PC 88-138'' k~hp~;:!~. I~i+K.~+;'~j~~°!'~rf~~ 1.;:er ~a ~ k~~:•~ t~~~~i~C~; W~p }~Y ~~ 1 ~ i~:i: ~:.. ~,..1if ~ 11'~:,•~~~~~,:
_. . '4~4,~"~ , FS ~t "1,,~ ) v ~1
~
.~
`i `;";~!{~
~` A ~j
'~?~S~GU'P?QIZ NQ, p~8 -138
A RES~L~UTION OF TFI~ ANAHEIM CITY PL~ANN;ING CUMMISSION
THAT PE7'ITION FOR Vi~RIANCE r~o. 3799 I3~ G1~ANTED
WHEfiEAS, the Anaheim City Yl~nnirig Commission did receive
a ve_-if:ied P~tition for Dariance from EALDWIN f3UILDING CObfPANY, 1681~ Hald
Aventie, Irvine, CA 92714, owner, and J~IAtdA HOARU, VICE PRk.S'lbENT, T:IE BALDWIN
COMPANY', 16011 Ha.l~ Avenue, Irvine, CA 92714, agenC, of certain real property
sit~tat•ed .in l•he City ~f AnahE~im, County of Urange, State oF' CaliL•ornia
described as:
tTf
. , , :..:~,f}~
K
:':~
~i
4~
: ;~
~.. PARCEL 1:
~
;•? TRACT N0. 2 OF TFIr: I,ANU aLL~TTED TO TEODOCIO YnRBA, AS
' D~:SCRISEU IN TFIE FIPlAL DECREE UF PARTITI(?N OF Y'HE
RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, WI~ICH WAS ENT~tZ~D
5EPTEMIIER 12, 19II5, IN BOOK 'B", FAGE 410 OF JUDGMENT~ '
OF THE DISTRTCT CUURT OL' TH~ 1"1T.H JUDICII,L DISTRICT IN
~' ANll b'UIt LOS ANGELI:5 COUr]1"~, CALSEOItNIA, DESCRI9ED 1~~ `
FOLLOWS: ~~`
~;
,,
BEGiNNIr1; AT THE SQUT~tWEST Cc.RN~R OF ZH~ TRAC~C OF `
; FET iPE YORDA, PF:R SAID DECREE; THG27CE SOUTH ?7 DEGREES
i OF3' EAST 1: a4.00 Ff.C'P; THENCF rroa~x 62 DEGR5F;5 52' EAST
': 5aY4.00 FEC'!' ?'0 TIiE I,:CiJE OF FLINT AND HlXBY'S ALI,OTME:IT ~`
5 PEk SALD DECREE: TFIENCP NURTFI 34 DF:GREES 45' ~:AST J
t 1270.50 FEET TO THk: TTORTHEAST LIPJE OF PERALTA YORBA ^
~ T~ACT, AS PER SAID DLI;REE; TcIENCE NpRTH 37 DEGREES 08' ~
t `~IEST fi6q,00 FE~T TO THB SCU'THGAST CORNf:R OF Z'H~ SAID
~ Tl2ACT OF FF,[,ipg yqRgA; ThCtarE; SOUTN fi2 JF.'GRF'ES 52' WLST
' 6955.7A FGFT TO 1'IiF. POSP]T OF H:;GTNNrNG. '~
5
U~
?; PARCEL 2:
y
~ TRI~CT N0. ?. OF THF. LAl1U ALLCITTED TQ FELIPE XOR~A,
~
DE~CRIBED IP~ 7'EIE r INAL DECREE OE' PAP.TITI0~1 OF THF
e RAI~CIiO 5AN'CIAGO D~' SANTA At7A, WHICH FIAS EPITERED
~ SEPTEDtBER 12, lbft3 IN fir~QK "g", PAGE 410 4? JUDGEMEtiTu '~
~ OF TIIE DISTRICT CUURT OF THE 17'PH ~1UDICIAL DISTRICT, TN `':
t AND FOR '~OS ANGEL~:S COUNTY, CALT~ORNZA, DL•'SCKIDED AS I
~ FUI,LOWS : +
+
f
S Ii~GiNN2f]G l;T TFIE SOUTFiWEST COP,tI~R OC THE TR/~CT OP 'POtQAS '~
~ YORBA AS PER SAID DEC:2EE:: THEtJCF. SO(lTI~ 27 DEGREES 08'
~AST 1254.00 FEF,T: TFiENCE trORTH 62 DEGREES 52~ EAST
6955.74 ~'EET TO THE: NORTHEAST BvUNDAKY LINE Oh.' Ti3F.
