PC 88-236~
^
RESOLUTION N"0• P..~88-236
~
A RESOLUT~ON QF THE ANI~FIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITTON FOR VAP.IANCE N0. 3834 BE GRANTED
,~
WHEREAS, tht Anaheim City Planning Cortunfssion nid receive a
v~rlfied Petition Eor VariancQ frum ~TEWPORT PACT~IC REALTY AND INVESTMEN7.',
4000 MacArthur Blvd., ~680, Nowport Beach, CA 926E0, ownez, agent, oE certain
roal ni•operty situatcd in the City of Anahnim, County of Orange, State oP
Cali£ornia described as:
PARCEL 1: THAT POR2IOI~ ~F TFIG uOUTHEAST QUART~R OF
THE SOUTHW~ST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, T.QWNSF~IP 4
~OUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, I*I THE RANCHO LQS COYOTES, AS
SHOWN OPd A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5~, PAGE 11,
MISCEGLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORAI~'GE COUNTY,
CALIFQRNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLAWS:
BEGINPJING AT THE S~UTtiEAST CdRNER OF THE WEST HALF OF
TFiE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QiJARTER OF
SAID SECTION 17; TH~NCE WESTGRLY ALONG THE SOUTFIERLY
LINE OF SATD SECTTON 1%, A D7STANCE OF 105.00 FEEZ' TQ
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER ~1F THE LAIdD DESCRIBED IN DEED '.CO
MARX CLARK, RSCORDED AUGUST 4, 1455, IN BOOK 3161,
PAGE 522 OF OPFYCIAI. RECURDS; THENCG ALONG THE
WESTERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRI~ED TN SATD BEED,
NORTH 0 DEGRE~S 25' 14" EAS'C 21Q.00 F~ET TO THE
NORTFIWEST COR~IEFi TFiEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57'
09" EAST 105.00 F~ET TO THE ~ASTERLY LIN~ OI' SAID
WEST HALF; THEPICG S(IUTHERLY' AI.ONG SAID EASTERI,X LINE
210.00 FL•'ET Td THE PUINT OF THE IIEGINNING.
PARCEIa 2; BEGI23~lIN~ AT A P~rrIT IN THE SOUTH LINS OF
TIIE .~'.OLT'rHWEST QUARTER 0~ SAID SEi:7.'IO2V 1'7, SAID POINT
BEIPIG l0U FEE;T WEST 01' THE SC~U7.'FiEAST CORNER OF THE
4r"EST HALI OF THE SOTITHEAST QUARTCR OF THE ROUTFiWEST
Q~JAFTER 117 FEET; TEIENC~~ NQItTH Q LEGREES 25' 14" EAST
?.1(i FEE1'; THE~NCE SUUTFI 89 UEGREES 57' 09" EAST 117
FE;ET; TH~;NCE .~,'OTiTH 0 DEGREES 25' 14" {VEST 210 FRET TO
THE POINT OF' THE BEGINNYNG.
EJLCFPTItdG THEREFRUM THAT PORTION INCLUUEU WIT.H PARCEL
1.
WHEREAS, the Citl Planning Commission did hold a public heari.r~t~
at the Civic Center in the Cih~ of Anaheim on August 29, 198ti, at 1:3~ p.m. ,
n~ticQ ~f said public hear3ng having been duly given as requirec~ by law and in
accord~nce wiCh the provisions of h,he AnahQim Mur-icipa] Code, Chapher 1a.03,
to hear and consi~ier evidonce for and again~t said pro~osod variance and to
investigatQ and maY.a fzndings and rocommeri8at•ion5 in connection therewith.
Q'.
A46~r
t;.
lry t :~ ; ~ . ,
~~~ ~i._> f i ..r ~ ~r' ~~'. . . ~ .
