PC 88-275~` 't
R~OI~ TI N N~,, PC$p~~~
A R~50LUTION OF THF: ANAHEIM CTTY PGANN?NG COAlMISSION
THAT PETITIGN FOE2 RECLASSIFICAT[pN N0. 88-89-11 D~ UENIED
WFiBREAS, ths ,Anahaim Czt,y Planning Commission did init3ate a
verif.ied ~,atition f.or Reclassitication for cerkai.n real property Hituarod in
Che City of Anahoim, Coiinty of Qrange, SCate of Cal,ifornia, doscribed as
follows;
TRACT N0. 422, LOTS 16 thrnugh 29
TRACT NU, 309, LOT 7
TItACT N0. 158, LOTS 16 throuc~h 30
TftACT N0. 1~3~ LOTS 3 through 8, 1 through 4
TFIAT PGR'PIQN OF LUT 42 OF THE ANAH~IM EXTENSION LO'TS,
AS SF10i^IN ON A MAP R~CORDc7 IN IIOOK 3, PAGES G3
THROUGH 65 b1TSCFLI,ANn0U5 RECORDS OF LOS A2dGELFS
COIINTY C.~.GIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLUWS:
AEGTNNING AT THu SOUTHWES~r r_ORNEI2 OF' LOT 4 IN BLOCK C
OF TRACT N0. 143, AS SHOWN ON A MAP I2ECORDSD IN $OOK
11 PAGE 38, MTSCELLaNEOUS idAPS 1tECORDS OF OR3INCE
COUN7'i', C.ALIk'dRNIA, HCNCE ~;ASTERLY ALQNG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LQT 4 AND THC EASTERLY THER~
OF A DLSTANCE OF 125 FEET, MORE OF LFSS TO AN
TNTERSECTION WITFi A LINE PARALLEL WSTF! AI1D 7.5 FEET
EASTFRLY OF THE GAST LINE OF SAI~ LOT 4 Ti~I:~iCE
SOUTI~iEf'.LY ALONG A LINF PARALT..EL WITH !'[II: EAST LINE
lOF ZEYtI STEtEET A DZSTANCE OF +~20.75 FEET MORE OR
L~ESS TO ?.N INr~R5ECTipN GINE PARALLEL WITfi 1-ND ~11.25
FEET NORTFIERLX OF THE CGNTERLINE OE' NORTFI STR~ET
"HENCE WESTERLY ALONG THF. LAST MENTION~D FARALLEL
LINE A DISTANCE 0~ 125 FEET yORE OIi LGSS TO )aN
INTEi2SF.CTTOH PAkAI~LEL WITH 265 FEET EASTERLY OJ? T~IE
CENTERL,INE OF 7,EYN STREET TEiENCE NOEtTHERLY ALONG TFiE
LA.~i'l MENTIOIvF.D PAkALf.EL C.IP;'e'. A DYSTANCE OF 420.7a
FE~;T M~RE OR LES5 TU THE POINT OF IIBCYNNING.
TRACT N0. 23, LOTS 16-30
~ ~' " ~ ';y' , ;.~,
~ ~
~
TltACT N0. 135, GOT~ 6 TE~RUUGH 10
Qgn4r
~1-
PC 8t3-275
;.~~
~ ~
~41`~~"~1
- _ i. ~ -. ~ 1,'i ~ l, j'.'~,
,
~~~
,
kOTHAER MCLC.S Al'iUITION BOOK ~ PAGE 82 LOTS 3 THROUGI3
5 AND 7 TFiROUGH :l2
HEISMAN AND GEORGR'F~ ADDITION BOOK 2.AAGE 249
MTSC~i.LANEUU5 hBCORDS OF L05 ANG~I~ES LOTS 70 THROUGH
7~, 74 THROUGH 78 AND LOTS 81 THROl7G~i 88
ORIGINAL DUILDING LOT 15 IN TfIF CTT.Y OF 1,;IAHEYM,
COUNTY OF URAIdGE STATE aF CALIFOHNIA AS P~R MAP THEP.E
OF RECORllED IN BOUK 4 PAGE~ G29 AND 63U OF DESDS
RECOHDS OF LOS ANGEGF.u COUNTY.
