PC 88-308~ "..
~
~~~.o~u~.~~s~~o~
. . .. . .., `.-.~~~ ~{n ~,-; .
~ ~ ~iyG1
~ ',i
A RF50L.UTION Q~ '!`gE A,~~gzM CITY PLANNTNG COMMIS:`70i7
TEIAT PLTITION FOR VARIANC~ N(7. 3862 k1~ GRANT3D
WHEREAS, th9 Anat-~im City Planning Cortimission did receive ~
vRrified Petition ~or Variance ~rom RC~G~k L. WTLLYI1MSOt1 and BONNIE S.
WILLIAMSpN, 3450 East La Palma Avenue, AnahRim, CA 928C6, os~rners, and SALKIN
ENGINFERING CORPORAT20N, 1?.15 East Chapm~an Avenue, ~2, Orange, CA g26b6~
agc~nt, of certain re~l property sikua~.ed in the City of Anahoim, County o~
Orange, StatQ ot' Calif~rnia described as;
'r
Parcel 1, as shown on a Map filcd in i3ook 228, Pages
33 a.nd 34 of Parcel Maps, Records of Orange (;ounty,
~+ Califorr-ia.
WHE[tEAS,. the City Planning Cornrnission did h~~ld a publfc hnaring
at thc~ Civic Ce~ateL in the City of Ai~aheim on 2T~~vomber 7, 1ggg, P.t 1:30 p.m.,
notice ~f said g~xblic hearing having boen duly given as required by law and in
a~r_ordanc4 with the provisions oi the Anahoi.m Municipal (;ode, Chapt~x 1a.03,
to liear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make fin~'ing~ and recommen8ati~ns in cotinocti.on therewith; anft
DrHEREA5, said Commiasion, after due inspecti~n, investigation
ar~ study mada by it~e]f and xn its b~hal~, and after due consfdoral:ion of all
evidenco ~rid reports offQred at said hearinq, doos fincl and determine tho
following facr.:~s:
1• That the ~etitioner. proposes rraivers oP t.h~ following t~
estahlish an il-lot (plus 1. private street lot), RS-HS-z2,000 "Residenr_ial,
Sing.t$-Family, Hi1ls.fde" s~a~div.ision:
~A) ,~ECxzorr 1~, q.1-~.4 - R~~.u_i~-~-19_G = ~~s8•
(All loks re:~uired t~ xbut on a publi~
~~~Q~-~r.~).levs Lot Nos. 2 through 10
abuttir,g ~ priva*_e S~rg@t only)
~ F3 ) i~'~~~~~2 ~ LQ~~Q~_Q - ~~d)~lP.1~_.~SZri..33~.~.~} •
~3~~_.y.~tt~_roquired; Q~~~~~Q feet
PraPa~ed for two lot•s)
2. That t' + aboye-men~ioned waivers are herHby granted on ~he ;
basis that t:here are apecial circumstancQS applicab2e to tho ~roporty 3UCh a~
size, shapo, topography, 1or.axion anCi surrotndings which tlo not apply to othor
idvnti:al.ly zoneQ property in the samo vicinity; and that s~rict applfcation
of the Zo~.~ing Code deur:vos tho pr~perry of privileqes anjoy~d by other
prop~rties in r,he identica2 zone anA classsification in the vicinity.
pA546~
PC D8-~08
";~.,~ , ~
~ ,,.
_++~sY,X 2i~B;y; ;.';'.'ri,.
1:.
y~r . .. . . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . .. . . ~~ .. ~ : . . ~ ~ . ~ , _ : , . , ~~ ~ . ~. ~ , . , ~ 'v~'~~!
t =
~~ - .
h't' ~
_ ~
~~ x~~-~ thore are ~xceptfonal or extraordinary circumsk$nces
or conditions applir.ablQ to the propert,y irivolvea or to the intended use of
thQ propert;y that do not apgly generally to the property or class o~ us~ in
the same vicinity an~i zone,
" 4• That thQ req~aested variance is nACassary Sbr the
, preservation and e~~,oymen~ of a substanLia7. properLy right posaessed by athnr
px~pezky in thp same vicinity and zone, and denied ~:o the properly in questi~n.
5. That L•he requQStefl v~riance ~ril.l not be materially
detrimerital to tho publ3c welfara or injurious to the property or improvements
;' in sach vicinity and zone in which the property is locateci.
~.
+~ 6. That no on~ indicated their presence ~st 3aid puLlic ne.~ing
ln aPpositio~i; and tha~. no corraspondencQ was recoived in opposztzon *_o
subje~~ petition,
AL~F,.4~tN~__.~~I_R~~~~l.~~LL~Y A~~ .IND ~~. Thal the A•a~-heim
; City Planning Commission has revieweu ~he p~raposa~, ta lecla~safy subject
property from th~ RS-A-43,QOp(SC) (Residential/Agricultural - Scenic Corridor
` Ovorlay) Zon~ ta tha RB-HS-22,~00 .
