PC 88-128:; t! F tr~R 1 M~x~a~ ~~,ir3 ~ ~' l•a• r~ m ~~ ~ riV {~J>' rrr~ n r ~.1 ~f; ~~ (, r~. .. ~-~ , ~ ~ t4't
~µ. ~ ~ 1} ~ r .~•
. . . .,~,::.~ , . .. .1.. n,c'j4~, 1 .1;; ,i1~aa i., ,~l~f i~~tA~ r i~ t~ ~t~Q~~,
.. . . 7':: , ~ ~ , `~~s\ S ~ ! ~b Y~;' ~sb ~n' i~l f:~~k~~~V°+jl~V i~;
~' „~
r ~
~ ?~
~
~ ~
;?j.
~ .. ~ . - ~ . u~~~~
!1:
t'!
. . ~ . ~.., ~ h.
RES LUTION NQ, PC 88-12Q `.;r~;
< ;i
; ~,
!i;
A RESOLUTION OF THB ANAH~IM CITY I~I.ANNING COMMISSION ;~
TNTERPRL'TING LAND US~ REGULAT.IUNS - RESOI.,iJTZON OF UNCERTAINTIES ~;;s'~;
IN CONN~CTION WITH PFRbfITTED PROJECTIONS A,BOVE MAxIMUFi STRUCTURAL AND ~
BUILUING HEIGHT IN THE SCENIC CdRRIDOR OVERLAY 'I,ONE ,;Y
WHEREAS, Section 1$.02.041 of the Anaheim Mun.icipal Code ~`,~
specifies that if an ambiguity exi.sCs with r.eFerence to matters of height, "•.'
yard requiremen~.s, area requirpments, or zon~ boundaries, ii: sha].1 be the duty ,y",
of the Flanning Commzssion to ascertain all pertzrient fac.*.s and se~ ~ortr its ,:.;;;
findings anii reasuns lherefor, and suc'h findinc~s shall he referred to the Ci~y
Counc~.l and, if approved by Citg Council, thereafter such interpretations
shal]. ~overn; and .
WFIEREAS, the applicant, has reguested that Ghe Planning ~;~;:
Commission iriterpret Sections 1&.04.030 (S'"RUCTURAL HEICHT LIMITATTONS - ~`
':
:
GENERAL); 18.84.020 (PERMITTED LiSES ANll STRUCTURES - GENFRAL (SCENIC CORRIAOR >
~
-;-~;
0'JERLAY ZOtvE);; az~d 18.89.042 (SITE DEVELOPMENT STA.NDARDS (SCENIC CORRIDOR ;~
~
~__~VERLAY ZOr;c:)) of the Anaheim Municipal Code as to whettier chimn~ys are a
permitte:~ proje~ction above the maximum structural and buildinq heiyht in the ~',~.
5ceni.;G C~~Or Overlay 7one (SC Zons) and speci.ficaYly whe~her or not the SC
;,,~
,
'''~
Zcne supersedes the "General Provisions" Section of the Code; and ,
;;~,
?~~
WHERSAS, the An~heim Ci~y Planning Comrnission did consid~r ~~~
'"
subject request at their regu.lar meeting on ~Qay 9, 1988, anc? after due '`h
investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf~ aYici after due ';•
cons.ideration of all evidence ~And reporh,s afiered, does hereby find and r~
determine the following facts~ s%r
~ ~,,s
1. That thore is ambiguity in Section 1$.84.092 - SITE :;1:
D~VSLOPMENT STANDARDS: Subsectiun .010 - BUILDTNG AND (';~:
,;
STRUCTURAL', HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, and ~ubsec~iQn .011 in ,
~''+?
that said Subsection .G11 doe~ not c'le~arly define the ;~~'
hiqhest portion of the structure, and Subsection .012 '`',~`
in that said Subsection .012 d~es not specific~lly
prohibit chimneys as perrcittecl projection;~ abovo tYie 'i,~
rooEline. ,
2. That ~.he intent of Subsocti~n .012 sha11 bQ
interpr.eted t, mean t2iZt r.himneys are not prohi}~ited
as pormitted projections above the roofline.
