
~- `~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ti,t~
__ ~C.e-~ :..~. ,~-.._ .~-~--~__ ~ .
. ~,
CFiAZi1MAN, ANAHETM CITY PL NNI2dG COMMIS5ION ;~t
, ~..~
ATTEST:
. ~ ~'~~' ~
SECRETA Y, A.rIAHrIM CITY PGANNING COMh!ISSIOti
STAT~ OF CALxFORN.LA )
~, COUNTY d F ORAN~G ) ss,
~.; CITY OF ANAHEZM )
~~
r{
7, Edi~h L. Fiarris, 5ecreCary of the Anahe.~m Ci.ty Planning
Commis~i on, do hereby cortify ~hat the furegoi.ng rQSOluCion was passed anU
`.~ adopted at a m~eting of khe Anahei.m City Plonning Commission helcl on tday 9,
:~ 1988, by the following vote of the me~nbers thereof:
~;
~ AYES: COI~SISSIOIIERS: BOUAS, ~OYDSTUN, CARUSILLC, FEGDHAUS, FIERBS'.C,
~ MC BURNFX, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
%
:; AI3S~NT: CnMJySTSSIONERS: NONE
4'
`' I~I WITNESS WHEREOF, I have herounto set my hand this ~th day of May,
~ 19$8.
~.
;'
~r
~ b~_ `'~^
~
~
~
~, .
_~..
•
-
__---
SECRETARY, ANAFiEIM CITX PLANNING COAIIytISSIO~
,t
; '~-
'.ia
;, ~,
;,I,~I
~
,
~i
'~~;,
~~
.ti
' ;~
;~~
~+;
<<,~
'~,
; ~t
'~
•f'~
~ ~^
'~
}}
~
~~
-a- pcea-iie
,'~
;a
.~
~~
~ ~ ~ . ..:`Y2~Y