PC 88-234~
1 •
..~~`
r
^ 'i
' ' `'J~r;~,,.
. . . ~.. ..,',ke
~~
,!~
I
~
Rk~S L T~T ION NQ~ PCDB-23~
v~
~~~'1
A~:ESOLUTION OF THE; 1'~N3~EIM ~TTY PLANN7NG COMMISSIQN'
THAT Pb~TITION I'OR VARTANCE N0. 3823 BE GRAIrTED
WHRRE'AS, l.ho An~heirn City Planning Commission tli.d receive a
verifieii Petition for V'ariance Eram ANAHEIM VILLAGE THREE QWN~RS ~SSOCIATION,
2082 N,ickzeJ son, t~212, Irvine, CA, owner, and BRENT NERGUIZIAN, 200Z Miahelson,
~212, Irvine, CA 92715, agent, of certaan rea~ proparty situated in tl:e City
of Anah~im, County af Orange, State of CaliEornia clescri,bed as:
LOTS 1 a1~D ?, OF TRACT ~5495, IN TIiE CITY OF ANAHETM,
C~UNTY OE' ORANGE, AS PER MAP RECOP.DED IN k300K 205~
PAGES 24 TO 29 INCI~USIVE OI' MISCELLANEOUS MIaP. S, I21
THE OFFICE OF THF COUNTY RECORllER OI' ~AIA COUNTY.
WI3EREAS, the City Planning Commissi~n clid hold a publa.c hearing
at the Civic Center in tihe City of Anaheim on August l, 1988, at 1:30 p.rn.,
notice of said publi.c hoaring having been duly given as required by law a:~c7 in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Cod~, Chapter I0.03,
to }iear and consider evidence far and against sz3d proposed vari~n.ce and to
investiga~e and cnake iinlings and rec:ommendations ~.n connection therewith; and
that subject petiti~n was continuod to the meeL•itic~ of August 29, 1988; and
WHEREAS, sai.d Commission, after due inspaction, investigation
and study made by i~self and in its behalf, and aFter due consideration oE a11
evidance and reports ofiered at said hearing, does find and cletermine t2ae
following f~cts:
l. That the petitionEr pro~~oses waivers af tkte fdllowing to
constru~:t a 3-story, 47-unit apartment complex:
(A) SECTIQNS 1.Q~4,~_06?..912 - Maximurn ^~tr~Yural heicth~.
and I$ • 34. Q6? . Q13 (I'srrnittecl: l~~orv within 150 feet of a
single-family residenL•ial zone an~ 2 gtori~s
orherwise;
Proposed: 3~~Q.r1P,S proposed 50-93 feet from
RS-7200 Zone)
(B) SF~T~NS :19.Q4~43•122 - MaxSmum f:enr~ h~iqh~J
~nd 18.~A~0~4.070 (k f .~e.r Perrnitted: $__f'_~et proposc~d)
0~59r PCf18-234
"~;;
;~r
~a
ry
K~i
, ~, r~;~,r f
. _.. .~.~:':,,, ~, . : .. ~ .~,
1~
;,,,
~~~ . - : , ~;~;
• ' ~ ~ saX;u~
~ Z. That the above-mentionod waivers are hezeb~r granted on tYie
, basis that ~here are special circumstances appl.icable to t:he property such as
size, shape, topography, location and surroundings which do not apply to ather
identically zoned property :in the same viainity; and that strict applica~i~n
oF the 7aning C~de deprives ~he property of priv,tlege~ enjoyed by other
prr~perti,as in tha identical zone and classificatiorx in the vicinity,
,~M ,,
`'' 3• That there are except.ional. or extraordinary cii•cvmstances
or canciitions applicable ta ~he property involved or to tho it~tended use of
thP property that do not apply g~;n~rally ta the ~roper.ty or class of use in
thc same vi.cinity and zone.
i
~' 4• That the requested variance is necessary~
~~~ ~ preserva~:ion and enjoyment of a su~staritial property ri ht toT t:he
~ g possessecl by ather
. pzogerty in the same vfcinity and zone, and denied ~o the property S.n que;stion.
~• Ttiat the requested ~•aziance w.i.ll not be materially
detrimRn~a2 to the public welfare or injurious ro the property or xmproveme.nts
i': in such vicin.ity and zone in which tho property is located.
ti
~• That 21 people indicated their presencs at said public
hearing in oppositi.ori; and thaL• no corre5ppz~dence was received in opposition
to :,ubject petition.
