PC 88-40~
RE~SQL TI N i~ p~~Q~40
,:,~ ~ ~ ° i~i?~~
. "~ +"~;f;
~~ "
A RESOLUT70N OF TIiE ANAFiEIM CITY PLANNITIG CObIhiISSION
THAT PETTTION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. A7-8fi-35 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, tho Anaheim City Plaazni.xig Commi.ssion did recdive a
vorified pei:ition far Reclassi£ication from EDWARD & MARGARET M. SAt1BAN, 106
N. Teri Circle, Anaheim, CA 92904, WALT~R J. & D,~.RLENE F. PE7'ERS, 107 N. Teri
Circle, Anaheim, CA 92804, RALPH L. & KATHRYN L~ BRAD~N, 110 N. Teri Circlo,
Anaheim, CA 92804, HOMER D. & PATRICTA GRIF'FIS, lIl N. Ter3. Circle, Anaheim,
CA 92804, JOfIN & GF.ORGLNE HARDAWA'1, 112 N. Teri Circ].e, Anaheim, CA 92304,
JIM & VIRGINIA L~,E SAUB, 1~~ N. Teri Circle, ;Anaheim, CA 92F304, owners and,
MAGD'1 HANPTA, 40U0 MacArthur Blvd., l~E80, Newport Beach, CA 92660, agsnt, fot
certain re~l. praperty situated in the Cihy oF AnahQim, County of Or~ngQ, State
of Califocnia: deseribQd as follows:
LUT 11 OF TRACT N0. 27f10, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED
IN IIOOK 89, PAG~S 11 ]1NTJ 12 C1F Di:fSCELLANEOU~ MAPS,
RECORD5 OF ORA2IGF. COUNTY, CAGIFORNIA.
LOT 12 OF TRACT N0. 2780, AS S~IOWN ON A MAP KE:CORAED
IN BOOK 89, PAGES 11 AND 12 OF MTSCELL~i~NEOUS MAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNT]C, CALIFORNIA.
LQT 13 OE' TRACT td0. 2'780, AS SHOWN ON A MAP F2ECORDED
I2I BOOK 89, PAGLS 1'! AND 1'L OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
REf.:ORDS Or QRANGE COUNTY, CALTA'ORri.i'A.
LOT 14 OF TRAGT 210. 2780, AS SHOWN Otd A MAP FECORDED
IN BOOK f39, PAGES 1~. AIdD 12 OF MISCELLAiaEOUS MAl'S,
REC;ORDS QF ORANGE COCJNTX, CALII'OR.NIA.
L,OT ~.5 ~F '£RACT NU. 2780, AS SHOWN ON A*'AP RECO~2DED
IN DOOY, a9, PAGES 11 t.tin i2 OF MISCELLANEOIJS MAPS,
ItECOiiUS OE ORAiiGE CdUNTY, CALrFORNIA.
LOT 16 OF T.RACT N0. 2780, AS S'FIQWN ON A MA° RECORDEll
IN BOOK E39, PAGGS 11 ~ND 12 OF MIuCET.,LANr~US MAPS,
RECOI:DS OF ORANGE CUUNTY, ~ALIFORNIA.
WEiEREAS, tha City t'lanning Commis ~ion did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Cez~ter in tk-~ Ci~y ot• Anaheim on February l, 1988 at 1: 30 p.:n. ,
r-ntice o£ 3aid pub.lic hearing hr~ving b~en duly given a~ required by 1aw and in
accordance c,rith the ~rovisi~~ns o£ tY:a Anahei.m Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hoar aiid aonsic3er evidonce f~r anQ again~t said pro~ose~ realassificaCion
and to i~vestiyetg aud inako Ei.ndings ancl recommer~astions in connectior.
therew.iL•h; ana
0190r PC$(3••h0
z
~,: _ _ .
e~
,,;
~
~ ~;~
~ ~~
- ~;,~
~~'~;~
,.~;,~
;~
WHEREAS, said Commissa.on, aft:er due inspe::tion, inves~igation
and stu~ly made by itselP and in its bo:~alf, and after due considexa~ion of a7.1
eaidence ~nd reports oEPered ~L said heariiYq, does Eind and determine the
follawing f~zcts:
; 1. That the petitioner proposo~ rQClassi~ication of subject
ti?'.'
`~ proporty frorn the RS-A-72Q0 'Lone tu the RM-1x00 Zone.
4~~e,
~'~ 2. That t;he Anaheam General Plan designates subject property
for L'ow Density, Resideni:ial land uses and that 2. General P1an Amendment (No.
23a) is pendi.ng which, iF approved, would redesignate the land ~:se to low
medium density, residential.
3, That the proposed rec:lassif3cation aF ~ubject property is
not nerQSSary nor deszrable for the orderly a~:d praper developmen~ of the
community.
