PC 88-306, ra
~
F2ESOL 1L TION ,NO. PC88-~06
.~
A RESOLUTION OF ~'FiE AI~TAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITTON FUR CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT ~IO. 3049 BE DENIED
"~~,i t iFY+tiY'
?i~r
i'~~~i
~t
r
-, ii
TriHEREAS, t;l~e Anat~.eim Ciky Pla.nning Commission did reci;ive a
;~ verified Pstitian For Condirional Use Permit fxom Wilken Way Limited
~, Psrtnership, Attn: Nichard T. Arawn, 6775 Azrport Drive, Riversid~, CA
92504, owner Eor certain r~a1 property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Cali~ornia, describecl as;
F'A2tCEL 1: LGT 16 OF TRAC1 N0. 253~, AS nER NlAP
RECORDEll Itl DOOK 115 ~AGE5 15 APID 16 OF N,ISCELLAIdEOUS
MAPS, TN THE OFFICE OI' TFiF. COUNTY RECORDER OF SATD
, COUNTY.
ExCEF:C TFiE NOR~H 130.00 FE~T THERGOF:
ALSO ~XCEPT THA';. PO1tTI0PI TFIFREOF LY.l'P7G SOUTFi OF A
LINE 'PHAT IS PARALLEL WIT:~ AND 200.OQ FEET NORTHERLY
h:EASURED AT RIGHT A1~uLES FROM TFiE GENTER LIPIE OF HALL
ROAL AS SAID C~NTER LINE IS SHCWN ON SAID M11P.
P~RCEI, 2: TFiE SOiJT.I~i 200.00 FEET OF THE WEST 200.00
FEET, AS MEASUHEU FR~M THE CENTEF~,SNES OF ADJOINING
S'rRE~TS, OF LOT 16 OF TRACT N0. Z534, AS PER MAF
RECORDED :IN BOAK 115 PAGES '15 AND 16 OF M7SCELLAIvEOTJS
MA,FS, TN TFI~ OP'f'ICE C~T' TFIE CUUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
GaUNTY.
PARCSL 3: T'rIE SOU'.CFi 2Q0 FEET UF LOT i6 OF TRACT N0.
2534, AS SHOFIN ON A MAP RECORllEn IPT BOOK 115, PAGES
15 I~ND 16 OF' MISC~LL~ANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS QF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCFPT THE WEST 20U FECT THEREFROAS, (SAID UISTANCES
BETNG DIEASURRD ?ROM THE CENTER LINF. OF STRE~TS
ADJOTNING).
~,.;
WHEP.EAS, the Cit;y Planning Commission did h~ld a public hQaring
at the Civia Center in the City oE Anaheim on August 15, 1988, ~h, 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearin7 havir-g been duly given as required hy law znd in
accordancs with ~ha provision^ o: the Anahaim Municipal Cod~, Chapter 18.03,
to hear an~ consider evidence for and againsL- said proposed conditional use
permit and ~o investigate and ma:ce findings and recommendat,ions in connecticn
t2ierewith, and whereas s~id Ize~rinq was contin~red to the meetings of SQptember
26 and Octaber ?4, 1488: and
WHEREAS, sairl Co:nmission, atter due inspe~tiun, investigation
~~; and stuay made by ieself and in it:s behalf, and atLer due considQration of a11
ecidence and reporCs offered at said hEaring, doe: find and determine the
"` following facts:
AF,'`
'};„ 0538r -1- F~C 88-•306
- N ,~
. ~~!
~` ' ~~
' ,1`~it~cil~rY
e
':
1. That tha proposad use is properly ane far whsch a con8it3onal
use perttiit is authorizc~d by Anaheim Munici.pal Code Sections 19.45.050.295 and
18.99~.OwU and Cali.tornia Government Code Section 6~915 to cons~ruct a 1 to
8-stnry, 327-uniY "afforclablF" senior citizens apartmont complex wi~h waivers
of the following:
(A) ,SECTT )A!~ 18.04,Q43.10'.l - xin~r~~nco hoiaht~jacent~tL
l.$,1,94.0~3.022 lc~cal streert.
and 1$_~4. 37 021 (3~g~permitt~d; 6 feet proposed)
(g) ~.E(~r_~~_~~~.LQ'~1~~Q - Minimum buil in ~P.._.ar~~~~r
and 18~94,031.02~, - welline~,}znit.
i120Q sc~uare fe ~~ required;
963~quare Peet pr~aposed) .
(C) SE~TTON 18.94.032.O1Q - M~ximum stru~t~ral h~icth~
2. That t2~e requested waivers (A) and (R) aro hereby ~]enied on the
ba~is that the pr~posal is too dense for the surrounding area which zncludes
single fami.ly residences; ~hat the proposal with its re]ac.~c~ density would
have an adverso aifect on WilkQn Way, a l~ca1 strc;et which pr.ovides vehicular
access ta th~ proposal as well as to the adjacent sing].e famil,y residences;
that i:hers are no special circumstances applicable to ~he nroperty such aG
sizE, shape, topagr~p2iy, loeation and surrounding~; which do not agply to othei:
=dentical.ly zoned prupezty in the samP vicinityr and that ~trict application
of the Zoning Code does not deprive thP property af privileges enjoyed by
other propertios in the identical zone and cla5sification in the vicini.ty,
3. That thQ requested waivor (C1 is hea~:3by cienied on the basis that
i.t it was deleted in cor.nection with the submittal cyf reviseci plans.