~,ALIFQI2NIA ~1~VIR NMEN'PA'L UALITY ACT F'INDING: That f~he Anaheim
City Pltr~nx~q Cqmmission has zeviewed the
47-unit ~partment c~rriplex with waivers of ~maximum ~~ ~onstruct a 3-story,
; maximum fence height orA an irregularly-~ha Q~ structural height and
approxim~L•ely 1,6% acres havin p Parcel oF land cansisting og
west side ~l a frontage of approxim;,;Ql~, gg Eeet on tYle
of Gr~enleat Avenue, havinq a maximum deprh of approximate2y 650
~eQ~~ 3ri~ further described as 2Q50 W.
apprave thQ Negahivo Declar.ation upon f ndi~ng ~that Vetu hasa ~Qn,siderecl rthe
NeqaL•ive DQC~aration togQther with 3ny cocnmonts reaeived during ~,he ublic
r~~xoW Process and further finding ox~ the bas.is of thc~ initial study and any
comments recoiv~d t-.klat there is no substantial evidence that the project wi11
have a significant effect on the enviranment.
!~ 1. That prior ko issuance of a
; signal assessment fz~ shall }~~ buildirig permit, the ap~ropria~e traffi~
paid to the City of Anahezm in an amount
as dekermined by City Council resolutcion.
2. That tFze ~xisting drrveway on Greenleaf Avenue sha11 b3 remnved and
replaced wiCh a standard cur.b anci gutter, sidetvalk and landscaping.
3. That prior ~a issuUnce of a building permit, evidex~ce sha11 be presentecl
satzsEact~ry t~ the Building Division hhat the ~roposed projQCk is in
conformance wit.h Council Po1ic Number 5~12
Etesidr.ttt,l~~ Yro~~~~s" and with P oisc~ Insulat•ion „Standards ~specif3ecl i.n
the California Administrative Code, Titl~ 25,
PC88-T.34
~
..`
~~~. ' . . . ~, r~'~i:
~~
.
~
4. Thzt gares shall not be insta].led ar.ross the driveway in a mannex which
may adverseZy affect vehicular trat•fic in tho adjacen+,: public streets.
Instal7.atian of any gates shall cor,f.orm Y.o the Er.gineering Division's
Standard Plan Na. 902 and sha11 be subject to the rev3.ew and approval of
the City Traf£ic Engineer.
5. That a parking plan indicating compliance with City parking design
stand~rds sYiaZl be subrnitterl to and approvc~d by the City Traffic Engineer.
6. Thati prior to cammencement of structura'1 Er~ning, two (2) on-sitQ fir~ '
hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and appraved by ~he
City Fa.re Department.
7. Th~:~ the Fire UPpartment/Sanitation Divis.ion "hammerhead turn~around"
sha11 be kept clear atc all times.
8. That subject praperty shall be served by underground utilities.
9. 'rhat a hydraulic neL-work analysis shall k~e pr.e~~ared and subsequen~ly
reviewed and approved by t~he Water Fngineering Division. The findings of
the ana'lysisr including any oif-site watar system impx•ovements sha11 be
implemented to t'.ie sa~isFaction of the W.ater Eng.ineerincy Division.
10. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park anr~
recreation in-.lieu fees shall be pail to the City oi Anahoim in an amount
~zs dekerminect by the City Courlcil.
11. That drainage of subject prc~perty sha11 be disposed of in a manner
sa~isf.actory to the City Engirieer.
~~~~ 12. That ii required by the Fire and Po]ice Aepartment, all lockable
podestrian and vehicular access gates sha].1 be equipped with a"kno~c box"
de~vice to the satisfaction of the C:ity I'ire DQpartm~nt, and the ~ity
Police Department.
13. ~hat traskx sL•orage ar~as sha11 ae providQd and maintained in s~ location
''1 acce~table to *he S~r~st Maintenance and Sanit~tiun Dxvision and in
~•,~'. acc~rdanae with appxoved plaiis on file with said Division.
t,'' 1~1. That all air con~itioning facilities and other rouf. and ground mounL-ed
equipment sha11 be properly shielded fro.n view, and the soun~l bufPered
from ~8jacent residential propertias.
r.: .
;t:
~';
:;~ :
gk.' ,
4~
-3- PC88-?.34
_.L
t
;;i
~;',fi.i
M ~ ~
~ .-~.
.ti;j'
15, That an eight (8) f~ot hi.gh masonry b1~ck wa11 st~all bo conshructed and
, maintained along tihe north and southwest (adjacent to fre e~aay) proparty
l~nes excepting the front setback where the wall height shall not exceed
three (3) feet.
