PC 88-121; ~
, ~
`.^ ; . , .. . * .. _-~ 1 4~1F . i ~ ~..r~:~
,i. !. •
~: . ..r ~ . . . 1 ~..1~'A! L t • V'~,
, ~ , r ~,
>. . .. _~, ~l:;i, F.: ,.1~ . ~ ~ '
~ x~
>
RFS~L T7: N N0. PC88-121
A RESOLUTION QF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C011MISSION
THAT YE7.'ITION FOR VARIANCE I30. 378f3 Bi GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissio~ did receive a
verifzeu Pe~itiorz £or Variance from RAYMOND A. MASCI~L and COTTNIE V. NiASCIk~L,
P.O. Box 4241, Anaheimr CA 92801, owner, and MASCIEL DEV~LOPMENT, P.O. Box
4241, Anaheim, CA 92801, agent, of certain reaJ prcperty situated in the City
of Anaheim, CounLy of Orange, State oi California describcad as:
LOTS 12 AND 13 OF TRACT N0. 255 AS P~R MAP THEREOF
RECORJJED IN' fi00K Z4, PAGE 25 OF MT~'~ELL~ANEOU5 MhPS IN
THE OFFICF OF TFiE R~C~RllER l~F SAID CfIUNTY.
W~iEREA5, the City P.la~ ning Commission did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center ,in the Cit,y uf Anaheim on May 9, 1988, at 1:30 p.m.,
noh.ice of said publi.c hearing having been duly given as raquired by Xaw and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal COl~P.~ Chapter 18.03,
to hear ~nd consider ~~~idence for an~ against said proposed variance and ~o
z.nvestigar~ and make findings and rec~mmendations in c~nnection therewi.th; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due ins~ection, in.vestigation
and s~udy made by itsalf and i~: i'ts behalf, and after due cor.sideration af all
evidQnce and reparts offerecl at sai~ hearing, does find and detQrmine the
followir~g facts:
1. Thai: the petitioner proposes waivers ot tihe~ followinc~ to
construc~ a 3-story, la-unit apar~.~nenh. complex:
(A) 6ECTION 18,34.~~_012 - Mr~ximum Structural Fieiah~.
(1-s r~ within 150 feet of a
single-family zone parmitted;
~-~„~,rig~ proposed at 72 L•o 75
feet)
(B) ~ECTI~N 18.34~9 - P rmi t~ En roachm~n i:z~o
Reau•ar Yar~i Are~.
(Parking s~aces not p~rrnitted to
encroach into 15-£oot deep front
yard; 2 parking spaces proposed
at 3 Peet frorn Cypress Street)
2. That r.kze above-mentiunad waivers are horeby granted on the
basi.s that. ttiErP are special cir.cumscax~r,es appJ icable to the properh.~ su.ch as
size, ahapQ, topography, location and surrounclings wh.ich cio nat apply to other
ident9.ca11y zoned r~roperty in the same vicinity; that strict app].icat.ian of
,si
0202r
Y,
a
,
' ~ ~'.~
;~;1}
;;~
';;~;
';;
'i
:r
,; ;
'r~,
~k
~ ,~,
y t ~~
1
t ' ~~~
.,. •.:/r l ~I Alj}i~~~N H'
~. .
ti ;
~
N, ii , ,i~4, i i tx~_fif~
y
~ ''~~'~ r~
,:1 1x.,~
,i
~4
. (I
~'illi
~he Zoning CodQ deprives the proparty of privileges Pnjoyed by other
pro»erties in the identical zone and cl~ssification in ~ht~ vicanity, and that
nearby single-f3mily resiclentially zoned properties ha.ve heen ~appraved £or
multiple-family residenLial zoning or are develapment with a non-residential
use (church).
;~'
+ 3. That the proposed variance zs hereby granted to the ~~
,a ~:etitianer's stipu?ation tha~ guest parking spaces ~haJ.l be limited to use by
~y`; guosts only to avoid parking on th~ streets. ':`''~~
4. That there are exceptional or extraordix~ary circumstances
w or cunditions applicable to ~he properCy involved or to the intended use ~t
the property thah. do not apply generally t,o thQ praperty or class of use in
the same vic~inity an.d zone.
5. That the requested variance is necessary for the
preservation ancl enjoyment of a st~bstantial property right possessed by othe,r
property in the same vicinity and zone, and clenied to the property in questian.
6. That the request~d variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the propexty or improvements
in such vacinzty and zone in whiah the pro~erty ~s located.