PERALTA YORRA TRACT, AS PEH SAID DECREE: THBNCE NOR?'H
27 UEGREES 00' WEST 12,ri4.00 FEL•'T; TFiF.NCG ;;QUTH 62
_ JEGREES 52' WES1' fi955,74 I'~ET TO TFI~ P07~iT OP F3CGZNNtNG. "-
N0307z PCg8-133
~'~,%;
a ~~
. .,~'x ":4~
3' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r,
~ y~ f
_. . . _ . . . ~ . ~ ,,. . .,., , r .~:s.~4~~
~ ~
~y . ~
PARCEL 3:
TFIE SECOND TkACT UC LANll ALLQTTEA TO RAXMlJNDO YOR1iA., AS
DBSCRIBED IN THE I'INAL DECFt~~ Or PARTITTON 4F THE
RANCHO 5ANTIAGO bE SAN'TA ANA, WHSCFI WAS ENTERFD
SF~PTr~SBF.R 12, 186a 7N BOOK "B", PAG~ 91n C~ JUnGMENTS
OF THE DISTRICT COURT C~F THE 17th JUnICI~L DISTRT(:P IN
AND ~'Oft LOS ANGEGES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
SEGINNIN~ AT THE hf05T SOUTFIGRLY OR SOUTHTiJESTERLX CORN~R
~I' THL TRACT OF LAND ALLOTTEll TO TEODOCIO YORBA, AS PER
S:~ID DECRT'R: THLNCE SOU~H 27 DEGREES Ofl' EAST 3128.40
~i-`~ FEET; THENC~, NORTFI 39 UEGREES h5' EAST. 6576.00 FEET TO
~
h'' T1?~: SOUTHEAaT CORN~R Oi SAID :fRAC7.' A1,LOTTED TO TEODOCIO
' YORDA; TFiENCE SOUTH ~ 2 DEGRGGS WEST ALOP7G THG SOUTFi~RL~X
~: `,
LINE OF SAID TRACT 5879.Q~ 1'EEZ TO 7'HE POINT OF
, I?EGIP1iJING.
. ,i.~('S ~ ~+ ~Y.'y~;:lidy;B
. , ~~~.r,-:tt.i
i , f.
WHEfiEA;, Y.he City P1rYnring Commi.ssion dicl hold a public hear~ng
at ~he Civic Center in khe Ciky oL Anaheim ori Ma,y, 23, 1988, ryt ~:~0 p.m.,
notice of ~aid public hedring having• been duly given as requir~d by 1a~~r and in
accordance with the pr.ovisions of the Anaheim Municipal CodQ, Chapter 1&.03,
to hear and r.onsider evidence foc• and against said proposed variance an1 to
invastigate ~,nd mnke i`.indings atid recommendarions in connectiora therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspeCtion, inv~stigat.ion
rlnd s~udy cnade by itself and in its behalf, atxd after due consideration of all
evi~lenca anci repor~e, oCf.ere~i at s~id hearing, does find and determine the
following factsr
'? 1. That ttie petitioner prop~ses waivers of the followin.~ ta
i establish one 35-1~t, RS~5000(SC) subciivisioti and eighL RM-30Q0(SC)
subciivisi~ns tutaling 25j! resiclenC.iti1 ]ots (proz~osed Tentative Trzet Nos.
13:58, 13492., 13493, 1349~,, 13~:95, 1~535, 13536 and 13537};
~F;(',~TZUPI 1.~27.g~1 0,0 - M.ini~m }~uillLinu ,i~~ wid~,
and 1$._~1.(Lfl, (50 _tee~ requirQd for RS-500n(SC)
zoned lo~a; ?0_f~g,~ El~q 1ot
pro~oseci for Lot No. 1 of Tentative
Tract No. 13539; and
.!4_~eg~ rec~uired f~r ~~K-3000(SC)
zonod lots, 258 lots at 25 tp~~~~~
propos~d Por Tont~tive Tract Nas.
13268, J.3h9?., 13493, 13999, 13495,
13535, 13536 ~nd 13537~
-2" PC80-138
~~
' 1
~r'*9
` Na
' .ti
, f~~
~
2. 'Ch~-t. t;lie above~mentioned waivers are hereby grantQd on the ~
bas3.a t~hat there ar.e special circum,tonces applicable tio the pr~~erty such as
size, shap~, topogra}~hy, wit.h severe gooteahnical cor~straints as a r.esult of
advQrSe soil conditions cambincd with steep +:.upography, and location and
surroundings whzch do not appl.y r~.~ othex• idQnl:ically zoned propQrty in thQ
sarne vicinity; tlnd th~t :~trict applicatior. uf tho Zoninc~ Code deprives the
property oP privileges enjuyed by oL-hnr propc3rties .in the identical zone and
~j
classific~+tion in the vicin.it_y. ~,
:1. That the geologic, soi.ls, ancl topogra~hir, condition~ of the
site are exceptzonal ar extraordinary circu~nstances ~r conditions applicable
to the property involve~: or. to the intenrled use of thQ ~roperty t;nat da not
apply gFnerally lo the proper.ty or class oL uso in the same vicinity and zone
in.