. RaEW
PC88-236 ~~
:,^
;,
. J,t
• • t~'~ 1~'~~h
WHEREAS, said Cam;ni Ssion, ~fter due inspectioz~, inverstigation
and study made by itselt and in it~ behalf, and aEter due consideration of all
~ eviderxce and reports offered at said lieaxing, does find and determine the
Eollawing Pacts:
l. That the petitiorier proposes waiv~r o£ tho fol.lowing ta c~nstruct
a 3-story, 22-unit~ apartmant complP:c:
~ 5~T:[QN 18.~4.0~2 11 - Maximum struc~ural heiahi-
(~ s ori~~ permitte3, ~-S~~ries
proposed). ~
2. That rhe abo~e-mentioried waiver iy heroby granted on the basis
ttzat there are special circwnstances applicable to the proparty such as size,
shape, topography, location and surroundings which do not apply to other
identically zoned property in the same vicinityp and that str.icL• application
uf the Zoning Code deprivt~s tk~e property of privi2r~ges enjoyPd L~~ other
~+roperties in tho identical zone and classi~ication in the vici,nity.
3. Thnt khere ar~ excer~tional or oxtraardinary circiunstances or
condi.tions app2zcab7e ~o the property xtivolvod or to the intended use uf the
propert;y ~hat do not apply generally to the ~roperty or class of ~:se in the
same vicinity and zon~.
~i. That t-he rc~quested variance is r.ecessary .~or the preservt~tio~ and
enjoyment of a substantial property right posscsssed by other prnperty irl the
same vicinity and zone, and d~?nied to t2ae property in question.
5. That the requestAd varzance w3.11 not be materially detrimental to
L'nF, public welfare or injurious to the property or improvemenL-s in such
vicinity and zone in which the pro,?erty is locatQd.
6. That (7) pFrsons indicated their pre~Ence at said gublic hearing
ir~ oppositiUn; and that no co:respo:ndence was racoived i_n opposit.inn to
s~ibject petiL-ion.
.~j~LIFQ~2NT~_ENVIRQ~A7M~~TTAL QCJALI~Y ACT FTyDTNG; ThaL- the Pnaheim
City Planning Commission has zeviewQd tlae proposal i:o RS-~A-43,000
(ResidantiallAgricultural} 'Lone to the RM-12~0 (Fesidential, Idultiple-I'amily)
Zone and to construct a 3-story, 22-unit apartment r,omplox with waiver.s oE
maximum structural height maximum site cuverage on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land ~onsistinq of approximately 1 acre having a frontage oE
approximately d17 feet on the n.orth side of t3~11 Road, having a maximum depth
of approximate].y 1G0 feet, bQing located appraximatelx 136 feet west af the
centerline of Ags~te Si:rQet and furkher d~scr~bed as 2U11 ~nd 2017 We~t Ball
Road; and doQS hereby appr.ove the NQgative Declaz•ation upon findxng that ir
has considered the Negative Declar~t•ion togQther with any comments received
during tli~ public review process and furtYier finding on t:~o basis of the
initial study and any comments receivecl that L-hore is no substantial ov.`clonce
that tkAe projoct wil] have a significant eEPe~ct on the er~vironment.
-2- PCt38-236
f'r`y)~
~~
:';~~
,..i
,~
~ .'
. , . ..._..... . ,',:~ ~ ...... .. . . . . ...(r A' 4,~ ~. 1;'.:.: 11~ ~~ ~ . Mv {r :..y,~.~. ~ . .
. ~.' ' !'.. .. .
.r '~ ~ ~.~'.~-~ t ~~
, , , ~ ..... ~. ~.
~ ~~ E ~~ : .. . . . ,. t ~ '. .~'f~~: it'.-. 5'' \ (1 r:: 4 ~~( l Ix ~f."!'I'fi5 ~ ~'U~1 4
. ~
,.~., ~~i~~~
, ; L4
a>fj,y.
~°~ ~ .
~ • '','
;,'~A:
~~~~lr.' ;~'~
;?