7. That ?. persons indicated their pr.esence at ^aid pablic
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was receivad in opposition
to sttbject petition.
CA:'~Ii' RNIA EPiVIRONMENTAL~ OUALI2~Y A~T FT.NDI~: 'That tY~e Anaheim
City Planning Commission h~s r.eviewod the proposal to reclassify subject
proper!y from t1:P RS-7200 (Rasid.ential, Single-Family) Zone to the 12M-I200
(Resid~^*~a.l, Multiplo-Family) Zone and to cor.struct a 3-story, 1l3-unit
apartmen~ complex witli waivPrs of maximum struatural heighL- aixd permitter3
encroachment into required yar~ area on a rectangularly-shap~d parcel of land
consisl.;ing of approximately 0.6 a.cre located at the southeast corner of
Cypress Street and Cof.fman Street, havi.ng approxima~e frontages on 215 £eet
on the south sicle of Cypross Street and 121 teet oxi the east side o£ Co£fman
Streat and furtk-er c3escribed as 22~ N'orth Coftman Stres~; and doe~ hereby
approve the Nogati~•e Declaration upan findxng that it has consa.dered the
Negative Declaratiun togethnr. with any cumments received during the public
review process ancl Eurther finding on the basis of tnQ init:ial study and any
commex~ts re~eived that there is no substantial evidence t:hat Y.he projECt wi1'1
have a significant effect on the environmQnt.
NOW, THF.R~FORE, BF IT RE~OLVLA that the Anaktei.m City Planning
Commission doos hez~eby grant subject Peta.tion for Variance, up~~n the
following condikions whzch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite ta
the proposed use of the subjecC property in order tu preserve the safety anc~
general wel~are of the Citizen~ of L•he City of Anaheim:
1. That this Var~an~~e is granted subject; to the acloption of the Zoning
Ordir_ance .in connection with Rec].assiPicakion No. 87-88-48, ,low pexiding.
_ .._ .._..
:, .
,~ W2_
PC88-121
x~
f
,;
;; ; ~ai .~+;P 'rn .'t'c~;?
. . . .. . .. . . . . . -.~r
!"'^~ ~ ,
2• Tht-l prior tio i~su~nco of a building permi.t, aFPi'nPx3ate park and
racr~sation in-liou fc~cc ~lia11 be paicl to tl;e City ~f. Analioim in an
amount ~s ~eCermined by Che City Councii.
3. That prior Lo 3~suance of a bu3lding parmit, the apprnpriatio traEfic
signal ~ssessmQnt fec~ ~ha7Z )~a paid to tho City o£ Anaheim in an amount
as doCermined by ttic- City Council.
_• ThaC s,i ;,e~,alk;~ :hall be inslalled aloi~g CoEfman an~l Cypress Streets as
required by the City F.nginee~ and. in accord:~:i~~ with standmrd p]ans ana
specifications on filo in rhe Ottice ci: ~hP City EnginRer.
5. That subjac:t proporty srall be servecl by underground uti~i~ias.
6. That drainage of subjer.t property shall bo dispased of in a rnanner
sati~[actory to tk~o City Engineer.
7. That pri.or to Comm~~~n,,,enL' oE s~ructural framing, fire hydrants shall be
installQCl and charged as requirad and ~at~srmi~~ed to bo nsces~ary }~~• tlie
Chief of. the Fire Departrr~ent.
~• Tliat trash st:orage ar.eas st~all be Qrovi~led and ma3r.laintd in accor.dance
with appro~~ed plans on fila with the Straet: Mdzntenance ann Sanitation
bivision.
9. That all air condiCioning tacilities and ~tyer roof and qround snounted
equipment shall be properly shielded fz~om vier:, an~l the sound huffered
from adjacenL• rasidential propertia~.
10. That prior t i~su»ncR of a builcli:ig pQrmit, t!~e r~wnc!r/developer :~
~ubject ~-'op~:rty shall post a faithfu: psrformanc:e bonci ~.rir}1 the City ot
Anaheim in au amouut approvP~ hy rhe r_iL•y Enginc~Qr to yuarantee the
remaval of existing street improvoments along C~ftman ~treat and
reconstruction/construction ot ful.l street impc•ovements at the ult.imato
loc~tion when roquired by the City Engfneez~.
l.l. That subject ~ronQrty shall be devoloped subsl•antially in accorc~ancw
with plans and s~,acifications on file wir.h the City of At~~hQim mar3c~d
Exhibit Nos. 1 througn 6.