4. Th~.t the requested variance is necessary £or ;:he ~
preserval-ion and enjoymen~ oL a substanti.al prcperty right pqss~ssed by other
propcrty .n the same v.icinit~ and zone, and deni~d to t}ie property in quest:ion ~
ancl t}iat similar c~evelopment has been permitted in Fast Hills, as tvell as ~
,~eve~ral locations in Azi~heim EIills, and furthEr that llag lots have been ~
permittec: in other residential projccts where geologic, soi.l~ and topogr~phir.
Canditions severeiy restrict engincering clc.~sign.
;`
5. That the reguested varianc~e vr_11 not be ma~c:riall~ ~
detrimental to the public wel£are or i.njurious tc Lhe property or improvements `j'
in such ~icinity and zone in which the property is lor.aL•ed. k~
+;
6. TYiat no one indic.ated their presence at said public hearing ~`
~~
in ~pposiCion; and that Yio corresponc~ence was receive~ in opposiL-ion to '
sub,ject petition. j
CAI,II'ORNIA ENVIRCIP]Mf.NTAL, _QIIALITY _AC'T F_LNDtNG: That the Anaheim
City P]anr~ing Con~mission has reviewed the grnposal to esCablisti one 35-].ot,
RS-5000(SC) zoned subdivision and Pight :2M-3000(SC) zonPd subdivi.saons
totaliiiy 25A residc~ntial lots with rraiver of rrinimum builc~ing siCe widtri on
ar- ir.regularly-shaped pazcel c~;f l~nd consisting of. approximately 591 acres,
bounded o~i L•he west by the Higtiland~ at Anaheim Fiills, on the north by
Syc3more Canyon (formerly Wallace R~nch) ~nd on thc south and east by t:he
Trvi.ne Co•~npany~ property and f:urttier describe~i as The S~xmmi~ of Anaheim Hil.ls
(formerly Oak H.ills R~-nch) plznnecl Community; ~rlci ~oes horeby approve the
Nogative D~clar~tion upon findin~ that it has cunsidered the Nogativa
Declaration t~gether with any camments received dur.ing L•hs publi~ review
pracess and further ~inding on ttie basis of ehe initial study and any
comments r~ceived that thcarF is no substant.ial evidenc~ that the code w.aivers
will ttave a sigiiificant eifect on the environment.
-3-• PC8t3-7.38
F
`~
l
-``~
;~,i
_ <~~"~~~
,..~„.
~
~
,, ;:f
,~,:,,;
~'~i
NOW, TFIERk;FORE, BE iT RESOLVED that the AnahPim Cit `~
Comrnission doQ~ hereb ~ Y Planning `;,~;;'
Y c~xant sub'oc~ Petition for Var•ianco, upon thQ ~~
following conditions wYiich ~re hereby Found t~ be a necessary prerequisite to
thQ ~,roposed use of ~he sub'ect ~';
`;;,;
general walfare oP the Cit.i ens otrt erC tynofrAnah ~m preserve the safety and ,
~~i
1. That tract maps to record tha division of subj~;Gr property ~hall be ';'ti(
submitl•ed to and approved by thF Ci~y of Anaheim and ~lien be recorded 3'~
in the OEfice of the Orznge County Recorder.
s:~~;''
2. That fire sprinklers shall ba installecl for a?1 rESidences locatod 1'1r
moLe than ].50 feot trom a public street. r';
3. That all stroet cul-dc~_sacs siiall have a minimum thirty-eig}lt (3g)
foot (inside) radius. ,
~. ThaY. L•he minimum design ,pe~~ tor local streets ::s twenty-five (?.5) I
miles per Iiour per th~ Caltrar.s sL•andard for maximum com£ort level,
5. That subjecL- property shall be developc~d substantiall.y in ~cccrdancp }
with plans and specificati.ons on f.'ile ivith the City ot Anaheim markad s
Exhibit NO. 1, '`
:t
6. That ~his ~Jariance is ranted s; `
Amondmen~ No. '~ ~ g to rhe approval of General Plan lY
in connection w~thaReclassif ~cat~ic~n ~lP7ord gga g7 xg,r asbanen ed ~~on thfas
Z`l, 1988, y
7. Zrat prior to issuance of a bu:ilding pe
one year trom tho d,ite of this resolutionltwhichever1occurs~f~rr;~f
Condi.tion No. 1, above-mentioried, shall be complied w.i;,h. Extensions
oL further time to complete said cor.ditions may re grnntel in
accardance with Sec~inn 18.03.040 of: the Anaheim Municipal Code.