WEST~RLY REC7'ANGULARGX 20 FEET ~)I' ORIGINAi, CITY LOT
14 AND TF1E EASTERLY RECTANGULARLY 50.25 F~ET OF
ORIGINAL CITY LOT 15 AS SHOWN IN MAP R~COEtDEA IN BOOK
4 PAGE~ 629 AND 630 OH llF,ED RF.CORDS OF LA COUNTY
TRACT N0. lti4'7 LUTS 2 AND 6
WHER°AS, the City Planr.i.ny Commi~sior. did ho2d a public hearing
at t}ie Civic Center in tt~e City o£ AnahQim c-n September 26th, ].988 at ].:30
p.m., noCice of sa.id public hearing having been duly givQn afi requirQd by law
ar.d in accordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
1f3.03, to h~ar and r.onsider evidence for. and t~gain~t said proposed
reclassitication and to investigake and makN findings ar~d recommendztions in
connectfon tharewith; and
WHGR~;AS, said Commission, after. due in~pc3ction, investigation
and studj made by itself anc~ in iL•s bohalf, and aEter due considaration of all
Qvidence and report~ off.ered at said hearing, does find and determine th~s
following facts:
1. Th1t the petitioner proposes reclassitication of subjer.t
I~ropcrties from the RM-2400 (Residential, ::ultiplc~-Family) and PD-C (Parking
llxstrict/Commercial) 2one to thc! PD-C/RM-7.9.OU (parking DistricL - Commercial/
ResidQntinl, MulLiple-Family) 4one.
2. That the Analleim Ge~zaral Plan designates subject pro~erties
adjacent to proporties ~ronting ths west side of Ana2ieim Enulevard betwet~n
[,a F~alma and Wilhelmina for Lc:--Medium D~ns.f~y Residential land uses ~nd
vetween Sycsmor.e auci Cypress for Medium b~:t,sity itasidential lanci usest and
pr~pertias adjhcent to proparties fronting ttie etts~ si~le of Anaheim B~ulevard
between La ~alma and Cyp.ress for L.ow-MQdium Jansity R~sir3antial land uses.
3. That the proQos~ii r.eclas~ification of subject pz•oper.ty is
prAmature and .is r~,t n~:cussary noz• desira~ilo £or the ordarly and proper
development of: the commun.ity.
~. That the pro~:qsecl recla:3aiEir_atjon of ~ubject propc~rty does
not prflperly relate ta Cha zc~nas and l•hair pez•mitted uses locally establi.shed
in clo;~o pra~imity to sub~ect groperh.y ~n,i to thQ zone3 and their permitted
uses ger.erally P~L•ablished throughout the ~. orr~nunity.
". ,
~
;~.~
»2- FC 88-275
.. ,• .,,. { ~.~ ~;,. +;
~ ~ ` , , i -Af'.~, ,: ~1,~ l . i.~(._ i
~~~ ~~ , . , ~ ~, ~ 1 '~5 4 . ° ~ ~ ~ i~~. Pl~~l ~i~~~~~1
~,
n, r.. . . ..... ,
~~ r~`e,
• ~ A~~~'<A .
