PC 88-61~~~ii 11~~~+y7A'!h}h+.r ....... ~....r a . ., ., ~.,`-1'~~~~.ir~i r'.~r.,~~ ~~' -} . ~ ~ .. . f:.. ..i:''', ~ y ~
, ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ~kNy4
. . ~ ~ / ~:%~~~
M"
RESOLUTION Iv0 PC88-61
A, RESOLUTION OF '.PHE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TFIAT l?ETIT;ON FOR RE:CLASSIFICATZON N0. 87-88-34 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion dicl receive a
verified petition for Reclassificatinn from VIVIAN IDA P.AULSON & MILDREN M.
MOORE, 2517 FIiway 35, Va11eX Park Manasquan, New Jersey 08736, owners, and
JEROME R. ARUKIN, 1~25 E. Lincoln A~.~nue, Suite Q, Anaheim, CA 92805, ac~ent,
of certain real proper~y situated in the Cit:y of Anaheim, County af Orange,
State of California,
described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
THE EA~T i45.50 I'EET. Or LOT 26 OF ~RACT N0. 403 IN
THE CITY OF ANAfiEIM, C~UNTY OF OR~.NGE, STAT~ OF
CALIFORNTI~, AS PER MAp RECORDEll IN BOOK 16, PAGE 11,
MISCELLAPtEOUS MAPS, IN TITE OFFICE OF TH~ COUNTY
RECORDER OF SA:ID COUNTY.
I'ARCEL 2s
'.CHE EAST 145.50 FEET OF LOT 25 TRA(:T h0. 403 IN TFiE
~I~Y OE ADTAHEIM, COLTNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA., A,S P~Et MAP RECORDED 7:N BOOK 16, PAGF. 11,
MISCELLI~,NEOUS blAPS, 7N THE pFi'ICE C1F THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUN~Y,
WHEREAS, the City F~lanning Commission did hold a public nearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 1.8, 19a8 at 1: ~0 p,m, ,
noL-icp oF said publzc hearinq having been duly giveri as required by 1aw and in
accordance with the prov~.sions oF the Anahe.im Municipal Cod~. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and. consider evide~ice fo.r and agaiiist said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and rec~mmendations in connection
therewit}l; and said public hearing lz~ving b~en continued to the meetinqs o£
Febraary ,17 and Fe}~ruary 2g, 198g; and
WHEREAS, sai~ Commissiori, aEter due inspection, ir.vestigation
and shud~ made by itselt ar~d :ii1 .its behali, and after due consideration oE t~11
evidance and reports ot•fe~ed at said hearing, d~es find and determine the
following facts:
l. That the petitioner prpp~ses reclassifica~ion of subject
property fr~m RS-7200 (Residential, Single•r'ami].y) to R.hf-2400 (Residential,
Multip].e~Family) zone.
. . . ..., .~r _ i
~hj ~±5
~ ~ . . ~~,~1:
. ' ' ~:.',';,V'
~ ~,
;~
';";.
-';~
';`:~
~,; ~,
~ .~
;;;.
%:
;,, i,,
,j;j
:~`~
.'.
2. TY.at the Anzheim Gener~l Plan ciesign~tes subject property
for Medium Density Residenkial lanci uses.
3. That the proposed reclassi,fication oE sabject proporCy ~,S ~
necessar~. and/or desirahle for, ths ordorly aud propex develo~ment af tha ~ 1
r_ommunity, "' ~
0213r.
; ...
5
PC88-61 ';'
~.:r
:~:s';
.;f
rSr
i i~i
. . .~~','~~~i~
~ : ~.•~ . `,d
~ . .. J.~ ~.llx~':~",~~
4. Tk~a~ tk:~e proposed reclassification oE subject property doas
Nroperly relate Lo the zones and hheir permitted uses 1oca11y es'tablished in
close proximity to subject. property and to the zonos and their permitted uses
genezal'ly established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification ot subject property ';.j
requires the dedica~~on an.d imprc~vement of abutting str~,ets ar,a alleys in '
accordance wi~tk~ the Carculation Element of the General Plan, due to the `I`
anticipated increase in t~raffic which will be generatFd by tk~e in~ensitiaai:ion ~
of land use. , .
G. That 7 persons indicateci their presence at the February 29,
1988 pu~lic hezring in oppositinn and thz•ee (3) persons indicatecl their
gresexico at the January 18, 1988 public hearing in opposition; an.d ~hat a
petit3.on containing a?~proximately 25 signatures was received ~.n oppo:,ition to
subjec~ petitzon.
