PC 88-1734l 't Ylr) ~y~~~S ~~~,d i~r rc1 q,' ~~ i r~r: ~'1~ ~~ti x,y'f~ 1~ ~ u
.- . ~ : ,,..~ , ~~_~lr„~ 1. ~ ~~.:~~ 1 i~~'~t 'Fs`,r•r S',;71{ M1 ` '?~.k7 ,y~~o lrr~ll~t,~~~~jy°
• I ' ~,°~ ~
~ ~
RESOLUTION P1~, PCBg_173
A RESOLUTION Ol~ THE ANAH~IM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TIiAT AETITIUN FOR VARTANCE N0. 3793 BE DENTED
tc.~:
~~ WHEREAS, the An~heim City Planning Commissaon did receive a
T'~
veriPied Petition tor Variance from JOFINNIE J. TUREK and SHURL'A P. TUREK, 1234
S. Western Avenue, Anahsim, CA 92804, RUDGLPH L. EUWARD DOLEZAL, 1226 S.
Western Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92804, AUSTELL SMITFI, 1238 S, G3'estern Avenue~
Anaheim, CA 92804 and JOHN LLQYD 2dcGOT.DRICK, J,R, and LINDA JEAN McGOLDRICK,
3159 T,anerose Drive, Anaheim, CA 92$04, owners, and ANDR~W HOMES, I'NC., ATTN:
~; Mike flewar, ~1000 MacArChur Boulevard, No. 6B0, Newport Besch, CA 92660, ~yent,
r„ for cErt;ai.n real property situ~Ced in the Caty of Anaheim, County oE Orange,
~~ ~ State of Calzfornia described as:
,,,
PARCEL 1:
TFi~ ~AST 50.OQ F~ET OF THE WEST 3F30.U0 FE~T OF
THE SO[1TH f38.00 FEET OF THL NORTH 484.00 F~G~' pF
THE NOR'PHWEST QUARTER OL' TTiE NORT~iWEST QUARTER
QF TTiE NORTHEAST QLTARTER OF SECTTON 23, TOWNSHTP
4 SOUTH, 12ANGE 1], WEST, IN TEiE RANCHO LOS
COYOTE5, AS SHOWN ON A MAP R~CORDELI IN HOOK 51,
PAG~ 11 OF MISCEL,LA?3EOUS MAPS, 12ECORDS UF ORANGE
COUNTY, C1~LIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2:
TFiE SOUTH 88.OQ FF,ET OF TFiE NORTH 484.00 I'BET OF
TFiE WEST 330.00 F'EET OF THE NORrFiWEST QUARTRR OF
TIiE NOR:PHWF,ST QUARTER OF THE NORTHNAST ~UARTER
OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIY 4 SQUTH, RANGE 11 WEST,
IN THE RI~NCHO f~OS COYOTE~, AS SHOWN ON A tvil~p
RECORDED IN ROUK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISC~LLANEOUS
td~PS, RECORDS OF ORANGE Ct~LINT.Y, I;AI,IFQRNIA.
WHEREAS, the Ci.~y Pl~nning Commission did holrl a public tiearing
at t}ie Civ.ic Center in the City of Anahei.m on July G, 198f1, at i:3U p.m.,
no~ice o;E said public hearing hnvinq been duly givcn as requirQd by law and in
accoruance ~with the gr~visi~ns of the Anaheim Muni~i~sal Cod~, Chapter ~8.03,
to hoar and c~nsider, ~vzcletica Eor anc7 agair-st said proposed variance and to
ir.vesCigate and make findings anc rec~:nmenciations in connscti.on therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after ctue inspection, invQS~igatia7
and stuciy made by itself and in i~s behalf, an~i after due coiisidoration of all
evidence and reports off•ered ~t said h~aring, dnes L•ind ax~d determine ~he
following f.acts:
03&2r.
1'. ,
~r_ss-1~~
a;,t~' ~
~ ~,Y
~y.,
~ 4ti
. . - . . ',~~I'f~~
;~ti
``;y;a
;,.} ~
•;~~i
,;r
t~f;
~'.J
~~I
1n.
ti
r
~
J~.
:,
',~
' ~>
~~j'
:'r
ti
,,
;i,
,.
,~
~
;~
;:, ~
~~~:
; ~;
;~ , ,~,
~ _ ~a~~~
;1
1
;;
,;.
';
;1
~~' .
