PC 88-168~a^~s
.,,,..it' ~'~P':"1
~ ~~ , ;a~ra:;~
. .4~~ ~.,,i..
RE~~L I'.CI N N0. P~.~:.1_t,~$.
A RESOLUTION ~F :CHE ANAHEIM CITY ~`LANNIVC COMMISSTON
THAT P~TI'.CION 'rOR RBCLA.~'iSIFICATTON NA. 87-Sfi-43 IIE DE!]Ti:D
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ci.ty I'1~nning Commission did receive a
veriPied pstition L'or RQC1~~ssiPication from DUNALU T. TAKAI AND DORO'THX M.
TAYAI, 317~ W. Rome Avenue, anaheim, C~\ 92809, AT'TN: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTRUL, P,O. E3ox h046, SanLa Ana, CA 927Q1-4048, owner, and MAGUY HANNA,
40Q0 W. MaeArthur IIeulevard, Suite 680, Newport Beach, CA 92060, agent, of
ce:tain real pronerty situated in the City of Anaheim, County ot Orange, srar.n
of California, lescribed as follows:
PARC~L ].:
THAT PORTZON Or THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWESm
QUAR7'ER OL' THE NO[tTHEA5T QUARTRR OF SECTION Y3.
'TOWNSH!!? ~1 SOUT:i, RANGE 11 WEST IN THE RANCHO LOS
COYOTES. AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED YN BOOK 51, PAGE
11 OF MISCELLANEf~US MAP~., RECORDS OI' ORANGE COUNTY,
CA(~IFORNIA, LYiNG WSSTERC,~,' OF THE S~UTHCRT~Y
I'ROLONGATION OF THE WESTFRLY LINC OF TH~ NUkt'.1FIEAST
Q(SARTER C%F T~iE NORTHWE5T QUAItTER OF THE NORTHEkST
QIIARTER ~I' SAID SECTIUN.
EXCEPTING TFiEREYROM '.IHI~T PO~tTION LYING SOI]THERLY 0~
T.HE IdORTFiERLY LTNE OF TFi~ LArU DESCRIBED ~N DEBD TO
OFtANGE COUNIY FLUOD CUP]TROL, RECORDcD NOVEMDEF :;,
1a59 IN BOOK 4961, PAGE 395 OE' 0['FICTAI~ RECCRDS OF
SAID ORANuG COUPIIY.
PIRCEL 2:
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NARTHWEST QUARTER OF TEif;
210RTH~AST QUl~RT~R OF SECTION 13, TUWNSH.T.P 4 SCUTH,•
RANGE 11 W~'ST, IN THE RA~]CHO LOS COYO"iES, TN TFiE ~ITY
OF APIAHEIM, C:OUTTTY UF URAiIGE, S;ATE OF CALIEURNIA, AS
SEiOWN Oti A MAP THEREUF RECORDED IN BOOi: 51., PAGF: 'll.
MISCEI~LANLOUS MAPS, Rf:CQRDS OF SAID O:tAI1GE COUNTI',
LXI~IG WESTERr,Y OI' THE EASTEi'.L~f 2G5.00 EEET, NORTf~ERLY
OF ~FIE NORTHSRLY LT!~E OF 'THE: T i~ND D~SCRIPtD IN THE
DEEU TO THE ORATIG~ COUt1TY FL00[) CONTROL DISTF.IC r,
RECORDED :10`J~MBGR ?.7, 1959, It: IIOOK 4991, PACB 3~1,
OFFICIAL R~.C03PS, AND EASTBRLY 0~' THE 50i1xEi~PLY
P~OLONGATION UF T'.-IE W~STE;kLX LIT~E OC THE .a£ST l~ 5~ 00
FEET OF TH~ NO~tTH~AST ~UARTER O~ THF, Nr,P.THWk:5T
QUARTER OE' TH~ NCiRTiiEAST QUARTER 4F' SAID SECTION.
s~
0357 r
~~~ ~
. ~ t• ~~~~
PC80••168
'i
'~':;:w
;~~ 6
,.
,~
w~~~:;: ~~,
~~"'~ ~
WFILFtE~S, tne C.ity P].anning Commissiori did huld a public hearing
at thE Civic Conter in the Cir.y oE Anahe.im on April 25, 1988 at 1; 30 ~.m„
noL•ice uf said public Yie~~.ring having been c~uly yiven as rt~quired by law and in
accardance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munfcipal Cac1e, Chaptar 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and ac~ainst said proposed reclassific~tinn
and to investigate aiid make findir~ys ancl recommanda~ions in connecti.on
therewith; and subject meeting was continued to the mceting ot May 23, 19Ra
ancl June 20, 1988;
~., ,aHERGAS, said Commissiori, after due inspection, ..nvest.i.garian
'; an~i stucly made by its~rlt and in iL•s benalf, and atter due consicleration of all
evidence and reports ofL•ered aL said hearing, does find and cl~termine the
following ~~~LS;
~-• Th~t~ the ~etit:~or:er pro~oses reclassification of subject
properr_y ftom dS_A-43,000 (R~sidential, Agricultural) Zar~e L-o kbS-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) 7,one.
~~ ~'hat the Anaheim Goneral k~lan designates subject pr.operty
for General Conunercial and F?ooci Cc+ntr.ol land uses.