CALIF012NIA EIIVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That l:h.e Anaheim
Cit~ Planning Commi~sion has revi~wed the propos~l to reclassify subject
pxoperLy from the RS-7200 l:Residential, Single-I'amily) zcale to the RM-2400
(Resi dential Multiple-Family) zone to construct a 2-story, 6-unit
"affordable" apartmen~ complex on property to be rezoned fr~m the RS-7200 to
the RM-2400 or a less inte,ns~ zone on a rectanqularly-shape8 pares.l of land
cor..sisting of approxim~tely 0.3 acre on the west side uf Tiardin~ Avenue, 160
feet south of the centerZiiie o£ Lincaln Avenue and further descrined as 111
and ii, S. Har.dinc~ Avenue; and do~s hereby approve the Ne~ative Declaration
upon finding• that it has considered the Negative Aeclara~ion toaPrhex~ wiL•h
any cotnments received c~uring the pvblir. review prucess and further tinditag on
the ~asis of the init ial si:ud~ and any comments rec:eived th2~t there is no
substantial evidence tliat the nrojeat w911 have a signi£icant e.E£eat on +~he
environment.
~
r N~W, THrREFORE, B~ IT RESOL'VEII that iche Anaheim City Planning =,+.`r
Camm ission dnes hereby yrant subjer.t Petition Por R~classification and, by s~ '`~~
;; dQing, that Title 18-Zoning of thc~ ?~naheim Municipal Co~'ie be amonded to
::y excl ude tn.e above-described property £rom the RS-7200 (Residential, ,'~~;~i~
r,~ Si: ~le-F'amily) zone ancl to incorporate said described property into ~he '"
G,ti RM-2400 (Residential, t~ultiple-Family) zone upon the .fnliowing conditions ,,h,
,i which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of ~"'
+`~~
~',I subjECt propc~rty in order ko preserve the safety and general welfare Qf ~he ' f
~:_ ~ Citiz~ns of the City of Anaheim: ;};;'~
ti
~'~ _ That the owner of subject pzoperty shal? zrravoce~uly offer ta dedica.+:a ;`,
`~+' to the Cit.y of Anaheim ~ strip of l,~nd tha.rty-two (32) f~et in wid~h ,;fY
i
from tci~ centerline of. thP street along Harding Drive fiox street
`;'
,~'
; widenin~,~ purposos. :
.
'
`
~ f
:a'
~
:
, ,
.
~
r : . ~,~
~.
v ~ j
y~~;
. „x
, ._~;
~ , I
1:~~., ~ .
. . ~.,.~:Y~ ~
;~
?j'.~
~ :
1~
y„
~
l.l
1; ~;,1
~. .
~.~,; .... .
. ..... .
. . . ... ~~'y
.. ti1~7`i
r ~' `~~ CC88"6~ .~~~{~
r
~.~`i
` t g
~A
~ t
U4 ~
' ~"~~i
~
~
-0 ~ .'~}'
~ ~
~~
," ~
~
~ ~ ~ . .
~
~ ~. r ~ { ~
~ V
1 '
~ I f •
l~~
~
°r~A~a ' ;. : _ .: :~ ._. .. _._...::.. ..,,.:: .,, ......... .. .. e.:..,.... .....,_ ... _. ..., .. . ..... .. ... , . _. . .. , . .,, .._ ___ ... _ . ... .,. ... ...._ , _.. _.. . .. . .,.. . ,1t~lii,`~~°_
t ~ ~ r.: ,`>',~ ~;,' ~~~T~d'J',~~
~ '~
~'
.
` }`F
~ .
r
~
~
~ '~~ ~rr.
~ 1~.
tr~y
I~
~'.i,;~
:
2. That al'1 engineeriY-g requtromonts of the City o£ Anaheim along Harding ~
~' ~'~
Drivo, xncludinc1 p:ep~ar.arion of 3mprovemQnt ptans and insL-allatinn ut "f
311 improvements such as curbs and gut~e:s, siclewaxks, water facilitios, ~
sCreet qradin ~nd avemont sewor n
g P , a;~ clxaanage Eacf13ties, or other ';1
appurtenant work shall be complied with as requir~d by tho City F.nginoHr
and in accorclance witl~ specifiaations an tile fn the Office of the City ''
;;
~nqin..ar; or thar secu.ri~y zn the Porm of a bond, certificaCe o~ .~
; dep~sit, letter o£ ~redit~ or cash, in ~n ~nount and form satisfactory ~.;:
~ to tiie CiCy af Anaheim, sha.ll be postod with t:ho City L•a guarantee the ~~
sati3f.acto.ry compl~tion ~~f saici improvements. Said 3eaurity shall bo `~~
posted with the City priur to .i.ntroducti~n of an ordin~nco rgzoning `
~
subject proportl~, to guaranCee th~ instxllation of Lho ,3laovo-required ,
imprcvements pr.ior to occupancy.