;•;~ 4. That t•he proposed reclassiL•ication of subject gro~erty does
~:'? not t roperly relate to tlie zonea and their permittec~ u:;es locally established
~~'; in close proximity to subjtct property ~nd to rhe zones and their p~rmi~ted
uses generally establishEd thrnughouL- khe community.
~~
~. ;
5. That the pr4posQ~~ reclassification is denied on the basis
that it does n~t comp.ly w.ith Nither the existing or the pending I~~n~1 Use
~ Element of tYie GonFral Plan.
f
;: 6. That pr~rsons indicated t-he.ir presence at said public
~ hearing in opiosition; and that a petition containing approxirnatsly
~+' signatures w~s receivPd in oppositiun to subjec+t potition.
,~ALIFO~NTA_, ENVIE2 NMEN'TAi, ~ ALTTY A T FINnIN~: That the Anakieim
City Planninq Conunission has reviewed the proposal to consider an. amendment
1:o the Land Use Elecnent of the General Plan to change the e,xist.ing land use
L'rom Low-Medium Densitv Residential to Med.ium Density Residsntfal and *_o
reclassity property £rnm RS-A-7200 to &bi-17.00 or a less intenso aone to
construct a 2 to 4-st;~ry, 75-iinit "aff.orda~ile" aparY.ment complex with waivers
of (a) m~ximum Fence )ieight, (b) m.iazimum structural setback, and (c) minimum
buildiny sitc~ area per dwelling uniL-, (d) maximu-n structural hQig•hr, and (e)
maximu~n si.te r_overage on a rectungularly-shaPQd parc~l af land consisting ot
approxima~Qly i.8 a~ri~s on the north side of I,incoln Avenur~, approximatel:y
325 f~ot easL• of the center'line of Be1 Air Street and £ur~her desc.ribed as
106, 107, 110, 11'l, 1:i2 and 113 N. Tor.i Circlt~; and doos hereby a~prove the
Negative Declaration upon fi.nding tt2at it has corssiderecR the Tlegative
Declarati~n toc~eth~sr with any commenCs receive~ dur:ing the public revi~w
process and f~xrther finding on Che ba.sis of the initial study anc~ any
~ommen~s roce~ved thaL- there is no substantial ev:icionce that the projoct will
have f.~ signi c;ant effect on t:he environraent.
NOW, THERcFOPE, BE IT R!.'SOLVFD th~t tile An~heim City Planning
Co~r.mission does herPby deny PE~tition for Reclassification on the ba~is of ~~he
af~~rementioned findings.
'"Z- PC$8-~U
~i . , ,
;~~
~
. . . ~ :Y3T~{~yyl~pP!! ~
. . . . ~ ~ „ I ~i \ ~~~
. ~ , ~ . ~ '~,~~t~:~]
'. i~,~*~y
'a i '¢
~
~ . . . . ~• ~ ~~~I~
,: i
( i.
~,~ ~ i~
TH~ FOREGOING RE~OLU2'ION is signed and approved b,~• me this 1st
day o,f Februaiy, 1988. ~
~
~r:
/~~~ ~ : ~
~ - r~~
. ------- ~ ~~
CHAIRMAN, ANAH~zM GIT PLANNTNCr, ~p SSZQN
?:~~f
ATTEST: _~,
~? ~
~ ?J ' +" ~ ,
' - •~ .
{ SECRETARY, ANp,k1EIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSS70N
,,
~TA'lE QF CALxFORN~A )
COUNT'Y OF ORAI~IGE ) ~s.
CZTY OF ANAHETbf )
,;
I. Edith L. Harris, ,~'
Commission, do liereby ~~r„F Secretary of the Anaheim City Plaiining ~~
adopted at a mc~eting of thE Ana eim Ci~y Pla niny Commissionnh 1 S k;
passed and ;;
1, 198a by rhE followinc~ vote of the m~mbers ~heraof: a on February '?
~•
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOZJAS, BOXbS'rUN,
CARUSYLLLO, FE~,DHAUS, HERSST,
N0~'S: MESSE, MC BCTRNEY
COMMISSIA.IERS :
ABS~NT: COIrII•1ISSTON~RS;
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, T have ]iereunY,o set m i
February, lggg, y.hand this lst day oP
~
__-,
: ~.~t_~~ ~° ~~.~.~
SECRETARY, At~AFxEIM ~IxY pLANNxNG COMMISSZ~PT
b
,
' ' f;r
''~i~
,., r`,,;
~'~~
~ ~ <,~~;~
:';~'~
'~
~~;
~a5'r
~~ i4
;';+,.
;~;;~~
; ~u
~ . . ~ ~, f'~i.»`
ii ri.
-3-
,
~
PCf3f3-40
r ~ < <, ,;~ ,' ' ~
.... . , ~ .,~.: ~ , r ~,-~~~w;~~