3. That SubsQCtion .011 relating to maximum overal3 `~~'
_ ;,,,,
height of any building or mobilohome in the 5cenic '''
^~,I}
Corridor Overlay Zone s~aall be interproted t.o mean
that the maximum over~ll heiglit of any building or '~~
mobilehome s~a11 be measurecl from the hi hest ~`'~~'
9 portzon _ _' 3:~
o:f the roofline to the highest finished gracie level -:,~s
at th~ foundation; provided, how~vor, that chimnays ~;:f'~
shall be excludsd. ;';~
;i c
~~
PC $8-128 ,;;~
''';?~
' ` ~d!~
, ,, s ~_ ,~t, . c,r~~a_.~c"~ ~'
, _ '' . .. . ,. ' . ~I:~.~ 2 4 1~ I fl4~1;~1 I X ~ln~(~~~^Q
1
''~ ~ r` , ~R~
.
n4 ,
~
.
~ 1• ~ q~V` .
~ ~ ~
~
,
~
~
;
~
~ ~
~
,
~
~ th`~
I
~;~~
~ . I ~~[~
:'pl.
A~
• t ti;~
3•t.
'j
't~ ~u4
.:.r~l
3. That: thexe is no ~-mbiguity in Ser.tion 18.84
020 ~
.
(PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTU'RFS -~ GEr1ERAL) and the ,
:.~%
Scer~ic Corrido_ Overla,y Zonc does suporced~ the ;i;
"General Provisioz.s" Secti.on ut the CodP, where "^~~
~' inconsistent. ~,t
i' ~
~
NOW, THEREFORL•', B~ IT R~S~',~'FD that the Anaheitn City Planiiing ~~:
~'
Commission does heroby make the afor~mAntioneu interpretations of th~ Anaheim
Municipal Code r$lating to Site Davelopm~nt S:andards and Building and f`
Structtira.l Height Limitations 3.r. the Scenic Corridor Ov~~rlay Zone. `.
t~`
,,; TH~ FOREGOING RESCLUTION is signe3 ancl approved b-,f ine this 25th ~
~
n day of ApriY. 1988. a
w. , ``
ii~ D,
U Q.~J2_.._..
~
' l
~; ---- +ti
:
~ CHAIFMAN, ANAI3~rM Cx Y PLANNTNG COt~AiTSSION
'~' ~
~'{ _ r r .
ATTEST:
S ~
- ~~~!/ ~ _ ~ t' '/1. ,<<.~/. ;!
~''ti
'~F SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIT'Y PLANNING CUhII~fISSTQN ~l
c~j ;;~
'
!
u
t' .:;j
~j STATE OF CAI~IFORNIA ) ~~
:
~;` COUNTY OF ~~2ANGE ) ss. '~,
~; CTTY OF ~~*.tAHEIM ) ~:,`:;
i4 .(
'`
z` I, Edit~h L. Harris, Secr~tary of ~he Anahoim City P? anning '
i Cnmmission, do hereby certify that ~he tnregoinc~ resolution was passed and
; ?~
~+
`
i adopted at a meoting oE the Anaheim Citg Planning Commission held on May 9~ P
~, 1988, by the fol.lowixig vote o.E the mombers thereof: r~,
~ :~ ~
`~ AYES: COI~II~ftSSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, ~ELnHA'US, HERBST, '~
~ MC HURNFY, MESSE ;¢
NO~S: COMMISSIUN~RS: NQNE ,
`.jF
;; ABSENT: COMMISSIOtTERS: NONE r;,
i ~
r'~
:. IN WITNESS WIiFRE01 , I ha~e hereur.~o set my ha:,d this 9~h day of May,
1988 ,
}z~,
. t.
r„
"' ` < F
' ~
_..- ~ ~i~..J /`~ - ~ ' 1+~~
Y
~
f{'~ 1
~
~
SECP.E'i',~ Y, AHETM CI'~.'Y PLaNNING COMMISSION ~
: :~:::;~1
's`:i:~D
H0066b
-2-
PC88-1: 8
. ~ ,,^ 1
.. . ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ . ii~::',~
~;~;
',:,;;,
; ,' •`'
,: ~i~1 ~':~tvs:tir 'r~