''t;
3. That street liyhting facilitias alonq Harding Drivo shall bo tnstalled ">
as ranuired by the Uti1.iL-ies General Manager in Tccordance with '~:i
specifica~ions on file :~n r.he Of.ficc~ of Uti2ities Gene.al Managor; and ''
thar, security in the i'orm ~f a bond, cextificate oP deposit, lotter of ':
~r~clit, er cash, in an amount and form sati.sfactory t~ the City of
AnahQim, shall be pastsd wilh the City to guara~,tec~ the satasfa~tary ~,;
campletion of tho above-mQntione8 improvements. Said security shall bA
posr,e~l with the City~ of Anaheim prior Co the introduc~3on of an
or~iinance rezoning subjec~ groporty, 'rha above~-requir~d improvQrrents
shall be installed prior to occcpancy. ';
4. That the or~nQr ~E subjar.t pr~perty sha12 ~av Lo the Ci',:y of An~hein a
fee for tree plantinq purposQS along Harding Drive in an amour-t As
cletermined by the City Council.
5. That prio: to intrudu~~tian of an ordinance rozoning subjecG property,
the properry owner shal.l prepare and recor~ an unsubordinated rovenant
lfmfting occupancy of each apartment unit to no more than two (2)
per.sons (other th~n ch'ldren under L•he ~qe of L•wo (2} years) per
bedroom. Said limitation shall be incluiled in each loase/:ental
agrnement. .'~ copx of the co~ienant sY~all be submitted to an~l approved by
the Ci.ty Attarney prioi to recordat.ton. A cnpy of the racoriied covenant
s2ial.l bQ furnished L•o tho Zoning llivisior:.
b. That tl~o orrner. of subject proporty shall dedicate to the City of Anaheim
u strip of land ten (10) ~eet in wiclth from the centerline of the alley
for alley widening purposes.
~, y~
,~
"3" PCflB-61 _.__.j;
'~ ~
~' ,,
~t
,.'a
,,~ 7
~~~~
..~ s
~;~iy
ly
r T'1
R~~i.m
r.CJ'.;= . . . . . . . .~.
r a + '~
r.:;~;. . ,. . .. ._ _. . ..r.::Mx.~±it..
} ~
~ . . . . ~ ~~~ i ~rt~,~~
~ ~l
~, ~{~i
~
;. That prior to the introduction oE an ordinancQ rezoning subject
property, C~ndition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5& G, above-meui:ioned, shall be
complotod. The provisions or T'i.[{ht:i qran~ed bx this resolution ahall
bocome nul7. ~nd void by ac~ion of the Planni~zg C~mmissioi- unlass saia
condi~ions aze ~omplied with within oYSe year from Y.he date of this
resolution, or such furthor timo as L•he Planning Carnmission may grallt.
~. 'Chat apProval of this applicati~n constitutea ~spproval oE the proposed
requust only to the e~~tont that it complies wi~h t:~e An~hoimr v 1 C~.aes
Zoning Code and any other ~pplicable Ci.ty regula~ions. App
no~ includo ~ny a Jtion Y r f.inilings licabl~~rnpordi an er ar ogulation ~or
requc~st regardinc an other app
reQuirement.
B~ IT i'URTHER RESOLVED that the AnahQim City Planning Comniission
doas her.eby find and determine thai: adoptian of this Resolu~ion is es~ros3ly
predicat;ecl upon applicont's comp~.i.ance wit;h each anci all of thc~ conditians
be
hereinabove set furth. Stiould any such conditions, or any par.t theroof,
dec'laracl inval.id or unenforcpablo by tho final judgment o~ ovals~ herein
c~mpetont jurisdintiox~, then this ReSOluhion, and any agp•
con~ainec~, shall be de~smod null and void.
THF FORF:GOING :2ESOLUTION is signad and approved by ma this 29!'h day
oF FQbruarl. Y988. ; ~~ .; „~. /'' I,
~r'~ ~~~~ , ~ ~ ~~,;l.J~~=-~ _.
_--__~-= ' " -
CFiAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CIT'~ LP ANNING COMMISSION
1
ATTEST: ~ _ ~ .
.__--. ---F`--'--~ ._!'~ • le~.,! ~_
SECRETARY, ANAFIGTM CITY. FLANNING COINMISSION
STATE OP CALIP'O~NIA )
COUNTY OF OR~tJGE ) s ~•
~ITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Gdith L. Harris, Sacret~ry of tbe 3~naheim Cfty F'lanning
Commission, do heroby cortify that ttio Eoregoing reso.lution was pa~sed an8
adopted at a meet•inc~ of the Aiiaheim City Planning Comrnission held on Fenruary
Zg, 1ggs1, ?~y the follovring vote uP the members theroof:
I~YES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, ~ELDHAUS, MC AURN~Y, MEESE
NUES: CON!MISSIONEitS: NONE
ABSFN'C: COb4r1ISSI0NEKS: ~OYUSTUri, CARUSILLO, HERBST
IN WI'fNY;SS WF1E~2EOF, I have tusreunto set my hand this 29th clay of.
Fabruc+r.l, 1988.
/ - ~ , _ ~ _.
SGCRETA~Y, ANAHEIM Ci'xY PL NNING COt~tYSSION
_4_ PCBg-G1
+ ry ,. , . : .. . ,~ ~, Yj~~~
~ Y .~L'i . . , . .. , ~ . . ., -- ' ~ ~,. ... ,~1