PC 88-207Y • y . • 'r
~
1+"~~
~ i '~i. ~
.. ~ ' 1. ;:,~lni
. . '~'~1.~1
~E$QLT~TTON N0. PCfi8-2Q7_
~"_~~i ,
A R~S~LUTION OF TFiE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMtSS~'ON
THAT PETITTON FOR RECLASSIF:CCAT70N N0. 8F1-S9-07 BE GRAN7.'ED
WHEREAS, ~he Anaheim City PJ.anning Commi~ssion d~.c~ receive a
varifasd petition f•or R~ciassi£ication Erom SPIROS GIANNOUTSOS and CATHERINE
GIANNOUTSOS, 1969 Alabtzcna L•ane, kittsburgh, PA :L5216, nwnor and MASSOUD
MANSHiZF+DEH, 1529 ~Jietnry Wa~, F~lacentia, CA 97.670, ag^nL, for certain real
pro~c~rty situated in the City o~ Anaheim, County of Orange, State oE
Californir~, described as follows:
BEGINNING AT A POINT. 80 FEET SOUTH~RLX F'ROM THE
NORTFIEAST CORNER OF VINEY.~RD LUT A-l, GITY OF
A:.A;i~IM, COUNTY OI' ORANCE, STA'!'F OF CALIFORNIA, AS
FER MAP R~COR1)ED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 629, LOS ANGELES
COUN'.CY, RUNrIING TFIENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE
NORTHERL]t I,ItlG OF SAID LOT 164 FFE'r, TIiENCE SOUTHERLY
PARALL~L WITH THE EASTERLY LINB OF SAID LOT 75 FEET,
THFNCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE IdURTHF:RLY LINE Ar
SAID LOT ~64 I'~E:T, THEtTCE NORTKERLY TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNITIG .
~
WHERFAS, the Ci.ky Planning Commission ~id h~ld ~~ public hQarinq
at the Civic Center in the City~ of Anahein~ on August l, 198fi at ].:30 p.m.,
notico of said public hearing liaving boen r,•ily given as requirud by law and in
accorclance wich the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal i:ode. C'hapter 18.03,
to hear arxd consider evidence for and a~ainst said pr~po~ed reclass=Eication
and to investigate and make fi.ndings and recommendations in connection
therewith; Tnd
WH~REAS, said Commission, aEtor du~ inspection, investigation
~nd study made by itsc~lf anc~ in its behalP, and after clue r.onsideratior_ of all
Qvider_ce and reporCs otfere~~ at saic3 hearing, does fiiid and deCermine the
following f.acts:
7.. Tkiar_ the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
prnper~y Er~m ~5-7200 (RQSidontial, Sing.le-Famil.y) Zone ro T.tM-2400
(ResiclPntial, Multiple-Eamily) Zone.
?.. That the Anakieim Genera.l P1an designaCe~ subj3c~ propezty
ror Low-Medium neY~sity Residential lanii uso,.
3. That the proposed cecla~sification of aubject property is
necessary ~ncl/or desirab'le for the urder.ly ~tld proper development of the
community.
0422r
PC88-20`~
. rs
' I~
"r~;;
~f;,
(r~, ~
,
t , ~ _:,:
~f.~
, : ,
^ , . :;:~~^
. . - . . . ..., , . ,:,.~, ~._ _
~
.. e';~~~
rrt
"i~
4. ~r,at the proposed recl~ssification of subject property does
properly re3ato ~A the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity ~o subject property and to the xones and their permitted uses
goner.ally established throughout the community.
5. That the praposed reclassificatian o£ subjec~ property
reguire~ the xmprovement af abutting streets in accordar.ae with tla~
Circulation ElemenL• u£ the GenQral Plan, c7ue ro t2ie ant,icigated incrsase in
traffic which wa.11 be generated by the inten~9.f•icaticn of land u~e.
~:; 6. That ane (1) ~~:rson indictttQd hzs p.resence at said public
` heari~zg in opposiCion; that no correspondonce was rece.ived in opposition to
` subject petition; and th~-t twa (2) p~rsons indicated thoir presence in su~port
, o£ subject petition.