3. Th~it: thc~ pi•oposeci reclassifieation oL• subjec~ pi•operty is
not necessary andior dosirable £or t:he orderly and proper deve?onmen~ of the
community,
4. That tti~ proposed recl•r.ssi.[ication of subjecl: property does
no~ properly relate to the zc>nes and their permirted uses 1oca11y establis}ied
in close proximity ~o sub;ecr property anQ Cn the zones ~nci thezr ~ermitred
uses gener~lly estat~].ished throughout the community.
b. That ~tpr~roxim;3tely 25 persons indicarecl their presence at
said Publ.ic he~r.ing in opn~sition; anci ~hat no corc•espondence was recei~ed irl
oppos:itior~ to subj~:c;t pptitioii.
~;~i
CALtI' krria B~IVIRONM~i7TA[, _Qt'ALITX A T
'~--'~- _.~__ F[NAJN~: Tha~ rlie Ana2i~im
Cit~r Planning Commission has revieHed r_he proposal to reclassify subjack
prooerty from th~ RS-A-43,000 (Rasicler.;tial, Agricultural) 7,one to the ~?M-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zorie and to cuns~ruck a 1-story, 4g_unit
(formerly 2-story, p4 unit;} apartment complex or. a rectangularly-~ha ed
parcel oP land c.ansisting of ap~roxicnately 2,5 zcres, havzng a t:-onCago PoF
a.ppruximately 133 feet or- the east ;;icle of Dale Avenue, having a maximum
depth of ~pproximately 1019 EeQt and being 1oea~e~l appz•oximately 650 f.eet
3otiL•:i o~ the cQntorline v£ Lincoln Avenue and furthRr d~scribed as 7.50 Dale
Avonue, ~ubjer_t property includos a p~~rr_ion oE the Carbun CrgQk Flood ConY.rol
Channel; and does hereby appruve t;he Negr1~.~VP. DQClaration upon ~ind.ing that
it h,~s considered the Ne~ative Uec:lara~ion toqether with any commc~nCs
receivecl during Che public raviQw proceass and further finc3ing on ~he basi., of
the initial skudy and any comrne:iit;;, rr~c;eived r,.hat thore is no substantial
evidoncg that the project wi11 have a:significant effect on the enviror.m~nt.
NOW, TffEREF'ORE, BE TT RESOLVEV that the Anahe.im City Planning
Commiss.ion cloes t~erebl ciQny sub;ecL• Petition for. Reclassifxcation cn ~he
basis o[ tre Forego:ing f:ind.tngs.
-1-
t ~! ~Y lI!l ' _ ' ..
a Jlf.:j ! 4?;','.
~ ~ ;,:~ n 141~,~5•,
; rr,
;,:
, ; .',
~.s;
j:
~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ . . „ . .,. ..,. ..~, ..~,.., . r.i~a r.r~:.~:~ ~qlqt:r17~14i1~'ai1~'i,`aC?~~1~+3~,{~.
r' r, ~~~~'Yf,
,~
~r -.v ~ . ,,*,~
r ~ ~
p l.•l ~ ;~ . . ~r,7y
'+1,. ~~ ~ . .. . l~'r"y~
~ ' .. 11.,t1
~'1.~ ~1 ~ .. .~`~ ~4 ~I
TFiE P'qREr,OING FESOLUTION is siqnQd and apProved by me this 20th ~,~
day o~ June, 1988. ,~14
~, ~ >
~ ~ ~ ..__.~r..,~-.~~• ~1L'~..~...~..,~~ '4E
CHAIRMAN, ANAHETM CI~PLANVItIG C ~ ~ ~
OMM T S S I ON ', ~~~
~ tr,,~
ATTEST: sF~
~a.. , f .
'r.i
~`+~F~: ...i .. '"~'}~
5 . . ~!~S~
4` • --_ " ~Ciy'
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI~'Y PLA NII~G !` c' ~ ``~
OI~SI~STUN '`-i~i~i
~
STAZ'E OF CAL~IFORttiA ) ~t
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) S5, - `'r;a
CITY OF AI~'AHEIM ) ;,;;
<J
_"`' I, Edith L„ Iiarr;.5, 5ecretary oL- the Anaheim City Planning a'
Comm.ission, do hereby c~rtify that the tpregoing resoluL-ion was passed and
''~.~: adoptQd at a meetin7 ~~ the AnaYiQim Cit Flannin ,~1{
'~;;' 19Fi8, by the f~llowin vote y 9 Commi.ssion held on June ?.0, ~;;
9 of the member.s thereof: ~
~ ~ ;:
'~r AYES: COtvIIyfISatONERS: BOUAS, ~• ~'~~~
+~ BOYDSTtJN, CAt2U.,ILLO, FELDHATJS, HERBST, "~~'
b!C BURNEY, r+
:;~; NOL•'S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~; AIISENI: COMh1ISSI0NEft5: NONE `
j ,
,~ ZN WITN.ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto seC my hund this 20th day og 'I
p ~Tune, 19afl, ;
,~ •''Y:
~
~ _ ~'~;
~ ---- ~;~.~`."„'~„' ~ ~ -
.'"iECRETl~RY, T+Id'Aiii;I~f CITY PLANNING COi~SISSSON 1~
~'
i ;'i
,
,
~
-2-
Yr !
t` ~
~ +e
ir . .'t.+.mi.> . . ~ . ' . . , ~ . '\ ~~I
ti....,...:,....... .... . . '. . , . ~. '
_ ;,
+, ~ ~
-- . , , , . . . , , ., , . . !~ d ,)l~