PC 88-25i ~ . - ~ ~;~A '`r .-.,~~'~r ~~,kvvy+~i~~ btt . b}'~e°' i
. . ~ ~.. ... . , . ' ~ - _ . . . A Y ~. (~.. .T~
~ ~ t.i~~t;K~!
s
:; } .
;
`i
RESOLtJTI02v rro. PC88-25
A RESOLUTION OF THF, ANAIiEIM CITY YLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETIT.ION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-88-24 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim
verified petition for Reclassificati
L•incaln Avenue, Anaheim, California
Linr.oin Avenue, Anaheim, California
situated in the City of Anaheim,
described as follo~ss:
City Planning Commission did recezvP a
:~n from ANGELO BRUTOCAO, ET. AL., 2240 W'.
928U1, owner arid HUGO A. VA'LQUE7, 2240 W.
92801, agent for cextaix~ real propQrty
County of Orange, State of California,
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSEC7.'ION OF TEiE SOTJTH LIh`.E pF
SAID SEC7'TON 8 WIT'~I THE SOUTHERL'Y PROLONGATION OF THE
CENTER LINE OF MULLER STRI'ET, 60.00 F~ET Z9IDc„ AS
DESCRIIiED IN PARC~L 1 OF THE DEED TD THE CJTY OF
ANAEiEIMo RECORAED NOVEMBER l, 1957 TN AOOK 4089 FAGE
397 OI' OHFSCIAL R~CORDS OF SAID ORANGF COUNTY, TFi~,NCE
NORTH 0 DEG. U2' 24" WEST 835.43 FE~T ALO~TG SAlD
SOIITH~RI~Y PROLpNGATION' TNTEI2SECTION OF SAID CENTER
LINL WITH TFiE ~ASTERLY PROLONGATION' OF THE NORTHERLY
L'1'NE OF TRACT N0. 1775, AS PER MAP RECORDED aN BOOK
5U PAGE I.5 OF SA1D 'MISCELLAN~OUS MAPS; THENCE NORTH
89 DEG. 37' 1~" WFSx 351.63 FEET PARALLEL WITH SAID
NURTHERLX U:iNE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAIll TRACT N0.
.1'l75; TFIENCE SUUTH 1 DEG. 16' 5~" EA~T E135.16 :rT
ALONG SA:CD EbSTERL'Y LIZiE TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF ~AID
iECTTON; THENCF~ SOUTH 89 DEG. 31" 00" EAST 333.59
1?EET ALONG SATD SOUTfI LTNE TO THE POINT pF BEGI*INING.
Ea{CEPTTNG THEREFROM THAT PORTION D~SCRIBED AS PARCELS
1 AND 4 IN THAT CERTAIt3 FINAL ORllER OF CONDEMNATIUN,
SUPERIOF COTJRT. CASE id0. 70691, A CERTIT'IED COPY 0'f
~ WHICH WAS 'RECO~2DED MARCH 28, 1958 IN HOpIC a242, PAGE
"~ 85 OF SAIA OI'FICIAL R~CORUS.
WHEREA;c, the City Planninq Commission did hol~~ a publi~~ liearinc~
a~t t.he Civic rerlter i~~ ttie City of Anaheim o:i Decernber 7, 1987, at 1~ t0 p.m.,
and subject pe~ition was continued to the meering of January 4, 19fi8; notice
of saicl public h~~aring having been duly given as required by law and in
accardance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Cli~pter 18.03,
to 1~ear and consider evidence for and againsi: said proposed reclassxfication
and to inv~est.igate and make findings an.cl recommendations in connectiun
ther•ewith; a.nd
WHEREAS, said Commi.ssion, atter due inspection, investigation
and atudy made by iks~lf and in :its behalf, and at•~er due consideration of a11
evidence and reports ~ffexed at said hearing, does Eind and determine the
following Facts:
0172r PC88-25
,A':. i
.. ~~;,~:~.':'i
;`~:
,;,
;+:';
~ ;;
,,,~
~
':'6
=rti
{,,
';~
,:
`~,
, ,}~
~{;
~,;;~ >;: ~:~,°.
,~ .~ -f ~~>>;~~u~
'~~
F '4
l. That the petitioner proposes reclassificatian of subject
proper~y from the CL (Cammercial, Limited) Zone to the RM-120Q (Residential,
Mt~ltiple- E'amily j Zone.
2. That the Anah~im Gene.ral Plan desigr~a~es subject property
for General Commercial land uses. General Plan Am~ndment *To. 237 is currently
pencling an.d, if approved, would redesignate the property to ~Iedium Density
Fesidential land uses.
3. That the praposed reclassification c~L subject property .is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly ~nd proper development of ~he
community.