ALiFORATI'~A ENVIROt~MENTAL QUALIT'Y_ A T FINUTNG: That ~he Anaheim
City Planning Commi~si.on has revi.ewea ;.he p~opos~l to reclassify subject
property from the RS-720U (Residential, Sinqls-Family) to the RM-24Q0
(Resic3.ential, MulGiple-P'2-mily) xone tn constriict a 2-st~ry, 14-uni~ apartment
~omplQx with waivers of minimum buildiny site area per dwelling uni~, maximum
struc~ural height and minzmum front sc~tback on an irregularly-shaped garcel oF
land consisting of approximatell 0.76 acre, having a frontage ~f approximat~ly
235 feet on the west side o.E ~ast StreeC, being locatea approximately 100 feet
south of Che cenL•erli.ne of N~rth Street ~nd further described as 747.-T47 N,
East Street; and does hereby approve the Nega~ive Aeclaxt~tion upon finding
that i~ has considereu the Negative Declaratiori together with any comments
received duririg the public review process and fu:ther findinq on tlze basis of
the in~~ial study an3 any comm~nLs received Chat there is no substantial
eviQence that the pr~jECt rrill have a significant c~L•fect on the ~rivironment.
NOW, THERk:F'ORE, BE IT FESOL.VED that the An~heim City Planning
Commis~aon daes hereby granL• subject Petit.ion for Rs~l~ssi£iCation and, by sa
~~ doi.ng, that Ti.Cle 18-7oning of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode be amended to
;
exclude the above-dQSCribed prnperty from the R~-•7200 zone and ea incorporate
said dc~scribed propHrty into the RM-240Q Znne upon thE foilarring conditi.ons
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequigite ~o the proposed use nf
; subject pr•~perty in ordAr to preserve t:he sa:ety and gener.al welfar~ of the
~ Citizens af the Cxty o~ Anaheim:
1. That the lega.l owner of_ subject property shall irrevocably offcr to
dedicaCe to the City of An~heim a strip ot lar~d forty-f.ive (45) feek
in wzdth from the centei~line of the streQr along E~~st Street for
s~.reet widening purposes.
2. That stroet ligfiting facilicies along ~asl: StroeC shall ba installed
as requirec3 by tb.a Utili.ties Gezi~ral Managor zn accurdauce with
s~3cificutions on filc~ in ~he Office of TJ*ilities Gener.al Manager;
or that security in the :Eorrn of a~ond, c~rtificate of deposit,
].et;ter ot ccocliL, or aash, in an amount and foa•m satisfactory to the
-2- PC88-207
r
~~}~i~ff~ ,~r . .,
f.-r~t ~ ~t 1 iiC~i P ~!V\1u,. i•i ~~.p, ~ro.f i~ .N,r ry
. . . . .. ... .. . ~'i'." I +. . . . 1' ~ 7 ,'~ . , ~ ~ ~ F l , `/'7 1 ~~' :W$!5.
~• , • , . ~~~~~
City of: Anaheim, ~hall be posted wi.th the City to guarantoe the
satisEac~ory complet.ion o£ the above-mec~tioned improvements. Said
security shall be posted with the City of Anaheim ~rior ta the
in~r~duction of an ordinanae rQZOning subject property. The
above-requirAd impr~vements ~ha11 be instalJ.ed pri~r to occup~ncy.
3. That a fee sha].1 be paid to th~ City oE Anaheim for treo ~1anL•ing
along East Street in an amount as dQtermined by CS.tx Council
resolution.
4. That prior to ir~Crocluction of an ordinanco rezonin ~-
g ~ubjecL•
pro~aerty, the legal property owrer sha11 prepar~i and r.oaord an
unsubordinated covena~it limiting occupancy of eaah apartrnent un:.t to
na nore than two (2) perr,ons (other tnan childr.~n t~:~der the age o£
t~ro (2) xearu) per bedroom. Ssia limitation shall be included in
each lease/rental agreemen~. A copy oP thR cavenaut shal'1 be
submitted fio and approved by the (;ity At~orney prior tio
recordation. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be Furnished to
the 7.oning Division.
~• That a covanant shall be r~r,orded agreeing to provide the renter of.
each d~,~elling• unit with written information obtained Erom the School
District,(s) pertaining to possible avercrowded conditions a~d buging
status o.f the ,;c.hool(s~ serving the dwelling unit.
