PC 88-238,!
~
^
~.~9~..~-~i 4c~ N4..t ~G 9~z~$
~."'',1
~w:::~
A RESOGUT30N OF TFIE ANAH~IM GITY PLANNINC COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VAI2IANCE NU. 3f335 FiE GRANl'~D
WFiEREAS, the Anaheim ~ity Planning Commission did receive a
verified Pc~ti.tiun for Variance fr.om L~ARRGLL PHILLIPS, BA.FF3ARA PFiILLIPS,
STEPfIEN D. SHIRT,EY, Et zl„ 1591 W. Tedmar Aven~~e, Anaheim, CA 92802, ownsrs,
and DENNIS FLYNN, 4&31 A iano .P1a2a, Yorba Lincia, CA 9268b, agent, of ~ertain
real proparty situatpd in th~ Czty of AnaYseim, County of Orange, Sta~a o£
C3lifornis dQSCribed as:
LOT 19A, OF T.RAC7' 255, IN THE CITY OF ANAH~IM. AS PEIt
MJ'.P R~:CORDED IN BOOK 14, PAGES 25 C)F MISC. /MAPS, IN
THF OFFICE OF COiJNTY R~COFtDEF OF OP.ANGE COUNTY
LOT 16 OF 'TF~A."f N0. 255, ~AST ANAHEIM SUBDTVISION,
CITY OF ANAHCI:n, COUNTX OF ORANGI:, STAT.L OF
CALIFORr1IA, A~ PER MAP REC.~RDEll Ih BOOK 14, I'AGE 25
OF MI5CELLANECUS ~fAr~S, REC~RDS 0~' SAIn OFANGE GOUhTY
PARCEL ]: LOT 19 OF TtZACl N0. 255, IN THE EAST
ANAIiETM SUBDIVISION IN THG CITI' OF A2d1lHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORA27GE, ~TATE OF CaLIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BGOf: 14, PAGE 25, MTSCFLI~ANEOUS MAPS, IN TFiE OFFTCE
OE THG COUNTX RECQRDER OF SAID COUTITY.
,
;;
:,
.
:t
~
:i
WHEREAS, Cti~ City Planning Commission c3id k~old a public Y~oaring
at the Civic CQntcr in tha City of Anaheim on Augusk 29, 1988, at 1:30 p.m.,
r-o~ice of said public hearing having been duly given as r~quired by law and i.n
~iccordanco with the provisions of the Anahei.m MunS.cipal Code, Cnapter 18.03,
to hear nnd c.onsider evidence for ard against said proposed variance and to
invostig~r_Q and make finciings ancl recomrnetidations in connection therawithl and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a£ter due 3nspection, in.vestigation
and study made by itsolf and in its behalf, and after due c~nsideratio.+~ of. aJl
evidQrace and reports ~f:fere~i ar_ said hoarinq, doos fi~xd and determine tho
following iac~s:
1. That thg pel•ition~z proposes wa3.vers af the following to
constriic't r~ L and 'L-story, 11-~.init condominium comple:c:
( A? i~%~~.~~~.~~_~ 1.s4 51, - ~~.x ~.4L.~1~ i 1Sj3_~'1~.~~ ~~ •
('~0 t~~ rc:uired; 4~~g~,~ propose~)
0458r
-i-
r~cos-23s
~ ~ Y~k
.^
;;
~ ~/S
.. , di7~~t ~.~, r~ , , .. . . .,
~ .
:r: I
ti
' (B) SE~T. NS _8s.~.~4S2.~az_ -
and 1QL~z,q62 plq
( C ) ~CT IQN 1~~ ls.~q
~.1 -~~* ;eT~
~:!:~t~
M~xam ~~.m s r i tuxa,l ti~iak~t. '
(~~Q.ries per~,~~_-~~~her~1~.,5.Q feet from
singlQ famal~ rasid~ntial zoninq; ~~~r,_~~
prono-~~~_?~F~~t Lrom RS-7200 zoning)
- Pe~,~tted en~roaCh-~r~n~ iztt~,rg4~_~d yard~.
(Reguired: parkin~~p~~ ~ ~,@rmitCed to
encroaeh into Eront yard o~ yard area adjacent
to single Eamily ~esidenciaZ zone to west;
Propos~d: ?, OpPn~g~Ges located 2 f
f ront y --------g~ f rom
p~~:opert line and open rnac -. loca~;g41 2
_fe~t from we~t RS-7200•-zoned pr~pertien).
