PC 88-1761P.
F.
~ -
. . . . . . . . . . . , .. ~:•i ~ .,ly' S 1J5 1l~`V'~
, . . . . ~ ~ . ~ ' ~. r p.l ~
~ ~ ~
. ~ . '. .,-:~'~
RESQLf~,TION NQ_.P~~-:l'l6
!;
A RF:SOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMh:I5ST0~~ ';
1'HAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. $$-t39-0"l BG GR~TTED
WHEREA;i, LhQ Ar~ak-o3m City Planning Commission clid 'f~C@1V@ a
verif•ied patitian for R~aclassi£ication Erom CLINTON H. FLYNN AND RUTH R.
t'i,YNN, 60;i-607 'Aost Aroadway, Anahoim, CA 92~305, owners, and S& M Developmeiit
Company, Attn: Mohammad Mehdi Ebrahimz~daP:, P.O. Box 3868, Misszon Viejo, CA
92640, aqenti, of cartain roal property situatad in tn~ City of Ana}~eim, Coun~y
of Urange, Stato of California, described as £o'llows:
Lot I2 in Y31ock 2 of the "Enterprise Tract", a
suk,d..vision oi a part of Vineyard Lot "E6",
Aiiaheim, as shown on a Map re:cvrded in Book ~,
page 39 Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, CaliPorni&.
Lot 13 ir,. Block 2 of "Enterprise Tract", a
subclivision of a pazt af Vinoyard Lot "E6"
Anaheim, as SYIOWTl an a map recorded in Book 4,
pago 89 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orango
CounY.y, CaZif~rnia.
WH~REAS, the Cit} Planning Commisszon did hold a publxc hearing
a*_ Che Civic Center in t21Q City o£ Anaheim on July 6, 1983, aY. 1:30 p.m „
notice of said public hearing having beon duly gi•ven as required by law and in
accorclance with L•he provisior.s of the Anahoim Munici~al ~ade, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evide:ice for anJ against said proposed r~classi.f.ical:ion
and to i.nvestigate and make i•indings and recommendations in connectiun
therewith; and
WFiEREAS, s3id Corr~mission, after due insy~ection, investigatian
ancl study made by itselt ancl in its behalf,~ and af~er ciu~ cansideration of a11
evidencc and re~~or.L-s oPfered at said hear.in~7, does find and detormine the
following tacts:
1. That the peCitioner proposos reclassiEication ot subject
propQity from the KM-24U0 (Residen~ial, Multiple-Fami'ly) Zc~ne to the RM-1200
(Residential, M~altiple-F'amily) Zcne,
2. Tbat the Aii~heim Genera~ Pl an de~ig~iates subjeat pz~operty
for medium density residential land uses.
3. That tho proposed reclass.ificatiun of setbject properky is
necessary and/or dQSirable for the orderly and proper developmenh. of Ct~e
com:nunity.
4. That the propos~d rr.cla3sificati.on oE subjccL pr.nporty doas
properly rolate to r.he zones ar.d their pQrmxtte6 usos loca~ly established in -;
close proximi~y t~ subject pr~perL•y and to the zonas and their permitted uses ''
gQn~rall.y estal~:lfshed throughout thg community. ~
0368r PC88-17~~
';~~fi
A~~
~ ~~.`.-
~
~
'~ ' ~ ~~i ~
5. That tk:e proposed r.~clasaific~3tion of subjact property
requiros the declicati~n of. ak+uttinq streets and alleys 3.n accordance with the
Cir.culahion rlemont of: hhc General PJ.an, due to the an~ic:ipated iriare~se in
tratfic which wi11 be generated by th~ intei:sif.i~ation af land u~Q.
6. That five poo~~la indic~ted L•heir prosence at said public
hearing in opposition; and t.hat no corres~ondence was received in op~osition
'~ to subjoch petition.
' CALIFORr1IA ~NVIR~rTMEN7'AL~~ALT'PY ACT F~NUIN : Th~t the A,naheim
City Plann:i.ng Commission has revzewed the proposal to reclassify subject
proparty from the f:M-2400 (Residential, MulCiple-Fami:ty) Y.o the RM-1200
(Rcside~itial, Multiple-Family) Zone ~nd h.o eonstruct ~t 10-uni~ apartment
~ complex with waivers of maximwr site coverage, minirnum floor area oi dwe113ng
;' units (de'leted} and. minimum recroat.i~n/leisure area (deletQd) on a
~; rectarigularly-shaped parcel of, land consist•ing ot approximately C.3 acre,
{.~ having a frontage of appro~~ir~ately 88 feet on the nortPi side ~f Broadway, and
being located approximately 760 fest west of the center].ine of Harbor
Boi:levard; and does hereby approve the Nega~ive Declaration upon finding that
it haa conszdered the Negative llQC].aration together with any comments re~aived
; durinc~ 1:he publ:ic review prc~cess and further finding pn tha basis of the
~~r initial sCudy ancl any comments rPCeived that there .is no substantial evidence
that the projecL- will have a significant effert on t;he environmenL•.