J
that the prc~j~cti aro}a~cotxsest roo~~ssovtrnt t~sgificah.ion is denic~d an
are being us~d for Y sevan (77) lots, and on1 ~k~e basis
ainglo an~ multiple Amiing, an~~ the remaining ~ots are bei.. Y fivo t5)
side o~ 2oyn ~tse~~ yetWEd11~Ncrth Streotdundrt~ilholmina Stra ng used for mixed
that pra~Rrties on the en~t
the Planninc~ Comrni .sic,n from F~U_C
pro~osed recslassificati~n would no~, r~~ Cons~gth et were rezoned by
to RM•-24pp on i'E~bruary 21, 1g~~, and
clowr~.z~~ning pr.o~ertit~s anc; impr~v~n,r~nt at th~ areant w: tYi hhe the
cur.rent trend at
6, rr~at 75 ~0 8U
public hearing in o persuns indicat`.ed t2:eix
~ig.natures was rece ve~ itl o~, d~~ ~2'~;t ~ P~~~tiou containi,n aresence at said
F'~.asir3on t~ subjQCt potition. 5 PPrOxirrt~tely 160
~rF~N~ E:NIRS,NMF,_NTAL
P1~nr.~ing Canm3.ssion has reviewecl th~e pr ~ a~~;~ N~e 13s3if
from ~hQ r~M_ ------~~ That: t2ie Anahegn, Ci~y
2400 (Residentizl, Mu.itip1e_g~~l Y subject; propc,; t1Qs
Commez•,.ial) ?.ones to the pD_C/hM-2400 y) and pp-C
Resi.de.ntit~l, Multiple Fami1 ~P`;rk.ing pistr,i.ct/
(Parkinq Disrrict
proper~iss frnntin y~ ZOn° °n cQrtain lots flaiik~ ~O~ercial/
g on North Anaheim Aou].evard between La palma A~e~ Q r~,nd
Cypres9 ~;treet, as c~escri~ed abovg; aiid doQS hereb
Doclarat.ion upon flnding that: i~
together with an~ ha~ considered Y a~nrove the N~qatixVe
1 c:onunen*_s roceived dur.in ~h~ N~gatfve Declaration
furtY~er Finclinc~ on ~he hasis of th8 initial tha
publ.ic raview process ~n~
that thero i~ nU substzntia7, e~id~n~e that the projeCt wili havo
effect on the envirr,nment. Y and dnp com,ments recoived
d ssqnificant
NOW, TFIE;REF'ORE, BE IT
Commission does hereby denY peL•itinn for$ Reclassi~ication on the
thaC the Anaheim City Planning
aforQmentioned f3.ndings,
basis nf the
THF. FOREGOING RLS~LUT1'ON is sigr~ed and approved b
ddy of aeptamber. 1988.
Y me this 26th
Ori~:ir~rtl,,;tip;rtrrl I~p• l1'~a; y T3~t6A~4~
. - _~ <<• .~,,- ,. / t! .-.,
CHA.tRFlOi~. ~ "~"`'--~ ~'---=~' -` ~~ s~
/) ' AH,L'IM C2TY pLANNINC COMMIggIp~
ATT~;ST: /
~~t i~'~I ~ . f~~Pi ~ ~ ~
SCCRE ARY., "-' ~ - '~~~
ANAI~IEIM CITY PC,ANNING COMMISSIUI3
-3-
~1~1 ~~ ~. . e .~~ ,/ tY "f ih 1~~ i f 't!~,` ,/_l,. ,
~ ^
~f'1~
c 1
~~~'~,~~''~ ~,r;t.'t( r~f51 f J)~!
N M, ,r~#~
'
' .1~1.,~).FI~~^ m~A1•~~
. .. l ., ~.}'
44
?.
~ ' '.~j~~Ji
. ~l
.~'. '~~:;!
i~
~I
~~f
i STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
i~
~ COUN'rY GF ORANGE ) ~S, ,;i
~ CITY OF A1~TAHEIM ) ~;;
;, t
>' T, Edith L. Harris, Sdcr~tary o~ thQ Anahoim rit,~~ Plsn:~ing ~:'•~y
y, Cammissiori, do heroby certify ~hat ~he foregoing resalutioa was ~~~~
p;isse+d atnd
,"; ado~stod at a mee~ing of the Anaheim City Planniny Commission held c.~n '~
i.
Se~tember 26, 1988 by tlie £ollowing vote of t•he members L-hor~~f:
~~~~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOUAS, CARUSILLO, .FELDIiAUa, HERBST, ~-
MESSE, MC f3UR'NEY ~
~:. NOES: COt~fTSSIONERS: r~orrr;
e~~ ABSENT: CONIh1ISSI0NERS: HOXDSTUN '`~
)
~:
~ TN ~~ITN~SS WHERECF, I have herounto sgt my hand thzs 26tih dax
~~ oF September, 1988.
F~ ~~~) ~ /J /''
.:; ~ (Onbin41`,,,.,,,,, :~ Fr~~c~ ~PC ~
'~ - -- ~--
;~ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI`rY Pi,ANNING COMMTSSYtiN .
-4-
~>~
~i
~' i
;
,,~,
~
._ -~;:~
PC 88-275 ,w
p
~'f
tl
. j ~.
fA~
>~j~
~ . . .. . . . . , . _ •~t ~51~9}'h':