(SC) (Re~idential, S3ngle-Family, ~iiJ.leide -
~~enic Corridor Overlay) Zune, to establish an 11-lot (plus 1 private street
1ot), su~c~ivision with waivers oF roquirect lok £rnntage and minimum lot wiQth
on an irregularly-shaPed ~?arce.l of l.and consisting ~f. approaim~tely 30.7
„ acre9, having ~- trantaye of approxiroately 315 foet on the south side of
,_ Ave~ida De Santiaqo, and being l~catEd approximately 650 feet south of the
centerline of T~mari;vk nrive; and doe~ hereb}• approve the Negative
~ beclaration upon finding that ik lias considered the Neqative beclarat~on
' tagether with any comm~rnts recoived duri:.
` furthor finding on the basis of thc~ initia 1 stucy a dlzany Q~~~eritQ~CreCg.ived
'' that theze is no substant'al ~
~ .~vidonce that the projc~ct will have a
significant effect on the en•rironment.
; l1CW, THEREFORE, H~ IT RESOLVED that the AntthBim City, Planninq
, Commissicn does herPby grant subjec~ Pel•.iC.~on for Variance, uoon Che
; following cunditions which arR hc~reby found to bo a necess~r
a the proposed use o~ the sub ~ct Y prernquisite to
i j propQrty in order tu praserve the s~sfety an8
a q~neral wc~lfare of the Citizens oE the Cf ty o[ Anahe.im:
1. ThaL• tt-is Vari~ncQ is granted subjecr Co L•he adoptxon of the Zoning
Ordinanca in c:oc~nection with Roclessltication No, gg_gg_lg, nuw pendinq.
2• Tt~at prfor to 3ssuance nf a ru;.lding permit~, the a~pr~priate major
thoruuqhf.r~r.e and bridqe fee shc~ll bo pafd to tho Cit.y of Anaheim in an
amount as specified in the Major Thoroughf.are and Bridge Fee Program ~or
tha FoothilliEasterr.i Transportation Corrid~r, as approv~d by City CounCil
Rosolution No. 85R-423.
. '' l~ ;'-1 `,! ~
~ ~fi
~'.'
-2 PCSE3-43CA
~ ~
, 3. TYiat prior to issuance of a building pe:m3t, tho appropria'tR trafFic
sic~nal assessment fe~ shall be puid to thc~ City of Ant~heim in nn amount
as determined by City ~ouncil. resoluti~n.
4. That a1.1 private streats 3ha11 be ci~veloped in acc~rdance with the
Engineering Divisiou's Staudard Derail No. 122 tor private st.roets,
ir.cludinq i:-stallati~n of atreeC n~rna sign~. Plans for the private
str~et ].igY.ting, as required by the s~andard deL•ail, shall ue s~~hmitted
to the Buildiny Di.vision iax approva] and includod with tho b~zilding
plan3 prior to the i~suance of bui.lding permits. (Pi•iv~-t~ street:3 are
those which provide primary access anii/or ~irculation within the project).
5. That a tract map to re~orct the division of SLib)L~Ct praperty shalt be
submitted ko and appravad by ~he City of Anahaim and than be recorclRA i,i
the Off~ce of the OrangR County Recarder.
6. Tk~at prior to any occL-pan~y, temporar.y street namo signs sha11 ~.~s
installed if parmanent street name siqn~ have not been insta'11ed.
7. That no public or private stroc~t grades shall excesd ten percent (10`b)
exce~t by pr3~r approval of thQ City ~iro Department and the Exigir.eeri~a~~
Aivision.
8. Tl-~t gakr~s ghall nut be installed across the pri~r~te street in a manner
which mr~y ac~versely affE~ct vehicular tra~fic zn the adjacent ~ublf.c
street. Installation of ~ny gates shall conf.orm to the Engineering
Division's Standard plan No. ~02 and shall be subject ~.o ~he r~view and
a},proval of the City TraEfi.c Enyineer.
9. That d•rainage of sub3ect proparty :hall be disposad of in a m~-nner
sai:isf3ctory to the City F;ng;.nc~er.
10. That prfor to issuance of a buildinq permit, Che appropriato fees due for
primar~• mai.ns, shali be pai~i to ~he water Utility D.ivision in accoxdance
with Ru1es 15A and 20 af the Water TJtility Ratea, Rul~s ~1Y1C3 R@(JLl1aC).OL1S.
11. That all loL-s within su:.~ject tract shall be •;erved by underqround
urf lit.ies .
12 That prior to fsauance of. bu~lding permits, uniierground line extension
feas shall. be paia to thP Ci~y Electrical Enqineering D~vision as
provideb for i.t- the Elec*_rical Rules, R~te~t and Regulations.
1;. ThaY. the cul-de-se+c shall b3 signed "No Par'r.ing" ancl the curb painted rod
tp the sxtisfaction of the City ~ire Deparkment. Said sign~ye nnd red
curbfny sha).1 thoxeupon be maintiainett by the ~iomeawner~ Associafion to
the satisfaction nf th~ CiCy FirQ Department.
lti. That prior t~ c~mm~ ~-ment uf gtruc~ural framfn~, t'ire hydcant9 sha],l be
insr.al2ed anci charged as re~uired and appr.oved by the City Fice
Daparkment.
