PC 88-303y' ~ ~.,t, r ~ .. ` ~
~~~~~~
RESO:~ 1~ION NO PCSQ=,~,Q3
t i~ ~l~Y~ ~!,`) AS^~~t4^6}~:, j~t~r~,~(~~~ -
7~
~ ~ " (Y r~. l~Gl~a,i. '
. ... ... ,:,'ty'
,~~, ,'
A RESOLLJTION pF TFIi; ANAHEIM CI7.'X PT,.AN~QTN'G rUMMISSION
THAT PETT'PION FOR f.CNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N~?. 3031 ~E GR~INTED
WFIERBAS, the Anaheim C: ty Planning Comm~ss.~.on d3d r~ceive a~verified
Pati~ion for Conditiqnal Use Permit fr~~m HYUNG HWA,v k`ARK A.*TD DOrIu^ SOON PA~tIt,
27].2 Wyakersham P1ace, Fullerton, CA 92633, owner;:, and CHONG S. LEE, 4500
Campus Drive, 1152(3, Plewport f3each~ CA 9:?660, ageizt i~or certain real proper~y
situa:.ed in the City of Ar~aheim, Count.y of Urange, State oE California,
Gescribed as:
~ I,OT 10, OF TRACT 2903, IN THE CI:'.CY JF ANAHEItQ, ~^.OUNTY
~.,
~.,.
bF QRl~NGE, STAT~; OF CALIFORNTA 1S PE.Q DiAP RECORDL'•,U IN
,.; H~OK 99, PAGES 21, 22, p.ND 'L3 OF MISI''.EL~,A1dE0US M);PS,
IN THE OFFICE l7F TF~~ CUUNTY RECOFDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WiiER~A~o tho City Planning Commi,ssi~n clid hold a pui~lic hear,ing at
the Civic Center in ttie City of Anaheim on Octobe.r 24, lggg at 1:30 ~.m.,
notice ot said pu.bJ.ic hearii~g having been duly gzven as required by l~w and in
accordance wiY.h the provisi~ns of the Anaheim Municxpal Code, Chapter 18,.03,
to hoar and consider avidence for. and against said proposed coudit~anal use
permit and tr~ irivesti.qate and make findings and recommer:dations in connecti~~n
there•w.ith; and
WIiEREA&, said Commission, ait.er due insp~ctzoii, investigation anc3
study made b~ itself and in its beha~f, and afL•er due consideration of alI
hviclenc~ and repo.rts offered aC saicl hearing, does find and determine the
f.ollowing facts:
1. That ~he proposed ~se is prnperly one .for which a conditional
use permit is au~chorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.41.025.070 and
18.44.Oa0.].35 to wit: ::o c4nstzuct a 7,'160 square-foot, 6-unit commercial
x•etail center wih.h waiver of the iollowing:
S~CTZON 1$.44.OG2 _Q1:1 - M~ximwn ru hural hei~h~
(~~F'. e~ permirted when sQtback 11 feet
from singlQ-Eamily zoninc~; 2 fe~
propos~d.)
2. That the requesL•ed waiver is hereby gran~ed on the basis ~.ha~
khere are special circumstances applicab3.e to the Qroperty such t~s sizo,
shape, topography, loaation and surroundings which @o not apply to other
identica7.ly zon~d property in the same vicinity; and that strict application
~f the Zoning Code deprives the property oi privileges enjoyed by other
properties in t~.e icientical zone and classxfiaat~ion in tlie vicinity.
3. That approval of said conditional use permit for a commerc3al
retail c:entor, does not include approval Eor a coravenience mark~t.
0535 -].- PC a8-303
~
, . ~: s:
~ ~ ~,;;::
„
~ ';
, , .. ~. ,;: t' , ~ f~~.
~~
:: ~ '~`.y~~
~'r~~
'4l~,;
~
~3!i
4. ThaL the proposed use will not adversely ~ffect the ac~joining
land us~s and ~_h~ grow~li ancl development of the ~rea in which iti is p:npos~d
to be :loca~ed.
5. That the si•r.e anci shape ~f. thc site pronosed tor the use is
adequate to a11aw the full developmeni: of the p.roposQd u~e in a manner nc,t
det.rimontal to ~he particular area nor to the peac6, he,alth, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of. the City ~f Anaheim.
6. That thc~ granting of the Conditioz:al Use Pernii: under the
conda.tions imposed, if any, will not be detrimenYal tp thc~ peace, haalth,
safety a~~d genora]. we~.fare of the Cflizens o£ tye City af A.iaheim.
6. That the traffic qeneraL`.ed by the proposed usQ w311 not impose
an unduz burden upon th~ streec~ and highways clesigned aand improve@ Lo carry
the traEfzc in the area.
7. That two (2) people indica,".ed their pr.esence at said public
heaz-ing in oppositian; and that no correGp;~nderice was received in opposit.ion
to t2xe subject petition.
