PC 88-27'--,
~
F' '~
~.+,~,~;
,',:,,ti; ~
, :!., I
RESOLUTION ~0. PCB~-27
A RESQLUTION OF TT3E A~IAHEIM C7TY PGANNING COMMISSIGN
THAT P~TI'PION FOR RF.Ct~ASSIFICATIAI3 N0. 87-88-37 BE DENIED
'~
~i;
;,t
~` WHEREAS, ttie Anaheim Ci~y Planning Commission did rec~ive a ~`
~; •verified petition for Reclassxf.icaiion Erom ~,t7GU5'.~TN V. LOPEZ AuyD ZELI'A D.
~,OP~Z, 905 S. Euclid, Anahei.m, California 928Q5, owner and T.A.S.S. Inc., -~,~~
~*
~5935 San Miguel, La Mirada, California 90638, agent, far cartain real
property sztuated in the City ~f Anaheim, Cuuntx of Orange, State of
Califarnia~ described as follows:
, ":-,~
THL' EASTEk~LY 50 k EET, FRONT AND REAR OF LUT 7 OF THE
DONAHO TRACT, 2N TH~ CITY OF ANAHElM, Cr,UNTY ~F ,'~~~
QRAN~G, STATE OF CALTFORNIA, AS PLR MAP RECQRDED IN '"'
BOOK 6, PAGE 36, MISCELLADIEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COi7NTY RF.CURDER OF SAID COUNTX.
~ ' .~~.~~`::i
WHEREAS, the City Plar.ning Commzssion did hold a public hearing ~~'
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 18, ].988 at 1:3Q p.m„ ''
no~ice oE said public l:earing having been duly giver- as requir.ed by law and in
accord3nce with the provisions of tho Anaheim Municzpa~ Code, Chapter 18~03,
to hear and consider evidence for and again~t saic~ ~+roposed raclassiFiaation
ancl to invc~tigat.e and makc~ findings and rec~mrnendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, aft~r due i.nspec~ion, invastigation '
and study made by itsel:E And in its behalf, and after due con~ideration of a11
evidence and report~ offered aC said hearing, does f.ind and clstormine th~ "?;
Followi.ng facts:
;t:;`
l. That the petitioner proposas rer,lassificatir~n of subject ~~`
proper.ty trnm the CG lCommercial, General) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-r~mily) Zone.
`~
2. That the Anaheirn ~eneral Plan designates sabject property }`
Lor Medium Density Res.idential land us~s. '.`~
3. That the propos~d reclassi£icatiori ~f subjeci: propexty is
not necessary nor desirable ~or thp order~y and proper d~velopment of the
community; ~nd would bg "spot zanang."
in close ~,roximity to siLbjRCt prnpe.rt~ and tQ the zones and their ~,~rmi~ted '"~'~
uses general3.y established ~~hro~tqhout the c~mmuni.ty.
4. Th~t the proposed reclassi£icatian of subject property does
not properly rclate to tho zones and their permittQC7 u~es 1oca11y est~blishcd
:',
~ . ~'xF'.
PCflB-27 :ii
`,; -;
. . . . ~ , .. .'..'tY`i
` ~ , ~ ~k~4
;,
i'
~ „
,;,~
. ~ .. ..iV'_'~~~
ti
. . .. . ~...., ~ ~ !.`iPJ.K:ni
~ ~
. ~^"1 . ~ . . , .
~~
r~
t ,~
S~ '1
;tk
~:f~
i~
; ;t
'~ 5. That 5 persons indicated their prese• ~+c said publia
hearing iu opposition; and tY~at a pQtiL-ic~n cont~~i:- appro~cimately '.;'~3~,
a;
signatures was received in opposition to subject petition. ~~~:
,~
,.~
r'~ ALIFO&NIA EN'VIRONMEt~TAL, ' ,~
;: ~ CIUALITY ACT FINDING: at the Anaheim City h;;i
!~'; Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to rQCl• .~ify subject~ propety ;'
j'~ from tho CG ~Commerczal, General} `Lone to the ~.M-12GG {Residential, `.~
' Multiple-Family) Zone to construct a 5-unit apar~ment c~mplgx on a ~
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting ot a~proximatelv 0.17 acre `,~:
having a frontage of approximrtely 50 foet on the south side of Center Stre~t, ;~;;4
and being lacated approximately 330 .*:eet west of the centerline o£ West Street ~~
,; and further describPd as 1124-1126 West Center 5treet; and daes herQby apx~ra~~e ~:~,
the Negative Aeclaration upon finding schafi it has considered the Negative '~~
`~I' Declaration L-oget.her wzth any conunents recsived durixiy the public revi.ew '~/`
process and furthar finding on the basis o£ the initial study and any aornments '~~
received that thera is no substantial eviclence that the project wi11 have a
significr~nt eEfect on ths environment.