_3- PCBa-0308
4. . '1'
~
'!~~
k
~'~ "r,'!~'r~R
~5. That ~ira sprinklers shall be 3,nstalled as required by ~hR City Fire
Deparl;mer~t..
16. Thak a11 requiz•emonl•s o£ Fire Zone ~, oCherwise iden~ified as Fire
Adninistrative Order No. ?5-01, shall be inet. Such requirements xncl ~xde,
but are not limited to: chimney spark arrestors, protected attic and
under floor opanings, C].ass C cr better roofinc~ ma~eriul and ons hour
fire resistivQ construction oP l~orizontal surfar.es if loctsLed within 2Q0
feet of ~d~aceYit brushland.
17. That nz~tive slopes adjacent L-o newly cor~structod hom~s shs~l'1 b~
hydroseAded witl-. a low fuel combustiblQ sQed mix. Such s_op~s shall bg
s»rinklered and weedACt as requiruc, to establish a minimum of one-hundred
(i.00) feet of separation betwe~n flam;nable VEC~bk&ti10~ ar.c~ any structure.
18, ~hat any specimen tree removal sh~ll be subject to thQ tree pr~servation
regulations in Chnpter 18.84 of the Ar.aheim Mur~icipa]. Code for the "SC"
Scenic Corridor Ove~lay Zone.
19. That, as specified i.n Ans~heim Municipal Code Sect:.on No. 1$.84.042.012,
no roof-mounted ~quipmcnt, whatsoeve:, sha11 be permitted.
20. That ~ubjec4 property ahall be deve~oped substantia].ly in ac~ordance with
plans and speciftc:ations on fi1Q with tho City of AnahQim marke~l Ey.hiblt
N'o. l.
21. 'That pridr to issuance of a buildanq permit, or within a periud of one
year frem tho dati o£ tY-is resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 and 12, above-mentionQd, sha11 be complied with.
Extonsi.ons for further tiine to c~~mplete saiii conditions may be granted in
ac:cordanc;a with Saction 18.03.090 oP L•he Anahezm Mux~icipa'1 Code.
22. That prior to final building ~nd zoning inspection~, Condi~ion Nos. 4, 9,
11, 13, 15, 16, 17 nnd 20, dbov~-mQntionQd, shall be complie~ wiGh.
23. Thak approval of this application con~titute~ approval of the proposed
request onl! to the extent thaf .it complies with the Ana~eim MuniciQal
Zoning Codo r.nd any ot2i~r applicable riky regulaLioiis. Appraval does not
include any action ur findings as to c~mpliance or appr~~,al o~ cz~e
request regardi.ng any oL•her appJ.icable or~inanca, re7ulation nr
rc~quirement.
BE IT FURTHER RCSGLVED t;hat Che Anaheim City Flanning Conunissio~
does heroby Eind aad determir~e tihat. adoptiun of Chls Res~lukion is oxpressly
pr~dicatod upon app.licant's compliance with oach arid a11 of the ronditiAns
~-oreinabove set £orth. Should any such conditions, or an~,~ part thereoi`, br3
rleclared invalid ~r unenfnrceable by the fin~l judgment o~ any coux•t of
competenL• jurisdi.ction, the:l this Resolut.ion, and any approvals herein
containQd, shas2l be deemod null and vaid.
"'o
'`~' PC88-4308
.~
.
,
~
~~
1
~
~ :;~?;~+r;,,~~,
J ;~"~
,:,;,~
~';;'r;
;,;
;_:
THE FOREGOII~G RESOGUTIUN is signed and approved by me thzs 7th day '
of November, ].988.
'~ ~~ ~' ~.~'..~r' ,'%. / l ~.~.,~_:
CHAIRWOMAZTr~ANAFTEItd CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSTON ;j;
~
ATTEST: '~
. _.]
i,r
_ ~~ ~.~~_.~ _.~~L~_~ ;~
SECRETARX. ANAHFIM CtTY PLANNINC C02+lhfISSION
STATh OF CALIF04NlA )
COUNTI' OF' ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAF3EIM )
I, E~ith L. FIarris, Secretary uE the A,r+aheim City Planning
Commission, d~ hereby certifl khat the foregoing res~lutioa was passec! and
adoptad ak a meating of che Anaheim City Planninq Commission held on November
7, 19a8, by tho fol].owinq voke of Che members thereoE:
AY'ES: CUhStyfISSIONERS: BOIJAS, I30YUSTJN, CARUSILLG, FFLBHAUu, HERBST,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NO.:u: COIrL'~lISSIp?7ERS: NONE
ABSBNT: COMNlISSIONERS; t70NE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Y have hereunto sat my hand this 7th day oE
November, 1988.
",^~
~ ~.~.~, ,~° ~~/~ _
SECRETARY, ANAHgrM CITY PLANNING COt~4fISSIOv
R'~
-5" PC88-030li
!'y.. u r.~ :: ~. ~
~,~ . . : ,.. . ,. .,~..~.. :.... . ,~,,., , . .,
~
3t;
~~
.., .~;.~~r.~