AL'!F IRNZA ENVIkODTtdENTAL OUALITY AC2• k'IND:CNG: That the Anaheim
City Planning Commiss.ion has reviewed the proposal to constru,at a 7,160
square-foo~, 6-unit commercia~ retail cexiter w~ith wazver oF inaximum
structural height on a rectangular7,y-~hapecl parcei of land cons~.sting of
aPproximatoly 0.57 acre located at the northeast corner ~~f Katel'J.a Av,~nue and
IIayle~s 5treet and fur.ther described as 1523-31 W~st Kate~lla Avsnue; and d~Qs
hereby apgrove ~he Negatzve Declaration upon findirzg that it has ronsidered
the Negative Declaration togQt:~er witlz any comments received ~urinc,r the
publi.c revie~r process anti Further Fincling on the basis of ~he iriitial study
and any comments receivad tha~ there i~ no substst~ti~1 ovidence that the
projsct wi11 have a siqn9.ficant effect r~n the enviranmenr.
NOW, THEREFORE, B~; IT RESOLVED that the Anaht+im ~ity Planning
Cum-,~issian doos her.eby qrant sul.~je ~t Petition for Coxiditiana~ Use Per~n.i.t,
upon the following conditions which are hereby found to ~ie a n3cessarg
prerequisite to tne proposed ase of the subject property in order. !:o presorve
tho safety and qeneral ~aelfare of the Citizens of ~hQ Citx of Anaheim:
.1.. That a fee shall be paid Lo the City oF Anaheim Eor s~reet li~~hting along
Katella Avenue in an amount as determined by City Council resolution.
2. That a fee s:ha11 be paid to trle City of Anaheim L•oz tree ~lantinq along
K,~teila AvQnue in an amount as detc.:r~•ined by City Council resolution.
3. 1'hat prior to issuance of a building pPrn~it, the appropri.~te kraL•:t.'~~.
signal assessment fea sha11 k,e paid la the City of Anaheim in an amount
as detc~rmix~ed by City Counr.il reso).ution.
;~
''
-2-
K~ °,~ti ~ i ,, r I~: ~-Y~ z`+ry ir~ C y~'~'i t~r~} ~
.~17.f ,~;~440..... . . .. ~ ~ . ~ . .. .. . ' , . , . t 1 i~ ~ ~~.
~ ~ ~ . .., . . . . .
~
~ .. ~.
i! ~):~dl~
i
4. That sidewalks r~moved an.c~/ar reconstructed along Bayless Street as
requared by ~he ~ity Ezigineer and in accordance with standard ~1ans and
specifications on tilc~ in the OEf.ice of the Ci.ty Engineer.
;
~ 5. That in the event a parcel map is nos~ roc~rded comhining the tk2 (2)
~ existing lots, thP 1ecJa1 property owner shall furnish the Zoning Division
with a copy of a recorded co~~enant and agreement in a form approved bp
the City Attorney agre~ing to hold subjec:t property as one parcel.
6. That street: lic~hting facilities alnng B~yless Str~Qt sha11 ~e installed
as required by Lhe Utilities General Manager in accorc~~nce with
~p~cificatians on file in the 0£fice ot Utzlities G~neral Mar~ager; or
that security ia the i'orm of a bond, certificate of depos~~, '1Ptter of
credit, or cash„ in an amount and ~orm satisfactory to tl~e: City ot
Anaheim, shall bs posted with the City to quarantee the satisfactory
comFletion af the above•-mentionFd improvpments. Said securitx shall be
postac~ wiY,h the City of Anaheim prior ta issuance of a building permit.
The above-required imgrovements shall be instz~lled prior to occupancy.
7. That suhjecL• property autharized by this resolution sh:~ll be served by
undergrounct ur.ilities.
8. That no fast-Food service facilities or convenience market sha11 be
permitte~d in this commercial retail cwnter unle3s a variaiZCe for parking
is approved by the Gity Council, Planning Commi.ssion or 7.oning
Administrator or sufficient. ~ar.king is provided in compliance with Cods
requi.rements.
"~ 5. '1:hat a11 air conditioni.ng facilitie~ ~nd other ~ x~of and groun~.-mounted
'i equipm,~nt shall be propQrly shielded ~rom view, and the soun~ bu££erecl
~`rcm adjacent rc~sidontial properties.
'i
~` 10. Th~t plans sha11 be submi~ted to the Building Livision showizig compl~anc.e
~; with tho minimum ~tandards of the City of 1~naheim, including the LJniform
i Iiuilding, Plumbing, Electrical, Machanical and FirR Codes as adopted by
~~ the City of Anaheim. The appropr.ia~e permits sha11 bp obtained for 3ny
~ necessary work.
11. That landscaping shall include ~kie planting of 15-gallon treos nn 10-£oot
centers along the norther].y property lino and exis~inr~ on-site
landseaping sha11 be installed and maintained in complianc~ with Ci~y
s~andards.