6• That ~,ricr to the xntroduction oE an ordinanct~ rezoning subject
pruperty, Conditiox~ Nos. 1 tfir~tigh 5, abave-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisioris or. •rights grt~nted hy fihis •r.esolution
shall bac~me null aiid void by actioxi of the Planninq C'ommissi.on
unl~ss said conditions are complied wa.th within one yedr from the
date of t2ais rF~solution, or suth furthe: time ~s the Planning
Commission may grant,
7• That approva'1 of this application cons~itutes approval oE khe
proposed roque~•t only ro the extent that it complie~ with the
Anah~irn Municipal Zoning Coc~e and any other applicabte City
rPgulalions. A.pproval does not includ9 any action or findings as to
cornpli~nc~ or approval of the requQSt ragarding any otk~er applicable
ordinance, r~gulation or requirement.
BE IT FUR':H.F.k RESOLVED t.hat tlxe Anaho.im Citx Planning
Commissxon does hereby find anc~ determint~ that adop~ion of thi~t Rasolution is
oxpressly preclicated upon a~plicant's compliance with ea.;h and all of the
conflitions hereinabove set Porth. Should any such conditions, or ony part
therQOf, ;~e declared invalid or unerforceable by tk~e final judgment ~f any
court of compF~tent ;urisdicLion, L•Y,en thi~ Re3olution, and any approva2s
berein contained, shall be deemeci null and void.
~~
-3-
, ,
;
~
PC88•-207
.. ; , ,`,{~~p:jk
i .~5~
~ ~~;
•~:.
.,
ra
~'.
,; ~,,
; rt,
.~ , ,
,
~~71X~ ~: ~ w~ ~ Y~.,.i"i: a, ` ' ~ r vti ~,ra4'~t ;l,'~ j1~`~l''tw~`,T~,~p~~ a'' }"' , , 4;F .~ v ~~..rt e~ v. ~~v a>> wyy~y
• a~i. ., ..,.~,., . .. '.._. .1"rCa,4...4 ~ ....~.s . .. „~ . ..{ry ' ,..;ip" 'S'IF' ~~;~;'. ,., ~ ~ r.~~, P~~ `!`+"_ jP~i~"7 S:;a{Xe ~1
I - ~ , .. '~t~~~
~ ' ~~~
~~ ...~~ ~ ~ h 4. 1~.
E . ; . • ~ i 1 ,i~Y':
~ ~ `j
;,, `';:
,~:,
•.:;;'r)~
' TH~ FORH.GOING RESQLUTIOZI is signed and approved by me thi.s 1st '~
' yI
day o£ August, 1988. 4:
i / , 1
~-
, /~ : ' s
~r ~ ~ G
I :l,l~ ~~ ~,~ ~,,~• Q~ ,,
~ : ~_.___ .- ~'+,
CHAIRMAN, ~~ AF~FTM CTTX PLT,NNINU Ct1MMISSTON :S
) ATTEST: ~ ~ / 1 _ :':i~
v
s ~ ..~ ~,1 . ~~:~~
~
~ ---- ~' n _ ' ~'
SECR~TA~tY, ANAHEIM CITY ~ING COtdMISSION ,~~:
S1'A'PE OF CALJ.F4RNiA )
COUNTX ~~' ORANGE ) ~s.
CITY OF ANAH}:IM )
I, Fdith L. Harr9.s, Secretary of che Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do i~ereby certify that che foregoing resoluii~n was pas~c~d and
adopted at a meeting of Che anahei~ C~ty Planning Cornmission helii on August l,
1988, by the folluwing vote of the member.s tYlereot:
AYES: CnMMISSI~NER3: BQUAS, BUYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, F~~,DHAUS, HERBST,
MC BURNEYv MESuL~"
NO~S: CCMMISSIONERS: NOiVE
AF35FNT: COMMISSIONFRS: NON'E
TN WITNESS WHERCOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi.s ls~ @ay of
August, 19t38. ~.,
~/~ ~ 1-`~ -~'~ 7 • .
~'' fu-.~`=~/~! ._ '~ ~ - ti't~L, ~
SECRBZ'`ARY, AN~'.HEIM CITY PLANNING COMM.CSSTON
-4- PC8$-207
,,
.~~~a" ~ ~ `
~ .. ,_ , .