12. That pciar to issuance ~f a buildiny permit, or rrithin a~er~od of one
year from t?-e datF of thic~ reso2ution, whichover occurs firsC, Conditioi~
N~s• 1, ~ 3, and 10, above-ment;ionerl, shall be compliad with.
Er.rensions for further time to complete said conaftions may be qr~n~ocl
in accordancP w.ith Secti~n 18.03.~90 oi the Anaheim ?dunfcipal Code.
13. That ~rior. t•o fin31 builQinc~ and zoning inspo~t;~ns, Condit~on Noa. q,
5, 6, fI, ~1 and 11, abovg-muntionod, shdll bcs compli~d with.
:: '~ i
~..
3 A'
~-
"3" pcsa-ixt
T ~~t; u i `J'a iFtc
~i : +~-
:~~,~~.r~~~~.:~'t b° ..~,~,. A ~.~..-.. ~"~.,r,;. ,... . . ~.v,~,r[ ri~ ~r ~ ~-~n.
, . ,., ..,i i i..,;. ~,~ ~ :~ .
... . „.. . . . ,
. . , i.... ,. . ..._, . :"IC'•_ . .. .. ~~4r<.~. . .. . t ,'i.?y ii ,:r~.• 3 Y'~,s,~:t•ia j a~)I;.'~"~~+~~ ""iJytl,~fA
. .. .;". . a. ~ ~ , ,.... a~j'„~j~,
. . . '~ `}S*.
• •
~ ~r.
,. ;S
14. That approval of this applicatton coristiL•utos ~~+rr~,•12 oS Lllc~ proposed
requQSt only to rhQ c::t;e~ii~ ChaC it complias wiCh ~he Anah~im Municipal
Zuu.ing CodP and any other applir.3ble Ci.t,y regulr~ti.ons. Approval t~qq5
not ~riClud9 any c~~.t.ion or Findings rss to compliance or approval ~£ the
requesL• regardinq any othQr a~plicable ord.in~nua, reyulation or
: equirc~mc nt.
IIE Ir FTJRTHE;K RESOLVED that Cho Anaheim City Planning Commisaion
cloes horeby Eind and ~etermine that adoptiur. of this Resolution is expressly
l~r~iclicatecl upon apl~licanl's complxance with each and a1]. of the candi~i~ns
herQinabove s~~t for.~th. Shoulc3 ~ny s~ich concl3~::u~~~, or aiiy part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceablQ Uy t}~ f~.nal judgment of any court ~t
compeh.ent jurzsdictiur~, then this Resoluti~n, ~nd any ~ppr4vals herein
eonL-ained, shall be c1P~mec3 null and voi.d.
TFiE rORE('OING RESOLUTION is signed and appr~vecl t~~~ :;o c.his 9th day
af May. 19a8. ~,, ,,~ .
i i7 ~/, /
~/a.;~..-%iv/ /~1;~ i t~...iT,
(:HAIRMAN, : `IAHGIM CYTY PLADiNI2JG CONIh1ISSI0N
',-~ i E ST ; ~
-- - ~-•'---~~~"t' --- --
SRCRETAR , ANAHEIM CIT'~' PLArINZNG COMMISSION
5TATE OF CALIFOBNIA j
t:0'UNTY OF ORANGE ) s s.
(:I7.'Y 0~' ANAf:EIM )
I, Edith L. Harri;,, Sec;retary of ~na Anatiefm C.ity Planning
Commissian, do hereby cc~rtify that tliQ ~orQgoinc~ rQSOlution was p~ssed and
aclopted at a nteetinr, of Che Anaheim City Planning Commission held cn May 9,
1988, by th~ f.ollowir,e~ vate of the membors thoroof:
AYF.S: COIyII•tISBIONERS: BO'JAS, BOXDSTUN, FBf,DHAUS, HGRBST,
MC BUFtNEY, :KESSC
NOF.S: COMMZSSTONFRS: CARUSIL'.0
AHSENT: COMMISS'lONERS: NONE
IN WITNE5S WHEREOF, i havo hereunt~ set my hand thi3 9th ~al of May,
198Fi.
~~~~ ~ ,q.~~ ~ I,, - .
_______.._ ~~-~_''C•t'!T~.•._.._._L\..~_~~~1~-.._,
SECRETAR~', ANAEtEIM CSTY PLl-fi
NING C~MMISSYON
"'~" PCES-121