4. That the proposed reclassificatic.~n of subject property does
properly relate ~o the zones and their permitted uses locally es~ablished i~z
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
gene•ral:ly esta;.~~.i~k~ed throughcut the community.
5. Thal• the proposed reclassi.fication of subject property
requires the dedication and improvemenl of abutting str.eets in acc:ordance with
the Circulatiun Element of the General Plan, due to the nnticipated ir..cxease
in traFfic which wi'll be gcnerah.ed by the intensificatio:z af 1an3 i~se.
6. That 7b people indi~ated their presence in r~ppos.~tion aGt
thA December 7, 1937, public liearinq, and 25 people :ndicated their presenc;e
i:~ opposition at the January 18, 1988, public hearzng; 3nd that petitions and
:LettE~rs containing 487 siynatures were received in opposition ':o sul5je~t
petit.ion.
~LIFOKNIA ENVIRONbIENT~L QiALITY ACT FINllYN~: That 1:he Anaheim
L'.~ r_y planni.ng Cammission has rev~iewed ~he proX~osa1 to cansid~r an amen~ment
to the General Plan to redesignate subject property Erom General Commercial
land to Meditun Density Residontiai land uses and to reclassify subject
pronerty frorr~ t::c CL (Cammercial, Lzmited) zone tn the Rtb-1200 (: esideutial,
Multiple-Family) ~one to construct a 220-unit, 5~-foot h.ig2:.. 4 to 6-story
"affordable" ~partment co~~iplex with waivers of maximtLm fence height~ minimwn
building site area per dwel.l:i.r,q unit, maximum structural haight and minimum
distance bc~tween builclings on a rectangularly-shapofl parcel of land
c~nsisting of approximately 5.7 acres located at the nor~hwest ~orner of
Lincoln Avenue and Muller StroeY. and further tiescribed as 1g25 W. Lincoln
Avenue; 3nd does hereby approve ~he Negative beclaration upon findir..g that it
has considered the ~Tegative Declaration together with any aommenr.s received
during ~he public review procoss and further finding on the baszs of' the
initial scud~~ and any comrnFnts receivecl that there is rio substantial evidence
that t.he ~roject wi.ll have a signiizcant effzct ~n ttie environmenr.
..2-
<<1~
' ~ ,c',
~-;E:
. . . . .~;=i~.
`'' r
;::`~:
;.y
,r--•.
~.~
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the anaheiin City P1ar~ning
Commis53.on noes hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
do3rig, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exc],ude the above-describeu pxoperty tro~n the CL (Commercial Limite~i) Zone
and to incarpo~ate said described proporty into the RM-1200 (Residenkia~ , ;,; :;;t
Mult:iple-r amily) Zone upon ~he fo1? owing conditions whzch are herery found to ~~-u~
be ~i necessary prerequisitc~ to the proposed use ot uubjecL• property in order <
to preserve the sa£ety and genex•al w~lfare o~ the Citizens of the City of :`';:
An ahoim :
~F~ i
1.
That the owner of subject property shall irrevoc:ably offer to . ~~ :~s
dedicate to the ~ity of Analzeim a strip o~ land 32 feet in
width from the centerlii~e of the str.eet along Muller Street for ;~
str~et widening purposes.
2. That street lightiiig Ea.:ili~ies along Lincoln A~venue and Muller ':,;j
otree~ shall b~ ins~alled as r.ec~uired by the Uti].ities Ger~eral
Manager in acr.ordance with spociiications on file in the Of:Eice
5
of Utilit.ies General 2danag~r, and that Security in the form of ~
a bond, c:erti£icate of deposit, ].e~tt~r pf credit, or :sash, an
an ~mount_ and form ~atisfac~orv to the City of Anaheim, sha11. ~=_~
be postE~d with the City ta guarantee th~ sata.sfactory ,~
~ompletic~~ of tne above-mentionec~ ii~iprov~ements ~ Said seeurit,y •,r2
shall be posted with the City ~f A.zaheam prior to the i~
inL•rccluct:ion oC an ordinance rezonirig subject property. The ;:~~
above-reqtaired improvemer~ts sha11 be instal.led prior to °'``la
occupancy .
' ~N
3. Tliat t2~e owner of subject property sYiall pay to the City of '~
Ariaheim a fee for tiee plant.ing pur~,~ses along i~incoln Avenue ;;~?H~
and Maller Street in ~n amounf: as determined by ~.hP City ,r;
Coun c i 1. 4
,.,,,~
~
4. ~
That prior to inl::oduction of ~an ordinance rezonixig subject ~
~ `~ ~;~i
''~~
propertx, tho property owner shall prepare and recQrd an E/,
unsubordinated covenant ~imiL.i.ng occupancy~ pf each apartmenk !;,','
unit fio no mor~ than two ~(2) persons (other than children under ~'~~~-
the age of two {2) years) per bedroan. Said limi.tation sh~l1 `•;,,~
be :ncluderl i;: each lease/rontal agreement. A cop~ of tT~e '~~`:i''
covenant sha].1 be submitted to anc~ apFroved by the C3.ty ,t
A{:torney priar tn recordation. F~ copy ot the recorded cuvenant `~;`-x
shall be furn±shed ta the Zoning Division. °`~~
` ;:`:;
5.