4. That L-l~e proposed use :is hereby denied ~~n the basis that the
populaLion dansity wou1Q adversely affe.t the adjoinin~~ la~r~d uses; ~:hat too
-nany 2-beciroom units are being propose~ and there is liGtle market £or senior
citizen ?.-bedroons units; anu Chat ~he proposal will adversely aflec: the
adjoaning land uses and the growtli anci developmont of thet area in which it is
proposed to be located.
5. That the size and shape ot the site proposcd °o~r ths usc~ is not
aclequate t.,a a11ow the full develnpment oi the prop~soci use in a mannor n~t
dPtrimental to L-he ~articular area x~ar to the pea~e, health, safc~ty and
generai welfare uf thQ Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. Tha~ th.o grantiriq of the Conc~iL•ion~'1 Use P~rmit will be
detrimental to t2ie peace, noalth, sa£QCy and gexieral wel.Caro of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
%. That the trafkic; gerier.aL-ed by tho proposed use will impose an
undue burden upon the strer~L-s and highways designed and improved to carry the
lraftic in the area.
-2- Pt: 88-306
~ :~
:''~I
, ~~
~h
.. .. ~ :•.J.k~l~
~~( ~"~~;r"1~ ~ 1~~ `ts '~~,i41~ ~t...;:.7 ~:~.,.
- ..,.. . , . ti/~i . i~~y+~'y~ ~;t~~ ,.,,;, ~~, .. .'ti .,;rrs '~ ~,~s
' k .
j
- ~~ ti Srl },{.,q ~
~
.. .
nb~~dT ,~
~ ,``
~i. ' ,
.r .. ~ ,
~(„t'+;j?` . .
1 ,i
.y
a.
That approximataly 13Q peo~le indicated •i:
their presence a~. the
OetoLer 24, 1988, publ,ic hearing, and approximatoly 50 peop].e indica~ed their
presenee at t he SeptembE: 26, 19ti8, public hnaring in opposition; and that
appcoximaL•ely 4~4 leL•ters indicating opposition wero receivect and
agpxoximately 31 telephone calls o~era racei~~ed fro m persons exprQSSing
;~. oppositiQn.
,~ALTFORN'TA E27VIRONMENTAI,_Q~JALITY AGT F'LNDIN : That the Anaheim
Cit~~ Plaz~nin.g Commission has rQViewed the proposal Co cox:s~cruct a 1 to
6-story, 327-unit "a£fordal~le" sena.or citizens apartment comglex (formerly 1
to 8 stories and 416 units) with waivers uf maximum fence height adjacent to
local street, minim~,n b~.zilding site arsa per dwelling unit and maximum
srructural li~ighL• on a recLangularly-shapod pa.*.•cel of land consisting o~
approximately 9,6 acr.es, havir.g a frontage of approximatQly 420 feet on t..e
south side of Wilken rlay, having a maximum dep~h of appro~imately 600 f~et,
bei.ng located appruximately 770 fest easC of the cenLerline of Harbor
Boule~vard and furthe,. described as 400 West Wilken Way; and does hereby deny
tlae Nsgative Declaration upon finding t.hat it has considered `he Negative
Declaration toget}~er with any commQnL•s rec3ivQ~ during the public revisw
prqcass ancl further Findinq on the basis ot the ir~itial study and any
comments received tlxat ~here is substanti.al ev.idence that the project~ will
have a sa.gn~ficant effect on the er~vironm~izt.
NOW, ~hERrFORE, BE IT RESOLVE;D L-hat tho Anah~im ~ity Planning
Commission daes hereby deny subject Petitinn for Conditional i1sP Permit, on
thc, basi5 of the aforemen~i~ned findings.
THE P'OR~GOI~JG RESOLUTT~N is signed and approved by me this 24th
da,y of Uatober, 1988.
,-~
(' , Ic..~ .., ,. i ~ / f .rt.:!_~-r~
----~- =~--~ _
CHAIRWOMAN~~ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS5ION
ATTEST: ~ _
~ .•/
- ~ ___~
SEL'RE RY, ANAFiEIbi ITY' PLANNING COMMISS_TUN
~
~,
;iTATE OF CAi..IF0I2NIA )
COUNTY CF ORAPIGE ) ss.
CITY QF ANAHEIM ;
I, Edith L. FTarris, Secretary of the Anahe.im City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify l:hat lhe foregoinq xesolution was passed az~d
adoptesi at a meeting of ~he A.naheim City Plannir~g (:ommission held on Octeber
24, 1988, b~r the iollowing vot•e oE tho members thereof:
AXES: COMMISST_QN~RS: BOUAS, IIOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, EiERB•.`,'.f,
M~SSE
NOES: C~AIl+~lISSTON~RS; NONE
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FELAHX~US, M:' BURNEY
' ,i:
TN WI'.~NESS Wt:EREQF, I have h~reunt~ set ~*y ha~nd this 24th clay
of Octobe•r, 1988. ~
~--~j~
~/ %74~~~_r.~ '~
SECRETARY, ANAHEI` CITY PLANNJNG COD4SISSION ,lv,
-- - . .. . ,; ~t;fG