. .....: . .~,;: i ,.+.,'r~ .. .::r.~u~kh i:::d °'"r'?,1rp r1~ d'C!V'v';Fr<R,at~~ .l'.p`.l. ~,1..., ~ ~k: 4iY. ~y'y
.~_5v.... . . v.l'~ . ~1,' . .:1~ .'':J'~~ A, . . . 7~, ~ '~'.~,' { ,.s'r,''~'i.r .I~~ n'.~~ ~k ~~"f'h J+i?'~'Mdl~f~1R~
, ~ ., nh 'r.,~~l ~
, . , ~~~~
~1~1 ~~ . . I ~~~
~ .f{t
~ :.~A
~~~M
. . ...:~1~}
",f1~'
4~F
1• Thut the petit;ioner
construcL a 31-uni~ eondo-ninium comple:~: proposQS waivQrs of thP following to ~y,
;
r
'
,
,
A) SE TIUNS
i8.31 0, 61.012
Minimum BuildxncLSite Area per 3
~;;;
Dwel.linq Uni~, _
~n'
; :•rr
(3QQi square feet requxred; 2?.92 '~;~
square fee~ praposed) ,~-
;.,•,,,~
B) SECrT02J~ 18..31, 062.012
M~simum Structur
l I~
i '~;};
'~~
a
qh~.
e
;;y
C) SECTION 18.31 O~f2,p2p Maximum~it•e Cove_ raae.
(4~L permirLgd; ~ proposed)
D) ~TTON 18.31.06.~,~,Q22
E) ~E~TI N 1H.31.Oh3 030
E) S~TION_ .1~1.063..Q31
c) ~~1 z~c i1 _ ~.~_..4~..LQ~ . o i a i
aad 18•3~~6r.oiQ
Mxnimum Building Setl~,~k.
(1Z to 27 feet required; f t~10
£eet propa,pd)
Minimum R crQ ~ional/L~is~xre Area.
(1_ 200 square ~eet per urii~
required; ,~ square feet praposed)
Minimum DimensiQn of Gro1.t_nd Floor
priva~e P- •i ~.
Minim~un Number o~ pa, rkinq Spaces.
(7$ required; ~ proposecl)
2. That the above-mentionefl aaivers (A, C, b and E) are
hereby denied on the ba3is that ther.e are no special circ~unstanees aQplicable
to the property such as size, shape, topography, location and surroundings
w2:ich de not apply to ather identic311y zoned pro~ert~ in th~ same vic5,nity;
and that strict applicar.ion of the Zoning Cod~ doea not cieprive the proper*..;~
of pr:.v:ile~es en~oyed by other properties xn the identical zono and
classif.ication in the vicinitiy.
3. That the abov~,-mentioiied waivers (D} and (F) are hereby
denieQ on ChQ basis that the naed for said waiver5 w3s eliminated.
4. That waiver (G) as hereby denied on the basis r_hat the
park.ing v~ariance will cause an in~rease in tr~tffic cor~gestion in the immediate
vicinity nor adv~rsely affoct any adjoining 13nd uses; anc3 thai; ~;he grantinq
of the par.king vaziance will bQ detrimental to the peace, health, safety or
general welfare of the cii:izens o£ Cho City nf l~naheim.
5. That therQ are no exceptional or extraordinary
circtimsCances or coxid.itiar.s ap~~lica'~~e ~o the property i.nvalved or to the
inten~3ed u~e of the property thF~r, do not apply qenerally to thQ property or
class of use in th~ same viciniCy aud zone.
~2' PC88-173
a
~
;.,
,;'~
`~;
~:t~;,
:, i
~'~
";J.
,"
,'.,'
~.;
', r:a,;
- _ ... . , ,: t~~~'~
li '
F •
v
., r
^~,
~
,. ~
~
. i~\~ ~! ~1~~~~
~; Y
~ ~.
t r~~
~{f
~~,1~a
i
6. ThaL the requssted variance i~ not nacessary £or the
preser~ratiion and enjoymant of a sul~s~an~ial property ri.ght possessed by o~her `''.'~~
property in thQ sam~ viciniCy and zone, and de-iied to the prope•r~y in questior~. ;:<`~k'
7. Ttiat the requested vax•iance will be materia.Lly detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvemonts in such
vicinity and zone i.n which the propc~;.ty is located.