~a
~i ,:
,ii
~;~~
1. Th~r prior ta issuance oE a buzldin
s~~i~al assessment £ee shaZ1 b
r
~
r
~
~
e paid to L•he
City of
Ana oxm
in
an
am~unt
as de~Prmined by City Counc3.1 resolution
~;;:
`
. ,
,
2. That sub'ect
] property sha11 be served by underground utilities. ,`.~
~
,
3.
ThaL sid~walks shal], be installc~d a.long Ball Road as required. by ~he Cit
~ngineer a~ad in acc~r
l ~;,°~
~'
I
y
c
ance with stand~rd plans aizd specifications on file
in the Office af the City EnginPer :;~
~
.
9. 7.'hat the ex:isting driveways on Ball Road sk~all be r~moved and raplaced
with standard curb anc?
;z.
`
`?~
gutter anc~ sicleWalk.
5. That the driveway s}1~11 be constructed witti ten (10) foot radius cuxb
returns as required b
th
i
y
Q C
~y Engineer. Exis
cracked
driveways sha11 be removad and replaced
~
g
i
as required
b
th~ C
t En
y ginoer.
6. That ~ parking plan indicati•rig compliance with Cit
standards and eliminatin
tw
•
r
l
g
~ L
andern parking spa.es sha11 be
sabmitted
to
and approved by ~he City Traffic I:ngineer.
7. That in the event a parcel map i~ nct rccorded r.ombiz~ing the tiwp (2;
exishing lots, the Isgal property uwner shall furnish ths Zoning Division
with a copy of a recorded cuvenant an~ agreement in a farm approved by
thQ City Attorney agrQ~ing to hold subjoct property as ana paxcel.
a. That gates sha11 riot be in~tallod 3cross driveway in a rnanner which may
adversely affec~ v~ha.cular traffic in ~he adaacent public skreei:s.
Installation of' any gates shall corifor~n to ~he Engineer.ing Division's
SY.andard f~].an ~o. 402 and shall be subject tn the revisw and appxoval oF
the City TrafPic Engineer.
9. Thai: trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location
acceptxbZe to the Str~et bfaintonance anc9 Sanitation Diva.sion and in
accordance witll appraved plan~ on fi].e with said Division.
10. Z'k~at pri.or to issuance oC a b~iilding permit, ~:,ppropriate park and
recrQat~on in-lieu f.ees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as deter,niri~cl by the City Council,
11. That cirair,age of subject propQrty sha11 be dzsposed of in a manner
satisEac~ory to the Ci~y EriginQer,
12. That prior to c~mmQncemenC ot strixcturaJ. frami.ng, E.ire hydrants sFia11 be
installecl and charged as required and approved by the Cil:y Fire
Department.
X3. That if r~equirad by the Fire and/or Police Department, all lockabl~s
pe8estrian ax~d vehicular access gates shall. be equipped with a"knox box"
device to ~he satisfaction of the City Fire Dep~rtment, anci ~,he City
Pol.ice Dep~rtment.
_3 PC8E1-236
4'~
~ . ~P,1~
, ~ . ~ . . , . ~ ~t1~(a
~If.~]
~
~
~
~ Y
.
G~
~~~'.}ti
'.I
~ ~ . . ~'j ~i
~.t
14. ~'hat all air conditioninq ~[acilities and other roof and ground mounted '~"
' equipment sha11 be propQrly shieldQd from view,
trom adja and the sound buFfered ~''~
~j cent rssidential properties. ;';
15. That prior to issuance of a building permit, evi
satisfactox
t
th
B
i dence sha11 be presentad ''
' y
o
e
u
lding Division i•,hat the
conformance
~ith proposed projec~ is 3n ~'~~
,
~`" r
Council Policy Niun;~er 5n2
Residential Projects" and with N
i "Saund Att~nuation in ;'
o
se Insulation
the CaliFornia Adm.inistrative Code, T~
tle 25 S~.andards specified in '
'~r
.