NOY~1, THEREFORE, B~ I: RGSOLVED thal. khe Anaheim City Planning
Commission dee~ hereby grant su.bject 1?etition Eor Rc~classification anci, by so
doing, that Title 10•-Zoning of the Anahaim Municipal Cndo be amended to
exclude the above-de~cri.;~ed property ~rom the RM-2400 (Residentiial,
Multip:le-Family) Zone and to inr,orporate saic~ dc~scribed property into the
Rtd-~].2dQ (Residentia7., rsultiple-Famil.y) 7one upon the following conditions
which are hereby fuund to be a necessary prerequisite tu th~ proposod use of
subjec~ propert.y in order to pres~rve the saPerv and gen~eral w~lfa.re of the
Citizens oE the City of Anaheim:
l. ThaL• n fee sha11 be paid to the C3.ty oi Ar«heim far street lighting
along Broadway in an amount as daterminQd by ~ity Council resolution.
2. TYiat tho legal owr-er ~f subject pronerty shal? i.rrevncably offer to
dedicate to L-he City of Anahei.m a ~L•rip oP land sixi:y threa and onE
quarter. (63.1.5) f~;et in width from ttie centerlin~ oE the street along
Broadway L•or ~treet widPning purposes.
• 3. Thac the ownar of s~xbject property shall irrevocabl~~ off~r tp dedicate
to thQ City a£ Anaheim sixfficient right-of-way to 2roviU~ for the
widenir.g o~ the public ral.ley to twenty (20) foet.
4. Th:it a foe shali he pai.d to thQ ~ity of AnahQim for t~±-e~ planting a2ong
Broadwa;~ in an amount aF determined b~ City Counc.il resolution.
,f
~.
»2-
~CSR-17~i
,;
~
.:A.,~
' r '~'~~i?;?s~)!1
5. Tl~at prior ~o introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
the l~gal pr.operty owner shall pr~pare and recorcl an unsubordxnated
covenant 1imi~ing occupancy of each a~artment unit to no more ~han two
~z) per.sons (other thnn children under thP aqe of two (2) pears) per
bodroom. Said ].imitation ~hall be include;'t in each leaselrental
agreement. A copy of the cov~nant sha11 be submitte~ to and approved b,y
the City Attorn~y prior to recordation. A copy oE the recorded covenanC
sha11 be ~urnished to the Zoning Divi~ion.
ti. That a.^.ovenant sha11 Le r.ocoxded agreeing ~o provide the renter of eact~
dwcalling unit with written iufoxmation obtained from the School
L~istrict(s) pertaining to possible ov~rcrowded conditions and bixsing
status of thQ school(s) serving the dwellxng unxt.
7. That prior to t•hr~ introduction of aix -~rdinance r.ezoning subject
pron~rty, Conditiun Nas. 1, 2, 3, ~1, 5 and 6, above-mentionQd, shall be
compl~tad. The provisioris ~r rights gr.ar_ted by this r~solution shall
bec~me null aii3 void by action of the Planriincr Commission ur,less said
conditions are complied with within onf ~ear from the date of this
resolution, or sucY: f•urther time as the P1ann.ing C~mmission may grant.
~• mhat ap~roval of this app].ication. conSL-il:u~PS approval of the proposed
req~xest only to ~he eactent that it complies wzL•h the Anaheim Munacipal
Zoniner Cod~ arid any ot:~er app~iaable City r~gulations. Approval does
not .'~nclude nny action or ~indin5s as to comF],S.ance or appr~val of. the
r~quest regar•ding any other app7.icable orciinar,ce, requlation ~r
requir~ment.
BE TT FURZ~FiER RESOI'.VGD that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doos her~by find Znd dotermino ~hat udopL-ion ot this Re;,olution is
e,xpre3sly pr.edicatod upor~ applicant's complian~e with each ancl a11 of the
condi~ions hereinabove set forth. Shoizld any suah condit.ions, or any pzrt
therea£, be d~clared invalid or unen~orceable by the final judqmPnt of any
court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any apprava~s
horein contained, shall be deemed nuil an~ void.
THE FORF:GOTPIG RESOf JTION i;, signed and appr~ved by me thi~ 6th
day oP July. 19a8.
~,.
' • /~ , '
__.~ ~ ~~ ,' f. ~/ ` ~ G /f~~~._,.f~'C....~
CHAIRMArJ, !A.NA}IE:M/ CITY PLANNING C,Q gMM SI IpN
ATx~ST:, ~'~ ~
/ /~ ;~~ ~/.
~ u.~~. ~.-l'C.~ .i__.L__.~~.~U ~' L-`-
~iCRET~Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNLNG COMMISSION
~;'~.
I, . ~
~
-3-
~C88-:176
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~
COUNTY OF URANGE ) Ss•
C]:TY OF I~NAHF.IM )
I, Edith L. Harri„ Secretary oP the Anaheim City Planning °;
Con~miysion, do herQby cerL-ify that tY:e ioregozng resolution was passed and
~dnpted at a meeting of th~ Anaheim City Planning Commzsaion held nn Ju1y fith, ,;
1988, by tlie following v~~Y,e of the members thereof : ;
AYES: CQMM7SSIONERS: ~30UAS, FELDHAUS, HERBST, MC BURNEY, MESSE
NO~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONF
ABS~NT: COMMISSxOTIERS: D~YDSTUN, CARUSILLp
IN W'iTNESS WHGnEOF, I have her.eunt~ set mx haiid ~his 6th day, af ,;';I
Jul~. 198£3. I~
~ ~, ~~
__ ~~- ~r--~ '-'~-~~^_
SE~RETA Y, ANI~HEIM CITY FLANN NG CON4riISSIOTi
.,,,,
4i~
vT:._
4p ~,'
~~
7;7. '
_,~_ PC88-176
%ri'{'