~D) ~ECTIONS ~_~~Qq.~Q~.~~._S~l - l~r.i.mum f nc~ hgagt~t,~
1~~Oay04~.1Q2 (~~n~ 6~~ Permitto3; 7 f
18 3__ 1__ ,____064~~ nortY. east and wQSt property~linQS~pQ3ed alonq
2. Thar th~ ~bov~-mentioned waivers (A), (II) and (Cj are hereby
grarlted on the basis that there are speai~~l circumstances applicable to the
property such as size, shape, top~graphy, location and suLroundings whicn d~
not apply to otner iclentically foned proper~y in tY,~ same vicfnityj and that
sL•rict ~~p13.cation oi the Zcning rod~ ~;~prives tl:e ~roperty of privilegos
enjoZ•ed by other propert,ios in the ident:tcal zoria anci c.lassification in the
vicinity,
3. Z'hat the above-mc~:iti~nQd waiver (U) is hereby granted for a wall
height of e.ight Eeet along adjacent single family rQS:,dentfal z~ning (~~ m~Y
be agreed to by the abutting propezty ewners) to mitigate ~ny i.mpacts of
subject residQritial condominium ~roposal and on the basis that there are
special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape,
topography, location and surrour_diny~ which do not. apply ~o oth~~r iden.tically
zoned property in Che sarne vicinity; and that strict a~plication af the Zoning
Code cieprives thQ proporty of. nrivileges anjuyed by other ~ropertiQS in the
identical zone and classification in the vicinity.
~. Th3t thQre are exce.prional or extraardinary circ~unstattces or
COIlC3~~lO11S applicable tc~ the properL•y invol.ved or to tho intended use oI the
Lroporty that do not apP1Y nenerally to ttie property or clas~ of use in thQ
~rne vicinity ancl zane.
5. Thak the roquestr-3 var.iancQ is necessary fa~ the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right pus~ossad by otYier propQrty in
~h~ 3amc~ vicini~y aud zone, and deniod to the property in queytion.
F. That tha requQSCed varianco will not be mat-erially detrimenr_~1
to t2ie pub.li~ wQlfare or injurious to tho ~,roper.ty or improvemonts fn such
vicinity and z~r.e~ in whlcn lhe propor~y is locat8d.
'l. That no onR .i,ndicated thQir presanco at saic~ public hoari.ng in
oppo~iti.on; aiid that no correspondenr.e was received .in opposftion to subjo~~
patition.
-2- PCCO-l38
~
~ ~ ~
~ r
.
+~ •~~ r>
~ ' ~'ti r~~
~ ", s ~a+i
,~~~
^y~ALI~Q.RNIA F.NVIRQN~],~~.L U~LIT~.,~~T _FI DI.~1 : That tho Anahe3m
City Planning Commission lias reviewecl thc~ proposal to reclassif~~ subject
proper~y from the RS-7200 (Residontial, Single-Family) Zono to the RM-3000
{ResidQntial, ~fultip;e-Family) Zanc~ and to cons~ruct a].-storv and 2-aL•ory,
I1-unit condominium complex with waivers of min3murn building site width,
maximum structural height, permiCtied eneroaehmant into roquirc~cl yards c~nd
maximum f~nce height on a rectangularly-stiaped par~el of land consis~iiig of
approximately 0.8 acre, having an approximlte fro;ntages of' 171 f~e~ on the
north side of Cypress Street, having a maximum depth of approximate].y I95
f.eat, being Zocated appr•oxima~ely 7Q feFt west- of the c~:nterline of Coffman
Street and further describod as 1811, 1817 and 1821 East Cypress Street; znd
daes here~y approve the Negative Decla.ration upon finr~ing that it has
considared the Negative Declaration t~gethar with any comr.i.nts recc~ive~l
durzxiy the ptxb~ic rQVaew pro~ess and furY.ber finding on th4 ~asis of the
initial s~udy and any comment,s rec~zved that therp is no subs:~ntial evidence
that the projecL• will have a signiEicant efEect on the environn;ont.
NOW, THERGFORE, BE I1' RF;SOLVEA that Lhe Anaheim City Pl~nning
Cormnission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variailce, upon the
fallowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prereq~.iisite to
the proposed use of thc subject proporty in order to prossrve the saf~~ty and
genezal welfare of the Citizens of l2ie City qf Analieim:
1. That this Variai-ce i~ gz•anr.ed sub;ject ta tiie adoption of the 'Loning
Ordinanr.e iai connectiou .: ith Recl~:ssificat;ion No. 88-89-].0, now pendir.g.
2. TY,at prior to issuance of a biiilding permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assc~ssment fee sha11 be paid t~ tha City of Anaheim in an amount a~s
dotermined by City Ceuncil rosoJ.ution.
3. Thak a tract map to rocord th~ d3.vi,ion of suhjoct property shall be
submitted to and. approved by the City of l~.naheim and L•hen l~o recorded in
the Offico of tno Or3r,re County Ctecorder.
4. 'That subject proporty shal]. b~~ served by unciorc~rounr~ utilities.
5. That all sma11 car spaces shall bc+ :zo smaller than eight (8) Leet in width
by tifteen (15) feet in depth.
6. That prior to commencem~.^.t of st:ructural framiny, oi--sxte fire riyflrant3
shal.l bs in;;tallecl az~d charged as requir•ed and approv~d by the City FirQ
Department.
r; 7. That a Eire L•ruck turn-around aroa shall bd provic3ed and maintainecl
on-~iCe to the satisfaction o£ the City E'ire De~partmenC. Said turn-around
aros shall be kcpt clear at a1Z timos and may be constructeci of tur.f block
.if accepted by the City Fire Den~ar~ment.