Thpt pr.ior t,o the introduction uf an nrdinance rozoning subject ;``;;,
~;'
property, Con~i.Lioi~. Nos. 1~hrough 4, abov~-m~n.tioned, st:all be ~
~
comp7.e~ed. The provzsions or rights granted b
y tha.s resr~lution ,
Fv
,
shall become null and void by acti4:~ of the Pl~nning Commission .~~~'
1
} ;;,
~
unless s~ic3 conditions are complied with within one year from ,
,
''°-'~~`
~
~~
the date of this resolution, or such further tinie as the ,
+`
?~
Planning Carnmission may grant, -
~;~1~
;
,.
;
~R
'=!Jan
....
.,
.
,~~
- 3 -
PCBR-25 i~,~
X;~
,.,
t't~
,tJr~.
!,S3~J
~'., !
. . ~ . .~. rT
t
1 4~. ,{
~
~
~
.
'~' . ~, ~ :
. . . . . . .. . ' . ,.
,. . . ~ . , ..,. ~ . ~. . . . ',..
... . '.... : . . - ,
. . . , .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ~ ..
.. ~ r'
M1~~
.
. ., . ~.'; ~,i~5, f
. .. ... ,e~'sy M~kel.n~f~Kn ~
. ~,~ .~~ti,y
~ V
. . . . 41+•.1.
~ ~,
6• TZl~t +~pproval ~~' Ch~,s ~pplication cc~nstitutee~ ap~rovF~l of the
proposed reqiiest unly to the extent that i.t camplies wihh the ~+
Anahoim Munic.ipal Zoninq Code dnd ~x~y other applicmble City
regulations. Approval does not include any actinn or findings
as to compl3ance or approval of. 'the reque~t rQgarding any other
applicablo nrdinnnce, rogulntian or requirement.
}3E IT I'UR'.CH~Ft RESOLVED th~t the Antthc~im City Planning Commission
doos heroby ~ind ancl detormino that adoption of this Resoliation is expre3~ly
predicated upon applicant's comp'liance wi.th c~ach and a11 of the conditions
here~inabove set forth. Should any ~uch conditions, or any part thereof, be
doclare~ fr.valid or unontorceablo by the fina2 judgment oE any court of
comper.enr jurisdicr,iotl, then this itesolulion, and any e-nprovals horein
containc~d, sha].1 be deemed null and vaid,
THG FUREGOTNG RE50LUTTON is signed und appro~~ed bp me thi~ 18th dax
of J~nuax•y, 19aQ,
___ 1 ~.~'~ ~,~1 ~.-~.
CitAtRMAN, ANAi;EtM C2T ~ PLANNiNr, COhII~fiSStON
::'1':fEST: ~
--_..~~'7~,~~ ~', /, ~~~~ ,~, .
SECRETARY, ~~~EIM CITY~PLANi~rN~ p;,Q„~YgSIOPI
STATE QF CALZFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~TGF. ) ~s,
CITY OF ~..*IAHEIM )
I, E3ith L.
Commission, ~~ h~r~-~y ~
arlopted at a meetf ng
.1anc:ary lb, 1908, by the
AYES: COT4fISSION~RS:
NOES: CObL*dISSZONERS:
~~BSENT: C0I~41ISSIONRAS:
Harris, Secretary of the Anahoim City Planning
~rCify th~t the foregoing rQSOlation was passed and
rf the Ariaheim Ci.ty Planning Comnission hold on
~~~llc,wing vote of the members theroof:
BOUAS, BOYUSTUN, CARUS7Lf~0, McE3URNEY, btESSE,
('6LDIiAUS, FIERBST
1.~f0i~T~
I:~ WITNFSS WHEP,EOF, I huva hereunto set mx hAnd this 18th day of
J~nuary. 1988.
:~,~ - ., , i
-___,..._,;..2.::~~~~, ~.~.l~ '~ ~
SF,CRETARY, ANAHEIM C'I~'X PLANN2rIG OMMISSYON
_q_
PC08-25
~~ • , Y.,.M ,,. . ..s. ,
~',~,nR . . ,.,r. ... ;.,,, ~,., . ,, ;'
--- - ---- . . , <,