. ;~;r~
_~
16. That a six (G)-toot high masonry block wall shall be constriicted arid
maint
i
d
a
ne
alung the east property line,
;3
'~
;, ~ 17. That ~he ~n-site landscaping shal'1 be maintained in compliance with Cit ,~'
~, standards. y
o.,-~
T.B. That this Variance is grantod subject to the adoption of 1:ha Zaning
Ordinance in ronnoction wiLYi heclassifica~ion No. 88-89-Oy, now pending.
19. ~hat subject properky shall be developed substianCially in ac~ordance wi~h
plans and specifications on file with ~.he City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nr~s. 1 ar~d 2; pravidecl, howevar, that revised plans shall be submitted to
and agproved by Planning llepartmen~ staEf and City Tra:fic Engineer
elim::nating ~wo tandem parking spaces, ar:~d eliminating the br~throom
doorway opeising into the kitchen.
20. That prior l•o issuance of a busld3.ng pQrmit, or within ~ period of on~
yoar
:'~ from the date of thi.s resolution, whichever occuc s ~irst, Couda.txon
os.
wzth 1, 6, 7, fl, 10, 15, 16 an3 1$, above-monta.oned, shall be r,omplieti
. E~ctensions Eor f.urther tiirie to com~le~o ~aid conditions may be
grant
Code. ed in accordarice with Section I8.03..090 of the Anakteim biunicipal
21. That ~rior to fi.nal buildinq and zoning inspections, Con.di~ion Nos. 2, 3,
9, 5, 9, ll, 13, 14 and 19, abo~~e-mentioned, st-a11 bo complied with.
BE IT rURTHER 12ESOLVED that the Anahoim Ci~y Planning Commission
does hereby L•.ind and dotermino ttiat adoption of Chis Resolulion is express'ly
predicated upon applicant's cnmplianc~ witYi each and a~Y o£ the conditions
herainabouo set forth, Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
doclared invalid or unenforceal~le bl the firlal judgment oF any cpurt of
competont jurisdaction, then this Resolution, ancl any approvals herein
containecl, ~hall be deeme~i nu'll aizd voi~.
-4- PC~B-23b
;-,;~
;~
~ , .
~~
~~'""`~~
;,., ~-ti •~;j^~~p~
' fti~1 ~~
, r~~r
"'' , v !;=f
,1
t'
i ;,
'~i
. . ,'ir;,~.
. ~ :,'.,,`~~~
; THE FORLGOING RE~OLUTION is sfgned and a~proved by me this 29th day ,~
' of Augus~, Z988. ~'
~ ~,.~ i~ /,~~ ;
_ ' /'~ ~'G ` , •/ ~:t .,l-r' -' ,,.!
CI~AIRWOMAN, ~ AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION ;'~';
~' % ~ ~~-,t,~
~r:; ATTEST: ' , '/ i{I
;sk, .r •~~f7 t`f~~.
r~"' _
~ . /~ '(_/~6~ . ~ ~'ii;
S~CRETARY, ANAHEIM CT75C PLANIJING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALTF'ORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAvBIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, ~ecreL•ary of the Anaheim Citj Planning Cummissi~n, do
hareby certify that khe foreqoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meQting of the Aiiaheim City Pl.anning Commission heJ.d on August 29, 198t3, by
thQ following •vote of the members L•herQOf:
AY.ES: COMMTSS20NERS: BOYDSTUN, CABUSILLO, FEL,DFiAUS
I30Eu: CO2rL'~fISSIONERS: ~QUAS, HERBSx
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MC: BURNrY, M~SSG
IN WITN~SS WF3EF.rOF, T have hereuuto set my hand this 29th d~y of
August, 1988.
~~' r ,~° ~-~:~ ~
- ~~ -~,~
SECRETAI2Y, ANAiiEIM CIT'Y PL~ANNING COMMISSrON
-5- pC8$-~236
~,~ ; e,
r~-