8. That 100 poople indicated their presence at saia publ:ic
heari•ng in opposition; ~nd that no correspondence was received in opposzti~n
ta subject petition. '
~LIFORN:[A ENVIRQ_,_NMENTAL OUALITY ACT FINDIN~C: That the Anaheim
City Planning Conunissian has revie•wed the proposal to reclassify subject
propert~~ frcm tho I2S-•A-43,000 (Residential/Agrir.ultural) 7,one ~o the RM-1200
(Rc~sidential/Multiple-Family) Zorie to construct a 31-unit cond~minium co~plex
with waivers of minimum building site area per. dwQlling uni~, maximtun
si:ructural height, naximum site coverage, rninimum build3.z~c,~ setback, minrmum
recrEationalJ]eisure ~rea, minimum dirr~ansion ot• ground :Eluor private patios
~nd minimum number oE ~arking spaces on ari irregularly-•shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 1.6 acres located at the naxtheast corner of
Lanerose Urive and Western Avenue, having ~pproxim~te fr~ntages o~
approximately 285 feet nn the north side of Lanerose Drive and approx,imately
233 feot on tha easr sida ef West~rn Avenue a~zd f:urthar described ~~s 1226,
1234, ar.d 1238 South Western Avexiue and 3159 Wgst Lanerase D`'iVe~~ ancl does
h~reby approve the N~ga~ive Decl.aration upon f:.nc~ii-g L-hat it lzas considerPd
tha i'vegative Decla~ation together with any commeiits received during the publia
rev3.aw process and turther tinding on the k~asis o~ th,e initial study and any
commen~s receive~ that there is u~ substantia] evidence that the project will
hava a signiEicant efL•2ct on the erzviro~imenL.
ttOW, TET~REF~JRE, BE IT RESOLV.ED t.hat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, does hereby deny subject Peti~ion for Variance on the basis oF the
aforem~nl:ioned F'indings.
, , •• ~
~/ ; llG~' •%.r ,~-' :,F~_n''--ct;_,,,_...
CIiAIRM'I~N, ATTAHEIM, CITl' PL~2TNING CUbSMISSION
~'
ATTEST: ~,~r~ ; : I
~ •:
~ ~ ,- ti~.~
~ ~ ,. ~r~ ___._
SEI:R~TAR , ANAHEIM CI~Y PL,ANNING COMMISSION
THE I'OItGGOINC~ RESOLUTTON ,is s.igned and appr~vecl by me this 6th
of July. 1988.
-3-
PC88-173
. .,., . .. . . . ,. . , _ . ~ , , . .1 ,
~x
;h
',r.t.
`;`12
!; ~;
r...
~1
+}°~
,c15S~,~,~,y~~a
,..1. .re~a.I~~~ tcAt~7i
~+,w"~:~~,
/~ .
Y
t~~
STATB ~F CALIFORNTA )
COUN:~Y OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF ANAFIEIM )
~.~",;H, a i~v'ren ~e~„nr ir t ~vur,~.v,~•T,,r•rarrk+~rc~q~a.~.~n~,~
,:NV 1 4~~ '~
.
' ~K~~
~ q
. I~,JM1J /~~ .~
i4~ 1a~
y
. ..
~'. ~
~:}
:
a 1t
l
y
s
. t~
;;
,
`,:~
.1~
:
;
}
;rs>~~
,_'~~;
I, Edith L. Harris, Sacretary nE khe Ana.hgim City Planning ~
Commission, do hereby r.ertify thaL- the foregoing resolutio~z was passed and ;:;~
adoptad at a mee:ting a£ the Anaheim City Planning Commxssion held on July 6, ,j ~:i~
1988, by the following vote of the momber thereof: +;`
•: ~,r<
:-z
"<:':',,,,
AYE5: COMtQISSIONERS: BOUAS, b0'YDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HERBST~ rfEuG~, MC HURNEY ;;-;
NOES : COMMTSSIOI~ERS : NONE ;;
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CARIISILLO `~~"
,: ~
,;,,
IN WITNESS WHERE~E, Y~ve hareunto set my hand L-his Gth day of .
July, 1~8t1. ~ ~ . / :,;
~ ~ ~,
v !,~~C.!t.~ _;A;
S~CRET RY, A,.*IAHEIM PLANNINF COMMISSI027 ;t,
,a t
~ -:~::~~.
, ::~.a.
;y.
,~~
,,.
,~~
~ '<;~
' ,''; i
:';~;
V
1,~
i~~!'.i
'~
. .';'y
1:;t
. ~ . ~~~'`t`~
° ~i
,^'S
;:~~
. ,'~~!-~'`:
.ir
~ ~'x';~
;~F ~
::r
~;
~~.
~~~ ~ .
40f
- h-i ':;~:~~~}....
.~
,~~
,;~
~ :?;,%f;~
~ l;~
_.:.1
, ,,~
i'~~
'~ii
r
~'~~
_. ._. ,.,tiyN
r_.-';' "~
~,'~7
r.~
~
~i,,
~'e
!,' r ~l
-4- pC88-173 , ;,, ~~,.
~.
. ~ ~~' . ~
' =. ~. 5;;~.
:~ :
~.,,~ia~
„.
~
• ,~ . .. ,
, . . . :,.. , ....: :::.r. '
. . , _.. ~ . . . , . , . . . . . _ . , , . ~ •~ a;'n