-3- PC88-238
'0. -l ~.i'~~•';Y
~ ;, .
. . . . .
''°~t`3
8. 'rhat qates shall not be installed across the private street in a maiiner
which may adverse.ly ai£ect vehicular traific in L•he adjacent public
street. Installation oP any gatps sha11 contorm to th~ Engi.neering
Divisi.on's :;tandard Plan No. 4U2 and sha11 be subject to thQ review an..~
approva~ ~f khe CiL-y Traffic EngineQr.
9. That drainage of subject property shall be disposPd of in a manner
,a~isfactory to the City Enyineer.
10. Thaf: trash storage ara~s shall be provided a.nd maintain~d in a location
acceptable to th~ Street Maa.ntenance anit Sanil:ation Aivisior~ and in
accordanc~ witn approved plans o~i file witli said Divisi~n.
11. That all air c~nditioning f.acilities ancl otlier roof and ground mounted
equipmeni: shall be properly shielded from view, anc~. the sound bulEered
from adjacent resi~lential properties.
12. That an eigtlt (8) toot high masonry block wall shall be coxistructed and
maintained along r.he north, east, south and west prupertiy lines abutting
single family xesidential zoiiing, unless written approval is given by the
adjacent pro~Erty owners for a lo~•:Pr block wall (minimum 6-fooC higti)s
provided, houevc ~'that the wall tieigh~ shall not excead thre~e (3) fc~et 3n
the front setback.
13. That subjecL- proper.ty shall be devoloped subst~nCially in ~ccordanca with
Qlans ar.d spacifications on file with ttae City oE Anaheim marked ~xk~ibit
Nos. 1 tnrough 6.
14. That prior to issuance of. a buildiny permit, or within a period af one
vear trom the aate of tliis resolution, whichever occuz~ first, Candition
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 12, above-mezxtioned, shall be complied with.
Extc~nsio~~ for furL-her time t~ campl~:te said uond.itzons may be grar~ted in
accordan~e with Section 18.03.09U of rhe Anaheim Municipal Code.
15. That prior. to final builaing and z~ning xnspactions, Cor~dz~ion Plos. 4, 9,
10, 11, and. 13, ~bove-montioned, shall be cnmplied with.
16. Tha~ approval of• Lhi~ application constitutes upproval of the proposed
requosti; ontl+ to the exrent thaY. it complies wit:h L•ha ~naheim MuniCipal
Zoning Code and any other applic~ble City r.egu.lations. Approval does not
in~l~.ide any action or fi.nciings as to comp.liance or approval of the xoqu~st
regarding any cL•hor applicable orciinance, regulation ~.r requirQment.
EE IT FURTHER RESOLV~D that the Aitahsim Cir.y Plannirig Commissi~n does
heroby find and deterrnine Ck~at adoption of this Kesolution is exrr~ssly
predicatfld upon applicant's comp'liance wikh each and sll of ttis conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any siach condiCions, or any part ~hereof, be
decl~-red inval.id or unenforce~.ble by the final jucigment af any court of
~ompetent juriadiction, then t~is Rosolutinn, and any approv~~.s t~erofn
cantained, sliall be deemed null and void.
_q~ PC88-238
°' ~'.,l
~ ~,
;:iC~~..:~
• ...,,,, ~
:,F
.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTTON is signed and approved by me this 29th day of
August, 198a.
~ , . ~; . ,: ~
i _ - - `'~ ~,~ ~ r ~ „'%~,..-
' /'%'.rl~'i-*_ -r ~._:l1 °~1~~:.-~-~
CHAIRWOM~~1, ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION
~,
,; ti ,
Y}~ ATTE S'1:
.~ ~..~ u~_~,~- ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEYM CIT.% PLANNING C02~2ISSZON
STAT~ Or CALIFORNLA
.•
-- ~ /' , ,,~ -,'" _
~r~~~~~-~`~ -.e~-{
SGCRETARY, ANAHEIM CrTY. P~.ANN~NG CQh4rS:SSION
-5- PCBfl~-239
^ :::
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s;,.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eaith L. FTarris, SQCretary of the An~heim City Planning
Commission, du here~y certify that the forego~ng resolution was passod and
adopted ai; a m i:ing of tho Anaheim City Planning Commission ha.ld on X.tagust
29, 1988, by tc~e Eollowing vote of L•he m~mbers thereuf;
AYE;S: CObIIrfI5SI0NGRS: EiOiTAS, $OYDSTUN, CARUSYLLO, FEI,U"riAUS
NOES: COtyII~iISSIOP:GR5: NONE
ABSENT: COh4~fISSIONF;ktS: HRFBST, MC BURNEY, MRSSE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Z have hereunto se~ my hand this 29th day of
Auyust, 1988.
;~
~~;