NOW, TTiERE~'ORE, BE IT R~SOLVED tk~at th~ Anaheim Cit~ Planning
Commission does hereby deny P~titio~ far Reclassification on the basis of the
aforementiongd findings.
THE FOREGOTNG RESALTJTION is sigried acd apprave~ by me this 1$th
day of January, 1988.
%~7
,
/~'~-~ .P-
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CIT PLANNILiG COMMTSSION
AT'xEST: _
__ ~ G~.~C.~~' _ ~%' `~~ .~ L~'vt-o •-
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PL3~ITNING COMMISSION
Ms~-(ti~JJa~Nryt~:•x:eF?tk:.k~' .Kt+,'~SY'vCa:t~/~J~;:tV,~.TiaSisJ-.roy~:r~.^:%~~_
-2-
,1`'
~z ~i
';:
~'; , ~
J
~,
I'
/~~:.
PC88-27 ~,~M1
<
F
'~f;`~`I
,~~
, ~ F,~
V~." .
~. + ~ l{4
, it~: W
n~,xh'ct;: ~~.r._i'i: ~b.c~~in,'si+ls.[~'~Y~
~, .
. , .. .... ... _,. . _.„
} ,~;., .,, ~ ~. _ , ~„~°sx°~s
} f,r~~,
.
~, r,,.,.,~ '+t ~;' f
t~'~.3 , ~~ ~ 7 ` ~~ ~`
~ 'v,y~'
'V {M~
. . . . , . . ' ~17~
~ . . ~.. . h`T~~
~t~
:~ '~ 1
i•~~
STATE OF CAI,IFORNIA ) .u~;;~
,.~ ;r
COUNZ'Y OF OR.ANG~ , A;;
) ss. ~~
CITY Ok' ANAHEIM ) ~~,;
~ ~ ~k~
t ~sr,
t T, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tho Anaheim City Planninr~ v'~,F~
r~ Commissian, do hergby certiPy that the foregoing resolution was passed and ~'
~~~„~ adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Plannin Cammiss' ,~~r'
g ion held on ~,~~
,~,i; Jantiary 18, 1488 by ttis following vote of the members thareof:
~~ , ,~
C a
~~ AYi.S: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, $OYDSTUN, CARUSTr,LLO, FELD~IAUS, HERBST, {~
~ MF55E, MC BLrRNEY !~~
y~
z; NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE
AIISENT: CQMMISSTONERS: NONE ~
~' ,
~ ';a
~ ~.: F ~
r;~ IN WITNESS WI~IEP.EQF, T havE hereunto set my hand t~his lSth day ' ~~
;~ o£ January, ~988. :,,y
. _A ''~,
~ ~' ~ ,ti•
!C f q
~
~ I ~~ ,~_.~-, "_ _~Y_ "~. ~ . / . . ; i
%u
5~ SECRETAkX, ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION
rr: ~;
;
;ti ,y;
~~k
~`~
~ ~~;>j
;:
. y!
:~!~ . . ;~.~
9 :t` '~,i
~~~ 1a
~!
I,~
~: `~
~)fr
F,.~ a
`~ ~
'•;Y '
:~
{~ ~~
3
~ +~
,+~
^9 ~~
i~
Aa ~~
~~
,+ ~Y}~5
~y
1'!
~ d
V~
<
~
' ~ ~ `~
'~ ~
~1. :
:~
;1 , ra
i
~~ , ~
f~ :
i~ t ''~;
X ~~^~
_ _ . :._ r ...
i a,
~ ~ l~ih
-3- PC88-2% '
~ ' #;~
~r,k~,~~
J ~P~yt~`l~
i+'^: ~
,;•`~. , =-, ,. `, :~ , ;, , ~ _ ~
. . ... , . .
'r t ^i~t~~
- - -- . . . . ~ , .. „ .. ., , . ,. ~ ~. „~,.,,',;a