16. 7.'hat the on-sita landscaping sha11 be maintainec3 in r.ompliance with City
standards.
~r ~a
s ~
17. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the leqal p roport~ owner
shall prepare and record an unsubordinated covenant limiting occupancy of
oach apartment unit to no mo~e than Cwo (2) persans (other ~han children
under th~ aqe of two (2) year~) per bedroc~m. Said ~imitation shall la~
included in each lease/rental agreement, A copy uf the covenant shal]. be
submiti:ed to and approved by the Citv Attorney prior to rseordation. A
copy of the recorded covenant shall be furnished to the Zoni ng Division,
18. Tha't the owner of subject prop~~rty snall sLibmit a letter reques~ing
terminatiion of Conditi~nal Use Yermit 2do. 2415 to the Zbn•ing Division.
19. That a fee sha11 be paid to the City of Anaheim for street lighting along
Greenleaf Avenixe in an amc~unl: as deterrt;inecl by City Council resolution.
ZQ• ~h~t subjec~ pr•operty shall bc~ develope~ substan~ially in accordance with
plans and specificaY.ions on fi].e wa.th the ~ity of Anaheim marked Revisi~n
No. 1 of ~xhil~ir Nos. 1, 2 and 3; pruvided, however, thaz the maximwn
builc3ing height shall be twenty-sev~n (27) feet as measured f•rom finished
grade to rooF peak,
21. That prior to :issuance uf a building pt.rmit, or witl-in a pQriod uf onp
year from the date o~ this re~olution., whichQ~~er occurs first, Conc~ition
Nos. 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 17, 18 ana 19, above-mQntione~, sYaal 1 bs compliod
with. Extensior.s for f.urther L•ime i:o com~lete sai~~ conditions may be
gr~ntFd in accordan.ce with Section 18.03.q9U of the Anaheim rtunicipal
Cor~o .
22. That prior tn final build:r.g and zoziing inspections, Canditicn Nos. 2, 8,
17. thruugh 15, and 20, above-mentioned, sriall ba c:ompliod wi.th,
23. That approval of t]•iis arg~lication constitutes ~pproval of the proposea
request only t~ th~ extent that it complies with t~e Anaheim Muraicipal
Zoninq Cod~ and any ot2~er app].icable City regulations. Apprc~val daes not
include any ar,tion or findings as to compliance or app rovaa of the
rPquest regarding any other applir.ablQ ordinance, regu?ation or
requiroment.
_ '; ~
-4 -
PC88-234
;~
;,,A
~~
, ~ , f I i~ F~r~ t"~M~
~ ~ 1+)S~v
~
~6
f~
' ,
i
~
~
~ ..i.ft
~ . ~ .~.1;:'~~n
i•.U
. . , (','t:''_
1
IY"
• 1~
BE Ix FURTHE~t RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission dues `r~i
hereby £irld and determine that adop~ion of t`tlis Resolution is expro~sly ?_;;~
predicat~~ u~ion applicant's ~ompliance with eacl-. and all af the aanditzons "=
hereinahr~ve sat forth. Should any such conditions, or any part the.raof, bo '!:7
~eclarec~ znvalid or unenforceable by the final judgmexi~ of any court o£ '-`~~
.... ,, .;.1
co,npPtant juri.sdiction, then this P.QSalution, and ~ny apgro~rals herein '`~~
;;~.
contained, shall be deemed nu11 and void. „
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by~ me this 29th da}r
ot• August, 198$.
'', -, ~' ,7
~~;; :: ~
i; . %~ ,-/ :" l ~ ~~_~e',~c./
CHAI RW02~5A '~ AN FIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
ATT.EST: /
~.~ a,~,ti.~.~,
SECRETARY, A23AHEIM CITY' PI. NING CQ~fTSSTON
STATE OF CALIFOI2NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY aF ANAPIEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secre~ary of the Anaheim Cifi.y E~l~nr~ing Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoinc~ resolution was ~assed and adopted at a
meetiing of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on
August 29, :1988, by the following vote of the members ther~of:
AXES: COMMISSIONE.RS: BOUAS, CARUSII,I,O, FELDHAUS
~l'QES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, ~OYDSTUI3
ABSENT: CODSMISSIONEF:S: MC BUFtNEY, MESS~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my han3 this 29~.h day oE
Augusk, 1988.
__ ~~.~~. ~ ~. -
~
SECRET.AR'Y, ANAHEIM CZTY PLAI~I~IING COMMI: aTOt7
-5- PC88-239