8. Ttiat prior to final buildinc~ and zoning inspections, CandiL-ion rros. 2
3, and 5, above-mentioned, shal.l bo camplied with.
9. That approval uE this application cor~stituL•es aproval oi t2ie I~rop~sed
requQSt only t~ the er.tent that i~ comp?ies with thc Anaheim ;'
Munic:ipa]. Zoning Cude and any other applicablQ City regulations. ~i~
Aporoval does not include any action or findngs as to compli~nce qr }
approval o[ the request reaarding any other applicable o.rdinance,
regulation or reqiziremen.t. r,:~
~
BE IT CUkTHEI? RESOLVED that ~he Anaheim City Planning Commission doaa
hereby find and determine tt~at adop~ion of this Resulutian is exprPSS1y
predica~ed upon applicant's c~m~,.lianc~ with each ancl all oE the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should ~ny suc2i cand.itions, c,r any par~ thereoP, be
~4 PC84~•138 .. _:,:
~ ~ ~i:',i~
. ~ .' ;~ ~i;'
;,,{
i., . .. .y';
` ~ . >{~~ i . a. ' } ~~. ::s , r 5,N'I
%~ 1~, ' I ~1 ~-1L~r: ..~M'~ < n !-_ _ {fr ~ .•'~r s . :K..:• ~ sPv;~..... . Y~.~.~,~' 1 i1n}..~.'f"llWliilR
~S~ .
, .. .'.
. . . ~ . . . , ..
,,. .. .. . ..
. ~ ~ . .
.~~ ~ . ~ , . 1
. . . . . . ~ . ~ ~ '~ . . , .
'.. h 5i~f~lER~ ~y
~~
'
~ ; T'
''
r ~
rc~~
~ , ~ r,
i
t ,~
~;
-~5
1,
. , r;;~.
`_il.+f;
"~la
, ~
~ ,,,~
;;
~~ deClarad
competent invalid or unenforceable by rhe
jurisdicti final
gm
n ~r
,
'
contained, on, then ~his Resolu
sha11 be deemed null a
d tion, and
any app a
als~ hQ ein ~
''
~
1~.i
n
void. ,
i.
,'-.,
THE FOREGOTNG RESOLUI'ION is signed and
MaY, 1988. a r
PP oved h• me ~hi
t 'S'
~~A
-~~
~ y
s 23ra da of
~l ~
~ _ --~
. ~~~.~.,. ':
:,~,,
CFIAI RMA N,
ANAH~?M ---------
CI Y PLAN
* ! ~
NItv
G COMMTSSION ~~
,i ATTEST: /'
S~ . ; Y
.
~
`
, .
~
s~r.KCxARY
, ~'~ ~ ~.~
~ __._
ANAHETDf CITY YLANNING CO?~SMISSION
• `' a~
I ~,~
~'
+w'
,,F
f
,
~
;
STI~TE qF CALIFORNIA )
CUUNTY OP' OItANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIt~S }
r. Editli L. I~arris, Secretary of tlie Anahpim City Plannin
do hereby certiL•y that ttie fore uin rer g Commission,
meeting of tt~e Anah~im City planring Commissio i~heldSOn~M~Pa ~nd adopted al a
following vote of the m~mbers thereof; Y' 23' ~9aa~ bY the
~Y~s= COMMISSIODTFRS: BQf1AS, BOYDSTUN, CA.kUSI:~LO, HFtt13ST
idC BZiRNEX, M~SSE
PiOES: COhL'~IIuSIONERS: NONE
AEiSENT; COt~1ISSI0NERS: ~'ELDHAUS
TN WITNBSS WHEREOF, I.tiav~~ hereuntu set my hancl this 23rd day of
May, 1988.
~~j1 ~
~.~~~*~A~'!y r
SECRL•'T f2Y, ANAHEIb! CITY PLANNING COMMI-_ S U
••5-
!'~': ;
' ~ ~ . ~ ;~;, ~.:r,, i
~~__ ;,,;~,
PC48-138
:
~ ~ '';~
. .,;','.:,:.«