12. That subject pr•operkp sha11 be cleveloped substantially in accordanc~ with
i~lans arad spocifiaations on filc with the City oF Anaheim m:,rked Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 3; provided, however, that a 6-foot high block wall shall
be constructnd and maintained ~long the n~rth pr~perty line.
13. That hours af operation shr~ll be limited ta 9:00 a.m. to 7:p0 p.m.
-3-
;.;;
~`
,,
PC 88-303 ~~~
, ~.
~ ~u
. ~:~~~
~ ~S'L ~~tit~ ,~ r. ~ ~,~~~ ~'u 4 ~ ~ i J ~ i 7;, ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~y~
~ '~~~ ~'?y z {I~ r-n ~ ~,, ~ ~ ~~ i _ t~ v '~ ~ i~' l i ~~, ~ ~1 {•;~, r p f ~<~ ii ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ iy u"f:4 b~;,J~~~l: ~1~ 1 5~~~~~'~i~~~1 '3'+`
,,~i.aY....~., ~ i ,• ~ :'~1 t ,, 2 i i ~i ~
~ . . . , . ~ ~ $ ~ i.
.~~l;t. . . .. , . . , ~ -
I ~~ ~ . . . . . . ~ .. . .
~~
~'
;
14. 'PhaC prior ~o issuance of a bufldang pormit, or within ~ period of one
xe~sr from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition
, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10, above-mentioned, sk~all be complied with.
;, Extensions f~r furLher time to aor.iplote said conditions may be grante ~ a.n
~,~; accordance with Secrion 10,03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode.
' 15, Thafi prior t~ fin.al building and zoning inspections, Gonditia~z Nos. 4, g,
%~ 9 a~~l 1x, above-mentiaried, shall be complied wiL•h.
16. ~'hat apnruval of ttiis application constitutes approval of the proposed
,- request ~nly i;o the extenr ~hat it complies urith the A.naheim Municipal
ti, Zoning Code anc~ any other appliaable Ci~y regulatio2is. Approval does not
;; znclude any action or fandings as ~o compliance pr approval. of the
;~~~ request regarding any othea. applicable ordinance, regulation or
' requirement.
~1
' H~ IT FURTHEH RESOLV~D that Y.he An~.heim City Planning Commission
does h~reby find axid dQtermine ~hat adcp~ion of tna.s Resalution is expressly
predicated upon applican~'s complS.ance w~th each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set fortlz. Should ~ny such conditions, or any part thereof, be
~ declared iavalid or unenforceable by the final juds~ment ot any court of.
~! competent jurzsdiction, tk~en this Kesolution, attcl any approvals herein
contaaned, sha11 b~ deemed n~xll and void.
M THE FOFtEGOING RE50L'J~IC~L7 is sxgrled and appro•~ed by me this 24th day o~
`' October, 19a8.
, •-~
. . • _ , -' '
,; c j rt..c,~. „._ .
-- 1. r~ rj~`'/G~!.r~{
i:HAIRWOMAN fAtdAfIEIM CITY PLANNTNG CQMMISSION
ATTEST: •
---~ ~~~- < L ~ ~
SFCRFxAR_, ANAH;'IM C~ Y PL ~
'G ~UMMISSION
-4 -
;:; ...:
{,~
c~a'r~~ "
,,;M1~~
;~
;,,
~';;;:
N(
;,~~~'.
3{~l
;,
;.
:3
tY
;F
~'~:
;~ S
;.~,
„;
_ f~
!f
PC 88-303
's
T~
i ., r ..
~ ,i ~f~,
.e i,
~ ... .. . ... ~ ~ . ... . . ~ .,, . ~ . .. .. S~t...~1 ;~.:ii~i
•
~
STAT~ Oc' CALIFORNIA
~~
4...
~t ~;;
24, 198ft, bx ~.he Lollowing vutQ of tti~ mombers thereof. s
AXES: COMMiSSZONwR5: BUIJAS, HOYI)5TUN, CARUSiGLO, HE:R$5T, ~ErSF~
:IOF.S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABCENT: COhIIrtIS5I0NERS: FELDHA.T)S, M(: BURNEY
IN WITNESS WFir nL'CF, S have herounto set my hand this 21r.h c9ay of
Qctober, 1988.
i~ _
~C~~"~C.~ , . ,r
SECRETARY, AIIAHFIM I X PLANNING COt~4SISSION
r ~ '~ ,~i~i}tiJ!
f,
~~ii
)1
tij
~~1 ~:
COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ ss. '
CIx'Y OF 1~N~HEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, S~c:rctary of the Anelieim City Planntrig
Commissian, do hdreby cerC.ify ehat th~~ fore~oing resolutian was pasaed and
Pdopte3 at a meoting of the Anaheim City Planninq Commission hnld on UaCober
-5-
~
PC 88-303 ~ `1
`;.
:-~1
;~
: ~:;t
,;,
.~~
,
~ .~ '~
..~
;;,u
. . ~'~